Rotonda and Bithumb META to Co-Host Next Block 2023 Conference for Web3 Collaborations

Thailand’s Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the independent state agency responsible for oversight and development of the Southeast Asian nation’s capital markets, is seeking public commentary on the updated set of rules it has proposed to regulate initial coin offering (ICO) portals.  In a notice published on its website on July 18, the SEC outlined that it is seeking public comments in relation to the criteria it has established for investor communication and service provision by ICO portals as part of its proposed regulations.Photo by Alin Meceanu on UnsplashEasing knowledge test requirementsThe regulations had been approved in principle last month and put an onus on ICO portals to ensure that retail investors take a knowledge test and pass that test before they are permitted to participate in trading ICO tokens. The current regulations stipulate that retail investors must undertake knowledge tests on an ongoing three-monthly basis. The updated regulations propose that ICO portals conduct suitability tests that are sufficiently comprehensive such that the investor understands the risks associated with any potential ICO-related investment. The SEC stated that the objective is that the investor has “a risk tolerance level appropriate and in alignment with the product risk.” Instead of quarterly knowledge tests, the proposed regulations require suitability assessments to be carried out once every two years. In this way, the commission believes that it will reduce the administrative burden for ICO portals while reducing friction for the investor. It stated: “These proposed requirements are in line with regulatory practices applicable to both securities and digital asset business operators.” Jagdish Pandya, founder of blockchain venture builder BlockOn Ventures, told Decrypt that “Thailand has been a first mover for crypto regulations and the SEC has played a pivotal role in providing all regulated activities and licenses, much ahead of Singapore, Malaysia, Philippines, and Vietnam in South East Asia.”  Moving past previous ICO market failuresPandya added that the proposed suitability tests would protect “amateur investors” from piling into ICOs and losing their funds like in the “old ICO scam era.” ICOs first gained significant popularity in 2017 as the crypto market started to expand. Around $6.2 billion in funding was raised by a broad range of crypto projects in that year. However, a complete lack of regulation at the time meant that the ICO marketplace was laden with outright scams. ICOs were being hyped up in pump-and-dump schemes, with investors losing most, if not all, of their funds as the fraudulent ICO promoters rug-pulled them, abandoning the projects and taking off with the ICO funding. Thailand’s existing ICO portal regulations were introduced in November 2023. The regulations require project promoters to make disclosures with regard to project creditworthiness and risk for debt-like tokens with a predetermined fixed rate of return.  Those promoting infrastructure-backed tokens, which allow the token holder to earn a revenue share from infrastructure projects, are subject to rules regarding items such as due diligence, asset valuation and issuer asset management.

Crypto Winter Halves Korean Bank Fee ProfitsLast year, Korean banks collected only half the amount in fees from crypto exchanges compared to the previous year, according to Korean news agency News1.©Pexels/PixabayDeclining bank fee profitsFiles submitted by the Korean Financial Services Commission to Yun Chang-hyun, a member of the ruling People Power Party, revealed that the five major Korean crypto exchanges paid 20.4 billion KRW (~$15.6 million) in fees to banks last year, which is a 49.4% decrease from the previous year’s 40.3 billion KRW (~$30.7 million). These exchanges (Upbit, Bithumb, Coinone, Korbit, and Gopax) have established agreements with banks to hold real-name bank accounts, which is a legal requirement for exchanges that wish to conduct trades in Korean won.Banks that have provided real-name accounts to crypto exchanges saw an increase in fee profits from 2019 to 2021. However, due to a decline in market sentiment last year, trade volume decreased, resulting in a reduction of bank fees. Last year’s crypto winter is attributable to various factors, including uncertainties in the global economy and collapses of crypto enterprises such as Terraform Labs and FTX.Fees by exchangesIn terms of fees paid to banks by exchanges last year, the largest exchange, Upbit, paid 13.9 billion KRW (~$10.6 million) in fees to Kbank, a mobile banking service provider. Bithumb and Coinone paid 4.9 billion KRW (~$3.7 million) and 989 million KRW (~$750,000) in fees to NH Bank, respectively. It is worth noting that Coinone switched its bank from NH Bank to Kakao Bank last November, paying 72 million KRW (~$55,000) to Kakao Bank in the fourth quarter. Korbit paid 486 million KRW (~$370,000) and 19 million KRW (~$14,500) to Shinhan Bank and Jeonbuk Bank, respectively. Gopax partnered with Jeonbuk Bank to obtain its real-name accounts in April last year.Lawmaker Yun said it was apparent that partnerships were being forged between only a handful of banks and crypto enterprises. Current regulations have to be reviewed to encourage more banks to participate in various blockchain businesses, he added.

India is strategically navigating the development of its digital rupee, with the Reserve Bank (RBI) actively addressing privacy concerns through technological solutions in its central bank digital currency (CBDC) pilot programs. According to a recent report by CoinDesk, a senior official with insights into these initiatives revealed that while progress is evident, the RBI is proactively exploring ways to ensure privacy in the use of the digital rupee.Photo by Julian Yu on UnsplashPursuing mechanisms to maintain anonymityThe RBI has introduced a new dimension to the discourse on privacy concerns associated with CBDC usage. The central bank official suggested that the RBI may seek legal backing from India’s finance ministry to enact legislation allowing customers to delete transactions for the purpose of maintaining anonymity. New-found urgencyPublic statements from the RBI suggested a lack of urgency in implementing a full-scale retail CBDC, coupled with a reluctance to provide a specific timeline. However, recent events indicate that an underlying sense of urgency may be emerging. In the past month, the retail CBDC achieved a notable milestone, processing one million transactions in a single day, with support from various banks. Several banks, including HDFC Bank, Kotak Mahindra Bank, Axis Bank, Canara Bank, IDFC First Bank and Union Bank of India, reportedly encouraged their employees to deposit funds in CBDC instead of fiat currency, contributing to this achievement. The official overseeing the CBDC development emphasized the necessity for experimentation and substantial efforts to ensure the security of the digital currency. While the settlement aspect is considered straightforward, addressing latency remains a priority for the RBI. No mandate on taxThe RBI, historically known for its opposition to crypto both domestically and globally, clarified that crypto taxation is not within its mandate. This clarification suggests that the RBI might not object if the Indian government decides to reduce the stringent taxes currently imposed on cryptocurrencies. The central bank clarified that it lacks the mandate to express a viewpoint on reducing a contentious tax that has stirred debate within the crypto industry. The RBI has been a driving force behind the adoption of wholesale and retail CBDC since late 2022 when it initiated pilot programs. The official emphasized that taxation matters fall under the government’s purview, reinforcing the RBI’s focus on its designated responsibilities. Similarly, the country’s judiciary recently turned down a plea to have it formulate a crypto regulatory framework, outlining that this too is up to the government to address. The central bank has a historical context of attempting to ban cryptocurrencies, with effective prohibitions in place between 2018 and 2020 until a Supreme Court order overturned the ban. Since then, the RBI has consistently expressed concerns about cryptocurrencies in various forums, including the Group of 20, where India played a leading role in coordinating global regulation in the crypto space. Recent utterances from the RBI governor, Shaktikanta Das, suggest that the regulator is disinterested in seeing the offering of spot crypto exchange-traded funds (ETFs) in India despite that eventuality coming to pass last month in the United States. Das also spoke positively recently about the tokenization of real-world assets using blockchain technology.