Web3 Cybersecurity Firm Zyber 365 Raises $100M in Funding

Binance Thriving in China Despite Crypto BanWhen China cracked down on cryptocurrency trading in 2021, it seemed like Binance, the world’s largest crypto exchange, would have to leave the country behind. However, nearly two years later, an investigative report carried out by the Wall Street Journal finds that business is thriving for Binance in China.Photo by Hanson Lu on Unsplash$90 billion in monthly tradingThe report, which was published on Wednesday, reveals that users managed to trade a staggering $90 billion worth of cryptocurrency-related assets in China within just one month.Internal data, shared with The Wall Street Journal and corroborated by current and former employees, unveils this underground activity. Remarkably, these transactions propelled China to become Binance’s largest market, accounting for a massive 20% of global trading volume, excluding trades by a subset of major traders.Almost one million active Chinese usersDespite the supposed ban, Binance’s internal discussions highlight the pivotal role China still plays for the exchange. Current and former employees indicate that Binance’s investigations team collaborates closely with Chinese law enforcement. This partnership aims to identify potential criminal activities among the 900,000+ active users in China, underscoring Binance’s efforts to maintain oversight.However, Binance now faces regulatory challenges tied to its secretive global operations. In June, the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filed a lawsuit against Binance and its Founder, Changpeng Zhao (CZ), alleging illegal operations and misuse of customer funds.Meanwhile, the Justice Department is conducting its own investigation. A report by Semafor on Wednesday suggests that authorities are considering fraud charges but they’re concerned that such an eventuality may lead to a run on the exchange. This regulatory onslaught has seen Binance’s market share among US users plummet, leading to a reduction of over 1,000 jobs out of its 8,000-strong workforce.Circumventing regulationThe clandestine existence of Binance’s footprint in China offers insights into the exchange’s ability to function surreptitiously in unwelcoming environments. To circumvent restrictions, Binance directed Chinese users to visit local websites with domain names before rerouting them to the global exchange. This tactic allowed Binance to keep a foothold in China, even after the government blocked direct access to its website in 2017.China’s central bank, responsible for imposing the crypto ban, remained silent when questioned about these developments. Binance’s official stance is that its website is blocked in China and inaccessible to users there.Holding on to its China-based users is crucial for Binance as it navigates a treacherous regulatory landscape that threatens its future. The company’s history with China is intricate. CZ established the firm in Shanghai in 2017, only for the government to initiate a series of regulatory attacks on crypto exchanges soon after. This led to concerns about money being illicitly moved out of the country, and Zhao eventually relocated Binance’s operations to Japan.Despite this move, Binance retained a significant workforce in China, a decision that raised concerns among its US arm regarding data control. Binance’s Chinese heritage also attracted attention, with Zhao addressing the company’s challenge of being labeled both a “criminal entity” in China and a “Chinese company” in the West.Binance’s relationship with China remains complex. As the exchange navigates these murky waters, its ability to operate under the radar and maintain its foothold in markets like China will undoubtedly play a significant role in determining its future trajectory.

Beosin Report: Crypto Rug Pulls Surpass DeFi Exploits in MayAccording to a recent report by blockchain security firm Beosin, losses from “rug pulls” or “exit scams” in the cryptocurrency space exceeded the amount stolen from decentralized finance (DeFi) projects during the month of May.The report, published on June 1 by Beosin Blockchain Security, revealed that rug pulls and scams resulted in losses of over $45 million across six incidents during the month. Beosin is headquartered in Chengdu, in China’s Sichuan province. The firm uses formal verification methods to secure smart contracts.In general there were 22 security incidents in the digital assets space over the course of the month. That overall figure accounts for losses totaling $20 million, and represents a vast improvement on the previous month.Three of the incidents were accounted for by security issues related to hardware wallets such as the Trezor and imKey wallets. Six were rug pulls/crypto scams, two were crypto crime incidents while another implicated a critical vulnerability relative to zero-knowledge proof technology.Photo by Tara Winstead on PexelsDeFi protocol attacksIn contrast, there were 10 attacks on DeFi protocols, amounting to $19.7 million in stolen funds. This figure represents a significant decrease of nearly 80% compared to April, and the losses from these types of exploits had been declining for two consecutive months, as per Beosin’s findings.The largest rug pull incident in May involved the alleged disappearance of $32 million associated with the crypto project Fintoch on May 24. Meanwhile, the largest attack on a DeFi platform was a $7.5 million breach targeting Jimbos protocol, according to Beosin’s report.Shifting hacker strategyBeosin noted a shift in the targeting strategy of hackers and scammers, who are now increasingly focusing their attacks on ordinary users rather than various project parties. To mitigate risks, the report recommended that crypto users enhance their anti-fraud awareness, conduct thorough due diligence before investing in projects, and learn how to improve the security of their digital assets.The report also issued a warning against using shared or public charging devices for mobile phones. Beosin highlighted the potential risks associated with these devices, as they could be manipulated to inject malicious programs that compromise private keys. This caution aligns with a similar advisory issued by the United States Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) in April.The FBI’s Denver office cautioned against using public USB ports, including those found at airports, due to the potential introduction of malware and monitoring software onto devices. Instead, they suggested carrying a personal charger and USB cord for use with electrical outlets.As the cryptocurrency landscape continues to evolve, it is crucial for users to remain vigilant and proactive in safeguarding their investments. With the rise of rug pulls and the ongoing threats in the DeFi space, staying informed, exercising caution, and adopting robust security measures are essential for protecting one’s digital assets in this rapidly changing industry.

Korean Banks Impose Crypto Exchanges to Maintain a Reserve of at Least 3B KRWIn a significant step towards regulating the cryptocurrency market and ensuring the safety of virtual asset users, South Korea’s Federation of Banks (KFB) has collaborated with financial authorities and virtual asset exchanges to establish the “Guidelines for the Operation of Real Name Accounts for Virtual Assets.” The KFB, as a group of banks and financial institutions, facilitates cooperation between its members and promotes the development of the financial industry.Photo by rc.xyz NFT gallery on UnsplashThe guidelines come as a response to the increasing need for stronger money laundering prevention measures and standardization in the crypto industry. The first step towards this was taken in 2018 when crypto exchanges became obliged to establish a real name account at a bank in order to provide Korean Won (KRW) deposit and withdrawal services to their customers. Currently, the exchanges that won such bank accounts are Upbit, Bithumb, Coinone, Korbit, and Gopax.However, this policy brought with it a set of challenges, including differing practices among various cryptocurrency exchanges, leading to inconveniences for users. Additionally, varying user protection measures, such as reserve requirements, caused confusion in the market.3 billion KRW in reservesTo address these issues, the new guidelines aim to clarify how banks operate cryptocurrency real-name accounts and bolster overall security. One of the key changes is the requirement for crypto exchanges to maintain a reserve of at least 3 billion KRW ($2.36 million). This reserve fund serves as a precautionary measure to address potential financial losses resulting from hacking incidents or system failures at crypto exchanges.Furthermore, the guidelines mandate banks to manage deposit and withdrawal limits by categorizing user accounts into limited and normal accounts. A limited account will not be converted to a normal account, which grants higher deposit and withdrawal limits, until the user’s transaction purpose and the source of funds are verified.Enhanced due diligenceIn addition, banks will perform annual enhanced due diligence (EDD) for individual account holders. This thorough review will encompass users’ identification, transaction purposes, and the origin of funds.User asset segregationTo safeguard users’ funds, crypto exchanges will be required to ensure that customer deposits are held separately or placed in trust. Regular due diligence at crypto exchanges will also be conducted by banks, with mandatory visits occurring at least once a month. Moreover, third-party services will be engaged to perform independent due diligence every quarter on crypto exchanges, providing an additional assessment of their operations.The official launch of these new guidelines is scheduled for January of next year. However, the requirement of depositing at least 3 billion KRW will come into effect earlier, starting in September of this year. Additionally, the implementation of guidelines for expanding deposit and withdrawal limits is anticipated in March of next year.