Ripple expands in UAE with new partners Zand Bank and Mamo

HK Regulators Facilitate Dialogue between Banks and Crypto EnterprisesIn a recent column, Arthur Yuen, Deputy CEO at the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA), stated that the HKMA and the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) will jointly convene a meeting on Friday to share opinions on providing banking services to virtual asset service providers (VASPs).Proportionate CDD measuresYuen said that banks should “differentiate the risk levels of customers and apply proportionate CDD [customer due diligence] measures,” and “refrain from adopting a ‘one-size-fits-all’ approach to reject account opening applications.” To address misconceptions about CDD, the HKMA issued a circular on Thursday, offering further clarification and sharing notable cases and best practices.The HKMA called on banks to enhance employee training on account opening procedures and create task forces to help companies seize new business opportunities. The HKMA plans to actively take part in developing and introducing international standards, and provide guidance and support for banks to adopt appropriate anti-money laundering measures.SFC’s guidelines in MayMeanwhile, SFC CEO Julia Leung said in a discussion with Bloomberg that the SFC will issue virtual asset guidelines in May.Reactions on TwitterIn his tweet, Justin Sun, the founder of blockchain DAO ecosystem Tron, hinted at the potential development of a Tron-based stablecoin in Hong Kong. The Hong Kong Innovation Encryption Fund (HKIEF), an investor in blockchain projects, also took to Twitter to predict the details of a regulatory framework for cryptocurrencies in the city.According to HKIEF, USDT and USDC will be classified as security tokens, while BTC and ETH won’t be deemed securities. Exchanges trading non-security tokens will need both a VASP license and a trust license. Hong Kong-based virtual asset exchanges will be required to obtain a full license by May 31, 2024.

Korean National Assembly Members’ Crypto Holdings to Undergo InvestigationThe Anti-Corruption and Civil Rights Commission of Korea (ACRC) has announced that it has convened a special investigative team to conduct an investigation into the virtual asset dealings of members of the 21st National Assembly, particularly details on acquisition, trading, and losses.Photo by Mediamodifier on UnsplashComing under scrutinyThe National Assembly passed a resolution back in May titled “The Resolution on Voluntary Reporting and Investigation of Virtual Assets of National Assembly Members,” requesting that all members of the Assembly should voluntarily report the status and changes in their holdings of virtual assets for a thorough investigation by the ACRC amid public concern about conflicts of interest and illegal transactions.As a result, individual consent forms for the collection, use, and third-party provision of personal information were submitted to the ACRC last Monday by Assembly members of the ruling and opposition parties.Other minor political parties like the Justice Party, Basic Income Party, and Transition Korea Party that had previously submitted their personal information consent forms have resubmitted their forms in accordance with the format of those submitted by the ruling and opposition parties. Independent lawmakers and some non-negotiation bodies have also voluntarily submitted forms of their own.Extensive legal probeThe scope of the investigation includes the domestic acquisition, trading, and losses of virtual assets by Assembly members starting from the beginning of their term on May 30, 2020, to May 31, 2023, when their personal information consent forms were submitted. The ACRC will compare this information with reports formerly filed by the members themselves.The ACRC appointed Vice Chairman and Secretary General Jung Seung-yoon as the head of the team and assigned some 30 investigators to carry out a census for 90 days starting on September 18. It will be executed under the Act On The Prevention Of Corruption And The Establishment And Management Of The Anti-Corruption and Civil Rights Commission and the Personal Information Protection Act.“As this is an important matter of public interest, we will conduct the investigation promptly and fairly in accordance with the law and guidelines,” said Jung. “We will also strictly protect the data acquired during the investigation process, including the personal information consent forms.”

Ripple Expands in Asia-Pacific with Full License to Operate in SingaporeEnterprise blockchain firm Ripple announced on Wednesday (UTC) that it has secured a full license to operate in Singapore, where it has established its Asia-Pacific headquarters since 2017.Photo by Sergio Sala on UnsplashFrom outline to full approval in 4 monthsThis development marks another step in Ripple’s strategic expansion within the Asia-Pacific region, known for its rapidly growing cryptocurrency market. Ripple’s journey to obtaining this full license began less than four months ago when the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) granted it an initial in-principle approval in June. With the newly acquired full license, Ripple is now authorized to offer regulated cryptocurrency payment services in Singapore, a key financial hub in the region.Brad Garlinghouse, the CEO of Ripple, expressed his enthusiasm for the company’s continued growth in Singapore, stating:“We have hired exceptional talent and local leadership, doubling headcount over the past year and plan to continue growing our presence in a progressive jurisdiction like Singapore.”Global expansion strategyThe company also highlighted the fact that over 90% of Ripple’s business occurs outside the United States, making the Asia-Pacific region, and Singapore in particular, a vital part of its global expansion strategy.Monica Long, President of Ripple, explained in a recent interview with CNBC that the Singapore office has seen substantial growth in the past year due to the booming business opportunities in the Asia-Pacific region. This expansion aligns with Singapore’s leadership in crypto regulation in the region. The introduction of the Payment Services Act, which has been in effect since January 2020, has played a large part in that, regulating payment services and crypto services to the public.Singapore’s regulatory framework also includes requirements for crypto service providers to safeguard customer assets in statutory trusts by the end of 2023 and restrictions on facilitating lending or staking of retail customers’ assets. These measures ensure consumer protection and responsible growth in the crypto industry.Praising SingaporeGarlinghouse commended Singapore’s regulatory approach, stating, “Under MAS’ leadership, Singapore has developed into one of the leading fintech and digital asset hubs, striking the balance between innovation, consumer protection and responsible growth.” Ripple’s experience in Singapore differs entirely from the ongoing legal battle it has found itself in in the United States with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).Both Ripple and Coinbase have found themselves embroiled in lawsuits with the regulator in the US. In Ripple’s case, the firm and its founders have been accused of unlawfully selling their native cryptocurrency XRP without registering it with the SEC. However, a landmark ruling in July determined that XRP, as a token, may not necessarily be classified as a security.Long spoke to the contrasting experiences the firm has encountered between the United States and Singapore. Long stated:”Being in Singapore a couple weeks ago felt like night and day compared to the US in terms of open dialogue with regulators, and thus being able to build innovative *and* compliant products.”Ripple, along with Coinbase and several other crypto firms, has criticized the lack of regulatory clarity in the US and has even considered relocating operations due to the SEC’s stringent regulatory stance. Notably, Coinbase also recently announced its successful acquisition of a major payment institution license in Singapore, following its in-principle approval obtained about a year ago.