Gyeonggi Content Agency Partners with The Sandbox to Foster Metaverse Talent

Crypto.com Plans to Launch Its Services in South Korea This YearIn an interview with local news outlet Global Economic, Patrick Yoon, General Manager Korea of Crypto.com, shared the global cryptocurrency exchange’s plans to launch its services in South Korea this year. Yoon, who previously held positions at Standard Chartered Bank and Visa, joined Crypto.com in September 2021.Expansion into KoreaAccording to Yoon, Crypto.com is actively preparing to meet the requirements for obtaining a real-name account from a Korean commercial bank. In Korea, virtual asset trading platforms are legally obliged to secure such a bank account in order to support the trading of the nation’s fiat currency, the Korean won. The exchange secured virtual asset service provider registration in South Korea last year through the acquisition of Korea-based virtual asset exchange OK-BIT.Photo by Anna Evlanova on UnsplashCollaboration with Korean ent industryDuring the interview, Yoon emphasized the growing global popularity of Korean entertainment content, including drama and music. He mentioned that Crypto.com is engaging in discussions with various Korean intellectual property holders and entertainment studios to explore innovative ways to introduce Korean culture and art to international crypto audiences. Notable collaborators include entertainment company Fantagio, K-pop girl group Mamamoo, content studio Astory, and production house Studio Dragon.Crypto.com’s global presenceFounded in 2016, Crypto.com has garnered an impressive user base of 80 million worldwide. The crypto exchange has been actively obtaining regulatory approvals in many countries, including France, the United Kingdom, Dubai, Australia, Italy, Greece, and the Cayman Islands.Recent developmentsCrypto.com also recently obtained a virtual asset service provider registration from the Bank of Spain, the central bank of Spain. Prior to this accomplishment, the company received a Major Payment Institution (MPI) license from the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS), the central bank of Singapore. While Crypto.com continues to make progress in various jurisdictions, it made the strategic decision to discontinue its institutional offering in the United States due to limited demand in that particular market.

Conflict Identified as Crypto.com Trading on its Own PlatformTrading practices at Crypto.com, the Singapore-based cryptocurrency exchange, have raised questions about potential conflicts of interest within the digital assets industry.Citing a number of unnamed sources, the Financial Times (FT) made the claim in a report published on Monday.Photo by Pixabay on PexelsConflict of interestIn traditional financial markets, exchanges typically match buyers with sellers at competitive transparent prices, while market making and proprietary trading are conducted by separate private companies. However, US regulators have recently cracked down on similar activities at digital asset exchanges. Binance, the world’s largest crypto exchange, faced 13 charges from the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), including allegations of manipulative trading to inflate trading volume.The presence of internal traders at Crypto.com has not been widely known since the company’s launch in 2016. The FT’s sources claim that Crypto.com executives provided sworn statements to external trading houses denying the company’s involvement in trading activities.Employees were allegedly instructed to deny the existence of an internal market-making operation. In response to inquiries, Crypto.com denied that employees were asked to lie, stating that their internal market maker functioned similarly to third-party market makers, ensuring tight spreads and efficient markets on their platform.The majority of Crypto.com’s revenue reportedly comes from its app for retail traders, where the company acts as the counterparty for transactions and operates as a broker model. The company’s trading team hedges these positions on various venues, including their own exchange, to maintain risk neutrality. Crypto.com emphasized that their exchange provides a level playing field for institutional traders.According to insiders, Crypto.com’s proprietary trading desk engages in trading activities on the company’s exchange and other platforms, solely focused on generating profits rather than facilitating an exchange. The market making desk, on the other hand, aims to enhance liquidity on the platform.Not a revenue sourceCrypto.com defended its practices by stating that comparing trading volumes to competitors is common in the industry. It said that the company’s priority is to continuously improve order book liquidity and reduce spreads, benefiting all participants. The firm told Decrypt that trading is not a source of revenue: “While we do have some market making activity, for example, we have internal market makers for our CFTC-regulated product Up/Downs in the United States.”As a private company, Crypto.com publishes accounts in different countries, but revenue breakdown by business line is not disclosed.Closure of institutional tradingFollowing the SEC’s enforcement actions, earlier this month Crypto.com announced the closure of its exchange for institutional US traders due to limited demand in the current market landscape, effective from June 21.In any marketplace transparency and fairness are crucial. It’s fair to say that there has been some level of sharp practice among some actors in the marketplace while regulators have been lacking in getting up to speed with the emergent sector, and moving to protect consumers. With the major crypto platform failures of 2022 has come renewed interest in resolving these issues. That may make for some short-term difficulty, but in the longer term, it should mean greater protections for market participants so long as a common sense approach is pursued.

Korea’s FSC Embarks on Developing Regulatory Framework for VASPsThe South Korean Financial Services Commission (FSC) has taken a step towards the development of a virtual asset regulation system by seeking external parties to undertake a research project in this area, according to local news agency News1.Photo by Joshua Miranda on PexelsSecond phaseEarlier this month, the National Assembly passed the Virtual Asset User Protection Bill, aimed at protecting investors and preventing unfair trading practices. This legislative accomplishment, scheduled to go effective in July next year, is referred to as the “first phase” of virtual asset regulations. Building upon this foundation, the FSC has now shifted its focus to the “second phase,” which involves the regulation of virtual asset service providers (VASPs).Regulating VASP operationsOne primary concern regarding VASPs is the potential for conflicts of interest arising from their involvement in the issuance and distribution of virtual assets. In response, the FSC is determined to design a regulatory framework that covers a wide range of virtual assets, including stablecoins, security tokens, and utility tokens.In addition to this, the FSC intends to establish a system that governs advisory and disclosure businesses, which will play a crucial role in disseminating information about asset prices and disclosures.Moreover, the regulatory system will include guidelines for holding parties accountable in case of incidents and for overseeing the operations of VASPs to maintain a safe and fair market environment.The FSC acknowledges the significance of aligning policies with international standards. To achieve this, the commission will conduct an examination of virtual asset regulatory approaches taken by different countries and international organizations. Through this study, the FSC aims to integrate global best practices and approaches into Korea’s own regulatory framework for virtual assets.Once the study is complete, the FSC has to report the result to the National Policy Committee of the National Assembly by July 2024 before the Virtual Asset User Protection Bill goes into effect.