South Korean Job Seekers to Benefit from Digital Badges for License Credentials

Disagreement has emerged within the Bitcoin blockchain community, revolving around the BRC-20 token standard. Domo, the pseudonymous developer behind the creation of the token standard, has publicly expressed his opposition to an upcoming upgrade proposed by the Hong Kong headquartered project, UniSat Wallet.Photo by Kanchanara on UnsplashDue diligence concernsOn Tuesday Domo took to the X social media platform (previously Twitter) to articulate his concerns. He voiced apprehensions about hastily implementing updates in BRC-20, asserting that such a rush could potentially harm the broader BRC-20 user community. Domo's resistance is rooted in his belief that UniSat Wallet's proposed updates lack due diligence and are being introduced precipitously without considering potential repercussions. He wrote:”Recognizing the serious implications and valuations involved, I believe rushing these updates in BRC20 is reckless, disregards their peer indexers, and could potentially harm the broader community of BRC20 users.” ‘Split’ rather than ‘fork’Conversely, UniSat Wallet has declared its intention to “follow the Ordinals Jubilee upgrade, to confirm that BRC-20 is still on Ordinals without splitting into an isolated protocol." Described as a "split" rather than a "fork," UniSat Wallet's approach adapts to the Ordinals Jubilee upgrade, a transformative change in how the Bitcoin blockchain manages tokenized assets. In mapping the way forward its proposing to take, UniSat outlined that it would publish a whitepaper on Jan. 31, describing it as “the most significant present we are able to deliver” for BRC-20, Ordinals and Bitcoin. The crux of the matter lies in the method and pace of implementing these changes. Domo's concerns reflect a broader sentiment within the crypto community, where the rapid pace of advancements often collides with the need for stability and thorough vetting. UniSat Wallet's proposed changes, though innovative, may be viewed as potentially destabilizing by certain community members, especially those deeply entrenched in the current BRC-20 standard. Striking a balanceThis development is pivotal, highlighting the dynamic and occasionally contentious nature of blockchain technology and cryptocurrency standards. Web3 project incubator and investor TrustlessLabs summed up the matter in a social media post on Wednesday, drawing the following conclusions:”This situation encapsulates a critical challenge in blockchain protocol development: finding the right balance between preserving stability and embracing technological advancements.” As technology evolves, divergent opinions on the trajectory of these advancements are inevitable. The ongoing debate between Domo and UniSat Wallet serves as a microcosm of the larger conversations transpiring in the crypto space about how to strike the right balance between progress and stability. The BRC-20 token standard, an experimental fungible token standard on Bitcoin, draws inspiration from Ethereum's ERC-20 standard. It allows the creation of fungible tokens using Bitcoin’s Ordinals protocol, constituting a significant breakthrough in cryptocurrency by enabling novel forms of tokenization on the Bitcoin blockchain. This disagreement not only spotlights a critical debate in the crypto realm but also emphasizes the delicate equilibrium between innovation and stability.  

Genesis Ordered to Comply with Subpoena in Terraform Labs CaseGenesis, the troubled crypto lender and trading company, has been issued a compelling directive by a New York court. The court has mandated Genesis to comply with a subpoena within five days, following a failure to respond to previous requests by the October 9 deadline, relative to a case involving Singapore’s Terraform Labs.Photo by Michael Discenza on UnsplashTerraUSD collapse falloutThese requests are related to the 2022 collapse of the TerraUSD stablecoin, a cryptocurrency which was supposed to maintain a peg to the US dollar’s value until it lost that peg and collapsed. At the time, the demise of TerraUSD reverberated throughout the cryptocurrency markets.In response to this collapse, the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) initiated a legal action against Terraform Labs, the company responsible for the token, and its co-founder Do Kwon, alleging that investors had been misled. Both Do Kwon and Terraform subsequently tried unsuccessfully to have the case dismissed.As part of the progression of this case, the SEC sought to question Do Kwon and gain access to company records held by the Singapore-headquartered firm. The defendants were ultimately unsuccessful in arguing their case in that instance on jurisdictional grounds.Failure to respondJudge Jed Rakoff, in a court order filed on Friday, highlighted Genesis’s non-compliance with the subpoenas, stating:“As of today, the Genesis Entities have failed to produce any documents in response to the Subpoenas.”These subpoenas were issued by the defendants to seek specific information from Genesis Global Capital, Genesis Global Holdco, and Genesis Global Trading on September 12.The court order does not specify the nature of the information sought. It is worth noting that Genesis extended substantial loans to the now-defunct hedge fund Three Arrows Capital (3AC), which was heavily exposed to the TerraUSD stablecoin. In January 2023, three Genesis entities filed for bankruptcy, and its trading arm ceased its US spot market operations in September.In addition to the challenge posed by Genesis’ non-compliance, Judge Rakoff is also wrestling with obtaining information from Do Kwon in connection with the legal proceedings. Kwon’s legal representatives have argued that he cannot physically come to the US as he is serving a jail sentence in Montenegro for possession of a counterfeit passport.However, Judge Rakoff has expressed his determination to ensure Kwon’s availability for cross-questioning and stated that Kwon will not be allowed to provide any declarations in the case without being subject to cross-examination.Citadel under scrutinyIn a related development, it emerged last week that Terraform Labs is accusing American market maker Citadel Securities of having sabotaged its TerraUSD stablecoin. As part of the Singaporean company’s pursuit of justice, it has called upon the United States District Court in the Southern District of Florida to force Citadel to furnish specific documents that relate to their trading activities during the period within which TerraUSD collapsed.Should it fail in that endeavor, Terraform has said that it will look to have the matter heard in Judge Rakoff’s court in New York.This legal development concerning Genesis marks a crucial juncture in the ongoing investigation into the TerraUSD stablecoin’s collapse and the actions of the entities involved, with Genesis now facing increased pressure to cooperate fully with the legal process.

Crypto vulnerability uncovered with $1B in digital asset exposureSecurity vulnerabilities in the validator infrastructure of InfStones, an established infrastructure provider, have been disclosed by Tel Aviv-headquartered cybersecurity firm dWallet Labs.Photo by Brett Jordan on UnsplashBlockchain network validator vulnerabilityIn a detailed Medium blog post published on Tuesday, dWallet Labs shed light on a series of vulnerabilities that, when exploited, could potentially allow attackers to gain full control, execute code and extract private keys from numerous validators on major blockchain networks. Cryptocurrencies such as ETH, BNB, SUI, APT and others were identified as at risk, with potential direct losses estimated to exceed one billion dollars.The vulnerabilities discovered by dWallet Labs opened the door for attackers to compromise the private keys of validators across multiple blockchain networks, putting over one billion dollars of staked assets at risk. In response to the findings, InfStones, a Web3 infrastructure platform, also released a statement on Tuesday acknowledging the potential threat. However, its representative, Darko Radunovic, disputed the figures provided by dWallet Labs in a statement sent to Cointelegraph. Radunovic stated that the vulnerabilities identified in the production environment account for below 0.1% of their active nodes launched to date, emphasizing that the impact would be limited to a small fraction of their operational nodes.According to InfStones, “237 instances were in scope, of which 212 instances were deployed for our development and testing purposes, and 25 freshly deployed instances in the production environment.”Mitigating steps takenThe company detailed the immediate actions taken to mitigate the vulnerabilities, including shutting down the affected ports, as well as rotating all credentials and keys within their platform. An internal review conducted by InfStones revealed no additional adverse effects. Notwithstanding that, the company took the additional step of hiring an external security firm to audit its systems and policies.Meanwhile, dWallet Labs Founder and CEO Omer Sadika shared his thoughts on the X platform as to how he believes such events should be handled. Sadika wrote:”The worst way to handle a cybersecurity vulnerability is not taking responsibility and lying. We were super open and transparent with the goal of eliminating the risk to web3. My take: it’s not about whether you are fully secure or not, because no one is, it’s about how you handle it and maintain the trust with your partners and customers.”The collaboration between dWallet Labs and InfStones sheds light on the ongoing challenges faced by the cryptocurrency industry in maintaining the security and integrity of blockchain networks. While vulnerabilities were identified and addressed, the incident underscores the importance of proactive security measures to safeguard the assets and data within the rapidly evolving landscape of digital assets.