LINE NEXT and Sega Join Hands to Develop Web3 Games with NFTs

Zkrypto Partners with LG CNS to Develop Blockchain-Powered Business ModelsZkrypto, a South Korean startup specializing in zero-knowledge proof technology, has entered into a memorandum of understanding (MOU) with tech solutions firm LG CNS, an affiliate of the nation’s conglomerate LG Group. The partnership aims to develop blockchain-powered business models.Photo by Shubham Dhage on UnsplashFrom academia to industryFounded in 2020 by Oh Hyun-ok, a professor of Information Systems at Hanyang University, and Kim Ji-hye, a professor of Electrical Engineering at Kookmin University, Zkrypto has been involved in a variety of projects. These range from enhancing privacy features for the Bank of Korea’s central bank digital currency (CBDC) to building a blockchain-based voting system for the National Election Commission.Meanwhile, LG CNS has been actively engaged in multiple blockchain initiatives, including a decentralized identity (DID)-enabled mobile employee ID system, a Token as a Service (TaaS) offering, and its own blockchain platform, Monachain. The company’s latest projects include the development of a platform designed for security token offerings.For corporate and retail customersBy pooling their respective expertise, Zkrypto and LG CNS strive to create new value and offer innovative services to both corporate and retail customers.Emphasizing the promising horizon of blockchain technology, an official from Zkrypto stated that the collaboration between the two companies is poised to explore new markets and opportunities.

Web3 Offers Potential for Japan to Rediscover its MojoEveryone recognizes that Japan has been at the forefront of innovation and the development of technology in the past but can it rediscover that cutting edge through Web3 and blockchain? In a recent interview with Forkast News, Yudai Suzuki, Co-Founder of a Tokyo-based Web3 incubator, suggested that it has that potential.©Pexels/邱 韬Re-establishing a competitive edgeSuzuki, who heads up Fracton Ventures, believes that such a pivot is possible for Japan in making Web3 the means through which it can rediscover the innovative edge it has been lacking in more recent years.Despite an historical strength and depth in technology and innovation, Japan has struggled when it comes to adopting and implementing new technology on a global scale more recently.Legacy techEarlier this year, it emerged that leading Japanese technology companies were collaborating with a view to creating a new open metaverse infrastructure called “Ryugukoku.” That project implicates the creation of a Japan Metaverse Economic Zone. Suzuki cites this project as demonstrative of a key issue relative to the overall development of Web3 in Japan.The project involves Japan’s legacy tech companies such as Fujitsu and Mitsubishi. He goes on to clarify that the majority of Web3 projects in Japan are being led by the existing technology behemoths despite the fact that Japan is seeing the emergence of a Web3-native generation.Suzuki identifies that one of the fundamental aspects of Web3 is that every decentralized autonomous organization (DAO) that’s created is immediately global in nature. Allied with that, most of that 18–25 year old Web3 native generation in Japan want to break through language barriers and communicate on a global basis.That outward looking characteristic is positive but it’s not how venture investment has traditionally worked in Japan. He explains that the conventional approach to investing in start-ups in Japan has been to first look to dominate the Japanese market before going global. The Fracton Ventures founder believes that this is a flawed approach in today’s world and that by the time they’ve gotten to number one in Japan, it’s already too late in trying to achieve that on a global basis.Government responsibilitySuzuki places much of the responsibility in affecting a more appropriate approach on the Japanese Government. “If they focus only on these huge Japanese companies, they will not succeed,” he says. He is also critical of the regulatory approach. Suzuki believes that “the government wants to change the laws and set new regulations at an early date,” and with that, such over-regulation has resulted in crypto entrepreneurs leaving the field. Regulation needs to be set on a more flexible basis so that it can be easily updated and upgraded as the technology develops.Global MindsetHe highlights the importance of having a global mindset and being open to different ideas and perspectives in order to succeed in the Web3 space. The entrepreneur points to that Web3-native demographic in Japan, explaining that their mindset has changed to a more global one as a consequence of dabbling in Web3. The same he believes is necessary on the part of the government if Japan is to become a leader in the tech industry once again.

While cryptocurrencies may be banned in China, crypto trading activity continues in some corners, nonetheless, sometimes through accessing overseas exchanges. With that, authorities recently uncovered a massive underground banking operation that exploited crypto trading platforms to evade local forex regulations.Photo by Manuel Joseph on Pexels$2.2 billion laundering operationOn Sunday, an account on popular Chinese social media platform WeChat run by China’s State Administration of Foreign Exchange (SAFE) published details of the $2.2 billion laundering operation bust. Xu Xiao, the Inspector at the Qingdao Branch of the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, revealed that the scheme involved underground banks who purchased virtual currencies and then sold the virtual currencies through overseas trading platforms to obtain the foreign currency they needed. This process, he explained, completes the conversion of yuan and foreign currencies, constituting the illegal act of buying and selling foreign exchange. Stringent capital controlsChina enforces stringent rules on money transfers outside the country. Citizens are limited to exchanging up to $50,000 in foreign currency and require a permit for transactions beyond that limit. Any transaction exceeding the limit without a permit is considered money laundering. During a recent investigation, authorities seized cryptocurrencies valued at approximately $28,000 in Tether, Litecoin and other digital currencies. However, the operation is estimated to have facilitated the movement of over $2.2 billion, involving more than a thousand bank accounts across 17 provinces and municipalities. Monetary control loopholesChina, once the largest cryptocurrency market, imposed a comprehensive ban on crypto exchanges in September 2017 and subsequently expanded its restrictions to include crypto mining and trading. Despite these measures, reports have surfaced about underground crypto exchange operations. Earlier this year, an investigative report by the Wall Street Journal found that global exchange Binance continues to do thriving business with Chinese customers. Global crypto exchanges are reportedly still onboarding Chinese clients indirectly. The South China Morning Post (SCMP) recently accused Binance of facilitating Chinese crypto trading accounts by falsely claiming they are from Taiwan. While mainland China adopts a hostile stance towards cryptocurrencies, the special administrative region of Hong Kong remains progressive in the sector. Hong Kong’s regulatory authorities have introduced specific rules for cryptocurrencies and are licensing crypto exchanges operating within the jurisdiction. Arthur Hayes, the co-founder of the BitMEX crypto derivatives platform, recently described Hong Kong as the gateway for mainland China to global capital markets. Hayes asserted that wealthy Chinese individuals all bank in Hong Kong and with that, they all have access to crypto exchanges and brokers. In Cambodia, it is understood that illicit Chinese-linked activities oftentimes implicate the use of U.S. dollar stablecoin Tether (USDT) to move funds in and out of China even though Tether is banned in Cambodia. The latest crackdown in China underscores the ongoing challenges faced by authorities in controlling crypto-related activities, highlighting the dynamic nature of such activity within and adjacent to mainland China. As regulatory scrutiny intensifies, the contrast between mainland China’s approach and Hong Kong’s more open stance toward cryptocurrencies becomes increasingly evident.