Hana Bank Enables Korean Art Collectors to Prove Ownership with NFTs

NH Bank announced today that Korean banks and fractional investing companies have teamed up to establish a consortium with the aim of building an ecosystem for security tokens. Consortium between banks and fractional investorsThe consortium comprises NH Bank, Suhyup Bank, and Jeonbuk Bank as well as six fractional investing companies, including Seoul Auction Blue, Tessa, and Galaxia Moneytree.The banking sector will contribute to the security token industry by building infrastructure for distributed ledger technology, conducting research on promoting security tokens, and bolstering investor protection. Korean banks’ crypto initiativesNH Bank has been in partnership with domestic Korean crypto exchanges Bithumb and Korbit to provide them with real-name registered bank accounts, demonstrating continued interest in crypto services. Under current law, crypto exchanges in Korea are obliged to hold real-name bank accounts if they want to provide Korean won trading services.This move led by NH Bank shows that traditional banks, which have been more conservative compared to securities companies, are actively striving to secure a position in the security token market.

Bybit Overhauls Institutional Trading Platform Bybit InstitutionalDubai-headquartered crypto exchange Bybit has announced the launch of its newly revamped institutional trading platform, Bybit Institutional.Bybit outlined details of the refreshed product offering which the company hopes will provide institutional clients with an elevated trading experience, via a blog post published to its website on Wednesday.The revamped Bybit Institutional platform claims to have introduced a host of new features that it hopes will distinguish it from competitor offerings:Photo by Gerd Altmann on PixabayLiquidityThe platform claims to be one of the largest in terms of open interest for crypto derivatives trading. This position allows for high trading volumes, creating frequent opportunities for clients to enter and exit positions. This heightened trading activity allows clients to execute orders without causing significant market price fluctuations.Asset safetyFollowing the spectacular failure of a number of crypto platforms in 2022, a lot of emphasis is being placed on client asset safety in 2023. Proof of reserve audits has been adopted by some platforms as a direct response to these failures. Bybit Institutional is offering that fail-safe in an effort to demonstrate that it maintains cryptocurrency reserves to cover all client holdings.Between routine audits, the use of robust security frameworks, multi-factor authentication, encryption, and other measures, the platform feels that it is prioritizing the security of client assets. Moreover, clients are also offered the option to utilize third-party custodial services for off-exchange settlement of trades and long-term asset storage.Fee structure optimizationThe platform is offering a fee structure that it claims to have tailored to maximize cost-efficiency for institutional traders. A customized fee schedule has been incorporated, based on trading volumes and strategies, and aimed at supporting institutions’ objectives of reducing trading costs while optimizing their returns.Eugene Cheung, Vice President and Head of Bybit Institutional, expressed his enthusiasm for the platform’s refreshed product offering, stating:“We are thrilled to introduce the new Bybit Institutional page, designed to cater specifically to the needs of our institutional clients. With our deep liquidity, commitment to asset safety, and cost-efficient fee structure, we aim to provide a seamless trading experience for institutions of all sizes.”Bybit Institutional has partnered with significant players within the industry in bringing its offering to market, such as Fireblocks, Copper, and Circle.Blockchain LifeThe United Arab Emirates-based exchange is also a participant in next week’s Blockchain Life 2023 event in Dubai, the 11th international forum on cryptocurrencies, blockchain, and mining. Cheung will participate as one of the panelists at the event on October 24. Titled “Crypto Market Outlook: Insights and Forecasts From Top Crypto Exchanges,” the panel of industry experts will delve into the current crypto landscape, emerging trends, and future forecasts.Bybit’s launch of the enhanced Bybit Institutional trading platform is indicative of the interest that exists between a range of market participants in cornering institutional business. UK bank Standard Chartered, through its Singapore-based subsidiary Standard Chartered Ventures and portfolio companies Zodia Custody and Zodia Markets, is also making a concerted effort to muscle in on this market segment.

CoinFLEX’s Creditors Sue CEO and OPNX in Legal DisputeCreditors of Seychelles-incorporated crypto platform CoinFLEX have taken legal action against its CEO, Mark Lamb, alleging that his involvement in launching the claims trading platform OPNX violated his fiduciary duties to CoinFLEX.Photo by Sasun Bughdaryan on UnsplashDissatisfied CoinFLEX creditorsAccording to the civil action, which was filed in a Hong Kong court earlier this month, they view OPNX as a competing business to CoinFLEX. The lawsuit also implicates CoinFLEX investor Roger Ver.Lamb joined forces with Su Zhu and Kyle Davies, the founders of the now-defunct Singaporean crypto hedge fund Three Arrows Capital (3AC), to introduce a platform for trading bankruptcy claims, initially named GTX (later rebranded as OPNX). CoinFLEX co-founder Sudhu Arumugam also backed the project, with Leslie Lamb, Mark Lamb’s wife, installed as CEO.Lamb and CoinFLEX defended the project, claiming it would enhance transparency in financial markets and benefit CoinFLEX creditors. However, creditors argue that Lamb’s actions indicate a strategic move to distance himself and his associates from CoinFLEX. With that, they’re seeking to prevent him from representing CoinFLEX in the future.Complaint detailsThe creditors of CoinFLEX assert that OPNX was not authorized by CoinFLEX’s board or creditors and that Mark Lamb independently appropriated CoinFLEX’s intellectual property, technology, customer base, and employees to create the claims exchange.They accuse Lamb of entering into a harmful licensing and purchase agreement with OPNX’s parent companies, Open Technologies Holding LTD and Open Technology Markets LTD. Through their lawsuit, the creditors are aiming to nullify these agreements and place OPNX’s assets and profits into a trust.OPNX’s strugglesOPNX has faced difficulties from the point at which it was launched. While Zhu and Davies were once leading figures in the digital assets space, their reputations have been severely tarnished due to the manner of the 3AC collapse and its profound impact on the broader crypto market.In April the platform confirmed backing from various venture capital (VC) entities only for many of the VCs to turn around and deny any such involvement with the project. Having issued an investor and marketplace alert in relation to the firm in April, a short time later the Virtual Asset Regulatory Authority (VARA) in Dubai issued a formal reprimand to the business' founders.VARA followed up in August, applying a $2.7 million fine. OPNX had entered a bid for troubled Singaporean crypto lender Hodlnaut as part of that business restructuring process. The offer was turned down on the basis that the deal involved OPNX’s native OX token, which was deemed to be far too illiquid. A short time later, the OX unit price plummeted.Zhu was arrested in Singapore last month in connection with non-compliance related to 3AC’s bankruptcy, while Davies’ whereabouts remain undisclosed.CoinFLEX’s creditors also accuse Lamb of reaching a settlement agreement with Roger Ver, known as “Bitcoin Jesus.” Ver was one of CoinFLEX’s initial investors but later became entangled in a dispute over an $84 million debt he allegedly incurred on the platform due to market volatility. The lawsuit seeks to recover any benefits Ver received from the settlement.On X, a user called @CoinFLEXReal suggested that it has uncovered evidence that Lamb, Zhu, and Davies “used creditor assets as their personal piggy bank.”