Sony Network Invests $3.5M in Startale Labs to Drive Global Web3 Adoption

In Malaysia local regulator the Securities Commission has ordered global crypto exchange platform Bybit to shut down its operations within Malaysia as part of enforcement actions being taken by the regulator against the company.Photo by Esmonde Yong on UnsplashOperating without registration The Securities Commission published a statement to its website late last week outlining that both Bybit and its CEO Ben Zhou had been reprimanded for carrying out digital asset trading activities in Malaysia without having completed the necessary registration. The regulator also pointed out that both Zhou and his company have been listed on its Investor Alert List since July 2021. The Securities Commission took the opportunity to remind investors that they should only deal with what it termed “Recognized Market Operators” (RMOs), a designation it applies to entities that have completed registration with the regulator. Investors who utilize unregistered platforms are not extended any form of protection under Malaysian securities law, the Securities Commission warned, adding that such platforms could put them at risk of fraud and implicate them in money laundering activity potentially. Enforcement actions Bybit has been directed by the regulator to disable its website and mobile applications that are currently targeting Malaysian investors within 14 business days from Dec. 11.  The regulator also wants the company to curb other forms of promotion aimed at Malaysian investors. With that, it has requested that the company take down its Telegram-based support channel for Malaysian customers. Advertising activity, including social media posts, must also cease in cases where such activity is aimed at Malaysian investors. The Securities Commission acknowledged that thus far, Bybit has been compliant with its latest enforcement requests. Intentions to secure licensing Bybit has responded to these developments on its Bybit Malaysia Telegram channel, stating that the company understands that these actions “may cause some inconvenience” to Malaysian customers. “Once we have secured the appropriate licenses, we look forward to reconnecting with you again in the future,” it added. The enforcement action is likely to be a setback for Bybit given that the firm appeared to be focusing on the Malaysian market of late. In June it emerged that the company was moving to relocate Chinese employees to both Malaysia and Dubai.  This is not the first occasion in which Malaysia’s Securities Commission has taken action against a crypto platform. In 2023 the commission ordered the closure of the Malaysian operations of global exchange Huobi (subsequently rebranded as HTX). The circumstances in that instance were similar in that it acted against the exchange and its CEO for operating illegally within the Malaysian market. Within the Malaysian market, only six trading platforms have been registered. These include Hata Digital, Luno, MX Global, Sinegy, Tokenize Technology and Torum International. Earlier the Securities Commission acted similarly in prohibiting Atomic Wallet from operating within Malaysia given its failure to register its digital asset exchange activities. 

South Korean banks will soon have to be prepared with adequate anti-money laundering (AML) measures when issuing real-name bank accounts to cryptocurrency exchanges, according to a report by local media outlet News1. This requirement is part of the proposed amendment to the enforcement decree of the Financial Transaction Reports Act, with the Korean Financial Services Commission (FSC) issuing a legislative notice about it today. The FSC will be gathering feedback until March 4, prior to the implementation.Photo by Tuan P. on UnsplashAdequate staff and physical facilitiesThe new amendment requires banks supporting virtual asset service providers (VASPs) to employ adequate staff and establish and uphold physical infrastructure to combat money laundering and terrorist financing. Through this revised legislation, the FSC aims for banks to be equipped with the necessary resources to manage risks linked to the provision of real-name bank accounts to VASPs. With the issuance of real-name bank accounts, banks will face ongoing cautionary duties. The FSC plans to offer clearer guidelines to help banks decide whether to continue providing such accounts to VASPs. In its 2024 agenda, the FSC stated its plans to evaluate VASPs' readiness for their responsibilities ahead of the Virtual Asset User Protection Act, set to be implemented in July. Additionally, the regulatory body will develop infrastructure to improve its monitoring of the cryptocurrency market.Intelligence platform focused on financial securityMoreover, the FSC plans to create a specialized intelligence platform focused on financial security. This platform is aimed at enabling proactive responses to cyberattacks and supporting financial institutions in the agile management of risks associated with emerging technologies.

Korean Financial Regulator Reveals Crypto Accounting Guidelines to Prevent Inflated Company ValuationsThe Korean Financial Services Commission (FSC) has announced new regulations to address accounting uncertainties in the blockchain industry, according to local news outlet KBS News. The rapid growth of the industry and the increasing impact of cryptocurrency transactions on corporate accounting have resulted in confusion due to the lack of clear guidelines.Last month, the National Assembly’s plenary session passed the Virtual Asset User Protection Bill, emphasizing the need for improved regulation. In line with this development, the FSC has introduced practical guidelines and measures to resolve accounting uncertainties.The FSC has introduced two measures to achieve this goal: virtual asset accounting guidelines and mandatory disclosure of virtual assets in annotations within financial statements.Photo by Beatriz Pérez Moya on UnsplashAccounting guidelinesThe virtual asset accounting guidelines state that when an issuer sells virtual assets to a customer, they must fulfill all obligations, such as the sales process, in order to recognize it as revenue. Any costs incurred during the issuance of a virtual asset and the creation of its platform should be recognized as expenses, unless there is clear evidence that these activities specifically contribute to the development of the virtual asset. Additionally, any reserved virtual assets after issuance cannot be treated as assets on the company’s balance sheet. These guidelines aim to prevent companies from artificially inflating the value of their companies using virtual assets.When recognizing virtual assets as assets or liabilities, virtual asset service providers (VASPs) must consider the concept of economic control. Economic control refers to the entity’s authority to dispose of a virtual asset without needing customer authorization.Virtual assets in annotationsFurthermore, companies are obligated to disclose their virtual asset transactions and holdings in annotations to the financial statement. This requirement ensures that users of corporate accounting information have sufficient details. Public companies holding virtual assets for investment purposes must state the basis for classifying the assets as assets or liabilities. They must also provide the book and market values of their virtual assets in their financial statements.Companies that have created or issued virtual assets are required to provide comprehensive information about the quantity and characteristics of these assets. They must also explain their revenue recognition methodology in the event of asset sales. Companies must provide disclosure regarding the historical utilization of cryptocurrencies that have been issued but remain unsold. This disclosure includes various factors such as portfolios and volumes.VASPs must disclose the volume and market value of virtual assets entrusted to them by customers for each asset, regardless of whether these assets are recognized as assets or liabilities. VASPs also have to provide information about the level of protection measures they have implemented to mitigate risks such as hacking.The FSC expects that these measures will enable readers of financial statements to make meaningful comparisons between VASPs while ensuring the provision of reliable information.The accounting guidelines, after incorporating industry feedback, are expected to undergo deliberations and resolutions by both the accounting standards review committee and the Korean Securities and Futures Commission, as per local news outlet Kyunghyang Shinmun. Once the guidelines receive final approval, they will be promulgated and implemented immediately. This process is anticipated to take place between October and November.Meanwhile, the inclusion of virtual asset disclosures in the annotations of financial statements will be enforced next January.