Netmarble’s Blockchain Platform Plans Tokenomics Overhaul for MBX Token

Cross Trading of LUNA Tokens Uncovered on Three Korean Crypto ExchangesAccording to a report by the Maeil Business Newspaper on Wednesday, it was discovered that cross trading of LUNA tokens took place on three South Korean cryptocurrency exchanges: Bithumb, Coinone, and GoPax.Three crypto exchangesAn indictment by the Seoul Southern District Prosecutors’ Office against Terraform Labs co-founders Do Kwon and Daniel Shin, along with interviews conducted within the cryptocurrency industry, revealed that Bithumb, Coinone, and GoPax were involved in cross trading LUNA tokens with a combined value of $598 million. Specifically, Bithumb accounted for $224 million, Coinone for $299 billion, and GoPax for $74 billion.The prosecution has confirmed that cross trading continued until the end of February 2022, a period marked by significant demands for virtual asset legislation from both the market and academia. Despite widespread calls for regulations to curb unfair trading practices, these instances of cross trading went undetected.Classification of LUNAMoreover, it is reported that legal punishment for the $598 million worth of cross trading is challenging unless LUNA tokens are officially recognized as securities by the court. Under the Korean Capital Markets Act, only cross trading involving tokens identified as securities can be subject to penalties as a form of market manipulation.During a plenary session of the National Assembly’s Legislation and Judiciary Committee on Tuesday, Justice Minister Han Dong-hoon made a statement suggesting that LUNA tokens could be considered securities due to their backing by real-world assets. However, he said that this distinction might not apply to other tokens.On April 25, the Seoul Southern District Prosecutors’ Office indicted Shin and others as accomplices to Kwon, assuming that LUNA tokens were indeed securities. This case now revolves around whether the prosecution can successfully establish the classification of LUNA tokens as securities during the trial, making it the central issue in the case.Photo by Kanchanara on UnsplashCrypto investor protection legislationLast Thursday, the National Assembly’s National Policy Committee approved a bill known as the “Virtual Assets User Protection Act,” signaling an accelerated legislative process. However, there are arguments suggesting that the definition of cross trading should be further clarified in either the legislation or enforcement decree.A representative of a law firm specializing in virtual assets stated that the implementation of the User Protection Act would take another year even after its promulgation, making it challenging to retrospectively penalize cross trading practices that had already occurred.

3AC Founder Secures Restraining Order in SingaporeSu Zhu, the Co-Founder of the defunct crypto hedge fund Three Arrows Capital (3AC) has successfully obtained a restraining order against BitMEX Co-Founder and former CEO, Arthur Hayes, in a Singaporean court.Photo by Monstera on PexelsNo communication “by any means”Crypto publication CoinDesk stated on Wednesday that it had seen a copy of the court order, which was originally issued on May 5. According to the details of the order, Hayes is prohibited from “making any threatening, abusive or insulting communication that would cause the Applicant harassment, alarm or distress.”Additionally, the former CEO of crypto trading platform BitMEX is forbidden from using “threatening, abusive or insulting words” in relation to Su Zhu. The order, which was issued by Judge Sandra Looi Ai Lin, clarifies that the BitMEX Co-Founder is not permitted to publish “any identity information” relative to Zhu or to communicate with him “by any means.”$6 million owedIt’s an understatement to say that Zhu, alongside fellow 3AC founder Kyle Davies, are not on Hayes’ list of favorite people in recent times. Following the 3AC collapse, Hayes has maintained that he is owed $6 million by the duo. Since the collapse of the hedge fund, Hayes has been tweeting out at the pair, calling them out relative to his claim that the duo have a debt obligation to him to the tune of $6 million.While both Hayes and Zhu have blemishes on their records, Hayes is much better regarded within the crypto community than Zhu. The BitMEX Co-Founder narrowly avoided a prison sentence in 2022 with the much lesser sanction of six months home detention being applied. That arose due to federal charges brought against him on the basis that he didn’t implement anti money laundering (AML) compliance procedures and checks at BitMEX while he was CEO of the firm.Despite this failure, Hayes remains popular within the crypto space, with his insightful commentary being lauded given that since he left BitMEX he has taken to writing blog articles relative to crypto and the broader economic situation. However, blog site Medium has taken to disabling access to his most recent blog article. The blog page states that the post “is under investigation or was found in violation of the Medium Rules.”Lacking a welcomeIn contrast with Hayes, commentary relative to the 3AC duo of Zhu and Davies has lacked warmth. Neither of the duo had jumped on social media for a number of months following the collapse of 3AC. More recently they have both tried to rehabilitate themselves, with many commentators within the space seeing it as a cynical move.In February the duo launched Open Exchange, more commonly known as OPNX, a trading platform for crypto-related bankruptcy claims. At that time, Hayes tweeted out that he interpreted the news as the return of the crypto bull market.Earlier this month, OPNX claimed that it had the backing of several credible entities in the crypto space. However, immediately afterwards, a number of those firms clarified that they had nothing to do with the startup.Meanwhile, crypto-focused venture capital investor Michael Arrington tweeted out his disdain in relation to the 3AC founder’s successful fund raise:“Three f***ing arrows dip****s successfully raising a new fund is the saddest bulls**t I’ve heard in a long time.”The regulator in Dubai has also failed to roll out the red carpet for the duo’s new venture. In April, it issued an investor alert in relation to OPNX. Subsequently, it has followed up with a formal written reprimand issued to Zhu and Davies, given that the business is not registered with the regulator although operating out of Dubai.

PantherTrade applies for Hong Kong trading licensePantherTrade (Hong Kong) Limited, a subsidiary of Futu Holdings, had been reported last month as being in the process of preparing a licensing application to trade in Hong Kong. According to recent reports in local media, it appears that the company has now submitted such an application to the Hong Kong authorities.Photo by Simon Zhu on UnsplashKey appointmentsThis move aligns with the broader trend, as a total of six companies have submitted applications to the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) of Hong Kong. It’s understood that PantherTrade submitted its application on Nov. 15. The move follows a similar application made by Hong Kong-based Meex Holdings on Oct. 12.Key strategic appointments within PantherTrade underscore the company’s vision for its virtual asset trading venture. Chen Zhihu, former Investment Director at Huobi Asset Management (Hong Kong), has joined as a director. The corporate establishment of PantherTrade in March also saw the addition of Hong Yimin, while the initial director, Fang Xingzhi, has a background with Jingdong Securities Co., Ltd.Interest from mainland ChinaRegulatory attention has intensified on PantherTrade and another applicant, Yax, affiliated with Tiger Brokers employees, according to reports from Nikkei Asia. Yax is another platform with mainland China ties, which was reported in October as intending to apply for a license to trade within Hong Kong.It’s understood that the local entity of Chinese enterprise blockchain firm OK Group, OKX Hong Kong FinTech Company Limited, submitted its own trading license application on Nov. 16.Licensing uptakeHong Kong’s regulatory environment has undergone a significant shift, with the city granting the first licenses to cryptocurrency companies under a new framework in August of the current year. The regulatory changes, effective in 2023, allow retail investors to trade crypto on exchanges licensed by the SFC. Importantly, the city has removed the restriction on crypto trading, no longer confining it to professionals with a minimum of $1 million in bankable assets.This regulatory evolution is part of Hong Kong’s broader strategy to position itself as an international hub for cryptocurrencies. The city aims to attract fresh capital and talent, especially in the aftermath of the pandemic. The licensing race among virtual asset trading platforms signifies a pivotal phase in Hong Kong’s vision to lead the digital asset industry in Asia.There had been some short-lived concern that momentum was moving against Hong Kong’s efforts to further the Web3 sector when it emerged recently that crypto derivatives platform Bitget was exiting the Hong Kong market and abandoning efforts to secure a trading license. That concern dissipated when Bitget’s motivations became clearer, following BGX, a related Bitget entity, making an investment into BC Technology Group, the owner of the already Hong Kong-licensed OSL exchange.PantherTrade’s application for a virtual asset exchange license in Hong Kong adds momentum to the city’s evolving crypto landscape. The strategic hires and the broader industry trend highlight the growing significance of Hong Kong in the global digital asset arena. As the regulatory framework becomes more conducive, the city aims to foster innovation and become a key player in the international crypto space.