Uniswap Competitor Maverick Protocol Raises $9M in Funding

Animoca Brands Expands Focus to Non-US MarketsHong Kong-based Web3 and blockchain unicorn, Animoca Brands, is shifting its attention to markets outside the United States following the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) classification of its $SAND token as an unregistered security.This move comes after the SEC named $SAND, along with other tokens like Solana and Polygon, in lawsuits against major exchanges Binance and Coinbase Global. The labeling of these tokens as securities by the SEC poses legal risks for companies involved in their sale.Photo by Zulian Firmansyah on UnsplashNavigating regulatory challengesAnimoca Brands, led by Co-Founder and Chairman Yat Siu, has long embraced a global approach rather than focusing solely on one territory. Siu clarified the firm’s response to the latest regulatory development to the South China Morning Post (SCMP) via email on Thursday.He emphasized that while the SEC concentrates on the US, Animoca Brands operates in more progressive jurisdictions such as Hong Kong and Japan, where $SAND is widely available and accepted. In response to the recent blockchain-hostile climate in the US, the company has proactively started emphasizing other markets, reducing its reliance on the US market and mitigating potential risks associated with regulatory actions.Exchange business impactWhile Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong has declared that his company has no intentions of delisting tokens labeled as securities by the SEC, this decision poses challenges for other exchanges less committed to selling these tokens. Dan Gallagher, Chief Legal Compliance and Corporate Affairs Officer of Robinhood Markets, expressed concerns about listing tokens due to regulatory rules and the uncertainty surrounding tokens created by organizations outside the US.These developments could have a chilling effect on exchanges, prompting crypto firms to consider moving away from the US market due to perceived uncertainty and the associated legal risks. As a demonstration of that, in a bankruptcy court hearing on Thursday, it emerged that the FTX Debtor is talking with bidders with a view to restarting the international business but restarting the US-based business is less certain.Animoca’s Middle East ventureIn a further display of its commitment to expanding outside the US, Animoca Brands announced plans in March to make significant investments, worth tens of millions of dollars, in the Middle East. This move reflects the company’s proactive strategy to tap into non-US markets and leverage the growth potential offered by progressive jurisdictions.Animoca Brands’ decision to prioritize non-US markets and reduce its reliance on the US market aligns with its global operating approach. The SEC’s classification of $SAND as a security has prompted the company to shift its attention to more progressive jurisdictions where $SAND remains widely accessible.As other firms, including Ripple, also explore growth opportunities outside the US, the global landscape of the crypto industry is evolving. By navigating regulatory challenges and expanding into promising markets, Animoca Brands aims to position itself for continued success and mitigate potential risks associated with the SEC’s actions in the US market.

CoinGecko expands data offering through Zash acquisitionCoinGecko, the Malaysian crypto data aggregator, has intensified its focus on the non-fungible token (NFT) market through the recent acquisition of London-headquartered Zash. The move forms part of CoinGecko’s initiative to enhance its API offering by providing comprehensive data on digital collectibles.Photo by Andrey Metelev on UnsplashSolving for crypto data fragmentationIn a statement published to its website on Wednesday, CoinGecko provided further details on its acquisition of the enterprise-grade NFT and blockchain analytics company. Separately CoinGecko Co-Founder Bobby Ong told Tech in Asia that the crypto data sector is fragmented. As a consequence, it leads to inefficiency as market participants are forced to navigate multiple crypto data APIs. It’s in an effort to solve that issue that Ong and CoinGecko have moved to acquire Zash.Zash Co-Founder and CEO Parit Patel expressed optimism about the evolving nature of NFTs and their potential to unlock new use cases globally, creating value for both companies and consumers. The company plans to introduce new services derived from the acquisition by the second quarter of 2024.Enriched data offeringIn its own statement, CoinGecko emphasized its commitment to offering more NFT-related metrics. The acquisition aims to enrich CoinGecko’s data offerings with information such as metadata, historical trades and lending data related to NFTs. The specific financial details of the deal were not disclosed.With the integration of Zash, users can expect access to a broader range of data across multiple blockchain networks, including Ethereum, Polygon, BNB Chain (formerly Binance Smart Chain), Bitcoin Ordinals and Solana. The extended services will cover NFT lending information indexing various marketplaces, such as Blend, X2Y2 and NFTfi.In reflecting on the acquisition, CoinGecko Co-Founder TM Lee considered the move in terms of the ongoing process of asset tokenization. Taking to the X platform, Lee wrote:“Any asset that can be tokenized, will be tokenized. Like tokens, NFT is a core primitive to the crypto economy stack. We’ve been building http://coingecko.com/nft earlier even in the bear market and I’m excited on possibilities within the NFT industry with @zash_api joining us!”Monitoring wash tradingOne notable feature introduced through Zash is the ability for users to monitor wash trading, an illegal form of market manipulation that gives the false impression of market activity. CoinGecko clarified that this feature would be available for “major collections” minted on Ethereum.Wash trading, involving the simultaneous buying and selling of assets, has been associated with the NFT bubble of 2022. Blockchain forensic firm Chainalysis reported that over 100 profitable wash traders collectively earned nearly $9 million from this activity. However, it noted that the majority of NFT wash traders have been unprofitable, resulting in losses exceeding $416,984 from more than 150 wash trades.While the NFT market has faced challenges, with total sales currently at $80.8 million, significantly lower than the peak in August 2021 when daily sales exceeded $2 billion, CoinGecko’s strategic move positions the company to provide users with enhanced tools for assessing and ranking their cryptocurrency holdings. Established in 2014, CoinGecko operates as a platform offering comprehensive data and information on digital currencies, contributing to the quantitative evaluation of cryptocurrency portfolios.

FTX, the failed cryptocurrency exchange founded by Sam Bankman-Fried, has taken legal action by filing a lawsuit against four former employees of Salameda, a Hong Kong-based affiliate closely linked to the exchange’s former CEO.According to a Delaware bankruptcy court filing in the United States on Thursday, the lawsuit alleges that five individuals exploited their personal connections to prioritize their asset withdrawals from FTX during a period of uncertainty regarding the exchange’s stability. The defendants in question are Salameda’s former employees — Michael Burgess, Matthew Burgess, Kevin Nguyen, and Darren Wong — as well as Michael and Matthew’s mother, Lesley Burgess, and two companies: 3Twelve Ventures and BDK Consulting.Photo by Bermix Studio on Unsplash Preference period clawbackThe critical withdrawals occurred within the 90-day period leading up to FTX’s bankruptcy filing on November 11, commonly referred to as the “Preference Period.” Under US law, customers who withdrew their crypto assets during this timeframe could potentially face lawsuits from the exchange’s creditors seeking to recover these funds, a process known as a “clawback” under bankruptcy regulations.The total value of these suspicious transfers is estimated at $157.3 million, with more than $123 million of that sum withdrawn after November 7, 2022. Michael Burgess is alleged to have received around $73 million of these illicit withdrawals.The lawsuit claims that the individuals leveraged their connections within FTX Group to ensure preferential treatment over other customers. In a specific accusation, Matthew Burgess is said to have engaged other FTX Group employees to expedite certain withdrawal requests from his FTX US exchange accounts while falsely representing the accounts as his own. 11th hour withdrawalsIn this way, Burgess and the other four defendants managed to get funds out when most other FTX customers couldn’t. The final withdrawals were executed only hours before FTX.com suspended all withdrawals on November 8, 2022, according to the lawsuit. As one commentator on X put it, “FTX employees were manually reviewing large withdrawals & pushing some ahead.”The legal filing also delves into the significant profits the defendants reportedly accrued from trading cryptocurrencies in the months leading up to FTX’s collapse. Even after their apparent departure from the FTX Group, Michael Burgess, Nguyen, and Wong actively traded through entities such as 3Twelve and BDK, with monthly trading volumes ranging from $100 million to $400 million.A noteworthy aspect of this activity is that their trading capital was allegedly derived from the FTX Group. The court filing goes on to claim that “Burgess, Nguyen and Wong received substantial transfers of digital assets and fiat currency from exchange accounts associated with FTX Group entities, including approximately 13.1 million FTT sent to Darren Wong, more than 1 million SOL sent to Michael Burgess, and nearly $4 million USD for ‘bonuses’ between Michael Burgess, Nguyen and Wong.” Retail clawback riskThis legal battle and the allegations against the former Salameda employees are being watched closely by other FTX bankruptcy stakeholders. The FTX Debtor has suggested that it will pursue clawbacks vigorously. That has concerned former retail customers who managed to withdraw assets in the final days before the platform collapsed. Equally, it is a worry for current FTX creditors who may have withdrawn some but not all of their assets before the exchange was shuttered.