Circle Considers Issuing Stablecoin in Japan

Sygnum Bank, a digital asset bank based in Switzerland and Singapore, has conducted a survey which has identified that investors in Singapore are more interested in increasing their allocation to crypto than their international peers. The bank’s 2024 Future Finance survey states that while a global average of institutional investors of 47% plan to increase their exposure to crypto next year, in the case of Singapore-based institutional investors, 57% of them expressed the view that they would increase their crypto holdings in 2025.Photo by Precondo CA on UnsplashThe report states:  "Singapore investors exhibit a higher risk appetite and motivation to invest on average than respondents from other countries.” The annual survey, which was published on Nov. 14, collated insights garnered from more than 400 institutional and professional investors, distributed across 27 countries, with average investor experience of in excess of 10 years. 121 of the survey’s participants were based in Singapore, with the survey having been conducted during Q3 2024. Long-term confidenceSingaporean respondents suggested that they were confident in the long-term potential and outlook where cryptocurrencies are concerned. While the main reason for investing in crypto was to gain exposure to digital assets in line with a global trend (56%), 41% of respondents from the city-state cited portfolio diversification as their reason for investing in the emerging asset class.  75% of investors expressed the belief that regulatory clarity has improved recently. Growing confidence among institutional investors generally is likely to be developing due to increasing certainty relative to digital asset regulation. While Donald Trump had not been elected in the United States at the time that survey participants responded, it was looking increasingly likely that he would win the election.  That’s likely to have had a bearing on investor outlook, not just within the United States but internationally, given the implications in terms of positive regulation and an overall positive approach to crypto. 39% of Singaporean respondents cited yield-generation opportunities as their motivation in investing in digital assets. The recent advent of spot crypto exchange-traded funds (ETFs) stood out as another motivation for investors.  Breaking down specific areas of interest within the crypto sector, 71% of Singaporean respondents were interested in investment in layer-1 blockchain networks. Meanwhile, 56% expressed an interest in Web3 infrastructure investment options, with 41% showing an interest in layer-2 blockchain networks. Interest in asset tokenizationIn relation to tokenization, 47% of those surveyed in Singapore indicated an interest in tokenizing mutual funds and corporate bonds over and above other financial assets and products. When first proposed, real estate was considered the most obvious asset primed for tokenization but mutual funds and corporate bonds now appear to be gaining more traction. Asset tokenization has been garnering considerable attention in mainstream finance but especially so in Singapore. Local regulator, the Monetary Authority of Singapore, (MAS) has been running Project Guardian, a collaboration between MAS and the financial services industry with an emphasis on asset tokenization. The project recently brought in the German central bank, the World Bank, HSBC and markets infrastructure firm Euroclear as participants. 

Ripple Collaborates with Hong Kong Regulator in RWA TokenizationIn a demonstration of an extended use case, Ripple, the real-time gross settlement system, currency exchange, and remittance network, has announced that it has been selected by the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) to showcase a real world asset (RWA) tokenization solution.Photo by Redd F on UnsplashReal world asset (RWA) tokenizationIn a press release published on Thursday, the San Francisco-based firm outlined that the objective of its participation in the HKMAs inaugural e-HKD Pilot Program is to showcase a particular approach to real estate tokenization. In principle the e-HKD project is a central bank digital currency (CBDC) scheme.Ripple is one of sixteen firms that will participate in the program. Among the other participants are HSBC, one of the largest banking and financial services institutions in the world, British multinational bank Standard Chartered, and Bank of China (Hong Kong).For its part, Ripple will partner with Fubon Bank, a subsidiary of one of the largest financial holding companies in Taiwan. The e-HKD Pilot Program will feature a series of pilots conducted through several industry players with a view towards carrying out in-depth research into application, implementation, and design issues relative to the e-HKD.Real estate tokenization is a leading example of RWA tokenization, which overall is anticipated to become a multi-trillion dollar industry by the end of this decade. Its plan is to build the solution on a private and secure ledger, guided in principle by the same technology that the company has utilized for XRP, the native token of the Ripple ecosystem.Illiquid assetsThe company points out that people’s homes are usually one of their primary assets. Notwithstanding that, unlocking value in real estate can be problematic, having considerable friction. The idea is that this illiquid wealth can be unlocked through tokenization. It’s a concept that is seeing a lot of interest from competing projects. Start-ups like Securitize and Provenance Blockchain would be among a long list of start-up firms that see the potential in the tokenization of RWAs.In Asia, Japanese trading and investment firm Mitsui has gotten involved in the tokenization of real estate through its Alterna investment platform. Tokeny and CoFund offer other examples of innovators that are pioneering real estate tokenization.In its press release, Ripple outlined that it aims to use its technology in this particular instance to enable Hong Kong citizens to experience the faster and more efficient release of equity relative to real estate.James Wallis, Ripple’s VP of Central Bank Engagements & CBDCs, expanded on this idea further:“The Asia Pacific region has many forward-looking regulators such as the HKMA, who are looking to leverage the capabilities of blockchain and crypto technology. It’s a huge honor for Ripple to be one of the select few organizations participating in the HKMA’s e-HKD Pilot Programme. We now have the opportunity to demonstrate how real estate asset tokenization could be brought to the citizens of Hong Kong, and are confident that our fully integrated solution will be an industry-first use case demonstrating the power of leveraging a CBDC for real estate equity asset release.”

South Korea’s retail-heavy crypto market is losing momentum ahead of broader institutional access to trading. Data from the Financial Services Commission (FSC) and the Financial Supervisory Service (FSS), cited by Financial News, shows that in the first half of 2025, Korean-won balances held at the country’s five licensed fiat-to-crypto exchanges sank 42% to 6.2 trillion won ($4.4 billion), signaling less dry powder waiting on the sidelines for trading. Only five platforms are permitted to support won-denominated trading, and the drop in parked cash underscores a broader cooling. By the end of June, the Korean crypto market cap stood at 95.1 trillion won ($67.5 billion), down 14% from six months earlier. The global market also contracted, but the decline was more modest at about 7% over the same period.Photo by Y K on UnsplashTrading slows but retail base expandsTrading activity eased as well. Average daily volumes across 25 domestic virtual asset service providers (VASPs) fell 12% to 6.4 trillion won ($4.5 billion) in the first half. Paradoxically, the number of market participants climbed 11% to 107.7 million across those platforms. Nearly all were individuals, as only 220 were institutions, reflecting long-standing restrictions on institutional won trading. That retail skew has consequences. Data submitted by the FSS to a lawmaker, cited by Digital Asset, reveals that the top 10% of users by trading volume accounted for roughly 90% of activity at the five fiat on-ramps. By exchange, the figures were Upbit (89.36%), Bithumb (97.97%), Coinone (97.54%), Korbit (97.52%), and Gopax (97.95%).  Market lawyers warn that this concentration heightens manipulation risk. Lee Seung-min of SEUM Law Firm said volatility may be more pronounced in tokens listed only on Korean venues, but added that deeper institutional participation could help reduce such volatility and support longer market cycles.  Regulators are inching in that direction. Earlier this year, authorities allowed universities and nonprofits to sell their crypto holdings. By year-end, the FSC plans to let about 3,500 publicly traded companies and professional investors, excluding financial institutions, open accounts at the licensed platforms for trading. Exchanges pour cash into promotionsWhile regulators are preparing to bring more institutional players into the fold, exchanges continue their long-running effort to draw in retail users. Another Digital Asset report noted that from 2023 through July 2025, promotional outlays by the five won-enabled platforms totaled 190.3 billion won ($135 million). Bithumb alone accounted for 180.3 billion won ($128 million), far outspending Upbit (9.4 billion won), Coinone (1.7 billion won), Korbit (1.6 billion won), and Gopax (100 million won). The gap suggests Bithumb, which ranks second in market share, has pursued a particularly aggressive approach to expand its customer base. Taken together, the numbers depict a subdued market, with less capital parked on exchanges and lighter trading while activity remains heavily concentrated among a small cohort of traders. Even so, the expanding base of individual accounts represents a bright spot, underscoring the market’s continued dependence on retail investors. If policymakers follow through on opening the door to a broader set of corporate and professional players later this year, Korea’s crypto landscape could shift from retail-driven fluctuations toward steadier, institution-supported flows.