JPYC secures $11.4M funding as Japan expands stablecoin push 

BLOX, the Malaysian Web3 firm, has forged a strategic partnership with AsiaPay, a payment processor and gateway solution provider in Asia, focused on crypto payments. Memorandum of understanding (MOU)According to a recently published press release, the collaboration has been formalized through a memorandum of understanding (MOU) and aims to collectively explore and develop cryptocurrency digital payment solutions tailored for the Malaysian market. As global consumers increasingly gravitate towards the most frictionless payment methods, cryptocurrencies are gaining significant traction. However, the seamless integration of cryptocurrencies into day-to-day transactions requires the support of adept payment service providers.Photo by Esmonde Yong on UnsplashStablecoin potentialDespite the burgeoning popularity of cryptocurrencies, the inherent volatility in their prices poses a considerable challenge. To address this challenge, stablecoins have emerged as a viable solution. The adoption of stablecoins has gained momentum, particularly in the business-to-business (B2B) segment, where the efficiency of blockchain-based payments and instant settlement can be harnessed without being hampered by the uncertainties of price fluctuations. It is within the area of stablecoins that BLOX can lend support, given that the entity is responsible for the first Malaysian ringgit-denominated stablecoin (MYRC). Ethan Chung, CEO and Co-Founder of BLOX, expressed enthusiasm about the partnership, stating:“I’m excited to announce our partnership with AsiaPay, enabling Malaysian merchants to effortlessly accept crypto payments without the need for technical expertise. Empowering businesses, simplifying transactions.” Regulatory sandboxThe crypto payment exploration, which will be undertaken by the two companies, is being enabled under the auspices of a regulatory sandbox environment provided by Malaysian central bank Bank Negara Malaysia. Loo Tak Kheong, Country Head and Director at AsiaPay Malaysia, emphasized the added value this collaboration brings to their payment solutions. He said:“At AsiaPay, we provide payment acceptance solutions with multi-currency, multi-lingual, multi-card, and multi-channeled payment capabilities, which we believe by adding an additional payment method via crypto, will further enhance the value-add service to our Merchants and Partners in the payments ecosystem.” AsiaPay operates throughout the Asian region, headquartered in Hong Kong but with a local corporate entity also established to serve the Malaysian market. Malaysia has shown interest in harnessing blockchain for the purposes of international trade and payments. Last year the Southeast Asian country’s Prime Minister had expressed interest in decreasing its dependency on use of the U.S. dollar. Under the guidance of the country’s central bank, Malaysian banks have explored the use of blockchain for the purpose of trade finance. The country had expressed interest in a central bank digital currency (CBDC) in a financial sector blueprint it had previously published, mapping a way forward from 2022 to 2026. The same document deems decentralized cryptocurrencies like bitcoin to be “non-backed digital assets.” Previously the country’s deputy finance minister had said, “cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin are not suitable for use as a payment instrument due to various limitations.” This strategic alliance between BLOX and AsiaPay reflects the ongoing evolution of payment systems, positioning both companies at the forefront of the exploration of crypto-as-a-payment means in Malaysia.

Cebu Meeting of FSB Highlights Crypto RisksThe Regional Consultative Group for Asia of the Financial Stability Board (FSB) has highlighted the risks implicated by crypto assets in a series of meetings held on Thursday and Friday in Cebu, the Philippines.The FSB is an international body with a mandate to monitor the global financial system, as well as make recommendations in respect of that system. The agency was established by the G20 group of countries in April 2009, replacing its forerunner, the Financial Stability Forum.Photo by John Alvin Merin on UnsplashA regulatory framework for cryptoThe two-day event focused on non-bank financial intermediation (NBFI) in Asia and the development of an effective global regulatory framework for crypto-assets. It discussed recent developments in financial markets, together with their regional impact.In opening remarks, Philippine Central Bank Governor, Felipe Medalla, stated: “Crypto, the biggest issue there is, whether we like it or not is quite a lot, especially younger people who are actually gambling. They have huge losses, our view right now. Well, you’re there, it’s your problem and the regulation becomes strict the moment crypto meets banking.”International participants highlighted the need for the development of an effective global regulatory framework for crypto-assets. Particular concern exists with regard to the potential for systemic risk in relation to crypto and a potential overflow into the traditional financial system.Earlier this year, the FSB proposed a complete regulatory framework for cryptocurrencies, with the report having been originally submitted in October of last year. Among its key components is the imposition of tighter controls. It proposed the guiding principle of “same activity, same risk, same regulation” for crypto assets, mirroring the approach taken for traditional financial assets.Global approach to taming cryptoThis approach has proven to be problematic for people working within the digital assets space. Many of the core facets of cryptocurrencies are entirely different to anything we see in traditional finance. Trying to frame crypto within an existing approach and standard has been perceived by many to be akin to trying to fit a square peg in a round hole.It’s not the FSB's role or place to affect policy directly. That responsibility lies with policymakers and regulators in each individual country. However, the organization is seeking to influence those individuals and entities in the hope that they will employ its suggested regulatory framework.Klaas Knot, Chair of the FSB and President of the Dutch Central Bank, provided this view on crypto: “We will come up with a global regulatory framework. It also only makes sense to regulate this from a global perspective. Because, nowadays you can take a server and put it anywhere in the world and start issuing these digital assets.”From Knot’s take, it’s clear that governments and central bankers are cottoning on to the fact that individual nation-state regulation is futile to an extent where decentralized innovations like cryptocurrency are concerned. Others such as European Central Bank (ECB) President Christine Lagarde and Mark Branson, President of German financial markets regulator BaFin, similarly have called for a globally enforced regulatory approach over the course of the past year.Ongoing struggleWhile regulation can be helpful, particularly when it comes to the points at which crypto meets the traditional system, there’s no doubt that this emerging innovation will disrupt the conventional system to some degree or other. That may place an incentive before central bankers and governments to try and stymie the further development of digital assets.While a truly global approach to regulating digital assets could retard development of the sector, there is rarely total consensus among world governments on a single issue. Therefore, by its very nature, crypto, and the digital assets sector will likely continue to develop regardless. It’s more a question of how long that process takes.

Illiquid Token Sinks OPNX’s $30 Million Hodlnaut BidThe interim judicial managers overseeing the restructuring process of troubled Singaporean crypto lender Hodlnaut have firmly opposed the takeover offer presented by OPNX, the Dubai-based crypto bankruptcy claims trading platform associated with the founders of the now-defunct hedge fund, Three Arrows Capital.Photo by Image Hunter on PexelsSpeculative token valueIn a report published on Tuesday, Bloomberg referred to a recent court filing in which the administrators of Hodlnaut had characterized OPNX’s $30 million bid in FLEX digital tokens as “illiquid” and bearing “speculative value.” Additionally, a significant portion of Hodlnaut Group’s creditors, representing 60% of the total debt, had also voiced their dissent towards the proposed OPNX deal.Hodlnaut, headquartered in Singapore with operations in Hong Kong, found itself among the casualties of the $1.5 trillion crypto market downturn last year. OPNX had expressed its interest in taking control of Hodlnaut last month.Among the concerns raised by managers were the absence of a cash injection or assets with readily available liquidity, such as Bitcoin or Ether. Furthermore, there was no clear timeline provided for the repayment of creditors’ debts, and the proposal lacked detailed information regarding payments, which are limited to just 30% of liabilities, according to the court-appointed supervisors of Hodlnaut’s restructuring.FLEX token offeringThe FLEX token, associated with the CoinFLEX exchange, whose founders Mark Lamb and Sudhu Arumugam launched OPNX earlier this year, is at the center of the proposal. Currently, it holds a market value of approximately $54.4 million. However, its trading volume remains low. Moreover, its unit value stands at $0.55, marking a substantial 95% decrease from a month ago when the offer was first submitted to the Singapore court, as per data from CoinGecko.The deal would have meant OPNX taking a 75% stake in the business. Previously, Hodlnaut’s founders Simon Lee and Zhu Juntao had put forward a proposal of a business sale rather than liquidating the company as the preferred option.Su Zhu and Kyle Davies, co-founders of Singapore’s Three Arrows Capital, played instrumental roles in the inception of OPNX, joining with the CoinFLEX founders in establishing the bankruptcy claims trading platform. Despite their initial contributions, it’s worth noting that Zhu has previously clarified that neither he nor Davies are involved in the day-to-day management of the exchange.Regulatory sanctionsIn recent developments, Zhu and Davies were sanctioned with a nine-year ban by the Monetary Authority of Singapore due to violations connected to their collapsed hedge fund firm, which operated out of Singapore. Furthermore, in August, authorities in Dubai levied fines against Zhu, Davies, Mark Lamb, OPNX CEO Leslie Lamb, and Arumugam for operating and promoting OPNX without the required local license.The rejection of OPNX’s bid by Hodlnaut’s bankruptcy administrators underscores the challenges implicated by illiquid tokens. The fate of Hodlnaut remains uncertain, pending further developments in the ongoing legal proceedings, and will depend upon its management’s efforts in finding a new buyer for the business.