Survey Reveals Favorable Public Opinion on Binance’s Acquisition of Korean Exchange Gopax

Conflict Identified as Crypto.com Trading on its Own PlatformTrading practices at Crypto.com, the Singapore-based cryptocurrency exchange, have raised questions about potential conflicts of interest within the digital assets industry.Citing a number of unnamed sources, the Financial Times (FT) made the claim in a report published on Monday.Photo by Pixabay on PexelsConflict of interestIn traditional financial markets, exchanges typically match buyers with sellers at competitive transparent prices, while market making and proprietary trading are conducted by separate private companies. However, US regulators have recently cracked down on similar activities at digital asset exchanges. Binance, the world’s largest crypto exchange, faced 13 charges from the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), including allegations of manipulative trading to inflate trading volume.The presence of internal traders at Crypto.com has not been widely known since the company’s launch in 2016. The FT’s sources claim that Crypto.com executives provided sworn statements to external trading houses denying the company’s involvement in trading activities.Employees were allegedly instructed to deny the existence of an internal market-making operation. In response to inquiries, Crypto.com denied that employees were asked to lie, stating that their internal market maker functioned similarly to third-party market makers, ensuring tight spreads and efficient markets on their platform.The majority of Crypto.com’s revenue reportedly comes from its app for retail traders, where the company acts as the counterparty for transactions and operates as a broker model. The company’s trading team hedges these positions on various venues, including their own exchange, to maintain risk neutrality. Crypto.com emphasized that their exchange provides a level playing field for institutional traders.According to insiders, Crypto.com’s proprietary trading desk engages in trading activities on the company’s exchange and other platforms, solely focused on generating profits rather than facilitating an exchange. The market making desk, on the other hand, aims to enhance liquidity on the platform.Not a revenue sourceCrypto.com defended its practices by stating that comparing trading volumes to competitors is common in the industry. It said that the company’s priority is to continuously improve order book liquidity and reduce spreads, benefiting all participants. The firm told Decrypt that trading is not a source of revenue: “While we do have some market making activity, for example, we have internal market makers for our CFTC-regulated product Up/Downs in the United States.”As a private company, Crypto.com publishes accounts in different countries, but revenue breakdown by business line is not disclosed.Closure of institutional tradingFollowing the SEC’s enforcement actions, earlier this month Crypto.com announced the closure of its exchange for institutional US traders due to limited demand in the current market landscape, effective from June 21.In any marketplace transparency and fairness are crucial. It’s fair to say that there has been some level of sharp practice among some actors in the marketplace while regulators have been lacking in getting up to speed with the emergent sector, and moving to protect consumers. With the major crypto platform failures of 2022 has come renewed interest in resolving these issues. That may make for some short-term difficulty, but in the longer term, it should mean greater protections for market participants so long as a common sense approach is pursued.

Cosmose AI, an artificial intelligence-driven retail analytics firm headquartered in Singapore, has opted to collaborate with the Near Foundation with the aspiration of building a blockchain-based payments system centered on low transaction fees as a more cost-efficient alternative to more conventional payments processors like Stripe and PayPal. Payment platform disruptionThe Near Foundation is a non-profit organization responsible for guiding governance, contracting protocol maintainers and funding ecosystem development relative to the proof-of-stake (PoS)-based Near blockchain protocol. In a blog post published to the Cosmose AI website on Sunday, the company set out the extent of its new partnership with the Near Foundation.Cosmose AI uses AI-powered analytics to track in-store foot traffic as a basis to engage with shoppers online. Both companies will work towards building a payment system that facilitates shoppers to purchase goods and services at low transaction fees through cryptocurrency. As part of the deal, Near has made a strategic investment in Cosmose AI, reflecting a Cosmose company valuation of $500 million.In its press release, Cosmose stated that the investment from the Near Foundation means that the Cosmose “is set to apply Web3 principles and further advance the AI-driven retail ecosystem. Cosmose believes that it can leverage Web3 such that users maintain complete control over their data while benefiting from the ecosystem they help to create.The AI-driven company has a suite of retail solutions, including the KaiKai app, which enables retail customers to discover retail stores in their local vicinity. The app also includes an online targeting platform. Both elements are being overhauled with a Web3 facelift, with the Near collaboration enabling the integration of blockchain into the app.KaiKai already settles payments by leveraging Near Protocol with the creation of its own native stablecoin, Kai-Ching. Near Foundation CEO Marieke Flament said that Near will give Cosmose “the means to leverage the full potential of Web3 in a way that is sustainable, transparent, and infinitely scalable.” Moving away from Stripe, PayPalIn an interview with TechCrunch, Cosmose Founder and CEO Miron Mironiuk stated: “ I’m not sure if you know how expensive and slow it is to process online payments. It’s absolutely crazy.” The Near protocol leads with an ability to achieve inexpensive, scalable blockchain transactions. If successful in building this blockchain-based payments system, Cosmose would be in a better position to replace the use of payments service providers like Stripe and PayPal.Mironiuk gave the example of a simple coffee purchase. Small transactions like that can involve transaction fees in excess of 10%. This overhead is reflected in the overall price of the cup of coffee, with the seller passing on the cost to the buyer. In that one isolated example, Mironiuk makes the point that a regular coffee drinker could be spending an additional $200 per year to cover the costs of payments intermediaries.Over the course of nine years, Cosmose has grown to a point where it extends its service to 20 million stores. The firm operates on a global basis, with its team of eighty staff distributed across centers such as Hong Kong, Tokyo, Paris, Shanghai and Warsaw, as well as at its Singapore headquarters.

Singapore Exchange Limited (SGX), the city-state’s primary asset exchange, is in the process of establishing Bitcoin perpetual futures trading on the platform.Photo by Kanchanara on UnsplashInstitutional product offeringAccording to a report published by Bloomberg earlier this week, the exchange platform intends to launch Bitcoin futures sometime during H2 2025. The product launch will be subject to regulatory approval from the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS). A spokesperson for the company told Bloomberg that the product offering will be geared exclusively towards institutional investors and traders in an effort to “significantly expand institutional market access.” Retail access to the product will be prohibited. Once launched, these Bitcoin perpetual futures contracts, being offered through a traditional finance (TradFi) outfit like SGX, will help to blur the lines between TradFi and the emerging crypto sector. Perpetual futures have no expiry date. They offer a means for traders to bet on price changes in an underlying asset while doing away with the need to take ownership of the asset itself. Cautious approachSGX has been cautious in listing crypto assets and derivative products. Last year the firm’s CEO, Loh Boon Chye, said that the time was not yet right for such listings.  His concern back then was that any such product launches would need “sustainable ecosystem support,” adding that “that means demand, that means governance, that means structure.” While spot Bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs) had been approved in the United States at that point, there has been much further development in the crypto-sphere since then, following the election of a pro-crypto administration in the U.S. That event has had knock-on effects globally. Singapore’s SGX isn’t the only traditional exchange platform to respond. Japanese futures exchange, the Osaka Dojima Exchange (ODEX), is gearing up to file an application with the Financial Services Agency (FSA) to list a Bitcoin futures product later this month. Closer to home, an American digital asset marketplace that focuses on institutional trading, EDX Markets, has plans to introduce Bitcoin perpetual futures products to the Singaporean market, according to a report which emerged in January. In May 2024, EDX launched EDXM Global, a settlement platform, in Singapore. This product launch by SGX serves the purposes of decision-makers in Singapore, who have been trying to position the city-state as a digital asset industry hub. Additionally, the move will bring greater acceptance of the digital assets sector from traditional market participants. Crypto perpetual futures contracts were first pioneered by crypto derivatives exchanges like BitMEX back in 2016. Since then, other crypto-native platforms like Binance and OKX have offered these products. In the case of unregulated offshore exchanges, the products have proven to be controversial, as at times, they have been used in a manner that has exposed market participants to counterparty risk. Failed crypto exchange FTX, together with its sister company Alameda Research, relied on the products in their trading activities. SGX, as a seasoned, regulated TradFi operator, which holds an Aa2 rating from Moody’s, is likely to prove to be a more palatable option for institutional players.