Survey Reveals Favorable Public Opinion on Binance’s Acquisition of Korean Exchange Gopax

Beosin Report: Crypto Rug Pulls Surpass DeFi Exploits in MayAccording to a recent report by blockchain security firm Beosin, losses from “rug pulls” or “exit scams” in the cryptocurrency space exceeded the amount stolen from decentralized finance (DeFi) projects during the month of May.The report, published on June 1 by Beosin Blockchain Security, revealed that rug pulls and scams resulted in losses of over $45 million across six incidents during the month. Beosin is headquartered in Chengdu, in China’s Sichuan province. The firm uses formal verification methods to secure smart contracts.In general there were 22 security incidents in the digital assets space over the course of the month. That overall figure accounts for losses totaling $20 million, and represents a vast improvement on the previous month.Three of the incidents were accounted for by security issues related to hardware wallets such as the Trezor and imKey wallets. Six were rug pulls/crypto scams, two were crypto crime incidents while another implicated a critical vulnerability relative to zero-knowledge proof technology.Photo by Tara Winstead on PexelsDeFi protocol attacksIn contrast, there were 10 attacks on DeFi protocols, amounting to $19.7 million in stolen funds. This figure represents a significant decrease of nearly 80% compared to April, and the losses from these types of exploits had been declining for two consecutive months, as per Beosin’s findings.The largest rug pull incident in May involved the alleged disappearance of $32 million associated with the crypto project Fintoch on May 24. Meanwhile, the largest attack on a DeFi platform was a $7.5 million breach targeting Jimbos protocol, according to Beosin’s report.Shifting hacker strategyBeosin noted a shift in the targeting strategy of hackers and scammers, who are now increasingly focusing their attacks on ordinary users rather than various project parties. To mitigate risks, the report recommended that crypto users enhance their anti-fraud awareness, conduct thorough due diligence before investing in projects, and learn how to improve the security of their digital assets.The report also issued a warning against using shared or public charging devices for mobile phones. Beosin highlighted the potential risks associated with these devices, as they could be manipulated to inject malicious programs that compromise private keys. This caution aligns with a similar advisory issued by the United States Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) in April.The FBI’s Denver office cautioned against using public USB ports, including those found at airports, due to the potential introduction of malware and monitoring software onto devices. Instead, they suggested carrying a personal charger and USB cord for use with electrical outlets.As the cryptocurrency landscape continues to evolve, it is crucial for users to remain vigilant and proactive in safeguarding their investments. With the rise of rug pulls and the ongoing threats in the DeFi space, staying informed, exercising caution, and adopting robust security measures are essential for protecting one’s digital assets in this rapidly changing industry.

The Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) has unveiled a new roadmap for digital asset regulation titled “ASPIRe.” The authorities in the Chinese autonomous territory have been working towards crypto hub status in recent years. This latest ASPIRe roadmap initiative has been formulated in an effort to future-proof Hong Kong’s status as a location that has been optimized for crypto businesses to form and develop. The ASPIRe roadmap was announced by the SFC on Feb. 19 with comprehensive details on the plan published to the regulator’s website. Photo by Skull Kat on UnsplashFive pillarsA-S-P-I-Re details five pillars that the regulator is focusing on in order to address challenges to strengthen Hong Kong’s crypto hub status going forward. The “A” pillar refers to “access,” with a focus on fostering an ecosystem that’s aligned with a regulatory regime that enables global participation. The regulator wants to attract “qualified participants,” while enhancing investor choice and integrating Hong Kong’s digital assets sector with global liquidity. The “S” pillar stands for “safeguards” with the objective of adopting risk-proportionate oversight, promoting regulatory clarity and aligning compliance requirements such that a balance is struck between core regulatory objectives and providing flexibility for the adoption of new technology. “Products” forms another pillar, with a focus on expanding the range of digital asset products and services offered by regulated service providers in Hong Kong. “Infrastructure” is another aspect that the plan homes in on. The focus in this regard is on modernizing reporting, surveillance and cross-agency collaboration through infrastructure building and the use of new technology.  The final pillar, “relationships” (Re), focuses on the empowerment of both investors and the industry in general through education, engagement and transparency. Influencing modern financeThe Hong Kong regulator is putting forward this plan with the understanding that the global virtual asset market was valued at $3 trillion in 2024. It suggests that the sector “has significantly influenced modern finance.” At Consensus Hong Kong 2025 this week, a crypto conference held in the Chinese autonomous territory, SFC CEO Julia Leung suggested that this plan will put Hong Kong in a strong position to secure its role as a crypto industry hub going forward. Hong Kong Financial Secretary Paul Chan Mo-po also delivered a keynote speech at the conference. He said that Hong Kong would “remain a stable, open and vibrant market for digital assets,” adding that Hong Kong is “investing heavily in the related infrastructure and talent development.” Mo-po went on to assert that Hong Kong’s Cyberport Web3 network and the Hong Kong Science and Technology Park are “vibrant hubs for Web3 innovation and fintech.” He also claimed that industry partnerships and the city’s universities are bringing through blockchain expertise.  The Financial Secretary understands the importance of appropriate regulation. He stated: “The key to success lies in maintaining an open, fair, balanced and forward-looking regulatory approach that is conducive to the sustainable and responsible development of financial innovation, including Web3.”

Hong Kong court grants trademark injunction against HuobiThe Hong Kong Special Administrative Region High Court has resolved a trademark dispute between X-Spot Global Limited and Huobi Global Limited, ruling in favor of X-Spot.Back in June, X-Spot alleged that Huobi Global infringed on its trademark rights related to the “Huobi” name. In the legal process which followed, the court sided with X-Spot, compelling Huobi Global to cease using the “Huobi” trademark or any similar name or logo in Hong Kong.Photo by Tingey Injury Law Firm on UnsplashPotential confusionThe court’s official judgment highlighted concerns about potential confusion among the public and industry professionals arising from Huobi Global’s use of the “Huobi” trademarks. It emphasized that such confusion could lead people to believe that X-Spot Global, as the registered trademark owner, is actively engaged in cryptocurrency business associated with the trademark. In response, the court dismissed Huobi Global’s plea to revoke the service order and halt negotiations, also instructing the covering of X-Spot Global’s legal expenses.Post-acquisition conflictThe background to this dispute originates in the acquisition of Huobi Global last year. It’s widely believed that TRON blockchain network founder Justin Sun purchased the exchange for $1 billion although Sun has subsequently suggested that he is just an advisor to the crypto exchange business. The acquisition was made by About Capital Management, an entity associated with the controversial crypto entrepreneur.In May of this year, Sun claimed that Wei Li, a brother of Huobi founder Leon Li, had unjustly profited from the sale of Huobi’s native HT token. The disagreement escalated and as a consequence of that conflict, it became apparent that the acquisition agreement explicitly prohibited the buyer from using the “Huobi’’ trademark.Leon Li accused the cryptocurrency exchange of violating the acquisition agreement’s rules by unauthorized use of the “Huobi” trademark. This legal battle has shed light on the strained relationship between Leon Li and Justin Sun.The court’s decision adds a layer of complexity to Huobi Global’s legal challenges, intensifying existing regulatory issues. Notably, the cryptocurrency exchange is already grappling with a recent order from Malaysian authorities to cease operations in the country due to alleged illegal activities.The ruling comes at a critical juncture for Huobi Global. In September the business rebranded to HTX, signaling aspirations for global expansion amidst a shifting legal landscape. At the time, Justin Sun provided the rationale behind the rebrand. Taking to the X social media platform, he wrote:“It’s very hard for foreigners, Westerners, to pronounce ‘Huobi’… It doesn’t make any sense to them.” Sun went on to explain that the word Huobi means fire and coin in Chinese, adding, “That’s why we rebranded as HTX for international branding.”In light of this trademark infringement injunction decision, it could equally be speculated that the company was acting in advance of an unfavorable ruling in compliance with the terms of the business acquisition agreement.In reaching a decision on the matter, Judge Mimmie Chan J noted the lack of a defense mounted by Huobi against the trademark infringement action.