North Korean Hackers Take Off With $100M Atomic Wallet Honeypot

Korean Travel Rule Solution Provider CODE to Start Charging Monthly Fees Next MonthSouth Korean Travel Rule solution provider CODE, established in collaboration between local cryptocurrency exchanges Bithumb, Coinone, and Korbit, has announced the implementation of service fees starting next month. Up until this point, CODE has been offering its services free of charge. The notification regarding this change was issued to CODE’s clientele, which includes various crypto exchanges, as reported by local tech news outlet Digital Daily.Photo by Kenny Eliason on UnsplashTravel RuleThe Travel Rule regulations, set by the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) and Korean legislation, require Korean trading platforms to maintain records of both the sender and recipient’s information for virtual asset transactions exceeding 1 million KRW ($780). The FATF, founded in 1989 and headquartered in Paris, is an international financial watchdog dedicated to combating global money laundering and terrorist financing.More competitive priceCODE is anticipated to offer its services at a more competitive price of 1 million KRW ($780), in contrast to its rival VerifyVASP (VV), which introduced a monthly fee of $1,800 earlier this year. VV is a product developed by Lambda 256, a subsidiary of Dunamu, the parent company of Upbit, the largest cryptocurrency exchange in Korea.CODE launched its services in March last year. Among its crypto exchange members are Gopax, Cashierest, and Coredax. In December, the Travel Rule solution provider appointed Lee Sung-mi, the former compliance officer of Bithumb, as its new CEO, and since then, it has accelerated its monetization plan. Prior to Lee’s appointment, Coinone CEO Cha Myung-hun had been at the helm of CODE.

Japan’s Financial Services Agency (FSA) is moving to close gaps in crypto regulation and support a new bank-led stablecoin pilot, as markets watch for a potential Bank of Japan rate hike. Tougher oversight of crypto lending and IEOsAccording to a CoinPost report, at the fifth meeting of its Digital Asset Working Group held last week, the FSA discussed introducing new requirements to bring crypto lending clearly within the regulatory framework. While firms managing or staking crypto must register as exchanges, some operators have avoided registration by structuring services as borrowing schemes, which are not legally treated as asset management.Photo by Possessed Photography on UnsplashThe FSA flagged that users face both credit and volatility risks, yet operators are not required to segregate customer assets or use cold wallets. Some services offer returns around 10% or tie up funds for several years, with weak risk management and exposure to re-lending defaults and staking slashing. Under the new policy direction, operators will need stronger risk management for re-lending and staking, tighter custody controls, and clearer risk disclosures and advertising. Institutional-only borrowing not offered to the public will remain exempt. Some members questioned whether the new requirements would be practical to implement for off-chain operators, noting that staking is fundamentally on-chain. The group also examined initial exchange offerings (IEOs) lacking financial audits, particularly those aimed at retail investors. Members discussed limits similar to equity crowdfunding: investments over 500,000 yen ($3,000) capped at 5% of annual income or net assets, up to 2 million yen ($13,000). Most past domestic IEOs were under 500,000 yen ($3,200). Some warned such caps could be bypassed through secondary trading, where tokens are immediately tradable. Major banks pilot stablecoinAlongside stricter rules, the FSA will support a stablecoin pilot led by MUFG Bank, Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation, and Mizuho Bank. CoinDesk Japan noted the project, the first under the Payment Innovation Project, will include three additional participants. Mitsubishi Corporation will oversee operations, while Progmat and Mitsubishi UFJ Trust and Banking will handle issuance and custody. The pilot, launching this month with implementation targeted within the year, will test whether a joint stablecoin by major banks can navigate regulatory and operational challenges. Rate hike speculation mountsJapan’s calibrated digital asset push comes as speculation grows over a possible Bank of Japan (BOJ) rate hike next month. Minutes from the BOJ’s October meeting, cited by South Korean outlet Edaily, show one board member saying most conditions for a hike have been met and that financial conditions would stay easy even after an increase. The BOJ kept its rate at 0.5% at that meeting. A rate hike was described as likely if firms are seen committing to wage increases ahead of next spring’s labor talks and if no major global shocks emerge. Markets, however, remain cautious, citing uncertainty over U.S. tariff effects and whether newly elected Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi will endorse such a hawkish stance. 

Binance Thriving in China Despite Crypto BanWhen China cracked down on cryptocurrency trading in 2021, it seemed like Binance, the world’s largest crypto exchange, would have to leave the country behind. However, nearly two years later, an investigative report carried out by the Wall Street Journal finds that business is thriving for Binance in China.Photo by Hanson Lu on Unsplash$90 billion in monthly tradingThe report, which was published on Wednesday, reveals that users managed to trade a staggering $90 billion worth of cryptocurrency-related assets in China within just one month.Internal data, shared with The Wall Street Journal and corroborated by current and former employees, unveils this underground activity. Remarkably, these transactions propelled China to become Binance’s largest market, accounting for a massive 20% of global trading volume, excluding trades by a subset of major traders.Almost one million active Chinese usersDespite the supposed ban, Binance’s internal discussions highlight the pivotal role China still plays for the exchange. Current and former employees indicate that Binance’s investigations team collaborates closely with Chinese law enforcement. This partnership aims to identify potential criminal activities among the 900,000+ active users in China, underscoring Binance’s efforts to maintain oversight.However, Binance now faces regulatory challenges tied to its secretive global operations. In June, the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filed a lawsuit against Binance and its Founder, Changpeng Zhao (CZ), alleging illegal operations and misuse of customer funds.Meanwhile, the Justice Department is conducting its own investigation. A report by Semafor on Wednesday suggests that authorities are considering fraud charges but they’re concerned that such an eventuality may lead to a run on the exchange. This regulatory onslaught has seen Binance’s market share among US users plummet, leading to a reduction of over 1,000 jobs out of its 8,000-strong workforce.Circumventing regulationThe clandestine existence of Binance’s footprint in China offers insights into the exchange’s ability to function surreptitiously in unwelcoming environments. To circumvent restrictions, Binance directed Chinese users to visit local websites with domain names before rerouting them to the global exchange. This tactic allowed Binance to keep a foothold in China, even after the government blocked direct access to its website in 2017.China’s central bank, responsible for imposing the crypto ban, remained silent when questioned about these developments. Binance’s official stance is that its website is blocked in China and inaccessible to users there.Holding on to its China-based users is crucial for Binance as it navigates a treacherous regulatory landscape that threatens its future. The company’s history with China is intricate. CZ established the firm in Shanghai in 2017, only for the government to initiate a series of regulatory attacks on crypto exchanges soon after. This led to concerns about money being illicitly moved out of the country, and Zhao eventually relocated Binance’s operations to Japan.Despite this move, Binance retained a significant workforce in China, a decision that raised concerns among its US arm regarding data control. Binance’s Chinese heritage also attracted attention, with Zhao addressing the company’s challenge of being labeled both a “criminal entity” in China and a “Chinese company” in the West.Binance’s relationship with China remains complex. As the exchange navigates these murky waters, its ability to operate under the radar and maintain its foothold in markets like China will undoubtedly play a significant role in determining its future trajectory.