Korea Securities Depository Spotlights the Significance of a Security Token Platform

Grab Turns to Web3 With Crypto Wallet IntegrationGrab, the Singapore-headquartered Asian ride-hailing firm with a user base of 180 million people, is integrating a crypto wallet into its platform.That’s according to Chinese crypto reporter Colin Wu. Wu tweeted out news of the development on Thursday, including screenshots which he had obtained that provide further detail relative to Grab’s Web3 wallet.Often dubbed the “Uber of Southeast Asia,” Grab’s foray into Web3 technology could reshape how the region engages with cryptocurrencies. This move, initially available in Singapore, aligns with the city-state’s reputation as a fintech leader and developing crypto hub, suggesting it may serve as a testing ground for Grab’s crypto integration.Photo by Afif Ramdhasuma on UnsplashPolygon wallet integrationOne pivotal aspect of this integration is Grab’s support for the Polygon wallet, a layer-2 scaling solution for Ethereum. Known for its speed and low transaction fees, Polygon aids Grab’s venture into crypto, as these characteristics feed into its practicality for everyday crypto transactions. This strategic choice aims to make cryptocurrencies more accessible and usable for the masses.Venturing beyond paymentsIt seems like Grab’s ambitions extend beyond basic cryptocurrency payments. It is also setting the stage for users to explore non-fungible tokens (NFTs) and blockchain technology. The company has provided guidance content for wallets and NFTs which would suggest that Grab’s vision goes beyond mere transactions and that it sees the potential for NFTs in terms of transforming digital ownership and other such use cases.The Web3 wallet stands out in terms of user experience. Unlike traditional crypto wallets that are reliant on private keys, Grab employs a PIN password system. This simplifies the crypto experience. This is of particular importance when it comes to trying to find ways to bring Web3 and crypto into everyday use by the mass market.Additionally, Grab introduces an account recovery system based on questions and answers, in an effort to strike a balance between security and convenience.MAS collaborationAs part of the firm’s journey into Web3, it has been collaborating with the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS), the city-state’s central bank and financial regulator. Together, they’ve explored digital assets, central bank digital currencies, and innovative payment systems, and it also indicates that the company is working towards including a Web3 offering while remaining in regulatory compliance.According to the company’s Q2, 2023 results, Grab records an average of 34.9 million monthly transactions.By integrating a user-friendly crypto wallet, supporting Polygon, and exploring NFTs, it appears that Grab is aiming to empower its massive user base to participate in the digital asset revolution. With Singapore as the initial launchpad, Grab’s Web3 journey holds the potential to influence how the entire region embraces cryptocurrencies.In simplifying crypto access, supporting innovative technologies like Polygon, and educating users about NFTs and blockchain, the Singaporean firm is paving the way for a more inclusive and decentralized financial future in the region.

NiceHash targets Asian market through EasyMining platform launchNiceHash, a Slovenian bitcoin mining and hashpower marketplace, has launched its crypto mining platform in Asia, known as EasyMining.Cloud-based crypto miningEstablished in 2014 by two Slovenian university students, NiceHash stands as the largest cloud-based crypto-mining hashpower marketplace globally. Boasting over 250,000 daily active miners and a user base spanning 190 countries, the platform serves as a link between hashing power suppliers and consumers, operating within the framework of the sharing economy.NiceHash published a press release from Singapore on Tuesday to announce the Asian product launch. The company has already established collaborations in the region, with Singaporean mining equipment designer iPollo appearing as a featured partner on the firm’s website.Photo by Traxer on UnsplashProduct offeringAt the core of NiceHash’s offerings is the facilitation of crypto trading and global hashpower. It claims to provide an innovative and seamless connection between miners and hashpower providers. Whether it’s mining with CPU, GPU or ASIC equipment, platform users can engage in the process to earn cryptocurrencies or sell surplus computing power, presenting an opportunity for profit without the need for an extensive data center.NiceHash employs various security measures to ensure the validity and safety of transactions. These include SSL encryption, 2-factor authentication and email notifications, enhancing the security of accounts and payments. The cost of NiceHash mining is set at 0.001 BTC, offering a range of 34 mining algorithms and supporting various coins to cater to the interests of a broad user base.The firm offers a QuickMiner service, an automatic mining program that simplifies the mining process for subscribers. Through the use of this application, miners and hashpower renters can kick-start their operations immediately.Miners and providers have the ability to trade hashpower on the platform, with dynamic pricing adjusting every 10 seconds based on cryptocurrency values, hashpower availability and miner demand.For hashpower sellers, NiceHash offers the Profitability Calculator, a tool that enables users to calculate daily mining earnings by inputting their mining rig specifications and power costs. The platform supports CPU, GPU and ASIC mining, allowing miners to focus on the most profitable algorithm and token pairings.EasyMining, the latest addition to NiceHash’s repertoire and the product it is now offering in the Asian region, represents a significant step forward for the firm in simplifying cryptocurrency mining. The company claims that users can select their preferred cryptocurrency, letting the platform handle the mining process securely and effortlessly.Changing market conditionsCrypto platforms have had to be agile in 2023, as the underlying environment for crypto-centric offerings has been subject to rapid change in many jurisdictions. While NiceHash is making a concerted effort to etch out a market share within the Asian market through this product launch, it’s also had to withdraw its services from another market in recent months.On Sept. 27, the company informed its customers that it was withdrawing from the UK market. In a letter to users, it stated:”Due to the recent regulation changes in the United Kingdom we are no longer able to provide services to those residing in the United Kingdom.” . . . “We are working hard to be able to resume our services to UK residents as soon as possible.”The company withdrew all services from the UK market, including the exchange, mining, hashpower marketplace and wallets.

The Legal Future of South Korea’s Crypto Industry: Necessary Legislation and SystemsA recent National Assembly symposium organized by South Korea’s Digital Asset Policy Forum brought experts together to discuss the challenges and prospects of the implementation of the Virtual Asset User Protection Act at the National Assembly Members’ Office Building in Seoul on Tuesday.Photo by Tingey Injury Law Firm on UnsplashInternational modelsReferences were made to global examples, such as the Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) — the world’s first standalone virtual asset legislation enacted in the EU — which ensures transparency, disclosure, authorization, and supervision of crypto-asset transactions. However, unlike the capital market, MiCA does not impose regular disclosure reporting requirements or corrections on them. Firms in Japan, on the other hand, are asked to provide disclosure under autonomous regulation through the Japan Virtual and Crypto Assets Exchange Association (JVCEA).Notably, in its recent Policy Recommendations for Crypto and Digital Asset Markets Consultation Report, the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) states that it is “seeking to encourage optimal consistency in the way crypto-asset markets and securities markets are regulated within individual IOSCO jurisdictions, in accordance with the principle of ‘same activities, same risks, same regulatory outcomes’.” This principle refers to the concept that any crypto-asset activity that has a similar function and poses similar risks to those in the traditional financial system — such as operating a trading platform or providing custody services — is subject to regulation that ensures equivalent outcomes, as defined by the UK Parliament.The IOSCO report also suggests that crypto-asset service providers (CASPs) should disclose information regarding ownership and control of crypto-assets, issuer and business-related information, issuer management teams, transaction history and operational description of crypto-assets, token ownership concentration, transfer protocols, and a given CASP’s treatment of the client crypto-assets and their respective rights and entitlements during events like hard forks and airdrops.Hurdles to overcomeExperts at the forum reflected these considerations in their sentiments. Han Suh-hee, a lawyer at Barun Law Firm, emphasized that it is important to determine what kind of information should be disclosed. She argued that it is necessary to discuss to what extent information about virtual asset issuers should be disclosed and whether mandating firms to disclose their financial and business conditions is efficient.In particular, Han underlined the need to consider the differences between virtual assets and stocks when establishing a framework for the disclosure of virtual assets holdings. Unlike stocks, virtual assets possess distinctive characteristics like their borderless and decentralized nature, unclear issuer backgrounds, and the ability to conduct peer-to-peer (P2P) transactions.Lee Han-jin, a lawyer at Kim & Chang Law Firm, added that the enactment of Korea’s Virtual Asset User Protection Act was aimed at establishing a system directly targeted at regulating virtual assets and virtual asset service operators (VASPs) — a significant development from the Financial Transaction Reporting Act, which had until now been the only legal framework responsible for regulating VASPs along with other entities like casino business operators. Virtual assets are now subject to a more systematized regulatory approach.However, he said that the Virtual Asset User Protection Act still has its setbacks because it is undergoing a two-stage legislative process. Lee criticized the fact that the same definition of VASPs outlined in the Financial Transaction Reporting Act had been brought over, which limits their identity to transaction intermediaries, wallet operators, and custodians while overlooking their other roles like crypto management, crypto deposits, and crypto collective investments.Lee also pointed out another weakness: the scope of prohibition on using undisclosed information and market manipulation is broader in the Virtual Asset User Protection Act than in the Capital Markets Act. He argued that enforcement decrees should stipulate the definition of insiders and exceptional cases when deliberating on the prohibition of insider virtual asset trading.Lee thus emphasized the need for a clear definition of virtual assets in the Virtual Asset User Protection Act, as it is yet unclear whether they are objects or assets. All things considered, he believes there must be a law that can encompass blockchain-based decentralization, outline the similarities and differences between digital assets and financial products, and accommodate new services that utilize smart contracts.“We are in the process of creating a regulatory system similar to those being adopted in other countries based on their respective markets,” said Lee Seok-ran, head of the Financial Innovation Bureau at the Financial Services Commission (FSC). “Unlike the stock market, which is equipped with regulations to prevent fraudulent transactions and misconduct, virtual assets are traded on multiple exchanges, so we are considering how to interpret unfair trading activities and conduct market surveillance.”She explained that the commission is prioritizing user protection measures and subordinate regulations. “I believe we will be able to create a system for subordinate regulations on disclosure once an overall global trajectory is established. But before that happens, we are working on guidelines for defining unfair trading activities with regulators and the Digital Asset eXchange Alliance (DAXA).” Unfair trading activities associated with virtual assets include not only those conducted on exchanges but also under other circumstances.The FSC officer said that the financial authority is set to establish legal criteria to distinguish cases such as false statements in white papers of crypto projects. She added that enforcement decrees will define both the conditions for restricting deposits and withdrawals on crypto exchanges and the corresponding limits.