China Launches Digital Yuan ATMs in Hainan Resort City of Sanya

Disagreement has emerged within the Bitcoin blockchain community, revolving around the BRC-20 token standard. Domo, the pseudonymous developer behind the creation of the token standard, has publicly expressed his opposition to an upcoming upgrade proposed by the Hong Kong headquartered project, UniSat Wallet.Photo by Kanchanara on UnsplashDue diligence concernsOn Tuesday Domo took to the X social media platform (previously Twitter) to articulate his concerns. He voiced apprehensions about hastily implementing updates in BRC-20, asserting that such a rush could potentially harm the broader BRC-20 user community. Domo's resistance is rooted in his belief that UniSat Wallet's proposed updates lack due diligence and are being introduced precipitously without considering potential repercussions. He wrote:”Recognizing the serious implications and valuations involved, I believe rushing these updates in BRC20 is reckless, disregards their peer indexers, and could potentially harm the broader community of BRC20 users.” ‘Split’ rather than ‘fork’Conversely, UniSat Wallet has declared its intention to “follow the Ordinals Jubilee upgrade, to confirm that BRC-20 is still on Ordinals without splitting into an isolated protocol." Described as a "split" rather than a "fork," UniSat Wallet's approach adapts to the Ordinals Jubilee upgrade, a transformative change in how the Bitcoin blockchain manages tokenized assets. In mapping the way forward its proposing to take, UniSat outlined that it would publish a whitepaper on Jan. 31, describing it as “the most significant present we are able to deliver” for BRC-20, Ordinals and Bitcoin. The crux of the matter lies in the method and pace of implementing these changes. Domo's concerns reflect a broader sentiment within the crypto community, where the rapid pace of advancements often collides with the need for stability and thorough vetting. UniSat Wallet's proposed changes, though innovative, may be viewed as potentially destabilizing by certain community members, especially those deeply entrenched in the current BRC-20 standard. Striking a balanceThis development is pivotal, highlighting the dynamic and occasionally contentious nature of blockchain technology and cryptocurrency standards. Web3 project incubator and investor TrustlessLabs summed up the matter in a social media post on Wednesday, drawing the following conclusions:”This situation encapsulates a critical challenge in blockchain protocol development: finding the right balance between preserving stability and embracing technological advancements.” As technology evolves, divergent opinions on the trajectory of these advancements are inevitable. The ongoing debate between Domo and UniSat Wallet serves as a microcosm of the larger conversations transpiring in the crypto space about how to strike the right balance between progress and stability. The BRC-20 token standard, an experimental fungible token standard on Bitcoin, draws inspiration from Ethereum's ERC-20 standard. It allows the creation of fungible tokens using Bitcoin’s Ordinals protocol, constituting a significant breakthrough in cryptocurrency by enabling novel forms of tokenization on the Bitcoin blockchain. This disagreement not only spotlights a critical debate in the crypto realm but also emphasizes the delicate equilibrium between innovation and stability.  

At the end of last month, social derivatives trading platform ZKX, a protocol that runs on the Ethereum-centric Starknet layer-2 network, shut down blindsiding the project’s stakeholders. That event has led to Singapore-headquartered digital assets firm Amber Group speaking out, calling for cryptocurrency projects to be more accountable and transparent going forward. Not economically viableNews of the project shutdown emerged when ZKX founder Eduard Jubany Tur took to X on July 30 to outline the discontinuation of the protocol. Tur claimed that the project was “unable to find an economically viable path for the protocol.” In a long-form post, the ZKX founder outlined that user engagement had been minimal, resulting in disappointing trading volumes. By extension, Tur claimed that revenues didn’t come anywhere close to covering cloud server expenses. “The market is undervaluing the work done and infrastructure built by appchains and dApps coming from ecosystems like ours,” Tur added. Pseudonymous blockchain sleuth ZachXBT had a different take on the matter, claiming that the shutdown represented a rug pull. Amber Group chimed in on the subject on X on Aug. 3. Amber suggested that it wouldn’t break any contractual non-disclosure obligations it had with regard to ZKX but that aside, the firm took the opportunity to share its perspective more broadly in an effort to promote transparency.Photo by Markus Spiske on PexelsAmber Group criticismAmber Group criticized the ZKX team on the basis of a lack of transparency. It stated: “The last update we received was on July 30, when the project announced the cessation of operations. This decision was made without prior communication, highlighting the importance of transparency in our industry.” Staying with that theme, it claimed that clear communication and transparency are essential for fostering trust and collaboration within the crypto community, and that such principles would guide future projects. Amber Group had acted as a market maker relative to the ZKX project. It borrowed and purchased ZKX tokens in support of the launch of the token and in an effort to support token liquidity post-launch. It had secured two million ZKX tokens from the open market, with its overall holding totaling three million ZKX tokens. Project investor HashKey Capital also took to the X social media platform on the subject. Like Amber Group it too criticized the ZKX project for its lack of accountability and transparency. It described the project’s reluctance to communicate as “disappointing,” while it asserted that Tur’s handling of the situation had been “regrettable.” Ye Su, founding partner at ArkStream Capital, expressed a similar complaint, stating on X that “when ZKX shut down, as investors, we got zero heads-up.” He also singled out Tur, claiming that “Edward took the money from early supporters without any communication, showing no moral standards and losing his right to future entrepreneurship in the industry.”

Hong Kong Launches Web3 InstituteThe Institute of Web3 Hong Kong has recently been established with the aim of promoting and developing Web3 technologies, including blockchain and other decentralized technologies. That’s according to a report that was published by the Hong Kong China News Agency (HKCNA) last week.©Pexels/Zetong LiPromoting Web3 developmentThe Institute of Web3 Hong Kong aims to promote the development of Web3 technologies by providing education, research, and development support to individuals and organizations interested in these technologies. It will also serve as a platform for collaboration between different stakeholders in the Web3 ecosystem, including developers, entrepreneurs, investors, and regulators.The institute is being led by Joseph Yam, the former Chief Executive of the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA), and is expected to play a key role in the growth and development of Web3 in Hong Kong and beyond.Yam is well-known for his expertise in financial regulation and has been a strong advocate for the adoption of blockchain technology in the financial industry. In his new role as the head of the Institute of Web3 Hong Kong, he is expected to use his experience and knowledge to promote the adoption of Web3 technologies in Hong Kong and the wider Asia-Pacific region.Developing financial centerThe establishment of the Institute of Web3 Hong Kong is seen as a significant development in the growth of the Web3 ecosystem in Hong Kong. Hong Kong is already known for its strong financial industry, and the adoption of Web3 technologies could further enhance the city’s position as a leading financial hub in the region. The institute’s focus on education and research will also help to develop a skilled workforce that can support the growth of the Web3 industry in the future.The institute is expected to work closely with the Hong Kong government and other stakeholders to create a regulatory framework that supports the growth and development of Web3 technologies. This is important, as regulatory uncertainty is often cited as a barrier to the adoption of blockchain and other decentralized technologies.Precursor to investmentThe establishment of the Institute of Web3 is also expected to attract more investment in the Web3 industry in the region. The institute’s focus on education and research will help to create a favorable environment for startups and other organizations that are developing Web3-based applications.While China has not been a crypto-friendly region in recent years, there are increasing signs that Chinese officials are content to see Hong Kong develop as a hub for Web3-based technologies while keeping the sector under much stricter control within mainland China. Chen Dong, Deputy Director at the Liaison Office of the Central People’s Government in Hong Kong has publicly praised Hong Kong’s push to become a regional center for Web3 innovation. Meanwhile, Li Feng, the Chairman and CEO of China Mobile, has been installed as the non profit’s honorary chairperson.The establishment of the Institute of Web3 Hong Kong is a significant development in the growth and development of Web3 technologies in the Asia-Pacific region. The institute’s focus on education, research, and collaboration will help to promote the adoption of Web3 technologies and create new business models in various industries. With the leadership of Joseph Yam, the institute is expected to play a key role in the growth of the Web3 ecosystem in Hong Kong and beyond.