Crypto.com Halts Institutional Exchange Service in the US

SBINFT, a Web3 subsidiary of the Japanese financial giant SBI Holdings, is launching a proof-of-concept experiment in collaboration with Obayashi Corporation, a major Japanese construction firm. The initiative, scheduled to run from Feb. 1 to Feb. 28, 2026, aims to test whether non-fungible tokens (NFTs) can drive user engagement and support community development. According to a press release distributed via PR Times, the project will use SBINFT Mits, the company’s NFT marketing platform, within the framework of Minmachi SHOP, a platform operated by Obayashi. Minmachi SHOP allows users to vote on, book, and purchase various goods and experiences—ranging from prepared meals to workshops—hosted in temporarily reserved spaces within offices and nearby buildings.Photo by Andrey Metelev on UnsplashPolygon-based NFTs underpin membership systemThe upcoming experiment introduces a blockchain-based membership system to this ecosystem. Users will create accounts on SBINFT Mits and receive a membership card NFT issued on the Polygon blockchain. This digital asset will serve as a dynamic record of their engagement within the Nakanoshima–Yodoyabashi area. During the trial, users can increase their membership rank through activities like utilizing services offered through Minmachi SHOP and inviting new users to the platform. These interactions are recorded as metadata on the blockchain. The companies aim to evaluate whether this on-chain data—stripped of personally identifiable information—can serve as an objective metric for community development. While specific incentives are still being finalized, higher membership ranks may unlock benefits such as discounts, access to exclusive services, or invitations to restricted events. EXPO2025 legacy program seeds partnershipThe partnership emerged from the MUIC Innovation Co-Creation Program, an initiative organized by MUIC Kansai, a foundation established by Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group and MUFG Bank. Designed as a hub for the EXPO2025 legacy, the program connects diverse stakeholders to foster social implementation platforms. Obayashi joined the program to explore how Minmachi SHOP could support community initiatives based on local demand. Simultaneously, SBINFT sought partners to test NFTs as incentives for sustained user engagement. Through program discussions, the companies identified NFT-based gamification as a potential mechanism to connect local governments, developers, and residents. The collaboration comes amidst a broader push by SBI Holdings into the digital asset space, even as executives voice concerns over Japan’s regulatory environment. In December, Tomoya Asakura, CEO of SBI Global Asset Management, criticized the slow pace of Japan’s cryptocurrency tax reform. According to DL News, Asakura warned on X that Japan risks falling behind jurisdictions like the U.S., Asia, and the Middle East due to a tax regime that levies up to 55% on crypto profits and prohibits loss carryovers. Although the Financial Services Agency (FSA) has signaled its intent to reclassify crypto as an investment vehicle—potentially lowering the tax rate to a flat 20% in line with traditional assets like stocks—legal amendments are not expected to take effect until 2028, reflecting the time required to revise relevant laws and government ordinances. As Japan’s regulatory framework around crypto continues to evolve, SBI continues to expand its Web3 footprint. Asakura’s comments came after reports that SBI Holdings plans to launch a yen-backed stablecoin in the second quarter of this year through a partnership with Startale. Together with Sony Group, Startale established a joint venture called Sony BSL to launch Soneium, a public Ethereum layer-2 network. However, the conglomerate is also recalibrating its portfolio. In September, Bloomberg reported that SBI Zodia Custody, a joint venture with Standard Chartered’s Zodia Custody, would discontinue operations. The decision to close the venture, which was split 51% to 49% between SBI and Zodia respectively, was described by a Zodia executive as a strategic alignment rather than a withdrawal. An SBI spokesperson confirmed that the dissolution was an effort to generate greater collective impact across the company's digital ecosystem, rather than a retreat from crypto custody services. 

Bybit Extends Service Offering to Include LendingDubai-headquartered crypto spot and derivatives trading platform Bybit announced on Tuesday that it has expanded the range of services it offers to now also encompass crypto lending.Photo by Traxer on UnsplashHourly interestIn the announcement which has been published to the platform’s website, the company set out the nature of the Bybit Lending product. “With Bybit Lending, users can deposit their unused cryptocurrencies into Asset Pools, which will be lent out to borrowers,” the service update outlines.Expanding on the features that the new service offering brings with it, the crypto platform outlines that customers will have the ability to accrue interest on an hourly basis. That interest will be calculated at a variable rate, with a variance in the rate depending upon the level of borrowing activity. “In extreme cases where there are no borrowers at all, the interest rate could drop to 0%,” the company clarified.Low risk claimsBybit points out that “loaned assets are kept safe by Bybit’s strict risk management system, enabling you to earn returns with peace of mind.” While this is comforting to hear, it remains to be seen to what extent crypto market participants will take this statement at face value.2022 proved itself to be a graveyard for most of the leading crypto lending firms, and with that, such failures also proved to be a graveyard for the hard earned funds of retail market participants in their hundreds of thousands. Many are dubious about the integrity and sustainability of the crypto lending model, at least at a retail level.Withdrawal restrictionsBybit added that the product facilitates flexible redemptions. However, in an accompanying note, it added that the withdrawal of funds is dependent upon “ the funds in the Asset Pool [not being] fully lent out and you have not exceeded your Daily Withdrawal Limit.”It’s important to note that as many of the failed crypto lenders were getting further and further into difficulty in 2022, they added more arduous withdrawal limits and withdrawal conditions as a mechanism to stem the bleeding that was the outward flow of deposits against a backdrop of a deficit in customer funds held by these platforms.In further marketing of the product on Twitter, the company is claiming that customers can benefit from interest rates of up to 16.46%. While one could take the view that limited promotion of exceptionally high interest rates is harmless, the lesson learned from recent crypto lender failures is that such platforms were offering excessive and unsustainable interest rates as a mechanism to reel in retail deposits, only to later proceed to mismanage those funds.Competing offeringsBybit is not alone in offering this service. While a plethora of lending services exited the market via bankruptcy, exchanges such as OKX and KuCoin have their own variations on lending. OKX extends a loan facility to platform users proportionate to digital assets the user has deposited on the platform. Seychelles-based KuCoin offers a lending service across a broad spectrum of crypto assets.The intent of US based platforms Coinbase and Kraken in this regard has been retarded due to the actions of US regulators. Kraken fell foul of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) relative to its staking service and paid a $30 million fine as a consequence. Meanwhile, Coinbase shelved plans to launch lending-based services in September 2021 having been warded off the idea by the SEC.

Korean Financial Regulator Reveals Crypto Accounting Guidelines to Prevent Inflated Company ValuationsThe Korean Financial Services Commission (FSC) has announced new regulations to address accounting uncertainties in the blockchain industry, according to local news outlet KBS News. The rapid growth of the industry and the increasing impact of cryptocurrency transactions on corporate accounting have resulted in confusion due to the lack of clear guidelines.Last month, the National Assembly’s plenary session passed the Virtual Asset User Protection Bill, emphasizing the need for improved regulation. In line with this development, the FSC has introduced practical guidelines and measures to resolve accounting uncertainties.The FSC has introduced two measures to achieve this goal: virtual asset accounting guidelines and mandatory disclosure of virtual assets in annotations within financial statements.Photo by Beatriz Pérez Moya on UnsplashAccounting guidelinesThe virtual asset accounting guidelines state that when an issuer sells virtual assets to a customer, they must fulfill all obligations, such as the sales process, in order to recognize it as revenue. Any costs incurred during the issuance of a virtual asset and the creation of its platform should be recognized as expenses, unless there is clear evidence that these activities specifically contribute to the development of the virtual asset. Additionally, any reserved virtual assets after issuance cannot be treated as assets on the company’s balance sheet. These guidelines aim to prevent companies from artificially inflating the value of their companies using virtual assets.When recognizing virtual assets as assets or liabilities, virtual asset service providers (VASPs) must consider the concept of economic control. Economic control refers to the entity’s authority to dispose of a virtual asset without needing customer authorization.Virtual assets in annotationsFurthermore, companies are obligated to disclose their virtual asset transactions and holdings in annotations to the financial statement. This requirement ensures that users of corporate accounting information have sufficient details. Public companies holding virtual assets for investment purposes must state the basis for classifying the assets as assets or liabilities. They must also provide the book and market values of their virtual assets in their financial statements.Companies that have created or issued virtual assets are required to provide comprehensive information about the quantity and characteristics of these assets. They must also explain their revenue recognition methodology in the event of asset sales. Companies must provide disclosure regarding the historical utilization of cryptocurrencies that have been issued but remain unsold. This disclosure includes various factors such as portfolios and volumes.VASPs must disclose the volume and market value of virtual assets entrusted to them by customers for each asset, regardless of whether these assets are recognized as assets or liabilities. VASPs also have to provide information about the level of protection measures they have implemented to mitigate risks such as hacking.The FSC expects that these measures will enable readers of financial statements to make meaningful comparisons between VASPs while ensuring the provision of reliable information.The accounting guidelines, after incorporating industry feedback, are expected to undergo deliberations and resolutions by both the accounting standards review committee and the Korean Securities and Futures Commission, as per local news outlet Kyunghyang Shinmun. Once the guidelines receive final approval, they will be promulgated and implemented immediately. This process is anticipated to take place between October and November.Meanwhile, the inclusion of virtual asset disclosures in the annotations of financial statements will be enforced next January.