AliExpress Partners With ‘The Moment3!’ NFT Project

The United Arab Emirates (UAE) is updating its tax policy such that cryptocurrency-related transfers and conversions will be exempt from value-added tax (VAT).  News of the policy change emerged via the UAE’s Federal Tax Authority (FTA), which published an Arabic version of the updated tax code on Oct. 2, followed by the publication of an English version on Oct. 4.Photo by Darcey Beau on UnsplashExemption backdated to 2018British multinational consulting firm PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) published a review of the UAE tax code update on Oct. 4. The auditing firm noted that virtual assets are defined within the UAE tax code as a “representation of value that can be digitally traded or converted and can be used for investment purposes.”It noted that Article 42 of the update dealt with the crypto VAT exemption. The firm suggested that entities dealing with crypto should “analyze the impact of the exemption on their (retrospective) VAT position, especially in respect to their input tax recovery,” adding that voluntary disclosures may be required to correct previous tax returns. Additionally, a VAT exemption has been introduced on services extended to fund managers relative to licensed funds. Younis Haji Al Khoori, a UAE Ministry of Finance official, stated that the amendments have been made with a view towards easing the burden on businesses. He stated:“These amendments help minimise misunderstandings, simplify procedures, and ultimately contribute to an improved quality of life for all.”  Crypto-friendlyAbdulla Al Dhaheri, CEO of the Blockchain Center in Abu Dhabi, commented on the development on X, stating:”The UAE, driven by visionary leadership, continues to set the global standard by becoming the number 1 destination for blockchain innovation. With the elimination of VAT on crypto transfers and conversions, the UAE reinforce their commitment to building a world-leading digital economy, attracting the best talent and investment from around the globe.” The UAE, and particularly Dubai and Abu Dhabi, have taken great strides forward in ensuring regulatory clarity for the virtual assets sector over the course of the past two years. Regulatory frameworks have been put in place, leading to many participants in the crypto sector praising the regulatory stance taken within the UAE.  This latest addition has equally being welcomed within the crypto sector. Many crypto sector participants have highlighted it as a wake-up call for other jurisdictions to follow suit or see crypto enterprises move to the UAE.  The Indian authorities, in particular, have an unfavorable tax policy in place relative to digital assets, with a 1% tax deducted at source (TDS) being applied. This latest development in the UAE prompted some to consider if India would learn from the UAE’s example. Earlier this year, the Indonesian tax framework, which subjects crypto assets to both income tax and VAT, was cited as the main reason for a slump in crypto trading. A recently published report by blockchain data platform Chainalysis found that the Middle East & North Africa (MENA) region accounts for 7.5% of crypto trading volume, with the report noting that the UAE, alongside Saudi Arabia, is showing a strong interest in decentralized platforms.

Regulatory crackdown as Hong Kong authorities act against crypto entitiesIn a recent move, the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) of Hong Kong has issued a public warning against suspected virtual asset-related frauds involving HongKongDAO and BitCuped, marking a significant crackdown on deceptive practices in the crypto space.The action taken by the SFC in conjunction with the Hong Kong Police Force was outlined in a notice published on Wednesday. The notice stated:“The SFC suspects HongKongDAO may be disseminating false and misleading information about itself and its business through online channels.”In relation to BitCuped, it stated: “The SFC notes that BitCuped claims on its website that ‘Laura Cha’ and ‘Nicolas Aguzin’ serve as its Chairman and Chief Executive Officer respectively, when in fact none of them has any affiliations with BitCuped.”Photo by Teodor Kuduschiev on UnsplashHongKongDAO’s alleged misinformationOperating under the name “Hong Kong Digital Research Institute,” HongKongDAO has faced accusations of disseminating false and misleading information. The SFC expressed concerns about the claims made by HongKongDAO, including assertions of licensing by the SFC, engagement in regulated activities since July 2020, and bids for a “Hong Kong Digital Currency Exchange Licence” related to the government’s stablecoins framework.The SFC contends that these claims are unfounded and could potentially mislead the public into believing that HongKongDAO’s services are officially sanctioned and legitimate.HongKongDAO seems to manage at least two Telegram groups, one in Chinese with over 10,000 members and the other in English with over 1,700 members. Within these groups, there appears to be a promotion of the purported “market” price and future market value of the HKD token, enticing investors to make purchases.Allegations of BitCuped false affiliationsSimultaneously, BitCuped has been accused of making fraudulent claims to enhance the credibility of its operations. The company falsely asserted affiliations with prominent figures Laura Cha and Nicolas Aguzin, claiming them as its chairman and CEO, respectively. However, the SFC has refuted these affiliations. Laura Cha is the Chairman of Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing Limited (HKEX), while Nicolas Aguzin is the Executive Director and CEO of HKEX.Taking proactive measures, the SFC has requested the Hong Kong Police Force to block access to the websites of both HongKongDAO and BitCuped. Cease and desist letters have also been issued to the operators of these websites, demanding the cessation of the sale of HKD Tokens offered by HongKongDAO.Series of crypto scamsFollowing the JPEX fraud allegations in September, Hong Kong faced another cryptocurrency exchange scandal involving Hounax in November. With at least 145 police reports filed and a sum of over HK$148 million ($19 million) involved, affected investors expressed frustration at what they deemed a slow response from regulatory bodies.These incidents have reignited discussions about the need for more robust cryptocurrency regulations in Hong Kong. The city’s aspiration to become a global hub for crypto innovation and adoption faces challenges due to a lack of clear and consistent regulation, leaving investors vulnerable to fraud and manipulation.In light of these developments, the SFC emphasized the importance of public caution regarding investment opportunities that seem too good to be true. The regulator urged vigilance against social media and instant messaging platforms where individuals, not investment professionals, might lure unsuspecting investors.

Singapore Elects Crypto Skeptic as PresidentGarnering 70.4% of all votes cast on Saturday, Singaporeans chose to elect Tharman Shanmugaratnam as their next president, a move that may have implications for Singapore’s outlook when it comes to digital assets.While many had hoped that he would be the nation’s first non-Chinese prime minister, the crypto industry has greeted his rise to this largely ceremonial role with mixed feelings. Shanmugaratnam’s previous stances on cryptocurrency and digital assets have been predominantly critical.Photo by Justin Lim on UnsplashFormer MAS ChairmanIn the past, the president-elect has referred to cryptocurrency as “slightly crazy” and “purely speculative.” His ascent to the presidency comes after a distinguished career that includes serving as the former finance minister, deputy prime minister, and chairman of the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS), the country’s central bank, from 2011 to 2023.Crypto platform collapsesIt was during his tenure at MAS that two prominent crypto companies, Three Arrows Capital (3AC) and Terraform Labs, faced catastrophic collapses.The demise of Terraform Labs, along with its TerraUSD (UST) stablecoin, triggered a severe “crypto winter” in May 2022, from which the industry is still struggling to recover. This downfall wiped out a staggering $500 billion in value over just two weeks, devastating the portfolios of numerous retail investors.The ripple effect of TerraUSD’s fall also engulfed 3AC, a significant cryptocurrency hedge fund headquartered in Singapore. The contagion spread across the cryptocurrency market, leading to the downfall of other major entities like crypto lending platforms Celsius Network and Voyager Digital, alongside Singapore-based Hodlnaut.Given that these catastrophic events unfolded during Shanmugaratnam’s tenure at MAS, it’s plausible that he bore the brunt of the consequences. That might explain why in speaking on the subject in 2021, he appeared to be more accommodative, suggesting that there may be a useful role that crypto could play and highlighting that Singapore had allowed crypto businesses to develop within the city-state.In June of last year, MAS reprimanded 3AC for providing misleading information and exceeding the allowed assets under management (AUM) threshold, thereby breaching its status as a registered fund management company.In January, Shanmugaratnam said that regulating the crypto sector would give credibility to speculation and on that basis, it would be best to leave it unregulated. He went on to suggest that crypto should be subject to existing regulation as laid down for traditional finance.Early stage concernsBack in 2018, when he was Singapore’s finance minister, Shanmugaratnam questioned the wisdom of broad regulation potentially legitimizing a speculative and “slightly crazy” market. During the 2018 World Economic Forum, he emphasized the importance of anti-money laundering measures and advocated for educating consumers about the risks inherent in the unregulated crypto sector.Although he acknowledged blockchain’s potential to enhance global payment systems, Shanmugaratnam favored integrating existing traditional payment mechanisms as an alternative to blockchain innovations.Singapore’s new president brings with him a history of skepticism towards cryptocurrency and digital assets. However, with a largely ceremonial role relative to day-to-day governance, he’s not in a position to take direct action that could hold the sector back although he will have the power to initiate corruption investigations upon the advice of the Singaporean cabinet.