Singapore’s Whampoa Plans Crypto-Friendly Bank in Bahrain

Seoul prosecutors charge eight suspects linked to crypto price manipulationEight individuals involved in a cryptocurrency fraud, which is separate from a murder case associated with the same token, have been formally charged and referred to court by public prosecutors in South Korea.The Joint Virtual Asset Crime Investigation Unit of the Seoul Southern Prosecutors’ Office has recently disclosed the arrest of two key figures in the scandal related to a cryptocurrency called Puriever (PURE). The unit apprehended the chief executive of the PURE issuer, referred to as “A” for anonymity, and a market manipulator. Both have been charged with fraud. In addition to these arrests, the prosecution has charged six other individuals–including an executive from a cryptocurrency consulting firm, anonymously named “C,” and a broker. These additional suspects have been charged but not arrested.Photo by Adam Śmigielski on Unsplash$16 million from over 6,000 victimsThe prosecution has accused the suspects involved in the PURE case of illicitly inflating the token’s price through deceptive disclosures and market manipulation during April and May 2021. This scheme reportedly enabled them to amass illegal profits totaling KRW 21 billion (close to $16 million) from approximately 6,100 victims. In March of this year, it came to light that the PURE was at the center of a series of criminal activities, including kidnapping and theft, which ultimately led to a murder in Gangnam, Seoul.The prosecution has uncovered that “A” and “C,” key figures in the PURE scandal, transferred 55.2 million PURE to a partner company under the guise of an initiative to reduce air pollution, as falsely stated in their disclosure. The suspects reportedly employed a skilled manipulator to inflate the token’s price artificially. Once the price peaked, they sold off the tokens, capitalizing on the artificially inflated value.Circulation supply manipulationThe case reveals a collective scheme orchestrated by a token issuer, a consulting entity, a broker, and an experienced market manipulator. A key tactic in their scheme involved locking their cryptocurrency wallet to artificially limit the token’s circulation supply. Furthermore, these fraudsters employed a bot to perform wash trading, which boosted the daily trading volume of the token. This strategy created a false impression of high demand and activity in the market.A representative from the prosecution emphasized that the cryptocurrency market is more susceptible to manipulation than the stock market. This vulnerability is attributed to the lack of a monitoring and supervision system in the crypto sector, despite its speculative nature. In response to these challenges, the prosecution has expressed a firm commitment to enhancing its crypto investigation capabilities with the goal of effectively combating criminal activities. These efforts are aimed at fostering a fair and transparent trading environment, safeguarding the integrity of the cryptocurrency market.

Hitachi collaborates with Concordium on biometric crypto walletJapan’s Hitachi Solutions, a subsidiary company of the Hitachi multinational conglomerate, has joined forces with the Concordium Foundation, unveiling a collaboration that centers on a state-of-the-art biometric crypto wallet.Photo by Nuno Antunes on UnsplashAlternative approach to securing cryptoAnnounced on Tuesday by the Concordium Foundation, a Swiss-based development team behind the Concordium layer one blockchain, this “proof of technology” initiative has the potential to fundamentally change how users access and secure their cryptocurrency accounts.Breaking away from traditional methods, the proposed biometric crypto wallet leverages users’ fingerprints or facial scans to generate a set of seed words, eliminating the need for users to store or remember them. This novel approach simplifies the restoration process, allowing users to recover their accounts with a mere biometric scan.Improving UXIf crypto and Web3 are to be adopted by ordinary people en-masse, user experience has long been identified within the sector as an area that still requires development. Making users responsible for the storage of a private key is fraught with difficulty, given the likelihood of private keys being lost or compromised.Various approaches are being taken to solve this issue. Tangem Wallet is one such alternative that utilizes near-field communication (NFC) in combination with an app and a card with an inbuilt chip, negating the need for the user to memorize a private key.This biometric-centered approach from Hitachi and Concordium represents another user-friendly approach to the problem of user authentication, harnessing the power of Hitachi’s Public Biometric Infrastructure (PBI) and Concordium’s self-sovereign identity framework. The result is an account creation process based entirely on biometric data, enhancing both security and user convenience.Complementary technologyConcordium’s network, with its stringent ID process for account creation to combat malicious activities, stands to gain substantial benefits from this technology. The biometric wallet will fortify users’ access to their IDs, a critical aspect of network security. Moreover, the technology’s applicability extends beyond Concordium, offering potential integration with any blockchain network.Users of the biometric wallet will have the flexibility to unlock their accounts either by regenerating seed words through a biometric scan or by decrypting a copy of the seed words. This dual-layered approach ensures that access is granted solely through the user’s unique biometric data, enhancing security and mitigating the risk of loss or theft.Developing this cutting-edge technology poses challenges, particularly in handling the inherent “fuzziness” of biometric data, where no two scans produce identical results, even from the same individual. Hitachi’s team addressed this by employing fuzzy key generation and specialized error correction technology, effectively distinguishing between scans.Unlike traditional crypto wallets that necessitate secure storage of seed words, the biometric wallet by Hitachi and Concordium, alongside solutions like multiparty-computation wallets and magic links, aims to overcome this hurdle. The goal is to resolve the issue of lost backup, a significant barrier to wider crypto adoption.This is not Hitachi’s first foray into the crypto/blockchain space. In mid-November the company announced a collaboration with the Japan Exchange Group (JPX), banking giant Nomura and Nomura portfolio company BOOSTRY to launch a $69 million digital green bond on the blockchain. In October Hitachi joined a consortium of Japanese companies with a view towards developing decentralized identity technology.

South Korean FSC updates definition of virtual assets and VASP regulations for Virtual Asset User Protection ActThe South Korean Financial Services Commission (FSC) on Monday (local time) published a new enforcement decree and supervisory regulations for the Virtual Asset User Protection Act, under which non-fungible tokens (NFTs) and deposit tokens are excluded from the definition of virtual assets. The act serves to protect customer assets, prevent unfair trading practices, and enforce penalties.“The enforcement decree and supervisory regulations provide detailed standards and methods to safeguard users’ assets and establish stability in the market,” the FSC said.Photo by Tingey Injury Law Firm on UnsplashDefining virtual assetsThe agency explained that it decided to exclude NFTs because they are mainly bought and sold for collection purposes, posing low risks to holders and the financial system. However, NFTs that can be used as a means of payment for purchasing certain goods and services are considered virtual assets. On the other hand, deposit tokens — which will be managed by the Bank of Korea’s central bank digital currency network — are regarded as a legitimate form of monetary deposit and are subject to relevant regulations instead of the User Protection Act. Other “electronic certificates of economic value,” such as mobile vouchers and electronic bonds, are also excluded from the definition of virtual assets.Enhancing security and transparencyFollowing the clarified definition of virtual assets, the updated regulations underline conduct measures that virtual asset service providers (VASPs) must comply with. For example, VASPs must calculate the total value of their customers’ crypto assets every month and store at least 80% in a cold wallet to prevent infringements like hacks — a boost from the current 70 percent. Cold wallets are deemed more secure than hot wallets because they keep crypto keys offline instead of staying connected to the internet.VASPs are also not allowed to arbitrarily block deposits and withdrawals of user assets without prior notice and a justifiable reason like internal system failure or hacks as well as requests from courts, investigative bodies, the National Tax Service and financial authorities. User deposits must be stored in banks, which can invest them only in safe assets such as government bonds.The act is set to take effect on July 19 next year after a legislative review scheduled for next month.