Singapore’s Whampoa Plans Crypto-Friendly Bank in Bahrain

The South Korean government and the Democratic Party of Korea (DPK) plan to finalize legislation governing Korean won–pegged stablecoins by March. According to local media outlet DataNews, the two sides will hold a closed-door meeting on Jan. 20 to discuss agenda items related to the proposed Digital Asset Basic Act, widely referred to as the second phase of South Korea’s cryptocurrency legislation. A key sticking point is who should be allowed to issue stablecoins. Financial regulators favor, at least initially, limiting issuance to consortia in which banks hold a majority stake (50% plus one share), citing concerns about financial-market stability. The Democratic Party, however, opposes granting banks majority control. Separately, the draft would require issuers to meet capital-adequacy standards and maintain reserves equal to at least 100% of outstanding stablecoins.Photo by Greg Willson on UnsplashCBDC pilots to streamline public fundsBeyond private stablecoins, the government is also exploring potential public-sector uses for central bank digital currencies (CBDCs), including pilot programs that would deploy CBDC-based deposit tokens. As part of a broader digital transformation push, officials aim to use CBDC rails for a significant portion of public funds administration. By June, CBDC-based deposit tokens are set to be used in an electric vehicle charging infrastructure project: buyers of approved chargers would receive tokens to help ensure subsidies go only to eligible purchases and to shorten settlement times. Regulators are also considering steps to expand institutional access to cryptocurrencies. Under one proposal, publicly listed companies would be allowed to invest up to 5% of their equity in digital assets annually. Eligible investments would be limited to the top 20 tokens traded on the country’s five largest exchanges, with the list reviewed every six months. It remains undecided whether stablecoins, including USDT, would be included. Another planned change would permit the trading of exchange-traded funds (ETFs) that track spot crypto prices. While current law does not recognize digital assets as eligible underlying assets for such products, that is expected to change under the forthcoming legislative revision. Exchanges say caps threaten growthAt the same time, proposed governance changes that could cap controlling stakes at around 15% to 20% have drawn pushback from industry groups. The draft Digital Asset Basic Act would reshape control structures at South Korea’s largest cryptocurrency exchanges—Upbit, Bithumb, Coinone, and Korbit—which together serve roughly 11 million users. Regulators at the Financial Services Commission (FSC) say the measures are intended to curb concentrated influence by founders and major shareholders, and are considering a framework modeled on rules for alternative trading systems (ATS) under the Capital Markets Act. Yonhap News reported that the Digital Asset eXchange Alliance (DAXA)—which includes the four exchanges above as well as Gopax—has warned the proposed governance restrictions could slow the growth of South Korea’s crypto industry. The group argued the changes would dilute the accountability of a clear controlling shareholder, particularly regarding custody and management of customers’ digital assets. DAXA urged regulators to adopt a framework aligned with global standards, warning that stricter caps could increase uncertainty for startups and discourage entrepreneurship and investment. Investors pour $2.4B into overseas crypto ETFsThe lack of domestically available spot crypto ETFs has also driven Korean investors to seek exposure overseas. According to the Korea Securities Depository, as cited by Edaily, Korean investors bought a net $2.37 billion of foreign crypto ETFs between Jan. 13, 2025, and Jan. 12, 2026, placing these products among the top 50 overseas securities by net purchases over the period. Those purchases included a mix of spot-linked products, crypto futures–based instruments, and funds tracking companies that hold digital assets on their balance sheets. Several of the most heavily purchased products involved leverage or options-based strategies, including the T-REX 2x Long BMNR Daily Target ETF ($573.1 million) and the YieldMax MSTR Option Income ETF ($493.9 million). Leverage-heavy demand has been a recurring feature of Korean retail trading. In an October report, Bloomberg noted that prospective homebuyers have increasingly turned to crypto in hopes of building capital, fueling appetite for higher-risk altcoins. Such tokens account for more than 80% of trading volume on local exchanges. 

Hong Kong Lawmaker Explores Digital Asset Links With MainlandIn a move aimed at bolstering its position as a rising global Web3 hub, Hong Kong Legislative Council member Johnny Ng has expressed his aspiration to foster greater collaboration between digital asset platforms in Hong Kong and a Shanghai-based exchange.Photo by Simon Zhu on UnsplashDigital asset exchange interconnectivityAs Hong Kong continues to position itself as a key player in the emerging Web3 landscape, Ng envisions a future where licensed virtual asset exchanges in Hong Kong could be interconnected with their counterparts in Shanghai.Ng’s remarks came during an interview with Chinese media outlet The Paper. Drawing a parallel with the established Shanghai-Hong Kong Stock Connect program that seamlessly connects the stock markets of both cities, Ng raised the question of whether a similar connection could be established for licensed digital asset exchanges. Ng’s idea hinges on the potential to bridge appropriate platforms in Shanghai with those licensed in Hong Kong for virtual asset trading.Interconnected talent poolThe lawmaker’s enthusiasm for interconnectivity also extends to the talent pool. He expressed his desire for more Web3 talent exchanges between Hong Kong and the mainland, recognizing Shanghai’s status as a financial hub boasting numerous exceptional financial enterprises.Hong Kong’s approach to the Web3 landscape stands in contrast to mainland China’s stringent cryptocurrency regulations. While China banned cryptocurrency transactions in 2021, Hong Kong has embraced crypto firms, even encouraging partnerships between these firms and local banks.This year, Hong Kong authorities unveiled a series of cryptocurrency-related policy statements, aimed at fortifying its stature as a global financial center. A significant step followed in December, when the Hong Kong Legislative Council passed an amendment introducing a comprehensive licensing framework for virtual asset service providers (VASPs).In a recent development underscoring Hong Kong’s pro-crypto stance, HashKey and OSL have become the pioneering recipients of licenses for retail trading under the new regulatory regime, which commenced on June 1.Differing policy approachesPeople following developments in crypto and Web3 in China and East Asia have been speculating if the strategic positive shift in Hong Kong towards developing as a regional hub relative to the sector is indicative of a softening in the approach of mainland China towards the industry. It appears that Hong Kong’s pursuit of crypto business has been sanctioned by Beijing.Commentators have been monitoring the emergence of further encouraging signals. In May, Chinese state television featured a segment that covered cryptocurrency and in particular Bitcoin. Binance CEO Changpeng Zhao (CZ) was sufficiently encouraged by the development to suggest that it was “a big deal,” although the clip was later removed from the broadcaster’s website.Ng’s proposal aligns with the broader narrative of Hong Kong’s ambitious push into the Web3 landscape, capitalizing on its favorable regulatory environment to attract crypto-related ventures. As discussions evolve around the potential interconnectivity between Hong Kong and Shanghai’s digital asset exchanges, the global cryptocurrency community watches with interest to see if there are any emerging signs that Beijing will reciprocate positively.

Russia is moving closer to establishing a comprehensive legal framework for cryptocurrency, a regulatory shift intended to integrate digital assets into the mainstream economy while simultaneously cracking down on unlicensed market participants. Photo by Egor Filin on UnsplashCrypto enforcement slated for 2027According to a report from the Parliamentary Gazette, the new package of regulations is planned to be prepared by the end of June, while from July 1, 2027, liability for illegal activity by crypto intermediaries is expected to be introduced. Anatoly Aksakov, head of the State Duma’s Committee on the Financial Markets, said that the legislation is intended to establish clear rules for the market, including strict oversight of crypto exchanges. He added that the draft law could be considered in its first reading within the next month. While the legislation seeks to normalize digital assets, officials have emphasized that the market will not be a free-for-all. The proposed framework would introduce administrative, financial, and potentially criminal liability, with enforcement modeled on existing laws governing illegal banking activity. Aksakov noted in earlier comments reported by TASS that while crypto may become a fixture of daily life, it would have clear boundaries. The government plans to cap annual crypto purchases by retail investors at 300,000 rubles (approximately $3,800). This regulatory drive coincides with an increase in crypto’s role in Russia’s cross-border transactions. Following the invasion of Ukraine, Western sanctions severed Russian banks from the SWIFT messaging system, prompting Moscow to seek alternative channels for international settlements. New data suggests these alternative payment rails have gained rapid traction. A report by TRM Labs revealed that sanctions-related crypto activity in 2025 was dominated by Russia-linked flows, a trend driven largely by the explosive growth of A7A5, a ruble-pegged stablecoin. The firm reported that A7A5 processed over $72 billion in total volume that year, while a wallet cluster tied to the A7 sanctions evasion network A7 was connected to at least $39 billion. TRM Labs identified A7 as a key bridge between Russian entities and partners in China, Southeast Asia, and Iran, signaling a concerted effort to bypass U.S. dollar-based systems. Illicit volumes hit record $158BThese numbers come as illicit crypto usage rises worldwide. According to TRM Labs, criminal transaction volume hit a record $158 billion in 2025—a 145% increase over the previous year. Yet, despite this surge, illicit activity accounted for a smaller share of the total market, falling from 1.3% in 2024 to 1.2% in 2025. Beyond Russian sanctions evasion, researchers also highlighted the burgeoning scale of Chinese-language money laundering networks (CMLNs). TRM Labs identified Chinese-language escrow services and underground banking as a distinct, high-growth sector. Adjusted crypto volume for these networks rose from roughly $123 million in 2020 to over $103 billion in 2025. Meanwhile, Chainalysis offered a smaller estimate, finding that CMLNs processed $16.1 billion in illicit crypto funds in 2025. The firm estimates that the illicit on-chain laundering market has surged from $10 billion in 2020 to over $82 billion today. This growth is supported by a sharp expansion in infrastructure, with the ecosystem now utilizing over 1,799 active wallets. Over the past five years, these operations accounted for roughly 20% of all illicit crypto funds—a share that has grown faster than illicit inflows to centralized exchanges.