Japan’s Kumamoto City Bolsters Innovative Blockchain Startups

Hong Kong Broadens Pilot Program for China’s Digital YuanA senior Hong Kong official announced last week that the Chinese autonomous territory plans to expand its pilot program of the e-CNY, China’s digital yuan, to include additional banks and payment platforms.Photo by Chi Lok TSANG on UnsplashDriving cross-border payment efficiencyThe e-CNY project is China’s ambitious endeavor to bring a digital counterpart to its national currency, the yuan, into mass market, everyday use. The primary objectives of this latest initiative are to enhance the efficiency and convenience of cross-border payments and to bolster greater use of the digital yuan on an international basis.Given Hong Kong’s status as a special administrative region of China and bearing in mind that it is a global financial hub, its role in the e-CNY project is likely to be of paramount importance to the Chinese administration.Hong Kong has been actively involved in the e-CNY project for some time. Previously, the local regulator, the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA), and the People’s Bank of China (PBOC) jointly explored and tested e-CNY’s feasibility and interoperability in cross-border scenarios.Ongoing collaborationOver the years, these two authorities have conducted numerous technical trials to assess the practicality of implementing the e-CNY. The PBOC initiated e-CNY testing in mainland cities in 2019, followed by cross-border trials involving Hong Kong and Macau. Collaboration between Hong Kong and the mainland relative to the digital yuan was initiated in December 2020 when a pilot program was launched.That program enabled Hong Kong residents to utilize e-CNY wallets for purchases at specified merchants in Shenzhen, aligning at the same time with a separate initiative, the objective of which is to achieve closer economic and social integration between Hong Kong, Macau, and nine cities in Guangdong province.Hong Kong and Mainland China had also partnered on technical testing in 2021 aimed at evaluating the technical feasibility, operational efficiency, regulatory implications, and legal considerations of employing the e-CNY for cross-border trade settlement between the two areas. That testing program is likely to be providing valuable insights, which Chinese authorities can use to expand the e-CNY’s scope and use cases relative to cross-border transactions.Completion of initial testing phaseHong Kong recently successfully concluded the first phase of its e-CNY trial, featuring local banks and the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA). This phase primarily focused on assessing the technical feasibility of employing the e-CNY for cross-border payments between Hong Kong residents and mainland merchants.What Christopher Hui, Secretary for Hong Kong’s Financial Services and the Treasury, was referring to last week at a fintech event, is effectively the second phase of that overall trial program. This upcoming phase will involve a broader array of banks, payment service providers, and use cases, expanding the scope of e-CNY testing.Taking this latest development into account from the point of view of e-CNY development by the Chinese government, it’s patently obvious from the myriad of initiatives that keep coming week after week that the Chinese authorities are determined to drive the e-CNY towards ever greater real-world use.

Korea’s prominent crypto exchanges Bithumb and Korbit have recently resumed charging trading fees, local media outlet Edaily reported. However, these changes in fee policies are reinforcing Upbit’s dominant market position while downsizing Bithumb’s and Korbit’s market shares. Meanwhile, the local banks affiliated with crypto exchanges are benefitting from an uptick in fee revenue from the recent bitcoin boom. According to crypto data intelligence platform CoinGecko on Feb. 28, Upbit accounted for 77.4% of the local market share in crypto transactions, followed by Bithumb (20.43%), Coinone (1.73%), Korbit (0.35%) and Gopax (0.09%). Photo by Markus Winkler on UnsplashShifts in market sharesAs of March 2, the market shares of Bithumb and Korbit decreased by 8.59 percentage points and 0.21 percentage points, respectively. Conversely, Upbit’s dominance grew to 86.57%, up by over 9 percentage points. A Korbit official said it’s too early to pass judgment on Korbit’s market performance, as the exchange’s policies on trading fees could change depending on the market sentiment. The person added that CoinGecko tracks only eight types of tokens traded on Korbit and does not cover all the transactions on the exchange.  Bithumb had previously benefited from charging no fees, driving up its market share to as high as over 40% in December. Following the decision to impose a fee of 0.04% on Feb. 6, however, the exchange has been experiencing a drop in transaction volume. Korbit also reinstated trading fees last Thursday, roughly four months after eliminating them on Oct. 10 as a promotional move. However, it's worth mentioning that the newly introduced trading fee is 0.07%, which is lower than the earlier rate of 0.2%. Meanwhile, Gopax currently exempts fees for users who trade BTC, ETH, XRP and USDC.  No local regulations on fees for crypto transactions At the moment, there are no local regulations on fees for crypto transactions, leaving the task of setting such fees to individual trading platforms. It is known that crypto exchanges in other countries, such as the U.S., set their own rates as well.  

FTX Seeks Exclusion of Dubai Unit from Bankruptcy ProceedingsFailed crypto exchange FTX, which filed for bankruptcy in November, is now aiming to exclude its Dubai unit from the ongoing restructuring proceedings unfolding in the United States.Photo by Roman Logov on UnsplashNo previous business activityThe motion, filed with the bankruptcy court in Delaware on Wednesday, comes as FTX contends that its Dubai branch had not engaged in any business activities prior to the bankruptcy declaration, making its participation in the rehabilitation efforts unlikely.In the recent court filing on August 2, FTX put forth its argument that its Dubai unit, FTX Dubai, held a balance sheet that was solvent. Consequently, the exchange proposed that initiating a voluntary liquidation process in line with the laws of the United Arab Emirates (UAE) would expedite the distribution of its positive cash balance, settling liabilities, and liquidating assets.FTX Dubai, a wholly-owned subsidiary of FTX’s European arm, holds a sum of approximately $4.5 million across various accounts. However, $4 million of this amount remains restricted by the Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority (VARA) of Dubai, serving as a security measure for its license as a virtual asset service provider.Expired licensingFTX Dubai was originally awarded a license by VARA in July 2022, although it never got to a point where it offered any crypto-related services based on that license. On May 31 of this year, FTX Dubai management was informed by VARA that the regulator would not seek to renew the license if FTX Dubai didn’t act to terminate it. The license was subsequently suspended on July 12 by VARA.Licensing could have been useful to a new operator coming in to run the business. Earlier this week, the FTX Debtor filed a restructuring plan that leaves a path open towards relaunching the FTX International business outside of the United States. It’s clear that the current regulatory environment in the US is such that it’s simply not an attractive option to establish a restructured FTX business there.The FTX Debtor and its advisors are engaging with bidders for the business. In establishing a business on the right footing, it may be just as well that licensing will start afresh. To settle market doubts, the new entity will need to achieve a high level of compliance and industry-leading customer protections.FTX Dubai is now anticipated to collaborate with the designated liquidator to carry out essential administrative procedures, ensuring a systematic and efficient execution of the liquidation process. The company’s decision to file for bankruptcy on November 11, 2022, initiated bankruptcy proceedings for a total of 102 associated entities worldwide, reflecting the substantial impact of its financial turmoil.The matter is scheduled to be addressed in the court’s first hearing on August 23, shedding light on how the court will respond to FTX’s motion to remove its Dubai unit from the overarching bankruptcy proceedings in the US. This development underscores the complexities of a cross-border crypto bankruptcy, highlighting the intricacies of global regulatory frameworks in this evolving sector.