LINE Xenesis Introduces AVA, an Entertainment NFT Platform

Japan and China are moving in different directions on digital finance. In Japan, senior officials are signaling a push to bring cryptocurrencies further into the mainstream financial system. In China, regulators are doubling down on limits for private-sector tokenization even as the central bank expands a state-led digital currency model.Photo by Nat on UnsplashTraditional exchanges to anchor crypto pushSpeaking at the Tokyo Stock Exchange on Jan. 5, Japanese Finance Minister Satsuki Katayama framed 2026 as “the inaugural year of digital” in her New Year’s address, according to local outlet CoinPost. She said she expects cryptocurrency adoption to broaden as commodity and stock exchanges take on a larger role, arguing that established market infrastructure will be key to realizing the benefits of blockchain-based assets. Pointing to the U.S., she noted that exchange-traded funds are commonly used as an inflation hedge, and suggested Japan could move in a similar direction. Katayama also struck an upbeat tone on the wider economy, saying she expects Japanese stocks to hit new record highs this year. She cast 2026 as a potential turning point as Japan seeks to move beyond a long stretch of deflation, and called for responsible but proactive fiscal policy alongside targeted investment in growth sectors. Her comments come as Tokyo considers a major overhaul of how crypto gains are taxed. Under a government proposal, profits from cryptocurrencies would be taxed at a flat 20%, aligning them more closely with levies on stocks and foreign-exchange trading. The framework would also cover crypto-linked ETFs and derivatives. Currently, crypto gains are treated as miscellaneous income, leaving investors subject to progressive rates that can climb to roughly 55% once local taxes are included. The proposed reforms would bring crypto assets under the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act. While the package is slated for discussion during the upcoming ordinary Diet session, which is scheduled to begin on Jan. 23, officials do not expect it to take effect before 2028, given the scope of the required legal and regulatory changes. Industry groups flag RWA tokenization risksChina, by contrast, continues to take a restrictive stance toward private digital-asset activity. Seven major financial industry associations—including the National Internet Finance Association of China, the Banking Association, and the Securities Association—issued a joint statement warning that the tokenization of real-world assets (RWAs) is illegal and amounts to a “risky business model,” according to Wu Blockchain, citing a WeChat post published last month. The associations argued that RWA tokenization still functions as a form of unauthorized fundraising barred under existing securities laws. They also warned of risks tied to both the projects and their underlying assets, including fraud, operational failures, and speculative hype, adding that even when the assets themselves are legitimate, token structures remain unreliable and could pose spillover risks to other parts of the financial system. The statement added that such activities have not received regulatory approval. The warning fits with Beijing’s broader, state-led approach to digital finance. Last month, Lu Lei, a deputy governor of the People’s Bank of China (PBOC), warned that unchecked private-sector innovation could pose challenges for monetary policy, arguing that the rapid growth of digital assets and stablecoins risks weakening central banks’ control over money flows. Against that backdrop, Lu said the PBOC has rolled out a new operational framework for its central bank digital currency that took effect on Jan. 1. The move places the digital yuan in a deposit-like role within the commercial banking system under a two-tier structure, with the central bank overseeing rules and infrastructure and commercial banks handling wallets, payments, and compliance. By late November 2025, the digital yuan network had processed 3.48 billion transactions totaling 16.7 trillion yuan ($2.3 trillion), underscoring how China is channeling digital finance through a centrally controlled system. The system includes about 230 million personal wallets and 18.84 million corporate wallets. 

A couple of recent reports have revealed how North Korean hackers have been moving funds to a Cambodian crypto payments platform while further insight has come to light with regard to how these hackers are compromising crypto companies. Huoine PayOn July 15, Reuters reported that Cambodian currency exchange and payments firm Huione Pay had received in excess of $150,000 in digital currency from a wallet associated with notorious North Korean hacking group Lazarus. Analysis of blockchain data demonstrated that the funds had been received by the Phnom Penh-headquartered payments firm in June 2023 and February 2024. Photo by allPhoto Bangkok on Unsplash‘Pig butchering’It’s understood that Lazarus stole those digital assets from three crypto firms during the months of June and July of 2023. While Huione has suggested that it was oblivious to the origin of the funds, a blog article by blockchain analytics company Elliptic, published to its website on July 10, suggested that “Huione Guarantee is an online marketplace that has become widely used by scam operators in South East Asia.”  Elliptic went on to assert that some of these scammers employ “pig butchering” techniques, where fraudsters manipulate the victim into investing into fraudulent crypto schemes. It added that “merchants on the platform offer technology, data and money laundering services, and have engaged in transactions totaling at least $11 billion.” The National Bank of Cambodia explained to Reuters that the company is not permitted to trade crypto and that it "would not hesitate to impose any corrective measures" against Huione. The platform is believed to have strong ties to Cambodia’s ruling family. One of the firm’s three directors is understood to be a cousin of the Cambodian Prime Minister, Hun Manet. The Lazarus hacking group is believed to have masterminded a $305 million hack of Japanese cryptocurrency DMM Bitcoin in May of this year. Pseudonymous on-chain investigator ZachXBT claimed on X that $35 million of the proceeds had been laundered through the Huione platform. Compromising crypto businessesIn a related development, a report by DL News published on July 15 has found that North Korean hackers are employing a new tactic in order to compromise crypto businesses. The hackers are scanning the internet for job postings advertised by the companies they’re targeting and submitting bogus applications. A report by the United Nations Security Council has revealed that in excess of 4,000 North Koreans have taken up employment with international technology firms. Part of the social engineering-based tactics employed by the hackers includes contriving to get employees within targeted companies to install malware.  Oftentimes, the resumes and LinkedIn profiles of real people are used in order to find a way in via the recruitment process. A report by DeFiLlama suggests that $664 million has been lost via instances of crypto hacking within the first half of 2024. 

Binance Headlines List of Japan FSA Warning Letter RecipientsJapan’s Financial Services Agency (FSA) issued a warning letter on Friday stating that several foreign cryptocurrency exchanges have been operating in the country without proper registration, thereby infringing Japan’s fund settlement laws. The regulatory authority specifically named Binance, Bybit, MEXC Global, and Bitget as the entities in question.The FSA indicated that these exchanges need to register with the agency to continue operating in Japan. Failure to comply with the registration requirements would result in enforcement actions by the FSA, which could include the suspension of their operations in the country.©Pexels/David DibertUnregistered digital asset exchangesThe FSA’s warning letter detailed that the cryptocurrency exchanges mentioned had contravened Japan’s fund settlement regulations by engaging in crypto asset exchange operations without proper registration. The regulatory body emphasized that the current list of unregistered traders may not accurately reflect the current state of unregistered businesses in the country.The FSA intends to continue monitoring the market and taking appropriate regulatory measures to protect consumers and the integrity of the financial system. The agency also encouraged all unregistered operators to register with the FSA to avoid any possible enforcement actions.Clamping down on unregistered exchangesThe FSA’s recent action against unregistered cryptocurrency exchanges is in line with the regulatory body’s ongoing efforts to clamp down on non-compliant operators in Japan. In 2020, the FSA introduced new regulations mandating that all crypto exchanges must register with the agency and obtain a license to operate in the country. These regulations were put in place to strengthen consumer protection and enhance the transparency of the cryptocurrency market. By taking these measures, the FSA aims to foster a more stable and secure environment for the burgeoning crypto industry in Japan.The FSA’s warning to Binance is indicative of the growing regulatory scrutiny that the cryptocurrency industry in Japan and other nations is currently facing. Regulators are increasingly concerned about the potential risks associated with unregulated cryptocurrency exchanges, such as fraud, money laundering, and market manipulation. As a result, many regulatory bodies are implementing stricter rules and guidelines to promote transparency, accountability, and consumer protection in the cryptocurrency market.These regulations aim to create a more secure and reliable environment for investors and industry participants. The FSA’s actions against Binance serve as a reminder to all market players that compliance with regulatory requirements is critical for the long-term success of the cryptocurrency industry.Global regulatory variationWhile Japan is taking steps to implement new regulations for the cryptocurrency and Web3 sectors, the country has not been as stringent in its approach as some other major economies, such as the United States. However, this does not mean that regulators in Japan are not actively monitoring the industry and taking appropriate action where necessary.One example of such action is the recent lawsuit filed by the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission against the popular crypto exchange firm, Binance, and its founder, Changpeng Zhao, over regulatory violations. This highlights the fact that regulatory bodies in different parts of the world are taking a more proactive approach to monitoring the cryptocurrency industry.Moreover, the FSA in Japan issued a formal warning letter to Binance in 2021 for operating without the necessary permissions. This is an indication that the regulatory landscape in Japan is evolving, and that crypto exchanges must comply with the relevant regulations to avoid potential legal repercussions. While the severity of regulatory measures may differ across different jurisdictions, the message is clear: compliance is crucial for the long-term viability of the cryptocurrency industry.