BNP Paribas Partners With Chinese in Digital Yuan Push

Financial regulators in Hong Kong are moving towards the presentation of stablecoin legislation following the completion of a consultation process. In February of this year, that consultation process, which received 108 submissions from professional bodies and industry stakeholders, was completed. It was run jointly by The Financial Services and the Treasury Bureau (FSTB) and the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA), culminating in the publication of the results of the process.Photo by Pat Whelen on UnsplashLegislative proposal publishedOff the back of that prior body of work, the regulators have now published a legislative proposal, incorporating responses to issues that were brought to light via the consultation process. The regulators concluded that going forward, stablecoin regulation should be considered primarily in terms of those stablecoin assets which operate on a ledger which runs on a decentralized basis. Additionally, no individual or unilateral entity should have the ability to tamper with or control those assets or the network upon which they exist. On this basis, the regulators intend to submit a bill relative to fiat-referenced stablecoins for consideration to the Legislative Council at a later stage in 2024. Before submitting any legislative proposal, the regulators plan to once again consult with stakeholders prior to finalizing any such proposal. As part of what they have set out thus far, regulators are looking to include a requirement for any stablecoin issuer to obtain a license in Hong Kong.  Reserve asset requirementsThey remain open to the idea that reserve assets backing an issued stablecoin could be held in an overseas jurisdiction. However, if the issuer is an overseas entity, it will be required to establish a local corporate entity in Hong Kong, with relevant management personal based within the Chinese autonomous territory. In light of feedback received during the consultation process, the regulator is looking at reducing the attestation frequency that each stablecoin issuer will be required to provide via an independent auditor in order to verify that the stablecoins issued are backed by the requisite amount of liquid assets.  Such reserve assets must be segregated from the working capital of the stablecoin issuer’s business, with the HKMA expressing a preference for a trust-like structure following input via the consultation process. Furthermore, reserve assets must be deemed to be both high quality and highly liquid, which would include cash, bank deposits and government issued securities where counterparty risk is minimized. On the basis that the Hong Kong dollar is pegged to the U.S. dollar, the regulator is content to allow issuers to use USD-denominated reserve assets if they prefer to do so. The legislative proposal also stipulates the need for issuers to have a minimum share capital of HK$25 million or 1% of the value of stablecoin in circulation.  The HKMA foresees crypto exchanges, securities firms and regulated banks having the ability to offer stablecoins to customers, so such offerings won’t be confined to dedicated stablecoin issuers.Back in March the HKMA introduced a stablecoin sandbox with a view towards learning what works best from a regulatory standpoint. It’s understood that a list of participants will be announced in the near future. Participating entities will be able to issue stablecoins in Hong Kong within that controlled sandbox environment, prior to full scale implementation once stablecoin regulation has been fully legislated for.

EOS Granted Whitelist Approval by Japanese RegulatorsThe open-source layer-1 blockchain platform EOS has secured whitelist approval from the Japan Virtual and Crypto Asset Exchange Association (JVCEA).The EOS Network Foundation, an entity established with a view towards supporting and safeguarding the development of the EOS blockchain network, announced the approval via a blog post published to its website on Wednesday.EOS raised eyebrows with a staggering $4 billion initial coin offering (ICO) back in 2018. This approval will likely act as a shot in the arm for the project, given the period of relative stagnation that has followed the ICO.Photo by Paul MARSAN on UnsplashEOS price respondsThe approval paves the way for EOS to be traded against the Japanese yen, potentially opening up new avenues for the cryptocurrency’s adoption and utilization. The endorsement has had an immediate impact on the EOS token’s value, driving its price up by 5.54% over the course of the past seven days in a surge of market activity.At the time of writing, the EOS token is trading at $0.622 with an accompanying market capitalization of $696 million. This positive market response underscores the significance of regulatory greenlights in the cryptocurrency sphere.Mid-September trading launchThe Japanese Financial Service Authority (FSA) will oversee the regulation of EOS trading on local Japanese crypto exchange BitTrade, a well-established platform in the Japanese crypto space. The anticipated commencement of EOS token trading on BitTrade is slated for mid-September.The EOS development team is coming out the better end of its interaction with regulators in this instance. However, that hasn’t always been the case. In 2019 the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in the United States fined technology company Block.one, which at that time was responsible for the EOS ICO. All things considered, the sanction was recognized by most in the crypto space as being very much on the lighter end.Fostering Web3 growthJapan’s crypto ecosystem has been actively seeking ways to integrate and foster the growth of the Web3 industry. Its regulators have been lauded more recently, given that Japanese customers of failed crypto platforms like FTX were protected from those failures due to regulatory rules that insisted upon crypto platforms ring-fencing and safeguarding user funds.There have also been several initiatives taken to collaborate with international regulators on developing regulatory standards relative to digital assets. Earlier this month, the Japanese Financial Accounting Standards Foundation (FASF) met with the Korea Accounting Institute (KAI) to work on establishing accounting standards for digital assets.Japan’s Financial Services Authority (FSA) is also participating in Singapore’s Project Guardian, an initiative driven by the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) to explore the potential of digital assets.Prime Minister Fumio Kishida’s supportive stance on Web3, describing it recently as “the new form of capitalism,” further reinforces Japan’s ambitions to establish itself as a hub for cryptocurrency activities. This regulatory nod for EOS could potentially mark the beginning of a broader trend, attracting more projects and investments to the Japanese crypto sector.

A United Nations (UN) report published on Monday pointed fingers at USDT for its alleged role in money laundering and scams in Southeast Asia, prompting the stablecoin’s issuer, Tether, to respond.Photo by DrawKit Illustrations on UnsplashFighting backThe stablecoin issuer finds itself under the spotlight once again, facing intense scrutiny over its association with illicit activities, according to the UN report. Responding by way of a blog post, Tether expressed disappointment and pushed back against the accusations. The firm asserted that the report disproportionately focuses on USDT's alleged connection to illicit activities, neglecting to acknowledge the positive impact it has had on developing economies in emerging markets. Collaborating with law enforcementTether defended its position by highlighting its collaborative efforts with global law enforcement agencies, such as the Department of Justice (DOJ), the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and the recently onboarded United States Secret Service (USSS). The company expressed disappointment with the UN's assessment and stressed that its monitoring measures surpass those of traditional banking systems, historically implicated in money laundering cases. Having frozen over $300 million in recent months to combat the criminal use of crypto assets, Tether emphasized the traceability of its tokens and its established track record of collaboration with law enforcement. In its blog post, Tether urged the UN to shift the conversation from concentrating solely on risks to discussing how centralized stablecoins like USDT could contribute to the fight against financial crimes. The UN Office for Drugs and Crime (UNODC) division responsible for Southeast Asia and the Pacific released the report, specifically highlighting USDT as a significant instrument for money laundering in the region, notably on the Tron blockchain. Tether's response came soon after the release of the UNODC report, where the company emphasized the need for a broader discussion with the UN on addressing financial crimes within blockchain platforms. Tether acknowledged that there are still numerous opportunities to combat financial crimes on blockchain platforms and encouraged the UN to engage with the industry to comprehend and implement contemporary strategies. The company expressed a willingness to collaborate on initiatives aimed at enhancing the understanding of blockchain technology and its potential in fighting financial crime. A perennial controversyTether has been the subject of a perennial controversy inside and outside the crypto space over the years. Its critics have long accused the company of not having the asset backing to reflect the U.S. dollar stablecoins it issues. The issue has been compounded by Tether’s inability to produce fully fledged audits as opposed to attestation reports to verify its holdings. Speaking on the edges of the World Economic Forum’s annual meeting in Davos, Switzerland, on Tuesday, Howard Lutnick, CEO of leading global financial services firm Cantor Fitzgerald spoke positively about Tether. He said that his firm has held and managed large quantities of Tether’s assets. Lutnick confirmed that “they have the money they say they have.” Off the back of Lutnick’s comments, Nic Carter, partner at venture capital and private equity firm Castle Island Ventures, outlined that Tether’s critics have been proven wrong. Carter wrote: “Tether truthers spent 6 years trying to convince everyone tether would collapse and drag down the industry. it didn't. . . . Not sure anyone has ever been more wrong about anything.”