Korean Cafe Attracts Customers with NFTs

Bitcoin is facing growing uncertainty as it trades near $90,000, down nearly 30% from its October peak of $126,000. While the cryptocurrency remains under pressure, investors are increasingly focused on Tokyo, where a potential change in monetary policy could tighten global liquidity. According to CoinDesk, which cited a report from Nikkei, the Bank of Japan (BOJ) is expected to raise its policy rate by 25 basis points to 0.75%, a move that would push borrowing costs to their highest level in nearly three decades. Historically, a stronger yen has often been associated with weaker Bitcoin performance amid tighter global liquidity.Photo by Kanchanara on UnsplashYen carry trade in focusThe report suggested that higher rates could unwind the yen carry trade, a strategy in which investors borrow cheap yen to fund positions in higher-yielding assets such as stocks and U.S. Treasuries. A similar dynamic played out following the Japanese central bank’s July hike, which precipitated a market-wide selloff that dragged Bitcoin from roughly $65,000 down to $50,000. However, CoinDesk noted that a recurrence of such volatility cannot be assumed. It added that speculative positioning is already skewed toward yen strength, while steadily rising Japanese bond yields suggest monetary policy is adjusting to prevailing market realities. Institutional skepticism toward BitcoinBeyond the macroeconomic landscape, fundamental skepticism remains entrenched among traditional finance heavyweights. John Ameriks, Vanguard’s global head of quantitative equity, said at Bloomberg’s ETFs in Depth conference that the asset behaves more like a speculative digital collectible, comparable to a Labubu toy, than a conventional investment, citing its lack of income generation, compounding, and cash-flow characteristics. Ameriks’ comments follow Vanguard’s move earlier this month to permit trading of select third-party crypto ETFs. He said the decision was based in part on the funds’ ability to establish a track record since their January 2024 launch. While acknowledging that Bitcoin could theoretically offer value during periods of high inflation or political instability, he maintained that its history remains too short to draw conclusions. Bullish case for BitcoinA contrasting view was offered by Katherine Dowling, president of the Bitcoin Standard Treasury Company. Speaking with DL News, Dowling projected that Bitcoin would surge to $150,000 by the end of 2026. She pinned this bullish outlook on favorable U.S. regulatory shifts, increased liquidity from Federal Reserve rate cuts, and sustained institutional adoption via ETFs.The perceived influence of institutional flows was also underscored by a recent weekly survey of 2,000 South Korean investors conducted by CoinNess and Cratos. The data showed that 42.3% of respondents view flows into and out of spot Bitcoin ETFs as the primary price driver. Monetary policies in major economies like the U.S. and Japan ranked second at 26.7%, while 16.3% pointed to shifts in equity markets. Another 11.5% attributed price action to the halving cycle, and 3.4% said they could identify no specific catalyst.

Hong Kong regulators consider opening up crypto ETFs to retailHong Kong regulators are now exploring the possibility of allowing retail investors to participate in spot crypto exchange-traded funds (ETFs).The CEO of Hong Kong’s Securities and Futures Commission (SFC), Julia Leung, was cited by Bloomberg on Sunday as having indicated that provided that the necessary regulatory approvals and checks are in place, the regulator may be open to the notion of retail participation where spot crypto ETFs are concerned. Leung emphasized the regulator’s openness to innovative technology that enhances efficiency as long as it addresses potential new risks.Photo by Markus Winkler on Pixabay‘Happy to give it a try’She stated: “We welcome proposals using innovative technology that boosts efficiency and customer experience. We’re happy to give it a try as long as new risks are addressed. Our approach is consistent regardless of the asset.”While both the United States and Hong Kong currently permit futures-based cryptocurrency exchange-traded funds (ETFs), the adoption of such instruments has been relatively modest in comparison to the broader fund industry.In Hong Kong, there are currently ETF listings for products like Samsung Bitcoin Futures Active, CSOP Bitcoin Futures and CSOP Ether Futures, with a total combined asset value of approximately $65 million. In June, Hong Kong’s largest ETF manager, Hang Seng, suggested that it too was considering a crypto product offering.In accordance with the SFC’s digital asset regulations, individual investors already have the opportunity to trade prominent cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ether on licensed cryptocurrency exchanges since June 1. Presently, BC Technology Group Ltd.’s OSL and HashKey Exchange are the only platforms in Hong Kong with permits for cryptocurrency trading. Additionally, there are expectations that mandatory regulations concerning stablecoins will be introduced over the course of the next year.Prioritizing investor protectionLeung expressed the regulator’s cautious approach, stating:“As the crypto ecosystem evolves step-by-step to the point where we’re comfortable, then we’re happy to open up more access to the wider investing public.”Notably, Hong Kong also recently unveiled its Web3 plans, highlighting its commitment to embracing blockchain and decentralized technologies.Hong Kong introduced a specialized regulatory framework for virtual assets in June which are designed to attract businesses while prioritizing investor protection. That need to protect consumers has been underscored recently by the alleged fraud that has subsequently been uncovered involving HK$1.6 billion ($204 million) at the unlicensed JPEX cryptocurrency exchange in the city.Market reactionThe significance of such a move isn’t lost on crypto market participants. Taking to X, one wrote: “Seismic shift. Hong Kong’s play could reshape the Asian crypto landscape. #Bitcoin ETFs? A strategic move to anchor HK as the digital nexus of Asia.” Another claimed that this “might redefine the crypto landscape and fuel the next bull market.”A report published by the Hong Kong Stock Exchange in April found that crypto ETFs have the potential to play a significant part in the next phase of digital asset innovation in Asia.Leung emphasized the importance of a strong and comprehensive regulatory structure, highlighting the SFC's efforts to enhance transparency in processing license applications for virtual asset exchanges.Moreover, the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA), the Chinese autonomous territory’s central bank, is actively exploring the possibility of offering guidance to banks regarding the provision of digital asset custodial services. These services are considered vital for nurturing the growth of a digital asset ecosystem and ensuring investor security.

The Need to Distinguish Between Security and Non-Security Virtual AssetsWith the recent enactment of the Virtual Asset User Protection Bill in South Korea, there is a need to lay out criteria for determining whether virtual assets qualify as securities, says Kim Ja-bong, a senior research fellow at the Korea Institute of Finance, in his report titled “The Implications of Determining Which Virtual Assets Constitute Securities and Investor Protection” released on Saturday.Photo by Shubham Dhage on UnsplashThe implications of the Virtual Asset User Protection ActThe Virtual Asset User Protection Act — which will take effect in July of next year — aims to protect customer assets, establish regulations against unfair trading practices, and enforce penalties. Notably, it will target virtual assets that are not securities, deeming it necessary for regulators to determine if virtual assets qualify as securities or not in order to enforce the bill. Assets with characteristics of securities will fall under the jurisdiction of the Capital Markets Act.Therefore, if the Virtual Asset User Protection Act does not provide sufficient investor protection, issuers may be incentivized to issue non-security assets rather than security assets to avoid the regulations of the Capital Markets Act. This further necessitates the act of distinguishing between virtual assets that are securities versus those that are not.Determining if a virtual asset is a security or notThere are two approaches to do this, according to Kim: the passive approach, which avoids considering a virtual asset as a security whenever possible, and the active approach, which treats a virtual asset as a security whenever applicable.He argues that it is better to focus on whether an investment contract qualifies as a security if it is considered an investment contract, rather than simply selecting a specific approach.Furthermore, the nature of virtual assets renders them unbound by national borders, so it is necessary to establish assessment criteria that correspond with international standards, such as those used in the US and Europe.This is especially important because if the criteria differ from international standards, there is a risk of domestic investors suffering damages due to an issuer’s pursuit of regulatory arbitrage between countries.Equitable recognition and potential for security tokensAccording to Kim, the importance of determining whether virtual assets are securities lies in ensuring that security tokens receive the same recognition and trading treatment as traditional securities such as stocks. With such a measure, security token offerings can serve as an efficient and reliable method for raising funds. Although there may be concerns that such a regulation may hinder the development of virtual assets, it may well be an opportunity for security tokens to be qualified and trusted as high-quality financial instruments just like existing securities, Kim claims.Even for virtual assets that are not considered securities, there are many types of assets that are financial in nature, such as e-money tokens — therefore, it is necessary to actively protect investors in non-security virtual assets through financial regulations such as reinforcing disclosure obligations, which is being done in the EU through the Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA).Empowering regulators for enhanced investor protection and market integrityKim underscored that investor protection and healthy growth of the virtual asset market are made possible mainly through expanding regulators’ authority to protect economic interests and prevent damages. The author also suggested institutional reforms that grant regulators substantial authority, which would enhance their ability to protect investors effectively and provide compensation for damages.He added that regulators should also have the authority to enforce liability for damages or impose civil penalties for unfair trading practices conducted using classified information.