Hong Kong Launches Web3 Institute

Singapore’s Whampoa Plans Crypto-Friendly Bank in BahrainSingapore-based privately held investment firm Whampoa Group has announced that it plans to open a crypto-friendly digital bank in the Kingdom of Bahrain in the Persian Gulf.Photo by Charles-Adrien Fournier on UnsplashIsland state diversificationThe island state has been looking to diversify from its predominantly oil-based economy into fintech and finance. Whampoa Group CEO Shawn Chan said that the company was “impressed by Bahrain’s solid reputation in the financial services sector, transparent regulatory framework, and ongoing pledge to collaborate and innovate.”Chan added that Whampoa would commit to providing “secure and innovative digital financial solutions in line with global best practices” relative to the proposed digital bank, with an eye towards setting a benchmark for the industry where digitally-native banking is concerned.Persian Gulf crypto hubsThe Persian Gulf is proving to be a crypto-friendly region in recent times. Bahrain is one of a number of Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries vying for digital asset-related business. The country’s financial services sector contributes in excess of 17% to Bahraini gross domestic product (GDP). Bahrain has been one of the first in the region to establish a regulatory framework for digital assets, together with a crypto asset licensing system.Its Persian Gulf neighbor, the United Arab Emirates, including the individual emirates of Dubai and Abu Dhabi, have followed a similar path, establishing a workable set of regulatory rules in relation to digital assets, alongside licensing of crypto businesses.CEO of the Bahrain Economic Development Board, Khalid Humaidan welcomed Whompoa’s decision to establish the business in Bahrain, emphasizing the importance of crypto-friendly digital banking to support further development of crypto business in Bahrain, while bolstering the infrastructure available to existing digital asset businesses operating within the Kingdom.Doors open in 2023The bank is scheduled to open later this year, providing integrated financial services covering traditional banking, together with crypto-specific banking activity. That will include digital asset trading and custody, as well as asset management-based products and services.Whompoa’s plan is to gear the bank towards meeting the needs of institutions, innovators and crypto start-up companies and sophisticated global investors. Crypto-friendly banking has been a perennial problem that has stymied the development of the digital assets sector since its emergence.That problem has gotten worse rather than better more recently, with a mixture of banking failures and a crypto sector crackdown leading to the closure of crypto-friendly banks like Silvergate and Signature in the United States in recent months.In East Asia, Hong Kong, while shaping up to compete on the global stage as a crypto-hub, has seen crypto businesses experience difficulty in terms of securing banking within the Chinese autonomous territory. Efforts are being made to alleviate that issue. Furthermore, Hong Kong’s largest virtual bank, ZA Bank, has set out to become the go-to bank for crypto start-up banking in the city.Experiences elsewhere exemplify how crucial banking infrastructure is to the embryonic digital assets sector. It underscores the important role that Whompoa could play in boosting crypto sector business in the island state of Bahrain as digital asset innovation continues to be rolled out.

Singaporean Researchers Devise More Effective DAO VotingResearchers at the Singapore University of Social Sciences have come up with a more efficient governance model for decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs).Photo by Shubham Dhage on UnsplashDAO governance reviewThe scientists presented their work via a paper titled “Voting Schemes in DAO Governance,” which was published earlier this week. The paper is due to appear in the Annual Review of Fintech in due course.The research paper initially sets out with a review of the different forms of voting currently used to affect DAO governance in the various early stage projects that are already up and running. Having taken a deep dive into existing approaches, the research team of Qinxu Ding, Weibiao Xu, Zhiguo Wang and David Kuo Chuen Lee decided that they could go one better themselves.Their review encompassed eight current approaches including the following: token-based quorum voting, knowledge-extractable voting, conviction voting and reputation-based voting. Each voting scheme was then evaluated based on the following factors:Efficiency: An assessment of the speed at which proposals are selected and approved.Fairness: Each voter should have equal rights to vote.Scalability: The degree to which storage, computation and communication needs can be adjusted relative to the number of voters.Robustness: An assessment of the relative resistance of the voting scheme to attacks and collusion.Incentive Schemes: The extent to which DAO members are motivated to vote.Following on from that analysis, the scientists put forward a hypothetical voting mechanism with design considerations relative to fully decentralized and permissionless DAO governance. When it came to ratings, the holographic consensus approach scored highest, with a “high” rating in the categories of efficiency, fairness and robustness, dropping down to medium when it came to scalability. None of the other approaches came close.In trying to go one better, the team took the holographic consensus approach and set out to create their own hypothetical voting mechanism based on this model. As evidenced from the paper, they tried to effect improvements to this approach:“We know that the downside of the conviction voting mechanism is that it takes time to approve an urgent proposal. To address this concern, we introduce a blind betting mechanism: each member could choose whether to bet on any proposals with a certain number of their tokens.”The researcher’s hypothetical model allows stakeholders to gamble their tokens on the likelihood of a proposal passing or failing. The logic with this approach, they claim, is that it would speed up the governance process, while making it more robust at the same time.In concluding remarks, the researchers acknowledged that all approaches were not without their pros and cons. They point out that the further development of DAOs shouldn’t be confined to a static organizational future. While they believe that their own hypothetical scheme is in theory superior, they acknowledge that it too has flaws. With that, the realities of implementing it in the real world may be a challenge.

Japan’s Cryptoasset Group Proposes Self-Regulatory Reforms for IEO SystemThe Japan Cryptoasset Business Association (JCBA) has revealed a preliminary draft advocating for reforms in self-regulation to bolster the soundness of the initial exchange offering (IEO) system. This draft has been submitted to the Japan Virtual and Crypto Assets Exchange Association (JVCEA).IEOs serve as a mechanism enabling various enterprises to accrue funds and broaden their user base by orchestrating token sales on cryptocurrency exchanges for Web3 projects. This fundraising method holds the potential to enhance trust as crypto exchanges, supervised by the Japanese Financial Services Agency, undertake evaluations of project feasibility and maintain ongoing oversight.Photo by Takashi Miyazaki on UnsplashPositive regulatory developmentsThe ameliorating regulatory landscape is also a positive development, highlighted by this year’s tax law amendment, which grants exemptions to enterprises’ self-issued tokens from year-end corporate taxation. In Japan, four IEOs have been conducted so far, with the inaugural IEO amassing over 900 million yen (approximately $6 million). The cumulative amount from the four IEOs has surpassed 4.4 billion yen. However, given that the IEO is a relatively nascent fundraising method, improvements in token price stability and operational modalities are required to ensure that businesses and users can engage with it confidently.Enhanced user protectionAgainst this backdrop, JCBA, an organization comprised of various enterprises involving virtual assets and Web3, has been discussing the direction of the IEO system from a corporate viewpoint since May of this year. Establishing price stabilization measures and selling restrictions within the Japanese IEO system will contribute to user protection by allowing investors to manage their assets under domestic regulations. JCBA stated that users will find domestic exchanges more secure in comparison to foreign ones.As this proposal represents an initial draft, deliberated and formulated only within the JCBA, the group intends to consult and assess the feasibility of the self-regulatory rules with each pertinent organization as necessary.Four key pointsThe document submitted by JCBA to JVCEA presented four key points concerning the IEO. Pertaining to pricing, it suggested the diversification of calculation methods customized to each project and the specification of price-related disclaimers. On liquidity, it posited that liquidity objectives should be established at the time of listing, and an environment conducive to securing liquidity should be developed. JCBA also pointed out the necessity of establishing rules for price stabilization measures at the time of listing. Finally, regarding selling restrictions, it was noted that both token issuers and exchanges should adhere to a minimum three-month lock-up period for tokens.