Coinone Boosts Crypto Account Security with Naver Two-Factor Authentication

Hong Kong securities group proposes ICOs as growth opportunityKey stakeholders in Hong Kong’s financial world are contemplating a transformative shift in the Chinese autonomous territory’s digital asset strategy that concerns furthering initial coin offerings (ICOs).Photo by Qinyi Lian on UnsplashRoom for improvementIn a recent letter signed by Chen Zhihua, President of the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Professionals Association (HKSFPA) and published to the HKSFPA website on Wednesday, the introduction of an ICO mechanism as a potential catalyst for the city’s economic revival has been proposed.The letter, which provided the HKSFPA’s “opinions on the 2024–2025 budget,” included the ICO suggestion as recommendation №10 on a list of various proposals. The suggestion comes amid ongoing efforts to navigate the economic challenges posed by the pandemic. Zhihua acknowledges the developmental approach taken by Hong Kong Chief Executive John Lee where financial sector strategy is concerned, but emphasizes the industry group’s belief in the room for improvement that exists to stimulate Hong Kong’s financial sector further.Formalizing ICOsFormalizing ICOs in Hong Kong could establish a supportive environment for crypto startups and investors seeking regulated and secure opportunities. The proposal aligns with a broader call for government engagement in economic recovery and policy-making, emphasizing a collaborative approach toward the crypto sector. This inclusive stance signals a forward-thinking perspective that could lead to more supportive policies and frameworks, fostering a conducive environment for crypto innovation and growth.Reflecting on the history of ICOs, the letter acknowledges the fundraising method’s evolution since the attention garnered by the Mastercoin ICO in 2013 and Ethereum’s significant milestone in 2014. The ICO boom of 2017 saw projects like EOS and Tezos raising substantial funds, accompanied by both enthusiasm for fundraising ease and concerns about investor protection due to minimal regulation.Fraud concernsWhile the ICO boom faced regulatory scrutiny and witnessed instances of fraud and scams, a progressive approach by financial regions such as Hong Kong could reshape the global perception of ICOs. The letter suggests that, under favorable terms, ICOs could play a pivotal role in revitalizing the digital asset landscape.Zhihua underscores the importance of addressing potential challenges by urgently reviewing and enhancing anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorist financing legislation. This cautious approach aims to ensure that ICOs in Hong Kong adhere to established frameworks, avoiding the pitfalls associated with unregulated fundraising.While that’s the HKSFPA’s position, the initial flurry of ICOs a number of years ago involved many projects proposed by scammers and fraudsters. At the time, the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) recognized the development as “downright fraud” and put pressure on exchanges to delist many tokens.One other related element that the letter proposes is in integrating environmental, social and governance (ESG) and Islamic finance elements into investment immigration policies. This forward-thinking approach reflects a growing awareness of ethical and sustainable investment practices that could potentially position Hong Kong to set new standards for responsible investment.

Regulatory breach sees Philippines initiate blockade on BinanceIt’s been a very challenging year for global crypto platform Binance — one that doesn’t appear to be improving with the latest move to block access to the platform in the Philippines.Photo by Alexes Gerard on UnsplashUnlicensed to tradeIn a noteworthy development, the Philippines Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) declared on Tuesday its intention to block access to the Binance platform due to regulatory irregularities.The SEC asserted in a statement that Binance lacks the necessary license to operate in the Philippines, cautioning the public against engaging in investment products on the platform. The regulator stated:”BINANCE is NOT REGISTERED as a corporation in the Philippines and OPERATES WITHOUT THE NECESSARY LICENSE AND/OR AUTHORITY.”The regulatory body is actively working to have Binance blocked in the country, citing concerns about unregistered investment products. The impending ban is set to take effect within three months, allowing investors a window to exit their positions held through Binance.Pushback on advertisingIn addition to its attempts to block access to the platform, the SEC has also approached tech giants Google and Meta (Facebook’s parent company), requesting the blocking of Binance advertisements on their platforms within the country. This is a response to social media campaigns designed to attract Filipino investors to the embattled cryptocurrency exchange. While users can still download the Binance app from Google and Apple app stores in the Philippines, the extent of investor activity in the country remains uncertain.Follows U.S. regulatory actionThese actions in the Philippines come hot on the heels of Binance’s CEO Changpeng Zhao (CZ) stepping down and pleading guilty in a U.S. money-laundering case. The Philippines’ ban adds to Binance’s challenges as it aims to expand in Southeast Asia amid legal troubles in the U.S. and restrictions on operations in China.Over the course of a three-month period earlier this year, the world’s largest crypto exchange platform lost its ability to trade in Germany, Canada, Belgium, the Netherlands and Cyprus. Additionally, French authorities have been investigating the platform for alleged illegal provision of digital asset services and aggravated money laundering.Facing regulatory pushback in the U.S. and Europe, Binance appeared to be concentrating on making further in-roads in Asian markets over the course of this past year. It had recently pursued a joint venture with Gulf Energy in Thailand to launch a new digital assets exchange.Media reports previously suggested that Binance was considering acquiring a Philippine company to obtain operating licenses in the country. The SEC’s move to ban the platform follows a warning issued last year against using Binance, and it represents a broader effort to regulate the cryptocurrency sector and protect the public interest.The recent guilty plea by CZ for violating U.S. money laundering laws has added to the legal woes of the cryptocurrency giant. CZ agreed to personally pay $50 million in penalties as part of a $4.3 billion settlement to resolve investigations into Binance’s practices. He may also still face prison time in the U.S. In the Philippines, the SEC warns that Section 28 of the Securities Regulation Code (SRC) allows the application of a fine of up to five million pesos ($90,000) and a maximum prison term of 21 years.

Shapella Upgrade to Have limited Impact on ETH’s Selling PressureThe Shapella upgrade on the Ethereum network scheduled to take place on Wednesday will only have a limited impact on the selling pressure on ETH, according to a report by the research center at Korean cryptocurrency exchange Korbit.©Pexels/JievaniShapella upgradeOne of the key features of the Shapella upgrade is to allow withdrawal of staked ETH. This upgrade follows September’s Merge upgrade that switched the Ethereum network’s consensus algorithm from Proof of Work to Proof of Stake, significantly reducing electricity consumption.Impact on selling pressureTo predict the impact of the Shapella upgrade on the selling pressure on ETH, the analysts at Korbit Research calculated the amount of time it takes for all the ETH staked as of March 22 to be withdrawn. They believe this calculation is relevant because withdrawals of staked ETH could trigger bulk sales, potentially imposing a greater selling pressure on ETH.According to the findings, the daily sell volume for the first three days is expected to be 300,700 ETH, 0.254% of the circulating supply. This volume will gradually decrease to 43,000 ETH for the next six months and to 29,000 ETH for the following six months, each corresponding to 0.035% and 0.024% of the circulating supply, respectively.All in all, bulk selling of ETH is not likely, considering it will take about a year and five months for all the staked ETH to be withdrawn and that the amount of withdrawable ETH will stay relatively low for each period. Furthermore, since this analysis assumes an extreme case, the market will be able to effectively handle the volume over the six month to 18 month period.4 other reasonsIn addition, Korbit Research outlined four other aspects that limit the selling pressure on ETH.Firstly, there is some concern that the selling volume of ETH may increase due to unstaking resulting from the cessation of staking services at American crypto exchange Kraken. However, a decrease in the number of validators on the Ethereum network will raise the base reward. This may prompt those who unstaked ETH to stake them on other platforms, rather than selling them.Second, ETH locked up at liquidity staking protocols such as Lido Finance and Rocket Pool provide liquidity for representations of staked ETH. These platforms allow users to stake fewer than 32 ETH for rewards. According to a February Binance Research report, 57.7% of ETH stakers enjoy liquidity and rewards. Therefore, there may be a limited impetus to divest of staked ETH.Third, since only 41.1% of ETH stakers are seeing profits as of the time of writing the report, the remaining stakers would have to risk losses when withdrawing ETH. This suggests that those not yet seeing profits are more likely to keep ETH staked. Furthermore, Dune Analytics data shows that most of the ETH stakers with gains staked ETH when its price was relatively low, which indicates that they participated in staking in early days. Shivam Sharma, the author of the aforementioned Binance report, states that these ETH stakers are likely “some of the strongest Ethereum believers.”Lastly, despite the Shapella upgrade, ETH withdrawals at different staking pools may not be initiated immediately. This could limit the circulation of withdrawable ETH, which in turn would hinder the selling pressure on ETH.Macroeconomic factorsThe Korbit researchers concluded their paper with a note that the selling pressure on ETH will be more influenced by macroeconomic factors than technical factors. They added that a possible downturn in the overall economy and corrections in risky asset markets might lead investors to sell ETH.