Sei Labs Raises $50M to Fuel Asian Expansion

UAE Starts to Accept Crypto License ApplicationsEarlier this week, the United Arab Emirates (UAE) announced that it has commenced the process of accepting license applications from crypto companies.©Pexels/Andrea PiacquadioThe announcement was made by the Middle Eastern country’s Securities and Commodities Authority (SCA) on Monday. The decision comes in the wake of last year’s UAE Council of Ministers opting to regulate the country’s crypto sector as per Decision №111.VASP approval processAs part of the process, virtual asset service providers (VASPs) are obliged to apply to the SCA for approval with those already licensed within the UAEs financial-free zones not required to undertake the process.When it comes to the individual Emirates of Dubai and Abu Dhabi, both have already implemented their own licensing process relative to crypto service providers. In the case of Dubai, it already has its Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority (VARA) and its procedures have been deemed to be unified with the process now being implemented by the UAE.The SCA suggested that the initiative offers the opportunity for crypto companies to “regularize their status.”Key rulesThe SCA has set out nine articles as part of the process it is asking crypto companies to apply for and sign up to. Article 3 stipulates that VASPs can only trade digital or virtual assets that have been accepted and approved within an official list of virtual assets.Article 4 sets out the tasks and responsibilities of the virtual assets platform operator. It considers the need for integrity, transparency and professional behavior. Service access must be organized through procedures that facilitate access only for permitted persons.Article 5 highlights the obligations of VASPs relative to seven areas. These include operational efficiency and flexibility, and the provision of operational rules. That incorporates the need for the setting and maintenance of operational business rules and meeting operational rules according to a predefined set of standards.The policy sets out the right of the SCA to request provision of documents and data from a VASP and their receipt within a specified time period.Jurisdictional arbitrageThe UAE and particularly its Abu Dhabi and Dubai emirates are demonstrating that they’re open for business where the digital assets sector is concerned. It’s one location that’s on the rise in terms of coming to global prominence in competing for crypto business alongside places like Singapore and Hong Kong.The Biden administration in the United States has shifted policy relative to digital assets to the down side. On Wednesday it emerged that leading US exchange Coinbase has received approval to operate in Bermuda. It’s being speculated that negotiations are also underway in Abu Dhabi to secure a license for the company to trade there.On the day in which Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Chair Gary Gensler received a harsh grilling in front of the House Financial Services Committee on Capitol Hill, Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong confirmed that the company is prepared to move overseas if the regulatory environment doesn’t improve in the United States.Meanwhile, earlier on Thursday, the European Union officially passed its Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) legislation in the European Parliament, providing clarity for the digital assets industry in Europe. In moving forward with crypto licensing, the UAE is jockeying for position among a field of global centers that are vying for crypto business while the US falls behind.

The recent 19b-4 approval of spot Ethereum exchange-traded funds (ETFs) by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is putting pressure on South Korean financial regulators to revisit their policies on digital assets. The SEC's decision to allow ETFs for Ethereum, the world's second-largest cryptocurrency, on May 24, 2024, follows its earlier endorsement of Bitcoin ETFs in January 2024. This move is seen as a significant step in merging traditional finance with the digital asset sector.Photo by DrawKit Illustrations on UnsplashKorean regulatory cautionIn contrast to the progressive stance in the U.S., the Korean Financial Services Commission (FSC) and the Financial Supervisory Service (FSS) have maintained a cautious approach regarding the integration of crypto assets into traditional securities markets. According to current regulations under the Capital Markets Act, ETFs in Korea are limited to traditional underlying assets such as financial instruments, securities, international currencies and commodities. These foundations are crucial for the creation of financial derivatives, leaving little room for digital assets under current laws. Calls for regulatory reforms and market implicationsThe decision by the SEC is expected to influence the Korean regulators to update their views on digital assets, according to local media and industry experts. Jung Eui-jung, the head of the Korean Stockholders’ Alliance, has advocated for Korea to emulate the U.S. by approving Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs. He expressed concerns that continued regulatory hesitance could lead to investor funds migrating to more progressive markets like the U.S., potentially positioning the U.S. to broaden its crypto market further. Xangle, a digital currency data provider in Seoul, has also criticized the current regulations as outdated, emphasizing the need for revisions to accommodate the increasing relevance of digital assets in global finance. 

South Korean lawmakers are moving to seize control of the nation’s stalled second phase of digital asset legislation, aiming to bypass months of interagency gridlock and introduce a comprehensive regulatory framework by January. The legislative acceleration comes as Seoul races to align with global standards following the implementation of the U.S. GENIUS Act in July, a shift that has intensified pressure on local regulators to formalize oversight of the crypto sector. According to a report from the Maeil Business Newspaper, the ruling Democratic Party of Korea (DPK) plans to introduce the Digital Asset Basic Act as a lawmaker-sponsored bill rather than wait for a government submission. The procedural move is intended to ensure that formal deliberations can begin during the February provisional session. Lawmaker Kang Jun-hyeon, a DPK member of the National Policy Committee, told reporters on Dec. 11 that relying on the government’s timeline would jeopardize passage of the bill in the first half of next year. Kang cited points of disagreement among the parliament, the government, and industry stakeholders. Among the authorities, in particular, a standoff between the Bank of Korea (BOK) and the Financial Services Commission (FSC) over monetary policy and issuance authority has been a key source of delay.Photo by Lauren Seo on UnsplashDraft sets ‘major’ stablecoin requirementsAt the heart of the legislation is a new classification system for stablecoins. The government delivered its draft for the Digital Asset Basic Act to DPK’s Digital Asset Task Force, outlining its intention to classify won-denominated stablecoins exceeding a certain issuance threshold as “major digital payment tokens.” According to Blockmedia, citing sources familiar with the closed-door briefing to the task force, these assets would fall under a rigorous oversight framework developed in consultation with the central bank. Under the draft rules, issuers would be required to maintain 100% reserves, prohibited from making interest payments to holders, and obliged to submit detailed issuance plans to the FSC. Foreign-issued stablecoins would only be permitted to circulate domestically if the issuer establishes a local branch. Although the government ultimately submitted its draft to the DPK, the delivery was delayed by two days, missing the Dec. 10 deadline set by the party. Officials attributed the postponement to unresolved interagency disagreements. The central bank had argued that any issuance should require unanimous approval from all relevant agencies, including itself, but the government agreed to involve the bank only when a token is designated as “major.” The Bank of Korea continues to advocate for a bank-led consortium issuance model, highlighting the coordination challenges that have complicated the bill’s preparation. Supply thresholds emerge as fault lineCritics warn that the proposed regulations could inadvertently tilt the market against domestic innovation. Analysts argue that if the threshold for the "major" designation is set too low, new won-based issuers may face compliance costs that could undermine their business viability before they reach meaningful scale. They added that setting the bar for entrenched dollar-backed issuers such as USDT and USDC is also complex, given that their combined global issuance already exceeds $250 billion. Market participants said concerns about triggering the “major” designation could prompt Korean issuers to cap supply to avoid heightened scrutiny, effectively stifling growth from the outset. Despite these concerns, political will to close the policy vacuum is hardening. The DPK intends to move the legislation forward on its own timetable, incorporating the government’s input but steering the process through parliament. Lawmaker Kang emphasized that while numerous issues remain, the task force aims to narrow the debate to a few essential questions before the bill’s planned introduction in January. Industry representatives have largely welcomed the clearer timeline, viewing the move as a necessary step to reduce uncertainty as the global crypto sector comes under more formal regulatory oversight.