Circle and SBI Holdings join forces to propel USDC growth in Japan

In the aftermath of the massive $235 million hack of the WazirX cryptocurrency exchange on July 18, users and stakeholders are grappling with its devastating consequences. The breach, which compromised a significant portion of the exchange’s reserves, has led to a series of legal, financial and security-related challenges, leaving millions of users uncertain about the future of their funds. The hack and its aftermathWazirX, once a leading Indian cryptocurrency exchange, lost approximately $235 million due to a breach in one of its multi-signature wallets. This included significant amounts of Shiba Inu (SHIB), Ethereum (ETH) and other assets. The hack crippled the exchange, forcing it to temporarily shut down operations and seek a restructuring process under Singapore's insolvency laws. The WazirX hacker has since begun laundering the stolen assets through Tornado Cash, a crypto mixer known for obscuring transaction details. According to blockchain security firm Cyvers, the hacker transferred over 5,000 ETH (approximately $12 million) to a new wallet and laundered $10 million in Ethereum through Tornado Cash. This mirrors the tactics of the North Korea-backed Lazarus Group, which has used similar methods in past high-profile crypto thefts. Photo by GuerrillaBuzz on UnsplashUsers seeking redress and government interventionAs the victims of the hack face uncertainty, over 4 million active WazirX users are expected to suffer a loss of at least 43% of their funds due to the restructuring process. Frustrated by the lack of action from Indian authorities, many users have sought help from Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, who was visiting Singapore at the time. Users took to social media to air their grievances and demand justice, urging the government to intervene. WazirX co-founder Nischal Shetty, who is based in Dubai, added to the confusion by stating that he does not know who is responsible for safeguarding user crypto funds on the platform. His statement has fueled outrage among users, who feel abandoned by the exchange’s management. Legal and ownership disputesAmid the chaos, WazirX is also battling a legal dispute over its ownership with Binance, the world’s largest cryptocurrency exchange. Shetty has repeatedly claimed that Binance acquired WazirX, granting it significant control over the platform's operations. However, Binance founder Changpeng Zhao (CZ) refuted these claims in 2022, stating that the acquisition deal was never completed. The uncertainty surrounding the ownership of WazirX has further aggravated users, many of whom are demanding a clear statement from Binance. So far, Binance has remained silent, neither confirming nor denying its involvement. This ambiguity has intensified calls for clarification, with users fearing that a lack of transparency may worsen their chances of recovering their funds. Partial withdrawals and restructuring effortsIn response to the crisis, WazirX has initiated phased withdrawals for users, allowing them to access 66% of their Indian Rupee (INR) token balances. Initially set for September 9, the withdrawal window was moved forward, offering some relief to users. However, many are dissatisfied with the partial access to their funds and are questioning when full crypto withdrawals will resume. WazirX’s legal team has indicated that users may recover only 55% to 57% of their crypto holdings, sparking further discontent. Meanwhile, the exchange has filed a moratorium application in the Singapore High Court, seeking a six-month reprieve from legal actions as it works on a restructuring plan. Looking aheadAs the WazirX saga unfolds, the future of the exchange and its users remains uncertain. The legal battles, ownership disputes and the ongoing laundering of stolen assets pose significant challenges to the platform's recovery. For now, users can only hope that the restructuring process will bring them closer to recovering their lost funds and that authorities will step in to provide clarity and resolution. 

Thailand’s Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the Southeast Asian nation’s securities regulator, is believed to be considering moving towards approving spot Bitcoin exchange-traded fund (ETF) products.  In an interview with Bloomberg, the Thai SEC’s Secretary-General, Pornanong Budsaratragoon, said that the agency is weighing up whether to allow individual investors and institutions to access spot Bitcoin ETFs. Budsaratragoon stated: “We have to adapt and ensure that our investors have more options in crypto assets with proper protection.”Photo by Photo By: Kaboompics.com on PexelsMoving along with global crypto adoptionJanuary 10 marked the first anniversary of the approval of spot Bitcoin ETFs in the United States. Given that the U.S. is home to the world’s largest capital markets, that decision has had an impact internationally. That reality is borne out by one of Budsaratragoon’s comments. She stated: “Like it or not, we have to move along with more adoption of cryptocurrencies worldwide.” While the SEC Secretary-General’s comment suggests that she feels a compulsion to move forward in line with developments elsewhere, that wasn’t the agency’s position in January 2024 following spot Bitcoin ETF approval in the U.S.  Shortly afterwards, the regulator, alongside its regional counterpart in Singapore, outlined that it had no plans to approve the product in Thailand, stating: "The SEC has been following these developments closely but we do not have a policy to allow spot Bitcoin ETFs to be established in Thailand for the time being.” Initial access to overseas productsIn March of last year, the agency had warmed to the Bitcoin ETF product offering to a greater extent, by approving access to such products listed overseas to high-net-worth individuals and institutions. Off the back of that approval, One Asset Management (ONEAM) launched a fund of funds in June 2024, enabling Thai investors to gain exposure to Bitcoin ETFs which had been publicly listed overseas. Back in October, Nirun Fuwattananukul, CEO of Binance Thailand, stated in an opinion piece published by the Bangkok Post that he felt that the Thai crypto market was moving from retail towards a focus on the institutions. He stated:“By allowing more institutional funds to participate, the SEC is enabling a diverse range of investment strategies and helping digital assets gain broader acceptance in the mainstream.” Fuwattananukul suggested that the local regulator had made some changes on Oct. 9, paving the way for institutional-grade mutual and private funds to invest in crypto products. The approval of locally listed Bitcoin ETF products would broaden investor access to digital assets in Thailand, particularly in relation to institutional investors, which is in line with the thinking of the Binance executive. Earlier this month, Thailand’s Deputy Prime Minister, Pichai Chunhavajira, announced that a pilot program was being launched to help foreign tourists pay for goods and services using crypto within the Thai resort city of Phuket.  Meanwhile, former Thai Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra expressed a bullish view on crypto in a speech he made in Bangkok last week. Shinawatra called on the country’s institutions to be more open to cryptocurrency, while citing regulatory developments in the U.S. relative to the emerging asset class.

Korea’s DAXA Prohibits Relisting of Delisted Cryptos for a YearThe Digital Asset Exchange Alliance (DAXA) in Korea will prohibit the relisting of cryptocurrencies delisted from its member exchanges for a year, according to Korean media outlet Edaily.©Pexels/Jan van der WolfDAXA’s arbitrary regulationSome criticize this regulation, arbitrarily created by DAXA, which consists of five major Korean cryptocurrency exchanges (Upbit, Bithumb, Coinone, Korbit, and Gopax), as this rule poses a significant impact on crypto issuers and investors.In fact, a blockchain industry insider said that when cryptos are designated by DAXA as a risky asset, their operators receive a notification from the group that relisting is possible after a year once delisted. So far, assets that have been delisted or designated as such are WEMIX, PCI, BASIC, SRM, and OMG.Coinone’s relisting of WEMIXDAXA added this stipulation, as it faced criticism for the absence of relisting regulations in its guidelines when Coinone, one of its members, exclusively relisted the WEMIX token. This raised doubts about the self-regulation of the industry because DAXA had decided the delisting of WEMIX on the grounds that the information on its circulation supply was unreliable.Crypto enterprises are complaining about DAXA’s devising of strict penalties when delisting processes are not transparent. DAXA has stated that a consensus has been reached for the first draft and it will be continuously revised.Stronger DAXA presenceThe Korean crypto industry forecasts that this regulation will empower DAXA’s presence in the crypto scene, considering that its members are responsible for 98% of the domestic trading volume.Experts note that DAXA needs to establish fairness and transparency in order for it to gain trust as a self-regulatory body. Park Yong-beom, Chairman of the Korea Society of Blockchain, said rules on listing and delisting have to be fair and transparent, and if market participants find them unconvincing, it would undermine the credibility and authority of the self-regulatory body.In an interview with Economic Review, Former KB Kookmin Bank CEO Lee Kun-ho suggested that DAXA should prioritize market vitalization and ecosystem strengthening. He believes that instead of focusing on market management and supervision, DAXA should concentrate on enhancing investor protection.