Korea’s Internet Agency Encourages More Blockchain Tech Adoption to Overcome Crypto Winter

Korea’s FSC Opposes Other Agencies’ Involvement in Virtual Asset BillAhead of the National Assembly’s passage of the virtual asset bill, the Korean Financial Services Commission (FSC) has repeatedly opposed the involvement of the Bank of Korea (BOK) and the Financial Supervisory Service (FSS) in regulating cryptocurrencies, according to the Korean newspaper Kukmin Ilbo.©Pexels/LukasFSC’s oppositionIn a document submitted to the National Assembly’s National Policy Committee, the FSC opposed stipulating the BOK’s right to request documents in the virtual asset bill. The agency argued that the bill is indirectly related to the BOK’s monetary and credit policy and that explicitly mentioning monetary and credit policy in the bill could lead to the misinterpretation of virtual assets as possessing the characteristics of currencies.The FSC also objected to stipulating the FSS’s right to inspect crypto enterprises. According to law, the purpose of the FSC is to inspect and supervise financial institutions. Explicitly stating the FSS’s right to inspect crypto enterprises could cause confusion to the public that they are financial entities.However, there are growing concerns about the FSC’s perceived intention to dominate virtual asset jurisdiction.At a small meeting held under the National Policy Committee last month, Lawmaker Yoon Han-hong of the ruling People Power Party expressed the view that the FSC should consider incorporating the BOK and the FSS in the virtual asset bill for crypto regulations. During the meeting, the FSC objected to the inclusion of a stipulation that excludes central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) from the definition of virtual assets. Meanwhile, the BOK agreed to include such a stipulation.Allowing class action suitsAccording to an internal document obtained by Kukmin Ilbo, the FSC also intends to allow class action suits for crypto investors. It seeks to add cryptocurrencies to a bill proposed for class action suits, which also deal with securities. Class action suits provide a means for victims to receive redress in cases where a representative is successful in winning the lawsuit against the offender.The FSC stated that it will follow the majority on the issue of whether the purpose of the virtual asset bill should include the phrase “to contribute to the development of the nation’s economy,” although it left a cautionary note that some might raise objections to this, considering the speculative nature of virtual assets.

3AC liquidators estimate 46% recovery while BVI court freezes $1BThe joint liquidators of the now-defunct Singaporean crypto hedge fund Three Arrows Capital (3AC) have provided creditors with an estimated 45.74% recovery rate for their claims in the bankrupt estate. Meanwhile, in parallel proceedings in the British Virgin Islands (BVI), a court has frozen $1 billion of founders’ assets.According to The Block, the details were disclosed in a December report to creditors by joint liquidators Russell Crumpler and Christopher Farmer of Teneo, the firm appointed to oversee the liquidation of the failed business.$1.16B in assetsAs of Dec. 18, the estimated value of 3AC’s assets was reported to be $1.16 billion, while claims totaling $2.7 billion are expected to be recognized for distribution. The liquidators highlighted that settlements in litigation against various parties, including DCG, Genesis and BlockFi, increased reported assets by an estimated $292 million. It’s important to note that the BlockFi settlement is still pending approval.A total of 154 claims, valued at $3.4 billion, were filed against the 3AC estate. The report indicates that $200 million of claims were not admitted for distribution, and $322 million in claims have either been rejected or are expected to be rejected. Additionally, $76 million in claims are currently under dispute. The report reveals that initial distributions to creditors are being planned for the first quarter of the upcoming year.Illiquid tokensThe breakdown of assets reveals that a large majority are illiquid tokens, subject to vesting periods, comprising 82% of the total. Only 6% of the portfolio is liquid, while equity and investments account for 6.9% and 4.8% is in cash. These illiquid tokens, totaling $563 million at current prices, consist of 13 different tokens with vesting schedules unlocking assets over the next three years, reaching $200 million by the end of 2024.To date, the liquidators have staked some of these tokens, resulting in $5.4 million in staking rewards. Liquidation efforts, including the sale of $34.5 million worth of liquid tokens and $15 million in NFTs, along with other asset sales, have generated a total of $66 million.Photo by Kemp Fuller on UnsplashFrozen assetsIn a related development, Bloomberg reported on Thursday that a British Virgin Islands court has frozen assets totaling $1.1 billion belonging to 3AC co-founders Su Zhu and Kyle Davies, along with Davies’ wife Kelly Chen. The liquidators filed a claim for insolvent trading against the founders for $1.078 billion, with additional claims against Davies for $66 million and Chen for $4.6 million.Teneo outlined the rationale behind the move in the following statement it made to Decrypt:“The worldwide freezing order has been sought in connection with claims that are being pursued by the liquidators that allege, amongst other things, that the Founders should be held responsible for causing 3AC’s position to deteriorate by an amount that is equivalent to the value of the freezing orders sought.”Su Zhu, who was under house arrest for the last few weeks, became free on Dec. 20. Zhu had been arrested in Singapore on Sept. 29 and sentenced to four months imprisonment, serving two-thirds of his sentence under house arrest.Throughout the bankruptcy proceedings, legal fees have accumulated to $49.7 million while the report suggests ongoing efforts to maximize creditor recovery.

Concerns Hanging Over Huobi Result in Significant Net OutflowAmidst rumors swirling around its executives’ involvement in a Chinese investigation, Seychelles-headquartered cryptocurrency exchange Huobi has observed net outflows exceeding $73.3 million in the past week.Photo by Shubham Dhage on Unsplash$73 million net outflowAccording to data sourced from blockchain analytics firm Nansen, Huobi reported an outflow of tokens worth $505.9 million over the previous week, with an inflow of $432.5 million. This resulted in a net outflow of approximately $73.3 million.Notably, this net outflow seems to be gaining momentum, as the exchange witnessed an outflow of $32.9 million on Monday alone, based on Nansen data. Additionally, Huobi’s stablecoin balances experienced a significant 33% contraction, dwindling to $99.47 million within the seven-day span, as per the data.Unverified reportsHowever, the outflow of funds coincided with unverified reports. Techub News, a Hong Kong-based crypto media outlet, cited insider sources to suggest that at least three high-ranking Huobi executives had been apprehended by Chinese authorities for investigation. Huobi originated in China with Chinese founders, albeit it has based itself in Seychelles ever since the Chinese crackdown on crypto trading emerged.Huobi’s Head of Social Media, Jiayin Xie, acknowledged the rumors and likened the situation to being “invited to tea,” a colloquial Chinese expression for being summoned by authorities for questioning. Despite this, Xie expressed concern over the baseless nature of the allegations, suggesting that the path to restoration might be challenging yet necessary for the exchange’s resurgence.Justin Sun, an advisor to Huobi, responded cryptically by tweeting the number “4,” a term commonly used in the crypto community to counter FUD (fear, uncertainty, and doubt). He also retweeted Xie’s post, standing in defiance of the rumor.Alongside this specific difficulty, Huobi continues to grapple with financial challenges. Sun revealed that the exchange hadn’t posted a profit from last year’s third quarter to this year’s second quarter. Despite this, Sun remains optimistic, projecting a potential break-even in the present quarter and a return to profitability in the upcoming quarter.Crypto platform uncertaintyThe aftermath of widespread crypto platform failures in 2022 has resulted in both regulatory pushback and concern among the crypto community relative to the well-being of the platforms that remain standing. Both Huobi and Binance are front and center of this speculation and concern. The issue is that without independently verified audits carried out by reputable auditors, market participants simply have no way of telling if these platforms are solvent.Travis Kling, the Chief Investment Officer at Ikagai Asset Management didn’t mince his words in taking Houbi to task via Twitter: “You are clowns and criminals, and there’s a billion dollar hole in your balance sheet that customers will have to eat.” Kling has been equally scathing in his criticism of Binance and its founder Changpeng Zhao (CZ). Ikagai took a significant hit in the FTX collapse, and in its wake, Kling promised to speak out more and be more critical regarding emerging issues within the sector.As the net outflows coincide with reports of executive custody, the situation surrounding Huobi remains fluid. The exchange’s journey through these challenges will no doubt be closely monitored by the crypto community.