Bitcoin layer-2 project Elastos sees ELA token surge

Gate.HK, cryptocurrency exchange Gate.io’s Hong Kong entity, is discontinuing its operations and has retracted its application for a crypto trading platform license with the local regulator. The company announced on Wednesday a planned "major overhaul" of its platform and has ceased new user registrations and deposits immediately. In compliance with local regulations, Gate.HK will delist all tokens—including major ones like Bitcoin, Ether and USDT—on May 28, urging users to withdraw their assets by August 28. The trading platform, which launched officially in May 2023, aims to re-enter the Hong Kong market in the future after securing the necessary approvals and contributing to the virtual asset ecosystem.Photo by Kelly Sikkema on UnsplashRegulatory environment and industry responseThe withdrawal of the license application, initially submitted in February 2023, was noted on the website of the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) on May 22, without a disclosed reason for the withdrawal. The SFC mandates that crypto trading platforms without a submitted license application by Feb. 29 must shut down by May 31 or within three months upon receiving further notice. This regulation has impacted several platforms, including HKVAEX and Huobi HK, both of which have recently withdrawn their license applications and ceased operations or faced operational uncertainties in the region. Currently, the SFC is reviewing applications from 20 crypto firms, indicating significant interest among global exchanges in securing retail trading licenses in Hong Kong. 

Taiwanese cryptocurrency exchange under investigation for money launderingBitgin, a cryptocurrency exchange in Taiwan, is currently under police investigation for alleged money laundering, with its Chief Operating Officer, Yuting Zhang, arrested in connection to the infamous “88 Guild Hall” money laundering incident. The exchange is cooperating fully with the investigation and has assured users that its operations remain unaffected.Photo by Adam Jang on Unsplash‘88 Guild Hall’ scandalThe “88 Guild Hall” scandal, which unfolded from late 2021 to March 2022, implicated Zhang in a massive money laundering network. The controversy exposed a multi-billion dollar operation orchestrated by local businessmen Zhemin Guo and Chengwen Tu, utilizing a network of foreign exchange offices and crypto exchanges.Yuling Tsai, General Counsel of the Taiwan VASP Association, addressed the situation, stating: “This time, a member of the preparatory group was involved in the investigation case. The preparatory group immediately held a meeting and issued a public response. The members involved in the case also took the initiative to suspend participation in the work of the preparatory group.”Business as usualIn an official statement, Bitgin confirmed Zhang’s association with the scandal and clarified that the ongoing investigation has not disrupted its operations. The exchange emphasized its commitment to cooperating with authorities, providing all necessary assistance to facilitate a smooth investigation process.The statement reads: “At present, Bitgin is fully cooperating with the investigating unit and actively providing all necessary assistance to ensure the smooth conduct of the investigation and hopes that the facts can be clarified as soon as possible.”Bitgin also confirmed that in light of the charges, the COO has ceased all communications with counterparties.Focus on regulationTaiwan’s Financial Supervisory Commission (FSC) outlined earlier this year its intention to restrict the activity of non-compliant offshore crypto exchanges. While cryptocurrency exchanges are not officially regulated yet, local operators have taken cues from the FSC to move towards self-regulation. A preparatory group was formed in September with Bitgin participating as a founding member.While Taiwan still doesn’t have a regulatory framework in place, it has applied anti-money laundering (AML) regulation to crypto businesses. In August, leading crypto exchange Binance initiated steps to register for AML compliance in Taiwan.Earlier this year, Taiwanese officials suggested that they would foster self-regulation while proposing the classification of crypto regulations within their own unique business category. Efforts were furthered last month when legislators introduced a cryptocurrency bill for its inaugural reading.JPEX falloutBeyond Bitgin, Taiwan is grappling with the fallout from wayward crypto exchange JPEX, which is accused of orchestrating Hong Kong’s largest financial scam. The authorities raided the local office of JPEX and identified suspects involved in the alleged fraud. To compound matters, local police also uncovered a $320 million crypto money laundering operation earlier this month.The incidents highlight the ongoing challenges faced by regulators in the region as they strive to protect investors from fraudulent activities.As the investigation unfolds, the Taiwanese cryptocurrency industry, along with its self-regulatory initiatives, remains under scrutiny, emphasizing the broader need for regulatory frameworks to safeguard the interests of investors and maintain the integrity of the market.

Korean Lawmakers Complete First Rough Draft of Virtual Asset User Protection BillKorean lawmakers have completed the first rough draft of the virtual asset user protection bill at a National Policy Committee meeting held later last month.©Pexels/Matthias ZomerAgreeing on term usage ‘virtual assets’So far, 18 bills have been proposed to regulate cryptocurrencies, and the lawmakers and the Financial Services Commission (FSC) agreed to use the term “virtual assets” to encompass similar terms such as digital assets and crypto assets.Phased enactment of billsThe bills are likely to be reviewed under the title “Virtual Asset User Protection Act.” The bipartisan group agreed to enact the bills in phases, introducing the user protection bill in the first phase and the virtual asset listing and issuance bill in the second phase.Meanwhile, there were mixed opinions on the content of the bills. In particular, there was debate over whether the bills should stipulate that the central bank digital currency (CBDC) is excluded from virtual assets, and whether the bills should include a standard for determining if a virtual asset is a security.Debate over stipulating CBDC’s statusThe stipulation of excluding CBDC from virtual assets was the most divisive topic since it would lead to defining the conditions for other assets such as non-fungible tokens. Moreover, the Act on Reporting and Using Specified Financial Transaction Information, which currently regulates virtual asset service providers (VASPs), does not contain any stipulation on CBDC. Some raised concerns that such discrepancies could later cause confusion. In the end, assembly members decided to discuss the matter again in April after consulting with the Bank of Korea and the Ministry of Government Legislation.Criteria for classifying virtual assets as securitiesRegarding whether to include criteria for classifying virtual assets as securities, the lawmakers and financial regulators took different sides.Lee Yong-woo, a member of the Democratic Party of Korea, underlined that a clear statement of the relationship between the issuer and the recipient of virtual assets in a whitepaper can determine their security status. He added that such provisions should be included in the bills.Park Min-woo, an FSC official, on the other hand, commented on a cautious note that in case virtual assets fall under the category of securities, they may not be applicable to the virtual asset act. He explained that VASPs might deal with both securities and virtual assets, and in such cases, there could be a misunderstanding that VASPs are not subject to the virtual asset act simply because they trade securities.