QCP Trading takes significant step towards full licensing in Singapore

Uniswap Competitor Maverick Protocol Raises $9M in FundingMaverick Protocol, a Singapore-centric DeFi project which aims to disrupt Uniswap’s dominance, has announced a fresh capital funding round.On Wednesday, Maverick announced that it successfully raised $9 million in a seed funding round led by Founders Fund. Prominent participants in the round include Binance Labs, Coinbase Ventures, Pantera Capital, and Apollo Crypto.It’s not clear what Maverick’s current valuation stands at, and in discussion with Fortune, Alvin Xu, one of the co-founders of Maverick Protocol, refrained from disclosing that valuation.Photo by Towfiqu barbhuiya on Pexels“Surgical approach to DeFi”Joey Krug, a partner at Founders Fund, expressed confidence in Maverick’s potential to contribute to the growth of the DeFi industry through its “surgical approach to decentralized finance.” Krug added that “Maverick has quickly established itself as a hub for liquid staking token trading whilst having greater capital efficiency for liquidity providers.”The injection of capital into Maverick comes at a time when crypto enthusiasts are seeking alternative platforms for purchasing and exchanging tokens. This shift in interest was sparked by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in the United States filing lawsuits earlier this month against two prominent centralized crypto exchanges, Binance and Coinbase.Following the news of the lawsuits, both Binance and Coinbase experienced significant outflows of cryptocurrencies. Simultaneously, the trading volume on decentralized exchanges, which are characterized by their lack of central ownership, surged from $1.2 billion the day before the Binance lawsuit was filed to $3.1 billion on the day the suit was made public, according to data from DefiLlama. These events occurred during the early afternoon when the SEC unveiled its charges.Crypto industry OGAlvin Xu has been actively involved in the crypto industry since 2018 when he joined the Tron Foundation and subsequently BitTorrent. For a time, he worked at Ethereum-centric blockchain infrastructure firm, ConsenSys, contributing to the development of the MetaMask wallet.In 2021, Xu embarked on the creation of Maverick Protocol, an automated market maker. Typically, market makers like Citadel Securities play a crucial role in traditional finance, matching buy and sell orders for stocks. In the crypto realm, where trading operates 24/7, Uniswap has gained popularity as it automates market making for a wide range of tokens.Xu believes that his new protocol can challenge Uniswap’s dominant position, stating: “That’s definitely our goal.” However, he acknowledges the substantial advantage Uniswap holds as a first-mover in the crypto world.Since its launch in March, Maverick Protocol, currently employing nine individuals, has set its sights not only on competing with Uniswap and other automated market makers but also on surpassing centralized exchanges such as Binance and Coinbase. Xu acknowledges that achieving this goal will require time and further development, stating: “I think it’s still early.”Maverick Protocol’s recent funding round provides a strong boost to its ambitions, stoking further competition with market leader Uniswap, while playing a role in shaping the future of DeFi.

Circle President Heath Tarbert, who oversees the issuer of the USDC stablecoin, arrived in Seoul on Aug. 21 for a series of meetings with South Korean cryptocurrency and blockchain industry leaders, as well as the governor of the country’s central bank. Citing industry sources, local outlet Newsis reported Tarbert visited three major exchanges, Upbit, Bithumb and Coinone, shortly after landing, spending roughly an hour at each. Discussions centered on recent developments in Korea’s digital asset ecosystem.Photo by Daniel Bernard on UnsplashGathering insight from exchangesThe trip underscores Circle’s growing interest in South Korea, one of the world’s largest crypto markets by trading volume despite its heavy tilt toward retail investors. Circle is reportedly seeking on-the-ground insight from local trading platforms. An executive from a research firm said the market offers an attractive foothold for global players looking to deepen networks. Previous reports indicated Circle has also begun informally recruiting in South Korea to support initiatives tailored to the local market, and the company is also weighing a direct investment in a domestic crypto firm. Homing in on stablecoinsStablecoins are expected to dominate the agenda with exchanges. USDC is the world’s second-largest stablecoin by market share, behind Tether’s USDT, and all three exchanges already support USDC trading. Upbit and Bithumb have meanwhile indicated their plans to develop Korean won–pegged tokens, recently filing trademark applications for their projects. Given Circle’s position in the sector, one exchange official said local platforms may look to the U.S.-based company as a benchmark, adding that practical knowledge-sharing could be the most meaningful outcome of Tarbert’s visit. Tarbert also attended a dinner with Simon Seojoon Kim, CEO of crypto venture firm Hashed, whose teams span Seoul, Singapore, Bengaluru, Silicon Valley and Abu Dhabi. Circle and Hashed have been in frequent contact, and the gathering offered another forum to exchange views on recent market developments. Talks with the central bank governorOn the policy front, Tarbert met with Bank of Korea (BOK) Governor Rhee Chang-yong at Circle’s request before the dinner. Rhee has signaled openness to the introduction of won-backed stablecoins, while emphasizing prudential safeguards and noting differences with some lawmakers on potential issuers. The BOK head has previously warned that allowing non-bank entities to issue won-backed stablecoins could pose risks, such as circumventing capital rules. The South Korean central bank is working with other agencies to develop a framework that ensures the stability and utility of stablecoins while preventing their use to bypass foreign exchange controls. The meeting between Tarbert and Governor Rhee likely covered regulatory parameters for cross-border remittances using stablecoins and avenues for public-private collaboration to foster a compliant won-stablecoin market. On the following day, Tarbert is slated to meet executives from four major financial groups: Shinhan Financial Group, Hana Financial Group, KB Financial Group and Woori Bank. Kakao Group, the company behind the KakaoTalk messaging app, is also on the itinerary. Representatives from its mobile payment platform, KakaoPay, are expected to take part in the discussions. The talks come as Kakao recently formed a task force to navigate Korea’s evolving stablecoin rules. Separately, Circle listed on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) earlier this year under the ticker “CRCL.” The initial public offering (IPO) priced at $31 a share and opened at $69, raising nearly $1.1 billion. As of Aug. 21, the stock closed at $131.80. 

Polymesh’s APAC Digital Asset Regulation Report Highlights ChallengesThe project team behind Polymesh, an institutional-grade permissioned blockchain built specifically for regulated assets, released a report on digital asset regulation within the Asia Pacific (APAC) region on Tuesday, highlighting several challenges that regulators are attempting to overcome.In a press release, the company outlined that the report covers recent regulatory developments in South Korea, Singapore, Hong Kong, and the broader APAC region.Photo by Jéan Béller on UnsplashProgressive regulatory effortsRegulators within the APAC region are currently striving to introduce legislation for digital assets, while several centers within the region are vying to establish themselves as hubs for digital asset-related business.The report explores the individual efforts of regulators in various APAC nations as they work towards crafting regulatory frameworks tailored to their jurisdictions. Those efforts encompass implementation, investigation, and enforcement of legislation in a borderless industry.Regulators in South Korea, Singapore, and Hong Kong have all embarked on formulating rules for emerging asset categories, albeit using different terminologies such as “digital assets,” “digital payment tokens,” and “virtual assets.” Their focus lies in striking a balance between consumer protection, market integrity, and industry development.Additionally, all three regulators adhere to the principle of “same activity, same regulations, same risks” when it comes to tokenized securities. They argue that regulatory requirements do not significantly differ solely because a security is in tokenized form. Each state has been actively engaged in local and global activities surrounding security tokens, including state involvement in the advancement of security token technology and cross-border transactions.Main findingsThe report’s main findings emphasize that while regulators in the APAC region are making strides in introducing digital asset legislation, the road ahead will not be without challenges.Legislating a cross-border industry poses difficulties that necessitate harmonization to foster a robust and interconnected ecosystem. Digital assets originating in Asia can be traded globally and vice versa. Merely identifying the asset’s place of origin is no longer sufficient.Although the report delves into the efforts of individual regulators, it emphasizes the need for long-term collaboration to establish a unified vision and practical implementation of regulations for this borderless phenomenon.Regulatory challengesThe regulatory challenges faced by South Korea, Singapore, and Hong Kong in driving the growth of digital assets in the APAC region are multifaceted. They include the intricacies of legislating an inherently cross-border industry. In turn, that can lead to the potential violation of legislation from other jurisdictions.The lack of harmonization among different jurisdictions, and variations in regulatory approaches among the three regulators are likely to be problematic. Furthermore, there are push-pull dynamics between the industry and regulators, with even the regulators themselves not always in agreement.However, despite these challenges, all three regulators have initiated the formulation of rules for new asset categories, with a strong emphasis on safeguarding consumer interests, maintaining market integrity, and fostering industry development.