Crypto community optimism across Asia following Trump’s election victory

The Seoul AI Innovation Tour 2024 – scheduled from March 5 to 7 – came to an end yesterday, Korean media outlet ETNews reported. Under the theme of “Navigating the Future: Unveiling Seoul’s Prowess in AI Innovation,” the event highlighted Seoul’s potential as an AI technology hub and facilitated discussions on global cooperation to foster the Asian fintech and digital asset industry.  The event was jointly hosted by the Korea Fintech Industry Association (KFIA) and The Asian Banker, a Singapore-based consultancy in finance and banking services. Several major Asian banks and fintech industry insiders attended the event, including officials from Permata Bank in Malaysia and Bank SinoPac in Taiwan. Photo by Headway on UnsplashLee Keun-ju, President of the KFIA, stated in his opening speech that cutting-edge technologies such as AI will further accelerate innovation in financial services. He also emphasized how the Korean financial and fintech industry developed at a breakneck speed over the past decade, introducing the landscape of the Korean fintech industry to bank officials.  Sharing insights on fintech and digital asset industry In the initial session, KFIA officials delivered speeches on the current financial environment of Korea and the association’s contributions to the local fintech industry. The following discussions revolved around development strategies for the fintech industry and collaborative efforts between the association and government institutions. In the later part of the event, leading local fintech insiders discussed the outlook of the security token offering (STO) and digital asset industry, sharing strategies to broaden their businesses to overseas markets. 

Bali Governor Warns Tourists of Consequences of Crypto UseAuthorities in Bali have issued a stern warning to foreign tourists, cautioning against the use of cryptocurrencies as a means of payment.Bali Governor Wayan Koster delivered the message during a tourism development press conference on Sunday, stating that individuals who pay with crypto or violate other regulations could face severe consequences, including deportation, criminal penalties, or strict sanctions.Photo by Alfiano Sutianto on UnsplashCrypto use “dealt with firmly”According to reports from state-owned Indonesian news agency Antara, Governor Koster emphasized the need for firm action against foreign tourists who engage in inappropriate behavior, violate their visa permit conditions, attempt to use cryptocurrencies for transactions, or infringe upon other provisions. Koster stated that tourists that violate Indonesian law and use cryptocurrency for payment “will be dealt with firmly.”Indonesian law mandates that all transactions within the country must be conducted in the local currency, the rupiah. Individuals found using alternative currencies can face imprisonment of up to one year and fines of up to 200 million rupiah ($13,300). These regulations were initially implemented to safeguard the rupiah from the widespread use of the U.S. dollar in the country.‘Silicon Bali’In recent years, however, Bali has emerged as a popular destination for crypto enthusiasts, earning the moniker of ‘Silicon Bali.’ The island has witnessed the rise of cryptocurrencies, with the local crypto community even establishing physical spaces such as the clubhouse set up by Indonesian exchange Tokocrypto.While the use of cryptocurrencies as assets is permitted in Indonesia, their use as a form of payment is strictly prohibited. The country also imposes restrictions on individuals engaging in foreign exchange business activities, requiring them to obtain permission from Bank Indonesia.During the press conference, Governor Koster reiterated the regulations, emphasizing that violations would result in administrative sanctions, including written reprimands, fines, and prohibitions on payment transactions.This latest announcement is part of ongoing efforts to curb negative tourist behavior on the island. Bali, heavily reliant on tourism, experienced significant setbacks due to the COVID-19 pandemic and subsequent travel restrictions. With the return of international visitors, new challenges have emerged.Earlier this year, Governor Koster proposed a ban on tourists using motorbikes following numerous traffic violations and accidents. Concerns have also been raised regarding tourists disrespecting local traditions by posing nude in sacred sites or engaging in digital nomad activities without obtaining proper visas.Policy strugglesThe firm stance taken in Bali on cryptocurrency payments aligns with the local administration’s commitment to upholding local regulations and maintaining the stability of the national currency. However, the Governor’s response is further evidence of the struggles that centralized governments and administrations around the world have been having in understanding decentralized cryptocurrency. The default position of many centralized governments has naturally enough been to control it.For that reason, we have seen administrations in places like India who have changed tact several times, sometimes banning crypto while at other times, permitting it. As time goes on, central administrators are beginning to realize that they can’t control it fully. They can only slow down its rate of progress at best.Over the course of the past 26 years, the Southeast Asian country’s sovereign currency has averaged an inflation rate of 9%, peaking in 1998 at a rate of 82%. Against that background, there’s likely to be an ever-growing interest in using decentralized cryptocurrency in the country.

A Korean Lawmaker’s Crypto Holdings Worth $4.5M Spark ControversySouth Korean lawmaker Kim Nam-kuk, a member of the opposition party Democratic Party of Korea (DPK), has recently come under scrutiny due to his reported possession of 800,000 WEMIX tokens from January to February last year, as reported by the Maeil Business Newspaper. These tokens were worth approximately 6 billion KRW or $4.5 million at the time. While Korean lawmakers are obligated to disclose their wealth, virtual assets are an exception. The disclosure of Kim’s ownership of these tokens has ignited controversy, as it unveiled a wealth magnitude significantly greater than previously understood.Photo by Karolina Grabowska on PexelsTravel Rule regulationA central issue in the unfolding dispute is the source of Kim’s investment in the WEMIX tokens. It has been reported that he purchased a significant amount of these tokens between January and February last year and withdrew the entire sum between February and March before the crypto exchange implemented measures to comply with the Travel Rule regulation. This rule requires that financial authorities be informed of transactions over 10 million KRW ($7,500). After the crypto exchange reported the transactions to the Financial Intelligence Unit of the Financial Services Commission, the government agency requested a warrant to search Kim’s account due to the transactions’ abnormality. However, the court dismissed the request.Jeonse deposit to LG Display sharesIn response to the controversy, Kim took to a YouTube channel on Tuesday to explain his WEMIX token investments. He stated that he had retrieved 600 million KRW ($450,000) after his jeonse contract expired and used the money to purchase LG Display shares. Jeonse a housing rental system in Korea where tenants put up a lump-sum refundable deposit on a rental space for a two-year stay. Kim claims that these LG Display shares later rose in value to 985.7 million KRW ($744,000) in January 2021 and that he used this sum to purchase the tokens.Account balance and WEMIX tokensDespite his explanation, there are still questions surrounding Kim’s sudden increase in his bank account balance. His account balance reportedly increased from 100 million KRW ($76,000) at the end of 2020 to 1.12 billion KRW ($850,000) by the end of 2021, which raised suspicions. If Kim had directed all the money withdrawn from the LG Display shares to WEMIX tokens, it is unclear where the additional $774,000 in his account came from. Kim has reportedly explained to his party’s leadership that he retrieved the principal amount of his investment due to the increase in the WEMIX token price. However, this explanation has not satisfied some critics.Insufficient explanationIn an attempt to address these concerns, Kim shared part of his bank transaction records on Monday. However, this disclosure has fallen short of addressing all the questions that have been raised, such as the precise amount invested in the tokens and their purchase prices. There is still significant public scrutiny and skepticism surrounding Kim’s explanation for his crypto holdings, and it remains to be seen if further disclosures will be made.Kim apologized to the Korean public via Facebook for any disappointment caused, especially amid challenging economic conditions. However, he denied accusations of using undisclosed information or unlawfully acquiring wealth. Kim maintained that all transactions were transparently made using only his own wallets through his real-name bank accounts.Potential insider trading and conflict of interestNevertheless, the public’s acceptance of his explanation is yet to be seen, as questions about his $4.5 million virtual assets persist, particularly given his reported total wealth of around $1.1 million. There are concerns surrounding the possibility of insider trading. Furthermore, Kim’s participation in proposing a bill to defer tax implementation on digital assets has triggered suspicions of a potential conflict of interest.Call for an impartial third partyRecent updates indicate that the prosecution is considering requesting a warrant against Kim in relation to the controversy surrounding his crypto holdings. The Anti-Corruption and Civil Rights Commission is also examining if his participation in proposing the bill constitutes a conflict of interest. It is evident that an impartial third party will need to investigate and analyze all relevant information to resolve this dispute. Until a thorough and unbiased investigation takes place, the public’s concerns and questions are likely to continue.