Foblgate adds D’CENT and Trust as supported external wallets

GRVT Debuts zkSync’s Inaugural ‘Hyperchain’GRVT, the hybrid crypto exchange incorporated in the British Virgin Islands, is all set to debut as zkSync’s inaugural “hyperchain,” marking a significant milestone in the zkSync ecosystem’s evolution.zkSync represents Ethereum’s second layer solution offering cheaper and faster transactions.Photo by Shubham Dhage on UnsplashCombining CEX and DEX qualitiesPronounced “gravity,” GRVT is an innovative platform that attempts to seamlessly blend the advantages of centralized and decentralized exchanges. It promises users a Robinhood-like experience while integrating self-custodial features akin to Uniswap-style exchanges. Matter Labs, the developer brains behind zkSync, shared news of GRVT's imminent project milestone in an interview with The Block.The introduction of GRVT as the first Hyperchain within the zkSync ecosystem has broadened the horizons of potential applications for this technology, according to Matter Labs. The project stated:“There is nothing like GRVT being built, not in the zkSync ecosystem nor outside of it. By being able to design and deploy custom hyperchains connected through hyperbridges, teams like GRVT’s can build entirely new use cases.”The ability to design and deploy custom hyperchains connected via hyperbridges opens the door to entirely new use cases, affording projects like GRVT the freedom to explore innovative possibilities.A layer 3 ValidiumGRVT will play a role as a Layer 3 Validium within the zkSync ecosystem. Validiums are Ethereum scaling networks that bear similarities to zk-rollups found in Layer 2 solutions. The critical differentiator is in how they handle data. Zk-rollups maintain data on-chain, whereas Validiums securely store it off-chain. This approach enhances user security by safeguarding against front-running and market manipulation.GRVT’s alpha version is set to make its debut next month, followed by the mainnet release in the first quarter of the upcoming year. Promising a transaction speed of up to 600,000 trades per second and less than two milliseconds of latency, GRVT leverages zkSync’s “horizontally scaling” infrastructure to deliver enhanced performance.Explaining the concept of horizontally scaling, Hong Yea, GRVT’s co-founder and CEO, told The Block:“Horizontally scaling means to deploy additional underlying pairs as new hyperchains. Say BTC/USDT perpetual futures is one hyperchain and so on. And we can look to add other infrastructure components like this as new hyperchains to scale throughout, as they can interoperate. This allows high-frequency traders to trade more efficiently with high transactions per second similar to a central exchange.”Token launchGRVT enjoys the backing of CMS Holdings, Hong Kong’s digital assets wealth manager Metalpha, alongside Matter Labs and others. Yea founded the company alongside CTO Aaron Ong and CCO Matthew Quek. Although incorporated in the British Virgin Islands, the firm employs people who are based in Hong Kong, the UK, Lithuania, and Singapore.It recently disclosed that it had successfully raised $7.1 million in pre-seed and seed funding in an equity with a token warrant round, achieving a $39 million post-money valuation. The launch of GRVT’s token is anticipated in 2024.GRVT is also making a concerted effort to obtain trading licenses in various jurisdictions. Currently, it has attained a virtual asset service provider (VASP) license in Lithuania, with work ongoing to achieve licensing in Bermuda. The firm hopes to then expand in Europe and the Middle East going forward.

Singapore's Monetary Authority (MAS) has recently added the non-custodial crypto wallet, imToken, to its Investor Alert List, prompting a response from the Singapore-based company.Photo by Zhu Hongzhi on UnsplashIdentifying unregulated entitiesAccording to the official MAS website, imToken found its place on the alert list on Dec. 5. This regulatory move demonstrates that MAS is monitoring the evolving crypto landscape with a view towards safeguarding investors from potential risks. The list serves as a repository of unregulated entities that might be mistakenly perceived as licensed or regulated by MAS. The regulatory body had also flagged BKEX digital asset exchange in December. BKEX had suspended withdrawals earlier in the year, having gotten caught up in an investigation surrounding money laundering activity on the platform. More recently, the company has ceased operations. Company responseIn response to being added to MAS's alert list, imToken took to the X social media platform (formerly Twitter) to address user concerns on Tuesday. The non-custodial wallet clarified that it had not applied for a financial business license in Singapore, the primary reason for its listing. Notwithstanding that, ImToken reassured its users that their assets remain unaffected due to the platform's decentralized nature. The company outlined that it is actively engaging with MAS to clarify its business model and aims to have imToken removed from the Investor Alert List. This development highlights the ongoing dialogue between crypto platforms and regulatory bodies, emphasizing the need for clear communication and compliance within the evolving crypto regulatory landscape. As MAS continues to take decisive actions, the industry remains under scrutiny, necessitating collaboration between regulators and crypto entities for a well-balanced and secure financial ecosystem. Unintended consequencesMAS has taken a proactive approach to regulation in the crypto space. That has been evidenced in previous actions such as blacklisting Binance in 2021, leading to Binance relocating its operations to Dubai. That blacklisting turned out to provide a classic example of the law of unintended consequences. With Binance having removed itself from the local market following the blacklisting, many Singaporeans chose to use FTX instead. FTX subsequently failed in November 2022, leaving a disproportionate number of Singaporean customers out of pocket. The inclusion of imToken on the alert list is particularly noteworthy amid the growing popularity of non-custodial wallets. Statista data from 2022 indicates that 81 million users have adopted non-custodial wallets, providing them with greater control over private keys and crypto assets. However, this surge in usage has also brought about increased regulatory attention due to associated risks. Founded in 2016, imToken was initially launched in Hangzhou, China, prior to relocating its headquarters to Singapore. At various stages, the firm has been funded by companies such as IDG Capital, Qiming Venture Partners and HashKey. HashKey has also collaborated with the company by extending trading services to imToken wallet users, including direct bank transfers. In 2021 imToken partnered with U.S. blockchain infrastructure provider Infinity Stones in order to enable an in-wallet ETH2.0 staking service.

Korea’s FSS to Collect Public Comments on Financial Statement Guidelines for Virtual Asset EntitiesThe South Korean Financial Supervisory Service (FSS) has revealed a set of exemplary financial statements aimed at clarifying the disclosure requirements of virtual asset-related entities. These guidelines have been designed to align with the Korean version of International Financial Reporting Standards (K-IFRS), which was established by the Korea Accounting Institute (KAI).It was reported earlier this month that the Financial Services Commission (FSC) brought forward these regulations to tackle accounting uncertainties within the blockchain industry.The main goal of these exemplary guidelines is to help entities provide financial statement readers with essential information regarding virtual assets. This includes details about the reserve amount held by virtual asset issuers and information about the virtual assets held by virtual asset service providers (VASPs).Photo by Kelly Sikkema on UnsplashPresentation sessionsTo ensure effective dissemination and understanding of these guidelines, the FSS, KAI, and the Korean Institute of Certified Public Accountants (KICPA) have planned presentation sessions. These sessions will take place from July 26 to August 11, which will involve visits to VASPs, listed companies, and accounting firms. Valuable feedback and suggestions from these stakeholders are anticipated, as the events encourage open two-way communication and welcome participation from anyone interested.Discussion meetingsTo further refine the ideas put forward during the presentation sessions, two separate discussion meetings with experts are scheduled for September and October. The recommendations gathered from the industry will undergo a careful review by experts and be thoughtfully incorporated into the guidelines.The FSS will finalize the guidelines in cooperation with the FSC, and the Securities and Futures Commission under the FSC will review them and give approval for their implementation. This is expected to take place between October and November.The FSC has stated that these exemplary guidelines are currently in their preliminary stage and open to potential changes during the public comment period. Additionally, companies have the flexibility to make necessary adjustments to these practice guidelines to suit their specific needs and requirements.Issuers, holders, exchangesThe exemplary practice guidelines are specifically targeted at three types of entities: virtual asset issuers, virtual asset holders, and virtual asset trading exchanges.For virtual asset issuers, providing essential information about their virtual assets is a key requirement. This information should encompass their business models, accounting policies, obligations (e.g. whitepapers), and the current status of their projects. Such details should be disclosed in the annotations of their financial statements. Furthermore, revenue generated from the sales of virtual assets must be recognized, and any changes to their obligations should be duly noted. Moreover, disclosure of the reserved amount of issued virtual assets and their intended usage plan is mandatory.Companies holding virtual assets must provide information regarding accounting policies, the total value of assets held, the reasons behind their holdings, and any gains or losses incurred. Additionally, holders are obligated to disclose risks associated with virtual assets and their potential impact.Virtual asset trading platforms, such as exchanges, are mandated to disclose not only their own virtual asset holdings but also those held on behalf of their customers. This disclosure should encompass detailed information about their accounting policies, the total value of assets under their custody, associated risks, and the involvement of third-party custodians. In particular, the platforms must indicate whether they treat customer assets under their custody as assets or liabilities and provide a clear rationale for such classification in the annotations of their financial statements.