Abu Dhabi’s Venom Ventures Fund faces market challenges

South Korea is set to allow initial coin offerings (ICOs) next year, easing a ban on crypto fundraising that has been in place since 2017. A draft of the Digital Asset Basic Act, prepared by the Financial Services Commission, would allow domestic sales of digital assets if issuers meet disclosure requirements, the Maeil Business Newspaper reported. The measure is intended to address concerns about tokens that are initially listed on overseas exchanges before becoming available to South Korean investors. The legislation outlines tougher accountability standards for crypto issuers. Projects that provide false information or fail to disclose material details in their whitepapers ahead of an ICO could be held liable for investor losses. Liability would also extend to other parties substantially involved in an offering, including outsourced operators and market makers.Photo by Y K on UnsplashStablecoin issuers need Korean presenceSeparate provisions set out rules for stablecoins, barring tokens issued by entities without a physical presence in South Korea from domestic trading, a restriction that would apply to widely used stablecoins such as USDT and USDC. Issuers would be required to fully back stablecoins with reserves such as cash or government bonds held at banks or financial institutions and would be prohibited from paying interest to users. The proposal reflected the FSC’s position on the second phase of digital asset legislation focused on stablecoin issuers. The issue remains subject to inter-institutional debate, with the Bank of Korea pressing for a bank-led consortium model for stablecoin issuance. The ruling Democratic Party of Korea (DPK) is expected to review a consolidated bill combining proposals from the government and the National Assembly next month, with plans to advance the legislation during the regular parliamentary session in the first quarter of 2026. The FSC’s focus on consumer protection is also reflected in its plans to introduce a Digital Finance Security Act, detailed in a recent report to the presidential office. According to Digital Asset, the proposed legislation would establish rules for traditional financial institutions as well as electronic financial businesses and virtual asset service providers. The move came after a 44.5 billion won ($30 million) hacking incident last month at Upbit, the country’s largest crypto exchange. Existing regulations under the Virtual Asset User Protection Act do not contain provisions specifically covering such cases. Separately, the FSC is working to strengthen its response to emerging forms of financial crime, including transnational offenses and crypto-enabled money laundering. It said measures under consideration included adding state-level criminal organizations to the list of entities barred from financial transactions, improving anti-money-laundering (AML) rules to better align with international standards, and expanding the scope of the travel rule. On the supervisory side, the commission intends to make the Virtual Asset Division a permanent unit after initially establishing it as a temporary body, News1 reported. The Virtual Asset Inspection Division within the Financial Intelligence Unit is also set to become a standing unit. Price declines weigh on exchangesThe stepped-up regulatory focus has coincided with a broader downturn in the crypto market. Bitcoin is trading below $89,000, about 30% below its all-time high of $126,000 set earlier in October. CoinGecko data cited by IT Chosun showed average daily trading volume across South Korean exchanges falling to $2.95 billion in November from $4.41 billion in August, with trading fees accounting for about 98% of exchange revenue. The broader market weakness has also been accompanied by declines in altcoins. South Korean crypto investors attributed the recent drop in altcoin prices to capital flowing into major cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin and Ethereum. A weekly survey conducted by CoinNess and Cratos showed that 41.7% of the 2,000 respondents cited capital concentration in leading tokens as the primary factor, followed by the growing number of altcoins at 31.6%, their limited practical value at 14.7%, and technical factors such as chart patterns at 12.1%. 

Seoul Auction Blue seeks to register security tokens with the FSS for Andy Warhol’s artworkSeoul Auction Blue, the operator of fractional artwork investment platform Sotwo, recently submitted an application to the South Korean Financial Supervisory Service (FSS), local news outlet Seoul Economic Daily reported on Wednesday (local time). Its aim is to register security tokens linked to artworks with the financial authority, marking it the third entity in the country to pursue this innovative financial venture.Photo by Guido Coppa on UnsplashAndy Warhol’s ‘Dollar Sign’The artwork investment app plans to issue security tokens based on Andy Warhol’s “Dollar Sign,” a piece measuring 51.0 cm in height and 40.5 cm in length. This artwork was purchased by Seoul Auction Blue at an auction for KRW 626.2 million (approximately $485,000). The total value of the security tokens, inclusive of issuance costs, is approximately KRW 700 million. The firm will issue a total of 7,000 tokens, each valued at KRW 100,000. Upon receiving regulatory approval, Seoul Auction Blue is set to open for subscription requests from Dec. 20 to 26.In its endeavor to issue digital investment contract securities, Seoul Auction Blue has meticulously prepared its documentation in line with the FSS’s guidelines. The selection of the artwork of Andy Warhol, the renowned and iconic 20th-century artist, aligns with the FSS’s recommendation to choose a significant piece by an internationally acclaimed artist. This strategic choice reflects the company’s commitment to compliance and the recognition of Warhol’s global stature in the art world.Preventing conflicts of interestThe registration application submitted by Seoul Auction Blue includes specific restrictions aimed at preventing conflicts of interest with its affiliates related to security tokens. As per these rules, the company is barred from buying idle assets of affiliates to back its security tokens. Instead, Seoul Auction Blue is permitted to acquire them only through public methods like participating in an open bid or a post-sale bid process. Notably, the token issuer is in principle prohibited from purchasing these assets via intermediaries in private sales or any other non-transparent settings.The acquisition of underlying assets requires approval from the compliance monitoring committee. Furthermore, this regulation strips Seoul Auction Blue of the capacity to determine the final trading prices or conditions for these transactions.In addition, the company is collaborating with a couple of securities firms to safeguard investors’ funds, creating a buffer against any potential bankruptcy of the issuer. The funds raised from subscriptions for the security tokens will be managed in accounts overseen by KB Securities. Additionally, an investor protection fund is being set up, which will be handled as a trust fund by Shinhan Securities. This fund acts as an extra layer of security, offering investors enhanced protection for their investments.

While cryptocurrencies may be banned in China, crypto trading activity continues in some corners, nonetheless, sometimes through accessing overseas exchanges. With that, authorities recently uncovered a massive underground banking operation that exploited crypto trading platforms to evade local forex regulations.Photo by Manuel Joseph on Pexels$2.2 billion laundering operationOn Sunday, an account on popular Chinese social media platform WeChat run by China’s State Administration of Foreign Exchange (SAFE) published details of the $2.2 billion laundering operation bust. Xu Xiao, the Inspector at the Qingdao Branch of the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, revealed that the scheme involved underground banks who purchased virtual currencies and then sold the virtual currencies through overseas trading platforms to obtain the foreign currency they needed. This process, he explained, completes the conversion of yuan and foreign currencies, constituting the illegal act of buying and selling foreign exchange. Stringent capital controlsChina enforces stringent rules on money transfers outside the country. Citizens are limited to exchanging up to $50,000 in foreign currency and require a permit for transactions beyond that limit. Any transaction exceeding the limit without a permit is considered money laundering. During a recent investigation, authorities seized cryptocurrencies valued at approximately $28,000 in Tether, Litecoin and other digital currencies. However, the operation is estimated to have facilitated the movement of over $2.2 billion, involving more than a thousand bank accounts across 17 provinces and municipalities. Monetary control loopholesChina, once the largest cryptocurrency market, imposed a comprehensive ban on crypto exchanges in September 2017 and subsequently expanded its restrictions to include crypto mining and trading. Despite these measures, reports have surfaced about underground crypto exchange operations. Earlier this year, an investigative report by the Wall Street Journal found that global exchange Binance continues to do thriving business with Chinese customers. Global crypto exchanges are reportedly still onboarding Chinese clients indirectly. The South China Morning Post (SCMP) recently accused Binance of facilitating Chinese crypto trading accounts by falsely claiming they are from Taiwan. While mainland China adopts a hostile stance towards cryptocurrencies, the special administrative region of Hong Kong remains progressive in the sector. Hong Kong’s regulatory authorities have introduced specific rules for cryptocurrencies and are licensing crypto exchanges operating within the jurisdiction. Arthur Hayes, the co-founder of the BitMEX crypto derivatives platform, recently described Hong Kong as the gateway for mainland China to global capital markets. Hayes asserted that wealthy Chinese individuals all bank in Hong Kong and with that, they all have access to crypto exchanges and brokers. In Cambodia, it is understood that illicit Chinese-linked activities oftentimes implicate the use of U.S. dollar stablecoin Tether (USDT) to move funds in and out of China even though Tether is banned in Cambodia. The latest crackdown in China underscores the ongoing challenges faced by authorities in controlling crypto-related activities, highlighting the dynamic nature of such activity within and adjacent to mainland China. As regulatory scrutiny intensifies, the contrast between mainland China’s approach and Hong Kong’s more open stance toward cryptocurrencies becomes increasingly evident.