Abu Dhabi’s Venom Ventures Fund faces market challenges

South Korean Banks Adopt Blockchain for Streamlined Civil Servant LoansSouth Korea’s state-run financial organizations and banks are embracing blockchain technology to streamline the loan process for government employees and enhance loan management for banks.Photo by Shubham Dhage on UnsplashBlockchain-aided loan servicesIn a collaboration announced today at the Korea Federation of Banks (KFB) in Seoul, the Korea Financial Telecommunications and Clearings Institute (KFTC), the Government Employees Pension Service (GEPS), and four local banks are coming together to introduce blockchain technology in providing loan services specifically tailored for civil servants. The four participating banks are NongHyup Bank, Hana Bank, DGB Daegu Bank, and Gwangju Bank.Easier applicationAt present, civil servants are required to acquire a physical loan recommendation letter from the GEPS in order to apply for a bank loan. However, with the implementation of the new loan system, the GEPS will have the capability to issue blockchain-based letters, which can be obtained by civil servants either in-person or remotely at banks. This innovative approach will significantly simplify the verification process for these letters.Easier managementFurthermore, the manual exchange of loan-related information, such as repayment history and retirement details, between banks and the GEPS will be replaced by a more efficient system. The KFTC will take on the role of mediator, ensuring that any changes to this information are immediately reflected in real time. This streamlined approach will significantly enhance loan management for lenders.The launch of this service is scheduled for November this year, bringing about improved accessibility to loans for government employees. As the project progresses, other financial institutions are expected to join in, further enhancing the convenience of public servants. Additionally, these collaborating organizations will explore joint services aimed at providing the necessary support to stabilize the livelihoods of civil servants.

South Korea is tightening its grip on the cryptocurrency sector, with courts handing down the first prison sentence under an investor protection law enacted last year. The ruling comes just as financial authorities signal a comprehensive overhaul of digital asset governance, ranging from ownership caps to the tokenization of real-world assets. The Seoul Southern District Court sentenced the head of a crypto management firm to three years in prison for manipulating virtual asset prices and amassing roughly 7 billion won in illegal profits, according to Yonhap News Agency. The court also imposed a fine of 500 million won ($340,000) and ordered the forfeiture of approximately 846 million won ($580,000). Photo by Daniel Bernard on UnsplashFirst sentence under 2024 protection lawThis marks the first conviction under the new investor protection law, which took effect in July 2024. It was also the first case fast-tracked directly from the Financial Supervisory Service (FSC) to prosecutors under the new legal framework. The conviction coincides with a broader regulatory debate involving Financial Services Commission (FSC) Chairman Lee Eog-weon. According to MoneyToday, in testimony before the National Assembly’s National Policy Committee on Feb. 5, Lee outlined an agenda covering anti-money laundering (AML) enforcement, stablecoin regulation, and digital innovation. However, he cautioned lawmakers against enacting blunt, one-size-fits-all rules that could stifle competition. Ownership cap rules trigger debateLee pushed back against a proposal to cap major shareholder stakes at 15%, pointing out that the exchange market is already a monopoly where smaller players hold less than 3% combined. He warned lawmakers that forcing firms with negligible market share to dilute ownership would effectively choke off investment. He argued that such restrictions would stifle innovation, advocating instead for a tiered regulatory approach that accounts for new entrants starting with no market share. Lee also addressed a separate policy direction that would recognize bank-led consortia—in which banks hold more than 50% plus one share—as eligible stablecoin issuers. He said the approach was not intended to favor any particular corner of the financial industry. On the enforcement side, the commission announced plans to strengthen its response to cross-border crime and money laundering involving digital assets, as reported by Digital Asset. A key measure under consideration is the expansion of the travel rule, which requires exchanges to share sender and recipient information for transactions. The rule currently applies to transfers of 1 million won ($680) or more, and regulators want to extend it to smaller transactions as well. The commission also pledged to support AI-driven transformation across the financial sector and to build a comprehensive regulatory framework for digital assets. STOs near legalizationIn a related development, South Korea has cleared a major legislative hurdle for the tokenization of real-world assets (RWAs). Amendments to the Capital Markets Act and the Electronic Securities Act passed the National Assembly last month, roughly three years after financial authorities first issued guidelines on security token offerings (STOs), according to another Digital Asset report. The legislation allows securities to be digitized on blockchain-based distributed ledgers and creates a new class of issuer account management institutions, enabling qualified companies to issue and manage security tokens directly. The bill now requires only Cabinet approval and official promulgation before it takes effect.

Cryptocurrency exchanges operating in the Dubai International Financial Centre (DIFC), a financial hub in the United Arab Emirates (UAE), entered a new compliance environment on Jan. 12 as updated Crypto Token rules issued by the Dubai Financial Services Authority (DFSA) came into force. The revised framework bars exchanges from offering certain digital assets.Photo by Christoph Schulz on UnsplashPrivacy tokens restricted to private walletsThe affected assets are privacy tokens like Zcash (ZEC) and Monero (XMR), although the restriction does not prevent Dubai residents from holding those coins in private wallets. The move is aimed at addressing anti-money laundering (AML) and sanctions compliance risks. The exclusion of privacy tokens reflects alignment with global compliance standards, according to Elisabeth Wallace, Associate Director of Policy & Legal at the DFSA. She told CoinDesk that bans of this kind are effectively inevitable if crypto businesses want to align with standards set by the Financial Action Task Force (FATF), given that privacy tokens are designed to obscure transaction histories and the identities of holders. The revised rules extend beyond token classifications, preventing regulated firms from deploying or providing tools designed to mask blockchain activity. These include mixers, tumblers, and other technologies that obscure transaction information. At the same time, the DFSA refined its classification of what it terms “Fiat Crypto Tokens,” limiting the category to tokens pegged to fiat currencies and backed by high-quality, liquid assets capable of meeting redemption requests under market stress. Under this definition, algorithmic stablecoins such as Ethena (ENA) would not qualify as stablecoins, though they would still be treated as cryptocurrencies. The update also alters how token eligibility is determined. Rather than maintaining a centralized list of approved assets, the DFSA now requires licensed firms to carry out their own assessments of the crypto assets they offer, document those judgments, and keep them under ongoing review. Thailand enforces crypto travel ruleComparable regulatory tightening is unfolding elsewhere in Asia. In Thailand, during a high-level meeting on Jan. 9, Prime Minister Anutin Charnvirakul said the Securities and Exchange Commission had been instructed to strictly enforce the travel rule, according to The Nation Thailand. The international standard requires crypto service providers to verify both senders and recipients in wallet-to-wallet transfers. The directive forms part of a broader government initiative to establish a national data bureau, envisioned as a centralized platform for real-time monitoring of suspicious transactions and the development of detailed financial risk profiles. In South Korea, enforcement actions have similarly intensified. According to Dailian, Korbit, the country’s fourth-largest crypto exchange, paid a 2.73 billion won ($1.9 million) fine imposed by the Financial Information Unit (FIU) under the Financial Services Commission (FSC) for violations of anti-money laundering (AML) rules. The payment followed a board decision and was made within a reduced-penalty period, allowing Korbit to receive a 20% discount. Crypto firms comprise 77% of Korean finesA broader review of penalties issued by the FIU since the disclosure of its sanctions guidelines shows that 77% of total fines were levied against virtual asset service providers (VASPs). While an analysis by Digital Asset found that only four of 95 fine cases issued since August 2023 involved VASPs, those cases accounted for a disproportionately large total of 41.8 billion won ($28.4 million). Exchanges fined to date include Delio, Hanbitco Korea, Dunamu—the operator of Upbit—and Korbit, with Dunamu receiving the largest penalty imposed by the FIU to date. The sanctions were linked to alleged know-your-customer (KYC) failures, unreported transactions involving individuals subject to warrants, and shortcomings in systems designed to detect suspicious activity. Separately, the FIU had issued disciplinary measures against Dunamu, including a warning to its chief executive and a three-month partial suspension of operations, which the company is contesting in court. The next hearing is scheduled for February. In overall fine totals, casinos ranked behind crypto firms, underscoring how enforcement against crypto intermediaries has been particularly robust, as oversight patterns continue to evolve.