Bullish files for IPO in the U.S.

OKX Appoints Nomura Portfolio Co as CustodianSeychelles-headquartered OKX, the world’s second-largest cryptocurrency exchange, has partnered with Komainu, a digital asset storage firm backed by Tokyo-based global financial services group, Nomura, to provide digital asset custody services for institutional customers.This collaboration allows institutional users to store their cryptocurrencies within Komainu’s custodian while utilizing the funds for trading on the OKX exchange. The partnership highlights the trend of vertically integrated crypto exchanges adopting practices from traditional finance, employing third-party custodians to segregate operations and mitigate risks.Photo by Karolina Grabowska on PexelsInaugural Komainu clientAs the inaugural client of Komainu Connect, a regulated settlement and custody system for institutions, OKX now offers its customers 24/7 trading with a combination of cold storage, multiparty computation (MPC), and hardware security modules (HSMs). Lennix Lai, the Chief Commercial Officer of OKX, explained that funds deposited in a Komainu custody wallet are transferred to a Komainu collateral wallet, which is then linked to an OKX account. This integration allows for seamless balance mirroring and active trading across OKX’s extensive range of spot and derivatives markets.Asset custody optionalityIn a tweet posted on Tuesday, OKX President Hong Fang wrote: “We are agnostic re how customers want to custody their assets. Third party, platform, self-custody.”Komainu Connect’s collateral wallet, with full transparency to OKX, operates within a tri-party legal agreement involving Komainu as the custodian, OKX as the liquidity venue and provider, and Komainu’s client as the client of OKX. Sebastian Widmann, Head of Strategy at Komainu, elaborated on this agreement, emphasizing how it enables Komainu’s clients to trade directly on the exchange while Komainu handles the settlement requirements. This framework ensures a secure and efficient trading experience for institutional users.While specific details about the volume of assets to be transferred to Komainu were not disclosed, Lennix Lai stated that the amount was “significant” and expected to increase as both firms enhance their institutional product offerings. OKX believes in providing users with a range of solutions, including on-exchange, off-exchange, and third-party balance mirror custody options. By partnering with Komainu, the erstwhile Beijing-based exchange aims to expand its service offerings and cater to the evolving needs of its institutional clientele.Komainu was established in 2020 through a joint venture involving Nomura, digital asset manager CoinShares, and digital asset security company Ledger. The firm operates under regulatory oversight in St. Helier in the Jersey Islands and in Dubai, with offices located in London, Dublin, and Singapore. Its robust regulatory compliance measures and strategic partnerships position Komainu as a trusted custodian within the crypto industry.Market maturationThe collaboration between OKX and Komainu represents a significant development in the maturation of the crypto market. By leveraging Komainu’s custody services, OKX aims to enhance the security and reliability of its platform, mitigating potential risks associated with holding customer assets. This partnership also underscores the growing demand for institutional-grade infrastructure and services in the cryptocurrency ecosystem.As the crypto industry continues to evolve and attract institutional investors, custodial solutions provided by trusted and regulated entities like Komainu are crucial for fostering confidence and facilitating broader participation. The OKX-Komainu partnership demonstrates the convergence of traditional finance practices with the emerging crypto landscape, highlighting the importance of robust custody solutions and risk management frameworks in the digital asset ecosystem.

Coinbase Affirms Commitment to India Despite Disabling Sign-UpsLeading US-based cryptocurrency exchange Coinbase announced on Monday that it has temporarily disabled new user sign-ups for its exchange platform in India.A report emerged via India’s English-language business daily The Economic Times on Monday which stated that Coinbase was stopping “all services” for Indian users.Photo by Big G Media on UnsplashClarification of a misunderstandingIt appears that Coinbase sent emails to a subset of its Indian customers, notifying them of the cessation of exchange operations in the country by September 25. However, a more recent report by TechCrunch outlined that Coinbase has provided further clarification that these emails were sent exclusively to customers who did not meet the updated standards set by the company.On that basis, these messages do not affect and are not relevant to the majority of Coinbase users in India. The email further advised affected users to transfer their funds from the platform by the specified date.A Coinbase spokesperson communicated to TechCrunch via email, stating:“We stopped allowing new user sign-ups on our exchange product in India back in June of this year. We maintain a robust tech hub in the country and offer live products, including our Coinbase Wallet. We are committed to India over the long term.”Coinbase’s proprietary exchange app in India reportedly boasts fewer than 50,000 monthly active users, as indicated by data from Sensor Tower, shared by an industry executive.Difficulty in cracking Indian marketDespite its aspirations, Coinbase has been unable to make headway with local authorities since launching its exchange in India over a year ago. The lack of progress with local officials has proven frustrating for company executives, including Durgesh Kaushik, who joined Coinbase last year as the Senior Director for Market Expansion, only to leave the company within a couple of months.Coinbase’s CEO, Brian Armstrong, made a visit to India last year to launch the exchange service by adding support for India’s popular payment instrument, the Unified Payments Interface (UPI). Unfortunately, the body overseeing UPI immediately denied Coinbase’s recognition, leading Coinbase to suspend support for the payment system shortly thereafter.UPI has proven to be a runaway success in India. Consequently, being able to access and integrate with it would be very important in providing Coinbase’s Indian customers with the means of on-ramping and off-ramping between the exchange and fiat currency. Coinbase affirmed its commitment to collaborating with the National Payments Corporation of India (NPCI) relative to UPI but these efforts simply have not borne fruit.RBI pushbackIn May of the same year, Armstrong disclosed that Coinbase had to halt its trading service in India due to “informal pressure” from the Reserve Bank of India (RBI), the nation’s central bank. Armstrong pointed out that cryptocurrency trading isn’t illegal in India — in fact, the country had recently imposed taxation on it. However, there were elements within the government, including the RBI, that appeared less enthusiastic about cryptocurrencies and were exerting “soft pressure” behind the scenes.Notably, other Indian cryptocurrency exchanges like CoinDCX and CoinSwitch remain operational, but they’ve had their own struggles in their own local market. In August CoinSwitch downsized its headcount, citing a 30% tax on crypto gains and a 1% tax deducted at source (TDS) on transactions as contributing factors. That same month, CoinDCX cut its headcount by 12%.

At the end of last month, social derivatives trading platform ZKX, a protocol that runs on the Ethereum-centric Starknet layer-2 network, shut down blindsiding the project’s stakeholders. That event has led to Singapore-headquartered digital assets firm Amber Group speaking out, calling for cryptocurrency projects to be more accountable and transparent going forward. Not economically viableNews of the project shutdown emerged when ZKX founder Eduard Jubany Tur took to X on July 30 to outline the discontinuation of the protocol. Tur claimed that the project was “unable to find an economically viable path for the protocol.” In a long-form post, the ZKX founder outlined that user engagement had been minimal, resulting in disappointing trading volumes. By extension, Tur claimed that revenues didn’t come anywhere close to covering cloud server expenses. “The market is undervaluing the work done and infrastructure built by appchains and dApps coming from ecosystems like ours,” Tur added. Pseudonymous blockchain sleuth ZachXBT had a different take on the matter, claiming that the shutdown represented a rug pull. Amber Group chimed in on the subject on X on Aug. 3. Amber suggested that it wouldn’t break any contractual non-disclosure obligations it had with regard to ZKX but that aside, the firm took the opportunity to share its perspective more broadly in an effort to promote transparency.Photo by Markus Spiske on PexelsAmber Group criticismAmber Group criticized the ZKX team on the basis of a lack of transparency. It stated: “The last update we received was on July 30, when the project announced the cessation of operations. This decision was made without prior communication, highlighting the importance of transparency in our industry.” Staying with that theme, it claimed that clear communication and transparency are essential for fostering trust and collaboration within the crypto community, and that such principles would guide future projects. Amber Group had acted as a market maker relative to the ZKX project. It borrowed and purchased ZKX tokens in support of the launch of the token and in an effort to support token liquidity post-launch. It had secured two million ZKX tokens from the open market, with its overall holding totaling three million ZKX tokens. Project investor HashKey Capital also took to the X social media platform on the subject. Like Amber Group it too criticized the ZKX project for its lack of accountability and transparency. It described the project’s reluctance to communicate as “disappointing,” while it asserted that Tur’s handling of the situation had been “regrettable.” Ye Su, founding partner at ArkStream Capital, expressed a similar complaint, stating on X that “when ZKX shut down, as investors, we got zero heads-up.” He also singled out Tur, claiming that “Edward took the money from early supporters without any communication, showing no moral standards and losing his right to future entrepreneurship in the industry.”