Wame and Pacific Meta join forces to build Asian Web3 industry

Korean Financial Authority Orders Suspension and Levies $1.4M Fine on Crypto Lender DelioDelio, a cryptocurrency lending company based in South Korea, has received a directive from the financial regulatory authority to cease its operations for a duration of three months, according to local news agency Yonhap. Additionally, the company has been levied with a fine amounting to KRW 1.896 billion ($1.4 million).Photo by Riva Ferdian on UnsplashExecutive dismissal recommendedThis announcement was made on September 1 by the Financial Intelligence Unit (KoFIU) under the South Korean Financial Services Commission. In addition to the measures mentioned above, the KoFIU advised the company to remove one of its executives.As a virtual asset service provider (VASP) registered with the financial regulatory authority, Delio offered deposit services with an annual yield reaching up to 10.7%. However, in June of this year, the company abruptly halted its withdrawal services, prompting investigations conducted by both the KoFIU and public prosecutors.Involvement with unregistered VASPsThe KoFIU saw that Delio had engaged in trading activities with unregistered VASPs and had also breached the restrictions on the trading of affiliate-issued virtual assets. These actions are prohibited under the Financial Transaction Information Act.The financial authority identified a total of 171 instances in which Delio facilitated the transfer of its customers’ virtual assets to unregistered VASPs located outside the country. Additionally, the authority also uncovered the company’s engagement in storing the virtual assets of unregistered VASPs.It was also discovered that Delio had not only neglected to assess the risks of money laundering before introducing new products or services but had also failed to fulfill Know Your Customer (KYC) obligations.

HKMA Issues Warning Against Crypto Firm MisrepresentationThe Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA), the central bank for the Chinese autonomous territory, has taken a stand against cryptocurrency businesses that falsely present themselves as “banks” and market their products as “deposits,” issuing a public advisory to raise awareness about the issue.Photo by Marcel Eberle on UnsplashBanking ordinance violationsIn a press release published to its website on Friday, the HKMA said that instances had arisen where crypto firms had labeled themselves as “crypto banks,” “crypto asset banks,” and “digital trading banks.” The regulatory authority underscored that such misrepresentations could be in violation of the Banking Ordinance in Hong Kong.In addition to adopting misleading bank-related titles, these crypto firms have been advertising “savings plans” as “low risk” with “high return,” potentially misleading the public into believing that these entities are authorized banks in Hong Kong, where they can securely deposit their funds.The HKMA stressed that only entities such as licensed banks, restricted license banks, and deposit-taking companies, collectively referred to as “authorized institutions” and holding a license granted by the HKMA, are legally permitted to engage in banking or deposit-taking activities in Hong Kong.Furthermore, funds held on crypto exchanges are not covered by Hong Kong’s Deposit Protection Scheme. “Under the Banking Ordinance, only licensed banks, restricted license banks and deposit-taking companies, which have been granted a license by the HKMA can carry out banking or deposit-taking business in Hong Kong,” the HKMA stated.Misuse of banking termsAny entity using the term “bank” in its business name or implying that it offers banking services in Hong Kong is committing an offense, according to the central bank. The same rule applies to any entity engaging in deposit-taking activities in Hong Kong or soliciting the public to make deposits.It’s important to note that crypto firms not officially recognized as banks in Hong Kong are not subject to the oversight of the HKMA.The HKMA advised the public to exercise caution. In cases of uncertainty regarding an entity claiming to be a bank or soliciting deposits in Hong Kong, individuals are encouraged to consult the register of authorized institutions on the HKMA’s website, and if doubts persist, it suggests that they should contact the authority via its Public Enquiry Service hotline.According to section 97 of the Banking Ordinance, only a bank or a central bank can use the term “bank” or its derivatives in its business name in Hong Kong without the written consent of the HKMA.Additionally, sections 11 and 12 of the Banking Ordinance stipulate that only entities possessing a valid banking license or recognized as authorized institutions are permitted to engage in banking or deposit-taking activities in Hong Kong. As per section 92 of the Banking Ordinance, only an authorized institution is authorized to issue advertisements inviting the public to make deposits, with certain exceptions.The HKMA’s advisory serves as a stern reminder to the crypto industry that regulatory compliance and transparency are essential, particularly when using terms associated with traditional banking, to protect the interests of the public.

The trustee of the failed Japanese cryptocurrency exchange Mt. Gox is preparing to initiate repayments of bitcoin (BTC) and bitcoin cash (BCH), prompting fears of a market sell-off among traders and investors.Photo by Dmytro Demidko on UnsplashConfirming repayment detailsThe crypto community on the /mtgoxsolvency subreddit disclosed that the Tokyo-based bitcoin exchange has initiated the process of verifying creditors' addresses for forthcoming repayments. Emails have been sent to creditors, confirming that their repayment details have been validated with relevant cryptocurrency exchanges. The communication from Mt. Gox appears to be staggered, with users on different platforms receiving emails at varying times. Some Bitstamp users reported receipt of the email, while several Kraken customers mentioned that they were still awaiting the confirmation. Mt. Gox, cautioning creditors, clarified that users with disabled or frozen accounts would not be able to receive repayments using the provided addresses. Additionally, the emails specifically pertain to payments in bitcoin and bitcoin cash. This recent communication follows Mt. Gox's announcement in November, where it committed to returning approximately 142,000 bitcoin, 143,000 bitcoin cash and 69 billion Japanese yen, valued at over $5.67 billion at the announcement date and approximately $6.46 billion at the present moment. During the November announcement, Mt. Gox assured creditors that repayments would commence in the following months and weeks. Creditors with payment methods deemed "effective at this time" were earmarked to receive their assets first. Towards the end of December, some creditors reported the addition of yen-denominated balances to their PayPal accounts by Mt. Gox, signaling progress in the repayment process. Market fearsThe fear among market participants of a distribution of bitcoin from the Mt. Gox estate has cast a shadow over the sector over the course of a number of years. With this latest development, it appears that the estate is finally on the cusp of executing on that distribution. If distribution is achieved in the short term, it will come at a time when bitcoin has experienced a major unit price pullback already. Since the approval of spot bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs) in the United States earlier this month, it appears that another bankrupt crypto exchange, FTX, has sold $1 billion worth of Grayscale Bitcoin ETF shares into the market. That move is believed to have been responsible for a dramatic drop in bitcoin’s unit price. In tandem with that event, some commentators believe that a pullback at this point is healthy for the market. That’s the view of Charles Edwards, founder of Capriole Investments. Taking to social media, Edwards wrote:”We're still not here yet. This pullback is very overdue and lower is healthier.” At the time of writing, bitcoin has a unit price of $39,884, down from a high earlier this month of $48,494. Confirmation emails have been reported by several Reddit users, with Bitstamp confirming for most, and a few Kraken users also acknowledging receipt. Nevertheless, a significant number of Kraken users mentioned they are yet to receive the confirmation email. Mt. Gox officially closed its doors in February 2014, almost a decade ago, after succumbing to an exploit in 2011.