Kazakhstan shuts out 980 non-compliant crypto exchanges in 2023

The South Korean Financial Services Commission (FSC) made an official announcement on Friday (KST) stating that "domestic securities firms brokering spot bitcoin ETFs that are listed on overseas markets may be considered a violation of the government's stance on virtual assets and the Financial Investment Services and Capital Markets Act." This stance refers to a press release published on Dec. 13, 2017 that outlined the government’s conclusion that virtual assets must be dealt with carefully.Photo by Lauren Seo on UnsplashFuture possibilityHowever, this statement is not to be interpreted as a complete dismissal of the possibility that South Korea could adopt the ETF. The agency added that it would look into the issue thanks to a more stable regulatory landscape sweeping the country following the implementation of regulations on virtual assets like the Virtual Asset User Protection Act. Authorities are also taking into consideration the fact that other countries like the U.S. are adopting a more open stance. Market downturnFollowing the announcement, stocks related to the ETF in the South Korean market – which had surged on the news of a spot bitcoin ETF listing on the U.S. stock market a day ago – saw share prices drop within a day. As of 10:04 a.m. on Friday, Woori Technology Investment was trading at KRW 7,650 ($5.82), down 4.61 percent from the day before, and Hanwha Investment & Securities was down 9.09 percent to KRW 4,000. Both of these firms hold stakes in Dunamu, the operator of South Korea's largest cryptocurrency exchange Upbit.

KDIC Seizes Crypto from Debtors Linked to Losses at Financial FirmsDuring the first half of this year, the Korea Deposit Insurance Corporation (KDIC) tracked the cryptocurrency holdings of 1,075 individuals and debtors responsible for causing losses at financial entities, including savings banks, according to documents obtained by local news outlet Herald Economy, from the office of lawmaker Kim Han-kyu, a member of the National Assembly’s National Policy Committee. From this scrutiny, KDIC identified 29 wrongful cases and proceeded to confiscate cryptocurrencies in 16 of those instances.KDIC is a semi-state body that has been instrumental in tracing and recovering assets from culpable employees at troubled financial firms and debtors in arrears. Meanwhile, methods for hiding wealth have become more sophisticated, typically unfolding behind the curtain.Photo by Georg Bommeli on UnsplashFirst crypto seizureOut of these individuals, 900 had taken out loans of at least KRW 3 billion ($2.2 million) from beleaguered financial institutions, while the remaining 175 were employees of these institutions, held responsible for their failures. This occasion represents the KDIC’s first seizure of virtual assets.Until recently, the KDIC struggled to reclaim hidden assets funneled into cryptocurrency exchanges, given their limited authority to seek documentation. KDIC’s purview mainly extended to requesting information from public institutions, banks, insurance companies, and securities firms. However, KDIC has now found a way to seize crypto assets by investigating the bank accounts linked to these exchanges. In Korea, crypto exchanges facilitating Korean won trades are legally mandated to secure real-name accounts from banks.Call for expanding KDIC’s authorityGiven the evidence of using cryptocurrencies to conceal wealth, many suggest that amendments to the Depositor Protection Act are necessary, enabling KDIC to directly request relevant data from exchanges and recover more hidden assets effectively.Furthermore in August KDIC secured a court order allowing them to liquidate these assets. Following this successful confiscation, the debtors’ cryptocurrencies have been frozen in their wallets, rendering them unresponsive to any market shifts. Discussions are now underway regarding the method of liquidating the debtors’ cryptocurrencies at market value on exchanges. This includes deliberations on whether KDIC will assume ownership of the cryptocurrencies and directly proceed with their sale.In a chat with Herald Economy, Lawmaker Kim emphasized the need for KDIC to have the authority to access information from virtual asset service providers. This would enable them to more effectively retrieve assets from responsible debtors. Kim further stated that such steps would enhance both the efficiency of debt collection and overall market fairness.

A legislator in the Philippines has put forward a bill that, if passed and enacted, would see the Southeast Asian country establish a Bitcoin reserve consisting of 10,000 BTC. The proposed bill was filed with the House of Representatives as House Bill 421. Its proposer is Congressman Miguel Luis Villafuerte, a representative of Camarines Sur’s 5th district since 2022. Villafuerte also served as governor of the same province on two occasions, gaining recognition for becoming the youngest individual to assume the governorship in the Philippines.Photo by Michael Förtsch on UnsplashDrawing on developments overseasPrefacing the bill with an explanatory note, Villafuerte draws on developments related to Bitcoin in the United States. He drew attention to U.S. Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell having referred to Bitcoin as “digital gold,” while pointing to a bill in the U.S. proposed by Wyoming Senator Cynthia Lummis to create a strategic Bitcoin reserve in the U.S., with the support of U.S. President Donald Trump. The bill itself, if passed and enacted, would provide a mandate to Banko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP), the country’s central bank, to acquire 2,000 BTC on an annual basis over a period of five years. According to Villafuerte’s proposal, that would result in the Philippines amassing a reserve of 10,000 BTC. 20-year minimum holding periodFollowing the achievement of this accumulation, the bill sets out that the leading digital asset would be locked in trust for a period of 20 years for the benefit of the country. A provision is included to establish a procedure that would enable the purchase schedule to be adjusted if a need arose to do so due to prevailing market conditions. Upon completion of the 20-year holding period, the proposed legislation calls on the central bank to present a report to Congress with recommendations as to whether Bitcoin should continue to be held or if some of the holdings should be sold off on a gradual basis. Following the expiration of that initial 20-year period, the governor of the central bank cannot recommend the selloff of more than 10% of the holding over any two-year period. Proof of reservesIn terms of sovereign nations, an early mover with regard to Bitcoin has been El Salvador. It became the first nation to establish Bitcoin as legal tender, while also establishing a Bitcoin reserve. However, the Central American nation has been criticized with regard to a lack of transparency surrounding that reserve. In the case of Villafuerte’s bill, the proposed legislation includes a requirement for the central bank governor to establish a system of quarterly proof of reserve attestations. It calls for attestations to be performed by an independent third-party auditor with expertise in auditing digital assets.The proposal comes as a number of nations are understood to be exploring the establishment of a strategic Bitcoin reserve. In April, a parliamentarian in Sweden proposed adding Bitcoin to the Nordic nation’s foreign exchange reserves. The Swedish parliament is set to debate the notion of a Bitcoin reserve next month. Meanwhile, Switzerland’s central bank has reportedly gained exposure to Bitcoin through a $253 million shareholding in Bitcoin treasury firm Strategy.