Seoul Auction Blue seeks to register security tokens with the FSS for Andy Warhol’s artwork

Coinbase Affirms Commitment to India Despite Disabling Sign-UpsLeading US-based cryptocurrency exchange Coinbase announced on Monday that it has temporarily disabled new user sign-ups for its exchange platform in India.A report emerged via India’s English-language business daily The Economic Times on Monday which stated that Coinbase was stopping “all services” for Indian users.Photo by Big G Media on UnsplashClarification of a misunderstandingIt appears that Coinbase sent emails to a subset of its Indian customers, notifying them of the cessation of exchange operations in the country by September 25. However, a more recent report by TechCrunch outlined that Coinbase has provided further clarification that these emails were sent exclusively to customers who did not meet the updated standards set by the company.On that basis, these messages do not affect and are not relevant to the majority of Coinbase users in India. The email further advised affected users to transfer their funds from the platform by the specified date.A Coinbase spokesperson communicated to TechCrunch via email, stating:“We stopped allowing new user sign-ups on our exchange product in India back in June of this year. We maintain a robust tech hub in the country and offer live products, including our Coinbase Wallet. We are committed to India over the long term.”Coinbase’s proprietary exchange app in India reportedly boasts fewer than 50,000 monthly active users, as indicated by data from Sensor Tower, shared by an industry executive.Difficulty in cracking Indian marketDespite its aspirations, Coinbase has been unable to make headway with local authorities since launching its exchange in India over a year ago. The lack of progress with local officials has proven frustrating for company executives, including Durgesh Kaushik, who joined Coinbase last year as the Senior Director for Market Expansion, only to leave the company within a couple of months.Coinbase’s CEO, Brian Armstrong, made a visit to India last year to launch the exchange service by adding support for India’s popular payment instrument, the Unified Payments Interface (UPI). Unfortunately, the body overseeing UPI immediately denied Coinbase’s recognition, leading Coinbase to suspend support for the payment system shortly thereafter.UPI has proven to be a runaway success in India. Consequently, being able to access and integrate with it would be very important in providing Coinbase’s Indian customers with the means of on-ramping and off-ramping between the exchange and fiat currency. Coinbase affirmed its commitment to collaborating with the National Payments Corporation of India (NPCI) relative to UPI but these efforts simply have not borne fruit.RBI pushbackIn May of the same year, Armstrong disclosed that Coinbase had to halt its trading service in India due to “informal pressure” from the Reserve Bank of India (RBI), the nation’s central bank. Armstrong pointed out that cryptocurrency trading isn’t illegal in India — in fact, the country had recently imposed taxation on it. However, there were elements within the government, including the RBI, that appeared less enthusiastic about cryptocurrencies and were exerting “soft pressure” behind the scenes.Notably, other Indian cryptocurrency exchanges like CoinDCX and CoinSwitch remain operational, but they’ve had their own struggles in their own local market. In August CoinSwitch downsized its headcount, citing a 30% tax on crypto gains and a 1% tax deducted at source (TDS) on transactions as contributing factors. That same month, CoinDCX cut its headcount by 12%.

Despite interest expressed by a Japanese lawmaker earlier this month for Japan to establish a strategic Bitcoin reserve, the country’s prime minister has declined to offer support for the idea.Photo by Su San Lee on UnsplashInsufficient informationJapanese crypto media outlet CoinPost reported on Dec. 26 that the country’s prime minister, Shigeru Ishiba, refrained from endorsing the notion of a Japanese strategic Bitcoin reserve on the basis that he and his government lack sufficient information on the subject. With that, Ishiba feels that it’s “difficult for the government to express its views” on the matter. The Japanese prime minister was prompted to offer his views on the subject having been queried by Japanese Member of Parliament (MP), Satoshi Hamada. During a question and answer session earlier this month, Hamada cited the United States and Brazil as examples of states that are currently considering the addition of Bitcoin as a reserve asset.  The Japanese lawmaker suggested that policymakers in those countries were leaning towards the consideration of Bitcoin as a hedge against economic risks, and that on that basis, he believed that the Japanese government should give the use of Bitcoin as a national reserve asset consideration. Hamada stated: “I think Japan should follow the example of the United States and consider turning some of its foreign exchange reserves into crypto assets such as Bitcoin.” Ishiba has responded by stating that his government lacks sufficient information relative to this “movement of introducing Bitcoin reserves that the United States and other countries are proceeding with.” Additionally, the Japanese government maintains that stability and liquidity are of paramount importance when it comes to the country’s foreign exchange reserves. With those factors in mind, it believes that Bitcoin is incompatible due to its price volatility. Unsustainable debt levels Some proponents of Bitcoin suggest that it offers a way forward for countries that have developed an unsustainable level of debt. In an X post published on Dec. 27, Thomas Jeegers, chief financial officer (CFO) at Swiss Bitcoin-only app enterprise Relai, set out a case for Bitcoin on that basis. Jeegers outlined that the United States has a debt of $36 trillion, accounting for 120% of gross domestic product (GDP).  He describes the Japanese scenario as being considerably worse, where the country’s debt accounts for 200% of GDP. Jeegers forecasts that the trajectory is unsustainable, with debt having grown “far beyond manageable levels.” The Relai CFO warns that the financial world is at breaking point and “it’s not a matter of 'if' but 'when' the system buckles under its own weight.” Earlier this month, investment manager VanEck published a report claiming that a strategic Bitcoin reserve could facilitate the U.S. in reducing its national debt by up to 36% by 2050. Like Japan, Russia has also decided against a strategic Bitcoin reserve. Although Finance Minister Anton Siluanov pointed towards Bitcoin’s unit price volatility being an issue, he is open to reassessing the matter in the future.

In less than a year since Hong Kong regulators gave the green light to crypto exchanges, there's been a noticeable surge of interest among traditional financial institutions and brokerages eager to secure their digital asset licenses for trading.Photo by Florian Wehde on UnsplashTiger BrokersTiger Brokers, a Beijing-headquartered one-stop trading brokerage with nine million international customers, offers one such example. The firm upgraded its Type 1 Hong Kong Securities & Futures Commission (SFC) license in January to include crypto trading for professional investors and financial institutions based in Hong Kong. The move followed an uptick in interest from mainland China-based firms in Q4, 2023.In a recent interview with Cointelegraph, John Fei Zeng, the CFO and director of Tiger Brokers, revealed that the firm currently boasts 865,500 funded accounts in Hong Kong, managing $18.9 billion in assets. Zeng stated: "Residents of Hong Kong will be able to trade virtual assets such as Bitcoin and Ethereum alongside stocks, options, futures, funds, and ETFs [Through Tiger Trade]." He explained that as part of the firm's expansion plans, additional digital assets will be evaluated. HKMA guidance on crypto custodyAs a testament to the regulatory clarity that has attracted firms like Tiger Brokers, on Tuesday Hong Kong's central bank issued guidance for authorized institutions interested in offering custody services for digital assets. The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) outlined comprehensive risk assessment procedures and emphasized the importance of robust policies, oversight, and resource allocation to manage custodial activities effectively. Notably, the HKMA's guidance seeks to address concerns stemming from recent industry mishaps, including the collapse of FTX, Terra and Three Arrows Capital (3AC), by mandating stringent safeguards to protect clients' digital assets from theft, fraud or misappropriation. Key requirements include independent systems audits, secure storage practices and transparent record-keeping, underscoring the regulator's commitment to fostering trust and stability in the digital asset ecosystem. Victory SecuritiesIn a similar move to that of Tiger Brokers, Victory Securities, another Hong Kong brokerage, secured a license from the SFC last November to offer crypto trading services for retail investors. The company reported a significant surge in virtual asset transactions and new customer acquisitions, prompting plans to introduce trading discounts to incentivize compliant and safe virtual asset trading services. Moreover, OSL, a licensed Hong Kong crypto exchange, joined forces with Interactive Brokers in November 2023, enabling the latter to offer bitcoin and ether trading to retail investors through its platform. Further underscoring the evolving regulatory landscape, crypto exchange Bybit submitted a retail trading license application in Hong Kong, indicative of the sector's continued growth and maturity. Nevertheless, navigating the regulatory framework isn't without its challenges. Web3 firms eyeing Hong Kong may need to invest up to $25 million in corporate infrastructure and compliance to secure licensing approval, reflecting the stringent requirements imposed by regulators. As Hong Kong continues to refine its regulatory framework and enhance investor protections, the stage is set for further collaboration between traditional financial institutions and emerging crypto players within the Chinese autonomous territory.