SK C&C to provide ChainZ Security Token service for Hana Securities

Intella X Joins Hands with Chainlink Labs to Enhance SecuritySouth Korean gaming company Neowiz announced Wednesday that its blockchain gaming platform, Intella X, has forged a partnership with Chainlink Labs, the founder of the Chainlink blockchain oracle network, to further solidify its position as a secure and transparent blockchain gaming platform.Chainlink’s decentralized oracle network connects data both within and outside of the blockchain — also referred to as on-chain and off-chain — which enables developers to build Web3 applications with access to real-world data and off-chain computation across any blockchain.Photo by Shubham Dhage on UnsplashEnhancing security and transparencyThe joint collaboration aims to apply Chainlink Labs’ on-chain and off-chain data connection technology to Intella X. By doing so, they plan to enhance the security of Intella X’s various services, including blockchain games and non-fungible tokens (NFTs).To ensure transparency within its blockchain gaming platform, Intella X will utilize Chainlink Labs’ verifiable random function technology to generate random values during game operations without compromising security or usability, supporting fair gameplay for all users.Scaling the platformAdditionally, they are considering technical collaborations to increase the platform’s scalability by using Chainlink Labs’ Cross-Chain Interoperability Protocol, which enables connectivity between different blockchain networks through a single interface.Operating on the Polygon blockchain platform, Intella X offers various in-house platform services, such as its decentralized exchange (DEX) and its NFT launchpad and marketplace. The platform has also soft-launched the Android and web versions of its IntellaX Wallet — a Web3 wallet for Web2 and Web3 gamers — and is ready to expand its ecosystem.

Binance’s Entry Followed by Increased Scrutiny on Foreign Executives in Korean Crypto FirmsSince Binance’s acquisition of South Korean crypto exchange GOPAX earlier this year, it appears that South Korean financial authorities have tightened their oversight of virtual asset service providers (VASPs), according to an article by local news outlet News1.Photo by Vadim Artyukhin on UnsplashAuthorities had previously instructed existing VASPs to report any changes in their location or registered executives. However, according to industry sources on Monday, authorities recently issued a notice to VASPs, emphasizing the importance of reporting the appointment of foreign executives as well. This change in authorities’ approach is not unrelated to the recent incidents involving Binance and GOPAX, which have caused ripples in the Korean market.Ongoing leadership changesBinance acquired a majority stake in Streami, the operator of GOPAX, back in February after GOPAX struggled to make principal and interest payments on its own decentralized finance (DeFi) service, GOFi, in the wake of the FTX collapse that happened in November 2022. In doing so, Binance injected capital into GOPAX in order to provide a solution for the issue.This marked Binance’s entry into the Korean market, with the number of monthly active users in the country soaring since then. A survey conducted in June by blockchain-based polling app Cratos also revealed that the Korean public had an overall favorable opinion towards the acquisition.Following the acquisition, Streami underwent multiple leadership transitions with Lee Jun-haeng resigning and Binance’s Asia Pacific Head, Leon Sing Foong, taking over. Shortly after, Foong also stepped down, and the baton was passed to Lee Joong-hoon, GOPAX’s former Vice President. It is also notable that Foong recently left Binance altogether amid regulatory scrutiny.Streami subsequently submitted reports to the Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) under the Financial Services Commission in line with requirements to inform the regulatory body about these changes. However, the FIU has not yet granted its approval, likely due to the legal challenges Binance is currently facing in multiple jurisdictions worldwide.In a seeming effort to address this regulatory roadblock, Streami has recently decided to delegate yet another CEO whose identity has not yet been disclosed. This marks the third leadership shift in just half a year.On the other hand, crypto trading platform Crypto.com also acquired the exchange OKBIT last year. However, its process of entering the Korean market was quite different from that of Binance, as the platform received proper approval for changes in executive positions, such as the appointment of Rafael de Marco e Melo as Chief Financial Officer.Mounting roadblocksIt appears that authorities have now decided to form a more robust oversight system, including monitoring changes in foreign executive appointments at VASPs. However, some argue that such regulatory changes could be perceived as a hindrance for global exchanges looking to enter Korea’s lucrative crypto market where there is a high level of investor sentiment from up to seven million individual investors.To operate as a virtual asset business in the country, businesses must obtain preliminary certification for an Information Security Management System (ISMS) and register as a VASP. Obtaining ISMS certification is a time-consuming process, prompting overseas VASPs to enter the Korean market by acquiring businesses that have already received certification in Korea.However, if the entry barriers to Korea increase as authorities start to scrutinize changes in foreign executive positions, global VASPs may reconsider entering the market.

HKMA Issues Warning Against Crypto Firm MisrepresentationThe Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA), the central bank for the Chinese autonomous territory, has taken a stand against cryptocurrency businesses that falsely present themselves as “banks” and market their products as “deposits,” issuing a public advisory to raise awareness about the issue.Photo by Marcel Eberle on UnsplashBanking ordinance violationsIn a press release published to its website on Friday, the HKMA said that instances had arisen where crypto firms had labeled themselves as “crypto banks,” “crypto asset banks,” and “digital trading banks.” The regulatory authority underscored that such misrepresentations could be in violation of the Banking Ordinance in Hong Kong.In addition to adopting misleading bank-related titles, these crypto firms have been advertising “savings plans” as “low risk” with “high return,” potentially misleading the public into believing that these entities are authorized banks in Hong Kong, where they can securely deposit their funds.The HKMA stressed that only entities such as licensed banks, restricted license banks, and deposit-taking companies, collectively referred to as “authorized institutions” and holding a license granted by the HKMA, are legally permitted to engage in banking or deposit-taking activities in Hong Kong.Furthermore, funds held on crypto exchanges are not covered by Hong Kong’s Deposit Protection Scheme. “Under the Banking Ordinance, only licensed banks, restricted license banks and deposit-taking companies, which have been granted a license by the HKMA can carry out banking or deposit-taking business in Hong Kong,” the HKMA stated.Misuse of banking termsAny entity using the term “bank” in its business name or implying that it offers banking services in Hong Kong is committing an offense, according to the central bank. The same rule applies to any entity engaging in deposit-taking activities in Hong Kong or soliciting the public to make deposits.It’s important to note that crypto firms not officially recognized as banks in Hong Kong are not subject to the oversight of the HKMA.The HKMA advised the public to exercise caution. In cases of uncertainty regarding an entity claiming to be a bank or soliciting deposits in Hong Kong, individuals are encouraged to consult the register of authorized institutions on the HKMA’s website, and if doubts persist, it suggests that they should contact the authority via its Public Enquiry Service hotline.According to section 97 of the Banking Ordinance, only a bank or a central bank can use the term “bank” or its derivatives in its business name in Hong Kong without the written consent of the HKMA.Additionally, sections 11 and 12 of the Banking Ordinance stipulate that only entities possessing a valid banking license or recognized as authorized institutions are permitted to engage in banking or deposit-taking activities in Hong Kong. As per section 92 of the Banking Ordinance, only an authorized institution is authorized to issue advertisements inviting the public to make deposits, with certain exceptions.The HKMA’s advisory serves as a stern reminder to the crypto industry that regulatory compliance and transparency are essential, particularly when using terms associated with traditional banking, to protect the interests of the public.