Chinese VC plans $10 billion Web3 fund launch

Binance Behind New Hong Kong Crypto Exchange Pursuing LicenseThe launch of a crypto exchange named HKVAEX in Hong Kong has raised eyebrows as it appears to be closely connected to the global cryptocurrency giant, Binance.Photo by Florian Wehde on UnsplashResource sharingWhile the two entities do not officially acknowledge any affiliation, they share resources and have some commonalities that suggest a deeper connection, according to a report published by the South China Morning Post (SCMP) on Wednesday.HKVAEX was established in Hong Kong as an independent entity under BX Services Limited. Despite the absence of shared names, official affiliations, or public statements, several clues point to a connection. The logos of Binance and HKVAEX bear a resemblance, and Binance’s official accounts, as well as CEO Changpeng Zhao (CZ), are among HKVAEX’s followers on social media platform X (formerly Twitter).Gaining a foothold in Hong KongIt’s worth noting that Binance’s services are not available in Hong Kong, which raises questions about the motivation behind establishing an independent entity within the city. While HKVAEX appears to be actively pursuing a virtual asset license in Hong Kong, Binance has been relatively silent about its own licensing plans within the Chinese autonomous territory. This move could potentially provide Binance with a strategic foothold in a market that is becoming increasingly significant for digital asset entities.Hong Kong has recently introduced a licensing scheme for digital asset entities, and this development has spurred enthusiasm among such entities to establish operations in the region. Alvin Kan, the Head of Asia at Sei Labs, has noted that Asia is poised to become a major expansion zone for the Web3 sector, with regulatory developments in the US creating opportunities for expansion beyond American borders.Stanley Fung, who currently heads up HKVAEX, previously served as the chief of Huobi’s Hong Kong operations until November 2022, according to his LinkedIn profile. His departure from Huobi coincided with the entrance of crypto entrepreneur Justin Sun into Huobi’s management.In a company-managed Telegram group, HKVAEX has emphasized its status as an “independent crypto exchange” in Hong Kong, separate from Binance. However, it also revealed that it sources liquidity from Binance. Despite asserting its independence and having its own technical team, there have been instances of collaboration between the two entities in Hong Kong, such as a promotional campaign where Binance was referred to as a “partner” in incentivizing the opening of an HKVAEX account.Changing strategyBinance has faced a series of regulatory challenges in recent times. In May, Binance exited the Canadian market due to new regulations related to stablecoins and restrictions on crypto exchanges. In the US, the two leading regulators have filed lawsuits against Binance, CZ, and related entities, leading to the departure of several top officials from the company.The leading global exchange appears to be pursuing a different strategy more recently. It has entered the Japanese and Thai markets through the acquisition of a local entity and a joint venture with a local company. While forced out of the Netherlands, its Dutch customers were moved to rival Coinmerce, which connects to the Binance trading engine and order books.The evolving regulatory landscape is reshaping the cryptocurrency industry, and the relationship between Binance and HKVAEX highlights the complexities and strategies adopted by major players in this evolving space.

Rising Cryptocurrency Arbitrage Transactions Raise Concerns in South KoreaThe number of arbitrage transactions between South Korean and foreign cryptocurrency exchanges has been experiencing a notable uptick, according to a report by local media outlet Maeil Business Newspaper.In recent developments, foreign actors engaging in price manipulation have been transferring substantial amounts of cryptocurrency assets to Korean exchanges, driving up prices. Subsequently, they transfer these tokens from Korean exchanges back to overseas platforms, capitalizing on the price discrepancies to generate profits.Photo by Maxim Hopman on UnsplashBithumb’s case in H1According to documents submitted to Kim Hee-gon, a member of the ruling political party People Power Party, on Monday, KRW 3.4 trillion ($2.6 billion) worth of tokens were moved from Bithumb, a leading Korean cryptocurrency exchange, to foreign trading platforms during the first half of this year. Although this figure marks a 40% decrease compared to H1 2022’s KRW 5.7 trillion, primarily due to the significant decline in token prices across the cryptocurrency market, it’s noteworthy that the number of transactions has seen a significant increase.Other exchangesGopax, another major exchange in the nation, recorded token outflows totaling KRW 12.3 billion. On the other hand, Upbit, Coinone, and Korbit, which are also prominent exchanges, declined to provide data due to reasons like confidentiality concerns. However, given that Upbit holds an 82.0% share of the Korean crypto market, nearly four times larger than Bithumb’s share (14.2%), it is suspected that the volume of tokens transferred from Upbit to foreign platforms would likely have followed a similar proportion.While the value of tokens sent from Bithumb to overseas operators saw a year-over-year decrease, the number of transactions surged to 231,302, nearly doubling the figure of H1 2022’s 124,048 transactions. The average transaction size was KRW 14.7 million.Even though the overall enthusiasm for cryptocurrencies might have cooled off since last year, the spike in the number of transactions suggests that there’s been a surge in arbitrage trading between Korea and foreign markets.Kimchi premiumEarlier this month, a significant transaction caught the eye of cryptocurrency market observers in South Korea. On September 1, crypto data analytics firm Arkham identified that 170,000 CyberConnect (CYBER) tokens were transferred to Bithumb from a crypto wallet thought to be owned by DWF Labs, a firm specializing in cryptocurrency trading and investment. The timing of the transaction coincides with a period during which the Kimchi premium for CYBER exceeded 100%. The Kimchi premium refers to the crypto price gap between Korean exchanges and their foreign counterparts.The complicating factor here is that DWF Labs is a foreign entity that is managed by a foreign team.The use of corporate accounts is virtually prohibited in the Korean crypto market. The Travel Rule mandates that any transfers of tokens between Korean and international exchanges must go through accounts that have been verified under Know Your Customer (KYC) guidelines. Given these regulations, there are growing suspicions within the crypto community that foreign venture capitalists may have used accounts in borrowed names to conduct sales on Korean exchanges, which are restricted to Korean citizens. However, it’s worth noting that there is currently no legal basis for taking punitive action even if borrowed-name accounts were indeed used.Lawmaker Kim commented on the limitations of current financial regulations aimed at preventing money laundering in the cryptocurrency market. Despite efforts by financial authorities, including the introduction of the Travel Rule, Kim stated that these measures have not been very effective. He emphasized the urgency of enhancing the regulatory framework to curb potential illicit activities involving cryptocurrencies, such as those exploiting market arbitrage opportunities.

Singapore’s Regulator Imposes 9-Year Ban on 3AC FoundersSingapore’s central bank and financial regulator, the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS), has handed down a nine-year prohibition order to Kyle Davies and Su Zhu, co-founders of the failed crypto hedge fund Three Arrows Capital (3AC).Photo by Swapnil Bapat on UnsplashSevere restrictionsThe penalty relates to alleged violations of the city-state’s securities laws. The prohibition order came into effect on Wednesday, carrying severe restrictions for Davies and Zhu.During this nine-year period, Davies and Zhu are prohibited from engaging in any regulated activities in Singapore. They are also barred from managing, serving as directors, or holding substantial shares in any capital market services business within the territory of Singapore.Loo Siew Yee, the Assistant Managing Director of Policy, Payments, and Financial Crime at MAS, emphasized the seriousness of the violations in a statement released by the central bank on Thursday. Yee stated:“MAS takes a serious view of Mr. Zhu’s and Mr. Davies’ flagrant disregard of MAS’ regulatory requirements and dereliction of their directors’ duties.” She further asserted that MAS would take action against senior managers who engage in such misconduct.Securities law violationsMAS’s decision to impose these sanctions on the 3AC co-founders was based on its findings of further securities law violations during investigations into 3AC and its founders. The regulatory authority accused Davies and Zhu of failing to inform MAS when 3AC hired a new business representative, providing false information to the regulator, and neglecting to establish an appropriate risk management framework.3AC’s troubles stemmed from the crypto market crash that occurred last year, triggered by the Terra ecosystem’s collapse. The hedge fund’s leveraged crypto positions exposed it to billions in loan defaults, resulting in significant financial losses. Its lack of risk management had a cascading effect in crypto. Lenders like Celsius and BlockFi had exposure to 3AC, leading to further collapses later in 2022 as a consequence.3AC’s creditors claim that the firm owes as much as $3.5 billion, and liquidators are now seeking to recover approximately $1.3 billion from Zhu and Davies, who allegedly incurred the debt when the firm was already insolvent.Regulatory reprimandsThis action by MAS follows last June’s reprimand of 3AC, which occurred just before the hedge fund filed for bankruptcy amid widely reported insolvency issues. At that time, MAS had criticized 3AC for providing false information, failing to report directorship changes involving Zhu and Davies, and exceeding the legal assets under management threshold.It’s just the latest reprimand the duo have received from a regulator this year, though. Zhu and Davies have been busy in trying to get another start-up off the ground. Earlier this year, they launched OPNX, a crypto bankruptcy claims trading platform. The venture is based out of Dubai, and the firm reported in April that it had gotten significant VC backing.Many of those that the company claimed were backing the venture disassociated themselves from those claims. The following month, the Dubai regulator, the Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority (VARA), reprimanded the OPNX founders, having issued an investor alert relative to the firm a few weeks prior to that. VARA's complaint was that the business had been operating without having acquired the appropriate licensing.