Top

Indian Web3 industry body campaigned for ‘level playing field’

Policy & Regulation·January 03, 2024, 2:42 AM

An industry advocacy body for crypto and Web3 in India had urged the Indian government to take action against nine offshore exchanges, prompting the government to issue show cause notices and block URLs recently.

 

Native industry pushback

According to CoinDesk, the publication has seen a copy of a letter that was sent in mid-December by the Bharat Web3 Association (BWA), addressed to the Indian Finance Ministry’s Department of Revenue Secretary, Sanjay Malhotra.

 

The letter was penned by BWA Chairman Dilip Chenoy. Chenoy has been in the role since March of last year having a number of years of leadership experience within Indian industry bodies under his belt, with time spent previously as Secretary General of the Indian Chambers of Commerce and Industry and as Chairman of the board of Sant Longowal Institute of Engineering and Technology.

 

According to its LinkedIn profile, the BWA seeks to “advocate for the collaboration between the regulatory bodies and the Industry for creating awareness about the new age technology and the emerging [Web3/crypto] asset class.”

 

‘Show cause’ notices

It emerged last week that India’s Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) had issued “compliance show-cause” notices to a number of overseas crypto platforms who have otherwise been active within the Indian market. The FIU is a national body tasked with liaising with and providing information to enforcement agencies where suspected illicit transactions are concerned.

 

The offshore exchanges, including Binance, KuCoin, Huobi, Kraken, Gate.io, Bittrex, Bitstamp, MEXC Global and Bitfinex, have been given a two-week deadline to respond to the show cause notice. This notice questions why regulatory actions should not be taken against them, aiming to ensure compliance with the country's financial regulations. It’s understood that the BWA's letter requested a one-month grace period for offshore exchanges to register with the FIU.

 

It remains unclear whether the government's actions were solely prompted by the BWA's letter or if it would have taken place independently. Notably, the BWA's letter aligns with the government's earlier mandate in March, requiring crypto businesses to register with the FIU and adhere to anti-money laundering processes under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA). Since then, 31 domestic entities have registered with the FIU.

 

https://asset.coinness.com/en/news/c3b66d7fe28e336f0aeee7820783d08c.jpg
Photo by Peter Glaser on Unsplash

Ensuring a fair game

The BWA's letter also proposes that offshore exchanges establish an Indian subsidiary, deposit the applicable tax deducted at source (TDS) from July 1, 2022 and face restrictions, including potential access blocks on mobile app stores and IP addresses, for non-compliance. While it's unclear if all these requests feature in the show cause notices, the BWA emphasizes the need for fair competition.

 

Rajagopal Menon, Vice President of leading Indian crypto exchange WazirX, stressed that “all we are asking for is a level playing field." The BWA's letter also urges the government to grant Indian retailers a 30-day window to withdraw assets before implementing any restrictions.

 

The fledgling BWA industry body recently celebrated its first anniversary with its founding member, CoinSwitch founder Ashish Singhal, stating that he got involved with the BWA “to help build an effective regulatory framework for Web3 and digital assets in India.” Singhal added that the BWA’s mission is “to help India realize its vision to be the leading digital economy.”

 

More to Read
View All
Policy & Regulation·

Jan 13, 2024

RBI Governor: No place for ‘crypto mania’ in India despite U.S. ETF approval

At the 16th Mint Annual BFSI Summit and Awards in Mumbai, Reserve Bank of India (RBI) governor Shaktikanta Das reiterated the central bank's cautious stance on cryptocurrencies, regardless of recent global developments. During the event, which was held on Thursday, Das took to the stage. He was asked if the approval of spot bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs) in the United States gives legitimacy to cryptocurrency.Photo by rupixen.com on UnsplashUnwavering responseDas was unwavering in his response, maintaining that the RBI remains steadfast in its approach and opposition to cryptocurrencies. He stated: "The way we look at crypto remains unchanged, irrespective of who does what."  He emphasized that the RBI does not intend to emulate regulatory decisions made by other countries. Despite this global development, Das maintained the RBI's reservations, expressing concerns about the potential risks associated with venturing further into the cryptocurrency space. Favoring a crypto banLast month, officials from the Indian central bank told the Hindustan Times that the RBI believes that the Indian government should impose an outright ban on cryptocurrencies in India. One unnamed official stated:"The government cannot sidestep the RBI’s concerns while deciding on cryptocurrencies, as it is responsible for monetary stability in India and maintains price stability." Das acknowledged the potential of blockchain technology, the foundation of cryptocurrencies, highlighting its versatility for various applications. Both the central bank and the Indian government have encouraged the development of blockchain rather than crypto. Last year, an RBI-led initiative, the National Payments Corporation of India (NPCI), recruited blockchain expertise to further develop that project. However, he made it clear that the RBI's focus remains on strengthening governance and assurance in regulated entities, with an emphasis on early identification, close monitoring and effective management of risks. Citing ‘Tulipmania’Das cautioned against a “crypto mania,” drawing parallels to the historical tulipmania of the 17th century. He underscored the RBI's position that embracing cryptocurrencies could pose significant risks, echoing his previous warnings about the macroeconomic and financial stability risks associated with these digital assets. The governor emphasized the importance of instilling an appropriate risk culture within organizations, with active involvement from the board and senior management. Das stated that the RBI expects top officials and board members to play a more proactive role in risk management. India’s crypto community responded critically to the RBI governor’s comments. Ajeet Khurana, a Web3 growth investor, responded on social media, stating:”Dear RBI governor, I respect you a lot, and I don’t mind that you don’t like Crypto. Diverse points of view are healthy. Yet, using words like 'tulip mania' only gives the impression that you are out of touch with what is happening in Web3. My request, Sir, is that you update yourself.” Vivek Sen, the founder of Bitgrow Lab, wrote:”Dear RBI, First, don't club Bitcoin with ‘Crypto’. Secondly, Tulips did not experience an 80% drop on four occasions, and they recovered each time.”Despite opposition to cryptocurrencies in official circles in India, a report last year produced by Chainalysis found that India is leading the way in Asia in terms of grassroots adoption of cryptocurrencies. 

news
Web3 & Enterprise·

Oct 25, 2023

Web3 Security Startup Blockaid Raises $33M in Funding

Web3 Security Startup Blockaid Raises $33M in FundingIsraeli enterprise Blockaid, a Web3 security startup founded by two former Israeli military cyber intelligence personnel, has secured a total of $33 million in funding.The recent Series A round of $27 million was led by Ribbit Capital and Variant and saw participation from Cyberstarts, Sequoia Capital, and Greylock Partners. This funding totals $33 million when consolidated with an initial $6 million seed round.Photo by Shubham’s Web3 on UnsplashSecuring Web3 against threatsBlockaid offers comprehensive Web3 security solutions designed to combat crypto fraud, phishing, and hacks. Its approach involves the examination of both on-chain and off-chain transactions. In this way, the firm is seeking to set itself apart from competitors like CertiK and Cyvers.The company’s decentralized application (dApp) Scanning Engine simulates and validates blockchain transactions before they are executed. This process takes place within Blockaid’s dApp Scanning Sandbox, which also assesses the potential maliciousness of interactions and dApps.Since its inception in September 2022, Blockaid claims to have successfully scanned over 450 million transactions, preventing over 1.3 million attacks and safeguarding more than $7.1 billion in assets. Furthermore, the Israeli startup’s efforts have averted losses of over $500 million in the Web3 ecosystem.Recent success storiesOne notable success story involves the prevention of a phishing attack targeting Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin’s X (formerly Twitter) account. Due to Blockaid’s security measures, users’ wallets remained protected, though unsecured wallets with approximately $700,000 in assets, including valuable NFTs, suffered losses in the attack. Blockaid has been involved in enhancing security for prominent platforms, including MetaMask, OpenSea, Zerion Wallet, and Rainbow Wallet.With the newly acquired funds, Blockaid aims to expand its client base and meet an increasing demand for its security solutions. Ido Ben-Natan, co-founder and CEO of Blockaid, expressed confidence in their ability to support both existing and new customers during these market conditions. Blockaid operates from New York and Tel Aviv and plans to bolster its workforce by hiring additional personnel across various functions.Addressing the Web3 security challengeThe significance of Blockaid’s work becomes even more apparent when considering the current challenges in the Web3 space. In recent years, the Web3 sector has faced a rising tide of fraud, phishing attempts, and hacks. As noted by Ben-Natan, Web3 has experienced staggering losses, with $14 billion stolen in just one year, surpassing losses in all non-crypto cyber-crime combined. Additionally, one in ten decentralized applications (dApps) has been identified as malicious, making even crypto-savvy users susceptible to malicious actors.Furthermore, there is a growing concern about nation-state actors actively targeting and stealing user funds for their economic gain. In this adversarial and uncertain environment, the usability and security of Web3 must be enhanced to unlock its full potential. Blockaid’s innovative security tools aim to provide the necessary protection for Web3 builders and users.There’s no doubt that Web3 has to become more seamless and far more secure if it is to appeal to the mass market. In its blog post announcing the funding round, the project stated:”We believe that users shouldn’t have to know they’re interacting with crypto. We believe that web3 should just work, and work securely.”

news
Web3 & Enterprise·

Oct 17, 2023

Haru Invest Considers Server Suspension as Troubles Persist

Haru Invest Considers Server Suspension as Troubles PersistIn the wake of halting withdrawals in June, Haru Invest, a Singapore-headquartered cryptocurrency platform, is contemplating the suspension of its server. This decision is part of the firm’s ongoing efforts to streamline operations and reduce maintenance costs.Photo by David Guenther on UnsplashCost reductionCEO Hugo Lee made the announcement on Monday, underscoring the significant burden of server maintenance costs on the company’s finances. He acknowledged that this cost represents a substantial portion of their fixed expenses and is thus a top priority for the firm.Lee disclosed:“We plan to suspend the service in a few weeks, backing up all member information.”However, he also noted that the company is yet to finalize a concrete plan for the server suspension.The move to shut down the server aligns with Haru Invest’s broader strategy to lower all costs associated with its services. Lee explained:“Some of the current fixed expenditures include the upkeep of Haru Invest services, the cost of workspace like the office, and the cost of communication with our members.”The company is actively seeking ways to reduce these expenses and preserve its assets.Asset distributionAdditionally, Lee assured users that the assets conserved thus far would be included in the distribution to those who have had their funds locked on the platform since June, offering a glimmer of hope to impacted users.Nevertheless, the announcement of the server suspension has raised concerns within the Haru Invest community. Some users have expressed skepticism about the purported high costs of server maintenance, believing the firm’s claim to be exaggerated.One user, voicing this discontent, commented on Haru Invest’s Telegram channel, “Server costs cost nothing.” Another remarked: “Servers are gone soon guys, huge costs, 200 USD a month.” According to industry standards, the maintenance costs for running a server for a small to medium-sized business typically range between $35 to $500 per month.Unhappy platform usersLee’s statement regarding the impending server suspension follows the platform’s earlier decision to terminate deposits and withdrawals in June. This decision was coupled with the closure of Haru Invest’s offices and the dismissal of numerous employees, as reported by local news agencies.Haru Invest attributed these issues to the fraudulent activities of the consignment operator B&S Holdings, formerly known as Aventus. While some investors accused the firm of orchestrating a “rug pull,” Haru Invest denied these allegations and maintained its innocence. One user posted the following claim on X (formerly Twitter) last week: “Rugpull. If justice is served, the scammers will be behind bars.”In a bid to address concerns over its corporate rehabilitation application, Lee appeared in court in September, emphasizing that Haru Invest was actively cooperating with investigating agencies. However, the company has yet to provide a timeline for the recovery of users’ assets as of early October.Lee also addressed the matter in Monday’s statement: “We are also responding to the rehabilitation proceedings that some of our members have filed with the court as mentioned in our previous announcement, in addition to actively cooperating with other authorities’ investigations. ”Haru Invest is reportedly facing a class-action lawsuit with disgruntled investors alleging fraud.

news
Loading