Indian Web3 industry body campaigned for ‘level playing field’

In the immediate aftermath of the approval of spot bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs) in the United States earlier this week, a Hong Kong legislator has spoken out to encourage a proactive response within the Chinese autonomous territory, while asset managers appear to be responding accordingly.Photo by Simon Zhu on UnsplashCompetitive responseLawmaker Johnny Ng has called on the local government to swiftly embrace the recent ETF approval in the United States. In a post on X, Ng emphasized the need for Hong Kong to proactively lead the way in the cryptocurrency space, fostering innovation to secure a global position amidst intense competition. Ng highlighted the Securities and Futures Commission's (SFC) previous expression of readiness to accept applications for spot bitcoin ETFs. He urged Hong Kong to capitalize on the rapidly evolving virtual asset sector, implementing policies and products that position the city as a global hub for virtual assets. "This presents an opportunity to solidify Hong Kong’s position as a global hub for virtual assets," Ng stated, emphasizing the importance of seizing this moment in the market's development. In December, Hong Kong's regulatory bodies, the SFC and the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA), reviewed their existing policies, releasing circulars that outlined the requirements for spot crypto ETFs. Fund managers explore ETFsHashKey, a licensed crypto exchange in Hong Kong, confirmed its potential participation in spot crypto ETFs through engaging in crypto transactions associated with ETFs and providing crypto custody services. The company, which obtained a license from the SFC to offer retail crypto trading services in August, positions itself to play a pivotal role in the emerging market. Livio Weng, COO of the Hong Kong-based crypto exchange, revealed that approximately ten fund managers, backed by Chinese capital and others from Asia and Europe, are exploring the launch of spot crypto ETFs in Hong Kong. Weng, in an interview with Chinese financial news media Caixin, disclosed that seven or eight of these fund managers have already been in contact with the SFC, forming teams to design investment products. Highlighting the importance of education in the crypto space, Ng called on the Hong Kong government to prioritize public education. He stressed the need to increase awareness of virtual assets among the public while simultaneously reducing opportunities for illicit activities involving digital assets. Substantial impactIn an interview earlier this week, Yat Siu, the co-founder of Hong Kong-based crypto venture capital and game software firm Animoca Brands, expressed the view that the spot bitcoin ETF approval in the U.S. would have a more substantial impact on the overall development of crypto in Asia. As Hong Kong prepares to pave the way for spot crypto ETFs, the SFC and the HKMA have already reviewed existing policies, outlining the requirements for such investment products. The December circular from the SFC emphasized that transactions involving spot crypto ETFs should occur through licensed crypto platforms or authorized financial institutions, ensuring regulatory compliance in the growing crypto market. 

South Korea is weighing a fiat-backed stablecoin, balancing monetary sovereignty against the fact that global stablecoins are dominated by the U.S. dollar while domestic payments are already near-instant.Photo by DrawKit Illustrations on UnsplashThin domestic need despite sovereignty aimsThe case for a won-pegged token is facing challenging headwinds. As a recent Korea Economic Daily report highlighted, skeptics argue the won's limited global demand and lack of reserve currency status would curb its adoption internationally. Domestically, the need is even less apparent. A study by NH Investment & Securities noted that with retail payments settling in seconds via biometrics or passwords, and with world-leading credit card and bank account penetration, the efficiency gains from a stablecoin are marginal at best. Despite this, the appeal of digital currencies is growing. Transactions in dollar-backed stablecoins USDT and USDC on Korea’s five main exchanges totaled nearly $71 billion between January and August, according to CryptoQuant. This rising adoption presents both an opportunity and a threat. While some analysts believe stablecoins could smooth exchange-rate volatility, the Bank of Korea (BOK) has expressed concern. In a recent working paper, Son Min-kyu of the central bank commented that the widespread use of dollar-backed stablecoins could entrench the dollar's dominance, while also amplifying run risk and market volatility in Treasuries during periods of stress. Scarce short-term collateralSeoul also faces a unique structural hurdle: a shortage of short-term government bonds to use as collateral. Unlike the U.S., where stablecoin issuers rely on a deep market for Treasury bills, Korea’s bond market is dominated by long-dated paper. Kim Pil-kyu of the Korea Capital Market Institute (KCMI) described short-term sovereign bills as vital for a stablecoin’s value preservation, a resource Korea currently lacks. As South Korea deliberates, other major economies are forging ahead on divergent paths. Japan is moving to authorize privately issued stablecoins this fall, while the European Union has brought them under its comprehensive Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) regulation. UK’s cap plan clashes with pro-innovation pushThis regulatory balancing act is also playing out in the U.K., where a policy rift is emerging. According to the Financial Times, the Bank of England has proposed capping individual holdings of widely used stablecoins at £10,000–£20,000, with a £10 million limit for businesses. Industry groups argue the plan would be expensive to implement and could blunt the U.K.’s competitive edge in digital finance. The central bank's caution also contrasts with the government's pro-innovation stance, with finance minister Rachel Reeves recently pledging to promote the use of stablecoins and tokenized securities. For Seoul, the global shift toward tokenized money is undeniable. With seemingly limited domestic demand and various structural challenges, a won-backed stablecoin is, for now, an idea worth watching as the broader financial landscape evolves. 

The blockchain network underpinning Bitcoin, the world’s largest cryptocurrency, requires an energy volume comparable to the annual consumption of Thailand. According to Digiconomist’s Bitcoin Energy Consumption Index, the protocol utilized roughly 204.44 terawatt-hours (TWh) of electricity between Nov. 18, 2024, and Nov. 18, 2025.Photo by Fré Sonneveld on UnsplashFiscal losses drive Malaysian oversightAmid these intense energy demands, Malaysia’s primary electricity utility has recorded substantial financial impairments attributed to illicit activities. Tenaga Nasional Bhd (TNB) reported losses totaling 4.57 billion ringgit ($1.1 billion) from illegal crypto-mining operations over a five-year span. In a Nov. 19 report by The Edge Malaysia, the Ministry of Energy Transition and Water Transformation (Petra) disclosed these figures to parliament, specifying that the unauthorized mining occurred at 13,827 locations between 2020 and August of this year. To counter these infractions through regulatory channels, Petra has formed a special committee scheduled to convene before year-end. This body aims to recommend enhancements to the Electricity Supply Act, which currently delineates penalties based on the offender's classification. Domestic violators face fines ranging from 1,000 to 50,000 ringgit ($240 to $12,000), imprisonment of up to one year, or both. Penalties escalate for non-domestic entities, involving fines between 20,000 and one million ringgit ($480 to $240,000) and potential prison terms of up to five years. Despite these provisions regarding electricity theft, a specific legal code regulating the act of crypto mining remains absent, creating a jurisdictional void. International bans and grid reallocationStrategies to curtail electricity usage by crypto miners are becoming evident elsewhere in Southeast Asia as well. Laotian Deputy Energy Minister Chanthaboun Soukaloun told Reuters last month that the nation intends to suspend electricity supplies to crypto miners by early 2026. He cited the sector's minimal economic contribution and low job creation as primary factors. Consequently, the state plans to redirect power to high-priority sectors, including AI data centers, metals processing, and electric-vehicle manufacturing. Parallel restrictions are emerging globally. In October, the government of British Columbia enacted a permanent prohibition on new BC Hydro connections for crypto miners to safeguard the Canadian province’s energy reserves. Officials pointed to the industry’s "disproportionate energy consumption and limited economic benefit" as the rationale for the policy. The debate over thermal innovationConversely, some enterprises are exploring methods to capture thermal output from Bitcoin mining to heat residential and commercial properties. If viable, such repurposing could utilize the considerable thermal byproducts of mining. A K33 Research study cited by CNBC indicates the industry generates roughly 100 TWh of heat annually, a figure sufficient to warm the entirety of Finland. However, industry consensus on the feasibility of these applications remains elusive. Proponents suggest that mining infrastructure could be situated in proximity to heat consumers. Skeptics, however, contend that the reliance on application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC) chips makes this impractical, arguing that the technical difficulty of mining a block renders household participation unfeasible. Despite these differing views, the concept continues to attract attention as a potential avenue for innovation in energy distribution. As jurisdictions like Malaysia and British Columbia tighten regulatory oversight, the cryptocurrency sector faces mounting pressure to address its energy footprint. The divergence between government restrictions and industry-led efficiency proposals underscores the complex relationship between digital asset infrastructure and global energy resources. Given the shifting landscape of policy and technology, the outlook for sustainable large-scale crypto mining remains uncertain, as governments weigh energy demands against economic benefits and the industry searches for more efficient ways to operate.