KuCoin invests in cross-chain inscription protocol

Samsung Plans to Expand Its Business Through NFTsSamsung Research, the research arm of Samsung Electronics, set up a new task force earlier this year to launch new projects to combat slowing demand for home appliances.Photo by Markus Winkler on PexelsSamsung’s endeavors in NFTsOne of its projects will involve non-fungible tokens (NFTs), in which Samsung has been showing its continued interest. Last February, Samsung Electronics displayed NFT artworks on their high-end televisions, and more recently, the high-tech company signed a memorandum of understanding with Hana Financial Group to develop NFT-related products.TVs to offer NFT art trading functionalityIt is predicted that in the first half of this year, Samsung will release a premium television with an application that allows TV viewers to trade NFT artworks. It is analyzed that the leading hardware manufacturer now attempts to expand its business models through NFTs and other content services while maintaining its dominance in the TV market.

The Dubai Court of First Instance in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) has notched up another milestone relative to the continuing rollout of the use of and legal status of cryptocurrency by recognizing crypto as a legitimate means of payment where salaries are concerned. The groundbreaking decision, which was revealed in the court via case number 1739 of 2024, gives confirmed legal recognition to the validity of crypto as a means of payment for salaries, which may be stipulated in an employment contract.Photo by David Rodrigo on UnsplashRuling reflecting a progressive approach to cryptoThe outcome hit the radar of a number of crypto-centric UAE-based lawyers, with Web3 lawyer Irina Heaver, a partner at NeosLegal, pointing out that the decision marks a shift from previous relevant case law in the UAE in 2023 when a similar set of circumstances led to crypto not being recognized for the purposes of salary payment. Commenting on the ruling of that previous case, she stated: “This decision reflected a traditional viewpoint, emphasizing the need for concrete evidence when dealing with unconventional payment forms.” Ecowatt (EWT) tokensIn this latest case, the circumstances revolved around a dispute whereby an employee claimed for unpaid salary, termination compensation and further benefits. The employee’s contract of employment outlined a payment in both fiat currency, alongside 5,250 Ecowatt (EWT) tokens.  Ecowatt is a renewable energy blockchain project which claims to serve a purpose in reducing carbon impact on a global basis through the tokenization of green energy. It was the failure of the employer to pay out the tokenized portion of the employee’s salary that led to the dispute and the subsequent lawsuit. The court ultimately sided with the employee, agreeing that the employer must fulfill its contractual obligation and pay out the remainder of the employee’s salary and benefits in Ecowatt tokens. The judgement stated: “As the respondent did not provide evidence of payment in EcoWatt tokens, the court orders the respondent to pay the claimant the value of her wages in EcoWatt tokens.” In weighing up this latest adjudication, Heaver concludes that the move is congruent with the progressive approach that is being taken to digital assets within the UAE. “This decision reflects a broader acceptance of cryptocurrency in employment contracts and highlights the court’s recognition of the evolving nature of financial transactions within the Web3 economy,” she stated. Mahmoud Abuwasel, partner at Wasel & Wasel, an international firm with a presence in Abu Dhabi, also noted the relevance of the ruling, posting on the matter on legal update database, Lexology.  Greater legal clarityLittle by little, greater clarity is emerging in jurisdictions worldwide with regard to the status of cryptocurrency and digital assets within the context of international legal systems. In 2023, a Chinese court recognized virtual assets as legal property, affirming the legal status of virtual assets as protected property under Chinese law.Earlier in 2023, the courts in the Chinese autonomous territory of Hong Kong determined cryptocurrency to be property “capable of being held in trust.” Not all decisions have been positive however, with a Singaporean court determining in April 2023 that crypto is not money, albeit that the judge did acknowledge that the matter would require a more detailed examination of evidence in another court. 

Taiwan Aims to Propose Special Crypto Law by Late NovemberIn a bid to address growing concerns surrounding offshore crypto exchanges and prevent regulatory arbitrage, Taiwan is actively working towards proposing a draft special crypto law for its first reading by the end of November.Yung-Chang Chiang, a member of the Legislative Yuan, the Taiwanese parliament, emphasized the need for a dedicated crypto asset act to effectively regulate crypto businesses in discussion with The Block on Friday. Chiang believes that cryptocurrencies, as an asset class, significantly differ from traditional financial products and require oversight through a separate, specialized legal framework.Photo by Ian Chen on UnsplashPublic hearingThe Taiwanese politician recently organized a public hearing within the parliament to discuss the draft proposal with key stakeholders, including virtual asset service providers, legal experts, and academics. He argued that while Taiwan’s Financial Supervisory Commission (FSC) had released guidelines for the crypto sector to establish self-supervisory rules through a potential industry association, these measures lack legal enforceability.Chiang pointed out:“In this case, under the authority of this special law, regulatory authorities can impose administrative penalties on operators who violate these self-regulation rules. Without such a special law, the regulators would lack the ability to impose penalties.”Under the proposed special law, all crypto platforms operating in Taiwan would be required to obtain a permit. Failure to do so could result in regulatory orders to cease operations. Presently, Taiwan mandates that virtual asset service providers comply with anti-money laundering (AML) laws, which were introduced by the FSC in July 2021. However, the broader crypto industry in Taiwan remains largely unregulated.It is unlikely that the special law will pass through all three readings during the current legislative session, which is expected to conclude by the end of this year. Chiang noted: “An election is coming up, and the current legislative session focuses more on reviewing the government’s budget.”Chiang also mentioned the possibility of Taiwan’s FSC proposing its version of the special crypto law, but this is not anticipated until at least mid-2024. He explained: “It’s hard to say exactly when the special law will be enacted, but it should likely occur sometime after the middle of 2024.”Binance, the world’s largest crypto exchange, is understood to be in the process of registering in Taiwan for AML compliance, despite not currently being regulated in the country. The exchange has formed a local entity named “Binance International Limited Taiwan Branch (Seychelles),” as indicated in the Taiwanese Ministry of Economic Affairs’ database.Banking difficultiesDuring the public hearing, Damien Ho, Representative of Global Partnerships at Binance, raised concerns about the challenges faced by crypto platforms in Taiwan in securing suitable banking services. Despite the FSC’s efforts to discourage banks from treating crypto platforms as high-risk entities, crypto platforms still encounter difficulties in their interactions with banks. Ho suggested that the Taiwanese government should encourage private or public banks to become more crypto-friendly, facilitating the regulated and effective development of crypto businesses.At the public hearing, Winston Hsiao, Co-Founder and Group CRO of Taipei-based crypto exchange XREX, suggested a step-by-step approach to regulation, with smaller entities adhering to self-supervisory rules formulated by the industry association after registration. For larger entities, he proposed obtaining a permit under the special law and potentially applying for other relevant financial licenses.