1st-Generation partners with Tapbit to venture into global blockchain market

Singapore Exchange Limited (SGX), the city-state’s primary asset exchange, is in the process of establishing Bitcoin perpetual futures trading on the platform.Photo by Kanchanara on UnsplashInstitutional product offeringAccording to a report published by Bloomberg earlier this week, the exchange platform intends to launch Bitcoin futures sometime during H2 2025. The product launch will be subject to regulatory approval from the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS). A spokesperson for the company told Bloomberg that the product offering will be geared exclusively towards institutional investors and traders in an effort to “significantly expand institutional market access.” Retail access to the product will be prohibited. Once launched, these Bitcoin perpetual futures contracts, being offered through a traditional finance (TradFi) outfit like SGX, will help to blur the lines between TradFi and the emerging crypto sector. Perpetual futures have no expiry date. They offer a means for traders to bet on price changes in an underlying asset while doing away with the need to take ownership of the asset itself. Cautious approachSGX has been cautious in listing crypto assets and derivative products. Last year the firm’s CEO, Loh Boon Chye, said that the time was not yet right for such listings.  His concern back then was that any such product launches would need “sustainable ecosystem support,” adding that “that means demand, that means governance, that means structure.” While spot Bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs) had been approved in the United States at that point, there has been much further development in the crypto-sphere since then, following the election of a pro-crypto administration in the U.S. That event has had knock-on effects globally. Singapore’s SGX isn’t the only traditional exchange platform to respond. Japanese futures exchange, the Osaka Dojima Exchange (ODEX), is gearing up to file an application with the Financial Services Agency (FSA) to list a Bitcoin futures product later this month. Closer to home, an American digital asset marketplace that focuses on institutional trading, EDX Markets, has plans to introduce Bitcoin perpetual futures products to the Singaporean market, according to a report which emerged in January. In May 2024, EDX launched EDXM Global, a settlement platform, in Singapore. This product launch by SGX serves the purposes of decision-makers in Singapore, who have been trying to position the city-state as a digital asset industry hub. Additionally, the move will bring greater acceptance of the digital assets sector from traditional market participants. Crypto perpetual futures contracts were first pioneered by crypto derivatives exchanges like BitMEX back in 2016. Since then, other crypto-native platforms like Binance and OKX have offered these products. In the case of unregulated offshore exchanges, the products have proven to be controversial, as at times, they have been used in a manner that has exposed market participants to counterparty risk. Failed crypto exchange FTX, together with its sister company Alameda Research, relied on the products in their trading activities. SGX, as a seasoned, regulated TradFi operator, which holds an Aa2 rating from Moody’s, is likely to prove to be a more palatable option for institutional players.

Ant Group Restructuring With Implications for BlockchainAnt Group, an affiliate company of Chinese conglomerate Alibaba, is understood to be undertaking a significant restructuring that could have broader implications for the digital asset industry.Photo by Shubham Dhage on UnsplashPotential IPOAccording to a recent report published by Bloomberg, the company is contemplating a separation of its blockchain and database management services, as well as its international business, from its core financial operations in China. It’s being speculated that the move is a precursor to Ant Group’s application for a financial holding license in China. Furthermore, it could be part of a bid to revive its suspended initial public offering (IPO) in Hong Kong.The company had been under regulatory scrutiny from the Chinese authorities over the course of the past three years. That investigation culminated in a hefty fine of 7.12 billion yuan ($995 million). The consequences of that regulatory investigation have taken a toll on the company’s valuation, plunging from a peak of $280 billion before the IPO cancellation in 2020 to a current estimated value of $79 billion.Blockchain business implicationsBy pursuing this restructuring, Ant Group seeks to refocus on its core financial services within China. It’s unclear what the outcome will be for non-core businesses such as blockchain-based ventures. Potentially spinning these businesses off could unlock hidden value in blockchain-related activities. However, such a move would also raise questions regarding the future of these non-core businesses and their potential impact on the broader digital asset industry.AntChain, the blockchain technology developed by Ant Group, holds a prominent position in China, being widely adopted across various sectors. Should Ant Group decide to spin off or divest this business, it could significantly alter the blockchain landscape in the country.Originally introduced as “Ant Blockchain” in 2017 alongside Alipay, AntChain expanded its services to provide blockchain-as-a-Service (BaaS) to Ant Group’s partners in 2018. In mid-2020, Ant Group took a step further by transforming Ant Blockchain into a separate entity and rebranding it as AntChain. Besides blockchain solutions, AntChain is also actively involved in developing Artificial Intelligence of Things (AIoT), risk control technologies, and other value-added tech services.The wide adoption of Ant Group’s blockchain technology has played a pivotal role in promoting blockchain implementation in China. Last year the company unveiled a blockchain storage engine called Letus, as a mechanism to lower storage costs of blockchain networks. Another project saw it partner with a Malaysian investment bank in an effort to develop a crypto trading and portfolio management app. These are individual instances of the company’s varied activities in the blockchain space.Any alterations to its blockchain operations could impact the pace and scale of blockchain adoption in the country. While the Chinese authorities have discouraged crypto trading and mining, they have very much encouraged blockchain development.The restructuring appears to be a response to the increasing regulatory pressures in the fintech industry. A further tightening of regulations on blockchain operations for fintech companies might potentially hinder innovation and growth in the sector.Most likely the guiding hand of the government in China will have a material effect on how these blockchain-based businesses develop in the event of an Ant Group restructuring that would see them being spun out.

Speaking at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Hong Kong Financial Secretary Paul Chan Mo-po said digital assets should support the real economy, but only within a framework of strong safeguards to protect financial stability, market integrity, and investors.Photo by Ruslan Bardash on UnsplashAccording to the South China Morning Post, Chan addressed a closed-door workshop on Jan. 20, where he highlighted the advantages of digital assets, including greater transparency, improved risk management, and more efficient capital movement. Reviewing milestones in the city’s crypto sector, Chan said that since 2023, Hong Kong has issued three tranches of tokenized green bonds worth a combined $2.1 billion. He also pointed to a Hong Kong Monetary Authority pilot launched last November that enables real-value transactions using tokenized deposits and digital assets. Chan added that the city’s stablecoin licensing regime is progressing, with the first licenses expected in the first quarter. Same risks, same regulationsWhile emphasizing the necessity of financial innovation, Chan highlighted Hong Kong’s regulatory philosophy, which dictates that identical activities posing identical risks must be subject to identical regulations. He explained that this approach is designed to promote healthy, responsible, and sustainable sector development, reiterating that protective measures against financial instability remain mandatory. As Hong Kong officials continue to promote the city’s digital asset push on the international stage, a local industry body has cautioned that proposed licensing frameworks for crypto trading, advisory, and management services may have unintended consequences if rolled out without transitional measures. Industry group calls for grace periodAccording to Cointelegraph, the Hong Kong Securities & Futures Professionals Association (HKSFPA) said in a submission to regulators that existing market participants could be compelled to halt operations under the new rules unless a grace period is provided. The association called for a transitional deeming arrangement of six to 12 months for firms that file licence applications before the regulations formally take effect. No definitive start date has been set for the planned virtual asset regulatory regimes, which remain under consultation. Two days before issuing those comments, the HKSFPA had cautioned that the planned introduction of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development’s (OECD) Crypto Asset Reporting Framework (CARF) and related Common Reporting Standard (CRS) amendments could create new operational and legal risks for local firms. The group said it supported the policy direction in principle but warned that uncapped per-account penalties and open-ended director liability could raise compliance risks, urging regulators to introduce clear caps and legal safeguards. The association also called for lighter requirements for entities with no reportable activity, the development of data file preparation tools from both the industry and the Inland Revenue Department (IRD), and the ability to transfer record-keeping responsibilities to third parties upon dissolution. Elsewhere in the region, Japan implemented the CARF on Jan. 1, 2026. Users of Japanese exchanges must now declare tax residence, while operators are required to submit transaction data—including trading volumes and asset breakdowns—to tax authorities by April 30 of the following year. Data regarding non-resident users is expected to be shared with foreign authorities under international agreements. Other jurisdictions are following suit, with India planning to adopt the framework by 2027.