1st-Generation partners with Tapbit to venture into global blockchain market

Hong Kong’s OSL crypto exchange receives $91M boostBC Technology Group, the owner of the licensed OSL exchange, has secured a HK$710 million ($90.9 million) investment from BGX.Photo by Precondo CA on UnsplashBringing clarity to BitgetX market withdrawalBGX is reportedly associated with Seychelles-incorporated crypto exchange Bitget. The investment, which was announced via statements published by both BC Technology Group and BGX on their respective websites on Tuesday, brings further clarity to the rationale behind Bitget’s recent decision to withdraw its BitgetX platform from the Hong Kong market.BitgetX was believed to be working towards crypto licensing in Hong Kong. Its decision on Monday to stop pursuing a virtual asset trading platform (VATP) license and withdraw from the market entirely had been perceived as a weakness of the regulatory regimen in Hong Kong. However, it now appears that it was just clearing the way for involvement in crypto trading brought about through its investment in OSL, an entity that has already acquired a trading license within the Chinese autonomous territory.BGX has entered into an agreement to acquire a 29.97% stake in BC Technology, OSL's parent company, pending shareholder approval. According to an announcement, BGX CEO Patrick Pan Zhiyong is set to become one of two new executive directors as part of this investment. Pan, concurrently serving as the CEO of BitgetX, will also oversee the transition as Bitget steps back from the market, scheduling its platform closure for Dec. 13.Sale rumors deniedReports emerged in October that BC Technology Group was considering the sale of OSL based on a $128 million valuation. Contrary to those reports, BC Technology vehemently denied any intentions to sell OSL, emphasizing its commitment to maintaining the exchange’s operations. The company dismissed such speculation as “factually inaccurate and highly misleading,” underscoring its dedication to navigating the evolving crypto landscape.Bitget, responding to inquiries from the South China Morning Post (SCMP), asserted its independence from BGX, stating that it is “an independent entity” with no legal or commercial connections to the crypto firm.BGX is incorporated in the Cayman Islands and wholly owned by Liu Shuai, the founder of Shenzhen Qianhai Junchuang Fund Management and Singaporean crypto fund Foresight Ventures. Liu’s investment portfolio includes Bitget, as well as U.S. crypto media group The Block, which was acquired by Foresight Ventures, according to reports earlier this week.The incorporation of BGX into BC Technology’s ecosystem introduces a dynamic player with diverse investments across the crypto space. Against the backdrop of Hong Kong’s changing regulatory landscape, with the introduction of a mandatory licensing scheme last year, BC Technology’s OSL was the first exchange to obtain a voluntary license from the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) in 2020. The asset management division of the company received a trading license in May of this year. In August, OSL, along with HashKey, received approval from the SFC to upgrade their licenses, allowing them to serve retail investors.The evolving regulatory environment reflects Hong Kong’s ambition to position itself as a crypto hub, attracting both institutional and retail participants. While that endeavor is not without its challenges, the city hasn’t been adversely affected by BitgetX's withdrawal from the market, given this related investment in OSL.

HKMA reflects on retail CBDC pilot phase one completionHong Kong’s Monetary Authority (HKMA), the Chinese territory’s central bank, recently released a report following the completion of phase one of its central bank digital currency (CBDC) pilot, highlighting the potential benefits of a retail CBDC, commonly referred to as e-HKD (digital Hong Kong dollar).Photo by Ruslan Bardash on UnsplashUndecided on full implementationIn a press release published by the HKMA on Monday, the authority clarified that the report underscores that while a retail CBDC could bring value to the payments ecosystem and unlock new economic transaction possibilities, in-depth investigation and evaluation are essential before considering large-scale implementation.At this stage, Hong Kong’s central bank has not committed to introducing an e-HKD, but the report sheds light on the prospects and challenges associated with such a move. The region has been signaling its intent to position itself as a hub for virtual assets, evident in the regulatory framework introduced in June and the granting of licenses to crypto trading platforms in August.Project e-HKD, initiated by the HKMA in 2021, is a significant step toward assessing the feasibility of a digital Hong Kong dollar. The pilot program was launched in November 2022 as part of the HKMA's “Fintech 2025” strategy. However, the HKMA remains cautious, as reflected in the comments of HKMA CEO Eddie Yue earlier this month. Yue told the South China Morning Post that the central bank is still waiting for greater clarity when it comes to the technological, legal and societal aspects of full implementation.Three core attributes identifiedThe report identifies three primary areas where an e-HKD could provide value: programmability, tokenization and atomic settlement. These attributes could lead to faster, more cost-efficient and more inclusive transactions. However, it’s essential to note that the 14 pilot programs conducted with 16 participating firms during phase one were executed on a small scale within a controlled environment.The phase one review highlights that the true potential and prerequisites for implementing an e-HKD on a larger scale depend on market developments and further investigation. It acknowledges that minor issues identified during the pilot phase could become more prominent or even unacceptable in a production environment.Gearing up for phase twoPhase one of the pilot program delved into various aspects, including full-fledged payments, offline payments, tokenized deposits, programmable payments and the settlement of Web3 transactions and tokenized assets. Hong Kong is now gearing up for phase two of the pilot, with plans to explore new use cases for an e-HKD and engage in more focused pilot initiatives. The goal is to understand how the e-HKD can facilitate innovative methods of transacting goods and services while maintaining financial stability.The HKMA’s stance on a retail CBDC places it at the center of a global debate. While the U.S. remains undecided on the issue, with the topic becoming contentious in presidential elections, India has forged ahead with plans for a retail CBDC. Meanwhile, Thailand’s central bank commenced a pilot project for a retail CBDC earlier this year.

Upcoming Regulatory Framework in Taiwan Sees Crypto Exchanges UniteIn preparation for the impending arrival of a regulatory framework for cryptocurrencies in Taiwan, nine prominent cryptocurrency firms have announced their collective efforts to establish an industry association.The nine exchange businesses announced the development via a press release which was published on Tuesday. The move comes in anticipation of Taiwan’s Financial Supervisory Commission (FSC) releasing comprehensive guidelines on cryptocurrency trading and payments by the end of September.Photo by Timo Volz on UnsplashDeveloping regulatory environmentThe industry body will include participation from native exchanges such as MaiCoin, BitoGroup, and ACE. While Taiwan has been behind the regulatory curve until now where crypto is concerned, the one measure that the FSC had already taken steps to mandate was that virtual asset services providers (VASPs) in Taiwan must adhere to the country’s anti-money laundering (AML) regulations. However, numerous other intricacies unique to the cryptocurrency industry still require careful consideration and regulation.Authorities in Taiwan have also put forward ten guiding principles for VASPs, designed to protect Taiwanese consumers.The forthcoming guidelines aim to address these concerns by introducing a comprehensive set of rules inspired by the VASP licensing framework in Hong Kong. One of the primary focuses of these proposed guidelines is consumer protection. They advocate for specific hot and cold wallet ratios for customer deposits with cryptocurrency exchanges, a measure designed to safeguard customer funds. Additionally, the guidelines suggest mandatory insurance against user losses to further enhance consumer confidence.Moreover, the FSC’s guidelines intend to prevent offshore cryptocurrency exchanges from operating onshore in Taiwan without proper compliance registration. This step aims to ensure that all participants in Taiwan’s cryptocurrency market adhere to uniform standards.In a bid to stabilize the Taiwanese financial system and prevent deceptive advertising practices, the guidelines also propose a ban on stablecoins linked to the Taiwanese dollar and impose restrictions on foreign exchange advertising within the country.Enabling self-regulationRegulators have also proposed the classification of crypto regulations within their own novel business category. As part of that initiative, officials expressed an interest in fostering self-regulation. The formation of this industry group could be deemed to be an encouraging sign relative to that aspiration.The nine cryptocurrency firms forming the industry association have established a working group led by Winston Hsiao, Co-Founder of XREX. This group aims to expedite the development of self-regulatory rules based on the forthcoming FSC guidelines.Wayne Huang, another Co-Founder of XREX, expressed his hope that the new FSC guidelines will provide the cryptocurrency industry with legitimacy, oversight, a clear growth trajectory, and an accelerated path to earn public trust.The formation of this industry association, coupled with the impending release of the FSC’s comprehensive regulatory guidelines, marks a significant milestone for Taiwan’s cryptocurrency sector. As the industry evolves, these proactive measures seek to ensure its stability, security, and compliance with international standards.