Top

Two Asian nations turn down spot bitcoin ETFs

Policy & Regulation·January 19, 2024, 2:50 AM

In a contrasting move to the recent approval of several spot bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs) by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), regulators in both Singapore and Thailand have turned down permission to list spot bitcoin ETFs.

https://asset.coinness.com/en/news/5c20fe2ebeb33d6997e51486fa52cb42.webp
Photo by Dmytro Demidko on Unsplash

Bitcoin not a qualified asset

According to local news media on Wednesday, Singapore's Monetary Authority (MAS) has announced its decision not to permit the listing of spot ETFs in the country. The MAS argues that cryptocurrencies, including bitcoin, do not meet the criteria for qualified assets within the context of ETFs.

 

This regulatory divergence means that retail investors in Singapore won't see the introduction of spot bitcoin ETFs domestically. However, they still have an avenue to trade such ETFs as they can turn to local brokerages for access to overseas markets. Despite this allowance, the MAS emphasizes the need for these retail investors to exercise caution due to the inherent high volatility and speculative nature of cryptocurrency trading.

 

A spokesperson from the regulatory authority clarified that while collected investment schemes (CIS), falling under the Securities and Futures Act regulation, include ETFs, they do not encompass bitcoin or any other cryptocurrency.

 

Future potential

While MAS may be turning down spot bitcoin ETFs at this point, there’s potential for a change of heart in the future. The FIMA Bill is currently working its way through the city-state’s legislative process. If enacted, it would give broader regulatory oversight of crypto to MAS. Lasanka Perera, CEO of Independent Reserve Singapore, recently suggested that the bill could make an ETF more likely.

 

Thailand says no

Meanwhile, Thailand’s Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has stated that it currently does not plan to allow asset management firms to launch spot bitcoin ETFs in the country.

 

Thai securities brokerage firms have been encouraging investors to consider investing directly in U.S. spot bitcoin ETFs. The Thai SEC clarified that while it closely monitors these developments, there is no immediate policy to allow spot bitcoin ETFs in Thailand. The regulator emphasizes that Thai investors can still engage in digital asset investments through domestic exchanges licensed by the SEC under the Digital Assets Decree.

 

India, too, doesn’t appear to have been looking favorably on the potential for such products. The governor of the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) said last week that “the way we look at crypto remains unchanged, irrespective of who does what.”

 

Asian optimism

In the wake of ETF approval in the U.S., many industry commentators had suggested that Asia would respond positively. Australian venture capitalist Mark Carnegie has suggested that the developing bull market would be “an Asian story.”

 

Yat Siu, co-founder of Hong Kong’s Animoca Brands, expressed the view that U.S. ETF approval would have a substantially positive impact within the Asian region. Hong Kong appears to be the most positive in the region in its outlook with regard to embracing spot bitcoin ETFs. Immediately following approval in the U.S., a Hong Kong legislator spoke out to encourage a proactive response relative to launch of similar products within the Chinese autonomous territory.

 

Meanwhile, recent news reports indicate that spot bitcoin ETFs experienced substantial trading volume, accumulating $10 billion just three days after their approval in the U.S. 

More to Read
View All
Web3 & Enterprise·

Sep 18, 2023

SK C&C Issues Voluntary Carbon Offsets on Blockchain-Based Credit Platform

SK C&C Issues Voluntary Carbon Offsets on Blockchain-Based Credit PlatformSK C&C, the information communications technology arm of South Korean conglomerate SK Group, said last Thursday that it has issued a total of 186,595 carbon offset credits through 19 projects on the blockchain-based carbon reduction certification and credit trading platform Centero.Amidst the ever-growing challenge of climate change, industries and companies around the world are attempting to reduce their carbon output and reach net zero emissions through involvement in carbon finance — specifically, carbon credit markets.Photo by Jas Min on UnsplashUnderstanding carbon marketsThere are two types of carbon markets — the compliance market, which uses a cap-and-trade system, consists of governments and companies that are legally mandated to offset their carbon emissions. On the other hand, the voluntary carbon market (VCM) operates outside of mandatory frameworks and uses a project-based system to allow companies, organizations, and individuals to trade carbon offset credits voluntarily. Each of these carbon offset credits represents the reduction of one metric tonne of carbon dioxide or greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Participants in the voluntary market are mainly driven by their corporate social responsibilities, shareholder pressure, or PR motives.Revolutionizing voluntary carbon reductionCentero — short for Center of Net Zero — provides a one-stop registry service that enables monitoring, reporting, and verification of greenhouse gas reduction projects in the VCM, and issues certified carbon reduction credits to support credit transactions with companies that are pursuing net zero goals. It was developed by SK C&C and is currently operated by the KCCI Center for Carbon Reduction Certification according to the KCCI Carbon Standard, which evaluates and certifies carbon reduction efforts.Centero takes care of the entire process of voluntary carbon reduction projects, from preparation to registration and execution, credit certification, and credit distribution. Its advantage also lies in its transparent management of carbon reduction projects and resources that reflect global regulations and standards, from organizing project information to keeping records of carbon reduction credits. Companies can also buy and sell credits on Centero’s intermediary carbon credit marketplace.Voluntary carbon reduction projects span a vast range of industries, from manufacturing and chemicals to information technology (IT) and construction. Current ongoing projects include carbon capture and waste management initiatives.Notably, Centero manages all credit information and transactions using blockchain technology. It makes all relevant information accessible to companies — including information about certifiers, verification, and quantity of issued credits — thereby increasing security and transparency in transactions. Credit-related events, such as the transfer of ownership, are also managed through blockchain processes.Through its most recent achievement, Centero has demonstrated a total carbon reduction effect of 186,595 tonnes.“The mandatory market has limited corporate participation, resulting in insufficient trading volume and difficulties in handling the demand for carbon emission rights due to the strengthening of global GHG emission regulations. Through Centero, we will encourage participation from local companies and organizations in voluntary carbon reduction projects and help accelerate a privately-led voluntary carbon market,” said Bang Soo-in, Head of SK C&C’s Digital ESG Group.

news
Policy & Regulation·

May 30, 2024

Hong Kong SFC to inspect crypto trading platforms post-licensing deadline

The Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) announced plans to conduct on-site inspections of local virtual asset trading platforms (VATPs) that are still in the process of regulatory applications after the June 1 licensing deadline. The SFC has emphasized that starting from June, all local crypto trading platforms must either possess a license or be deemed-to-be-licensed to operate legally. Operating an unlicensed VATP post-deadline will be considered a criminal offense, with the SFC actively pursuing compliance.Photo by farfar on UnsplashFocus on compliance and market adjustmentsThe inspections aim to ensure adherence to regulatory standards, particularly in safeguarding client assets and executing Know Your Customer (KYC) processes. The SFC has advised investors to only engage with licensed platforms and cautioned unlicensed companies against marketing their services or accepting new retail clients. Amidst these regulatory changes, the number of license-seeking crypto exchanges has declined. Notably, 11 firms, including OKX and Huobi's local branch, have retracted their licensing applications, leaving 18 still pending. Meanwhile, Gate.HK has halted certain operations in anticipation of meeting the new regulatory demands. To date, only two companies, OSL Digital Securities Limited and Hash Blockchain Limited, have secured a license to operate under the new framework in Hong Kong. 

news
Web3 & Enterprise·

May 29, 2023

Temasek Cuts Pay Following FTX Autopsy

Temasek Cuts Pay Following FTX AutopsySingaporean state-owned investment firm, Temasek Holdings, has announced a reduction in compensation for executives responsible for the company’s investment in the now-defunct cryptocurrency exchange FTX. Temasek, once the second-largest outside investor in FTX, faced scrutiny after the collapse of the exchange.Photo by Emilio Takas on UnsplashNo misconduct findingOn May 29, Temasek released a statement confirming the completion of its internal review of the $275 million investment loss incurred from FTX. The review determined that there was “no misconduct” within the company. However, both the investment team and senior management took “collective accountability” and experienced a reduction in their compensation.While acknowledging the inherent risks associated with any investment, Temasek emphasized the importance of continuing to invest in new sectors and emerging technologies to understand their potential impact on the business and financial models of existing portfolios. They recognized the need to adapt to an ever-changing world and explore avenues that could drive future value.It’s worth noting that the $275 million loss from the FTX investment constituted only 0.09% of Temasek’s portfolio value, which stood at over $293 billion at the time of the collapse.Temasek maintained that it conducted extensive due diligence before investing in FTX, emphasizing its commitment to a thorough review process. Chairman Lim Boon Heng stated in a May 29 interview with Bloomberg that there was fraudulent conduct intentionally hidden from investors, including Temasek. The negative outcome of the investment has been disappointing for the company and has had a significant impact on its reputation.Reputational damageSingapore Deputy Prime Minister Lawrence Wong echoed similar sentiments, highlighting the financial loss and reputational damage caused by the FTX collapse during a parliamentary meeting in November 2022.During the due diligence process, Temasek reviewed FTX’s financial statements, assessed regulatory risks related to financial service providers in the cryptocurrency market, and sought legal advice. The company also engaged with individuals who had firsthand knowledge of FTX, including employees, investors, and industry participants.In recent news, Temasek addressed and dismissed rumors about a $10 million investment in Array, a developer of algorithmic currency systems based on smart contracts and artificial intelligence. The company clarified that such reports were incorrect, refuting the circulating news articles and tweets.Temasek’s internal review process is certainly a move towards transparency and accountability. It indicates a willingness towards addressing the matter. That said, there are FTX creditor groups who fervently disagree with Temasek’s analysis.Class action lawsuitEarlier this year a number of FTX creditors filed a class action lawsuit against a number of venture capital (VC) firms, including Temasek. The FTX customers maintain that Temasek and others played a role in a conspiracy to defraud them. Venture capital firms have countered with the view that they themselves were victims as a consequence of the FTX collapse, suffering multi-million dollar losses.The fact remains that VCs get much further involved than merely handing over a check. They get involved with marketing, operations, and many other facets of the businesses of their portfolio companies. Meanwhile, other creditors suggest that Temasek has a responsibility to do right by the 1.4 million FTX creditors (a disproportionate number of them being Singapore-based) and to invest in a restructured FTX business, an option that represents the best opportunity for FTX customers to recover their funds.Temasek may have reached certain conclusions by way of their internal report on the matter but this is not likely to be the final analysis relative to its involvement in the fall of FTX.

news
Loading