OKX Burns $244M $OKB in Record Exchange Token Supply Cut

Bybit CEO Applauds Hong Kong and UAE Regulatory ApproachesBen Zhou, the CEO of Dubai-based crypto spot and derivatives trading platform Bybit, has recently lauded the regulatory approach of Asian and Middle Eastern countries.In a recent interview with CoinDesk, Zhou singled out Hong Kong and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) in particular, while also drawing attention to the contrasting approach taken to regulation of digital assets in North America, particularly Canada.Photo by Alex King on UnsplashDiffering regulatory approachesThe Bybit CEO believes that the tone set by regulators towards the crypto industry differs significantly between regions, with Asia and the Middle East displaying a more collaborative and supportive stance compared to North America. He perceives a shift in the attitude of regulators, seeing cryptocurrencies as an opportunity rather than a crisis.Praising Hong Kong and Dubai Regulators, Zhou highlights Hong Kong’s aggressive efforts to attract crypto companies by tapping into the talents within the industry. While recognizing the common goals among regulators worldwide, he notes that Dubai’s crypto regulatory framework has advanced even further than Hong Kong’s.Bybit’s strategic moves underline Zhou’s praise for these regions’ regulatory environments. On April 1, Bybit announced plans to establish its core operations in Hong Kong, positioning its research and development (R&D) and marketing teams in the Chinese autonomous territory.Subsequently, on April 17, Bybit officially unveiled its headquarters at the Dubai World Trade Center, a year after receiving in-principle approval to operate its crypto asset business in the UAE.Canadian market exitHowever, Bybit faced challenges in Canada due to its evolving regulatory landscape. While the company claimed not to operate in the United States, it had onboarded customers in Canada in the past. The situation changed in May when Bybit withdrew its services from Canada following the fallout from the FTX exchange scandal in November 2022.The regulatory environment became increasingly stringent, prompting Bybit to exit the Canadian market. Despite having ongoing conversations with Canadian regulators and receiving an invitation to apply for a crypto license, the restrictions on stablecoin usage played a significant role in the company’s decision to withdraw.Fifth most popular exchangePresently, Bybit ranks as the fifth most popular crypto exchange in the world, according to a report by CoinGecko for the second quarter of 2023.The company has been extending out its product offering, recently entering the crypto lending arena. Towards the end of May, the business received “in-principle” approval from the Astana Financial Services Authority (AFSA) to operate as a digital asset trading business and digital asset custodian in Kazakhstan.In June the crypto exchange followed the lead of other global crypto platforms such as Crypto.com and Binance by integrating artificial intelligence-driven trading tools into its platform for the benefit of its users.As the crypto sector continues to evolve, the differing regulatory approaches in different regions will play a crucial role in shaping its future. Bybit’s CEO, Ben Zhou, advocates for collaboration between regulators and crypto companies, emphasizing that viewing cryptocurrencies as an opportunity will foster innovation and growth in the industry.

Korean National Assembly Members’ Crypto Holdings to Undergo InvestigationThe Anti-Corruption and Civil Rights Commission of Korea (ACRC) has announced that it has convened a special investigative team to conduct an investigation into the virtual asset dealings of members of the 21st National Assembly, particularly details on acquisition, trading, and losses.Photo by Mediamodifier on UnsplashComing under scrutinyThe National Assembly passed a resolution back in May titled “The Resolution on Voluntary Reporting and Investigation of Virtual Assets of National Assembly Members,” requesting that all members of the Assembly should voluntarily report the status and changes in their holdings of virtual assets for a thorough investigation by the ACRC amid public concern about conflicts of interest and illegal transactions.As a result, individual consent forms for the collection, use, and third-party provision of personal information were submitted to the ACRC last Monday by Assembly members of the ruling and opposition parties.Other minor political parties like the Justice Party, Basic Income Party, and Transition Korea Party that had previously submitted their personal information consent forms have resubmitted their forms in accordance with the format of those submitted by the ruling and opposition parties. Independent lawmakers and some non-negotiation bodies have also voluntarily submitted forms of their own.Extensive legal probeThe scope of the investigation includes the domestic acquisition, trading, and losses of virtual assets by Assembly members starting from the beginning of their term on May 30, 2020, to May 31, 2023, when their personal information consent forms were submitted. The ACRC will compare this information with reports formerly filed by the members themselves.The ACRC appointed Vice Chairman and Secretary General Jung Seung-yoon as the head of the team and assigned some 30 investigators to carry out a census for 90 days starting on September 18. It will be executed under the Act On The Prevention Of Corruption And The Establishment And Management Of The Anti-Corruption and Civil Rights Commission and the Personal Information Protection Act.“As this is an important matter of public interest, we will conduct the investigation promptly and fairly in accordance with the law and guidelines,” said Jung. “We will also strictly protect the data acquired during the investigation process, including the personal information consent forms.”

China's highest judicial authorities, the Supreme People's Court and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, have released a judicial interpretation that includes the use of virtual assets to transfer illicit funds as a recognized method of money laundering. This move aims to strengthen the legal basis for investigating and prosecuting cases linked to cryptocurrency and money laundering activities.Photo by Vidar Nordli-Mathisen on UnsplashClarifying the legal status of crypto transactionsThe new judicial interpretation classifies virtual asset trading as a potential channel for money laundering. It specifies that using virtual-asset transactions or financial-asset exchanges to transfer or convert the proceeds of crime falls under the act of “disguising or concealing the source and nature of criminal proceeds and their gains by other means” as outlined in the country’s criminal law. Liu Honglin, founder of the Shanghai-based Man Kun law firm, clarified in a social media post that the interpretation does not equate all cryptocurrency trading with money laundering. According to Liu, the directive is not intended to criminalize the possession or trading of cryptocurrencies domestically but to provide clear legal guidelines for prosecuting specific illegal activities linked to crypto transactions. Impact on crypto trading and enforcementShao Shiwei, a fintech lawyer based in Shanghai, suggested that this interpretation could pose challenges for stablecoin merchants and increase legal risks for those involved in receiving illicit funds through crypto trading. The interpretation is part of broader efforts to regulate the virtual asset space, following the comprehensive ban on crypto trading activities by the People’s Bank of China and other authorities in September 2021. Despite the ban, many investors have continued to find ways to engage in crypto trading, sometimes circumventing capital control measures. For example, in May, Chinese police dismantled an underground bank that utilized the USDT stablecoin for foreign currency exchanges involving over 13.8 billion yuan ($1.9 billion). This incident underscores the ongoing challenges in enforcing existing regulations against the backdrop of innovative methods to bypass legal restrictions.