OKX Burns $244M $OKB in Record Exchange Token Supply Cut

Hong Kong licensing success sees SEBA Bank expand APAC crypto presenceSwitzerland-based SEBA Bank AG has taken a significant step in its global expansion strategy by securing a license from Hong Kong’s Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) to manage traditional securities and digital assets through its subsidiary, SEBA Hong Kong.Photo by Ruslan Bardash on UnsplashFirst move into APAC for crypto businessSEBA Hong Kong published a statement on Wednesday to announce the milestone. It marks the crypto-centric bank’s maiden entry into the Asia-Pacific (APAC) region and expands its footprint across three regulated hubs, including Switzerland and Abu Dhabi.The acquisition of the digital asset license from the SFC provides SEBA Bank with the ability to offer regulated services pertaining to digital assets, encompassing both virtual assets and securities. The move is seen as a reflection of SEBA’s confidence in the long-established capital markets and strong appetite for investment and trading in Hong Kong.SEBA Hong Kong’s CEO, Amy Yu, expressed her enthusiasm, stating:“We are tremendously excited by Hong Kong’s deep-rooted capital markets and appetite for investment and trading; to have secured this license from the SFC provides enormous potential for our business, owing to the well-established and defined regulatory framework that is present here.”Opening up OTC derivatives possibilitiesThe license grants SEBA Bank the authority to engage in a wide range of regulated activities related to traditional securities and digital assets within Hong Kong. This includes dealing with and distributing all types of securities, including virtual asset-related products like over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives.What is likely to give SEBA Bank’s licensed services the upper hand is their accessibility to a diverse clientele, including institutional investors, corporate treasuries, funds, family offices and high-net-worth individuals. The aim is to cater to a broad spectrum of clients seeking exposure to the digital asset landscape, from sophisticated institutional investors to individuals with substantial assets.This milestone comes after SEBA’s previous in-principle approval (AIP) for virtual asset trading services, granted in August. The full approval allows SEBA Bank to significantly broaden its product and service offerings in Hong Kong, contributing to the wider adoption of cryptocurrencies and digital assets in the region.Franz Bergmueller, Chief Executive Officer of SEBA Bank, highlighted the significance of this regulatory achievement, not only for the bank but for Hong Kong’s position as a global financial services hub. He stated:“This regulatory clarity not only benefits our business but also supplements Hong Kong’s status as a global financial services hub. The region’s robust legal system provides a solid foundation to conduct crypto-related services, and we look forward to beginning that from today.”The regulatory breakthrough achieved by SEBA Bank in Hong Kong aligns with the broader trend of evolving and expanding regulations in the digital asset space within the region. Hong Kong has been progressively adapting its regulatory landscape to accommodate the growth of digital assets.SEBA Bank’s move also echoes the welcoming environment for crypto firms in Hong Kong. As Standard Chartered-backed Zodia Custody recently announced plans to launch its services in the city, it underscores Hong Kong’s emergence as a prominent player in the APAC region. SEBA's presence in Hong Kong not only strengthens the region’s stature as a global financial services hub but is also suggestive of its interest in fostering the growth of the digital asset industry within the Chinese autonomous territory.

As cryptocurrencies increasingly position themselves as a recognized asset class and potential hedge against fiat inflation, illicit activity tied to digital tokens is becoming more visible. A recent high-profile case in the UK has brought this issue into sharp focus, centering on a fraud scheme originating in China. According to BBC News, the case involves Qian Zhimin, a woman who raised funds from more than 100,000 investors in China by claiming to operate a crypto mining company that also develops health products. Instead, she laundered the proceeds and fled the country. On Nov. 11, Qian was sentenced to 11 years and eight months in prison by a UK court.Photo by Vasilis Chatzopoulos on Unsplash$6B fraud and lavish lifestyle​Qian entered Britain on a forged passport in September 2017 and proceeded to live an extravagant lifestyle, renting a mansion in Hampstead for over £17,000 ($22,700) per month. She was arrested in northern England in April 2024, and it was found that she held roughly 61,000 Bitcoin, valued at roughly £5 billion ($6.6 billion), having converted portions of her holdings to cover her substantial living expenses. ​The sheer scale of her wealth was revealed after police searched her rented residence, discovering the Bitcoin reserves on hard drives and laptops. It marks the largest crypto seizure ever recorded in the UK. During the raid, officers also found four other individuals at the property illegally employed to handle household tasks such as shopping, cleaning, and security. ​Since Qian’s arrival in the UK, the value of her Bitcoin holdings has appreciated more than 20-fold. With the fraudster now sentenced, victims are seeing a glimmer of hope for restitution. A civil case scheduled for early next year will determine the fate of the seized assets. However, while many defrauded Chinese investors are reportedly preparing to file claims, establishing a clear paper trail may prove difficult. Many victims routed funds through local intermediaries rather than transferring them directly to Qian’s firm. ​U.S. Bitcoin forfeiture and Beijing’s allegationsWhile the UK courts grapple with the aftermath of Qian’s fraud, a separate crypto controversy is brewing between the U.S. and China, highlighting Beijing's continued vigilance over the sector despite its 2021 ban on trading and mining. According to Cointelegraph, the state-supported National Computer Virus Emergency Response Center (CVERC) has alleged that American authorities are connected to the disappearance of roughly 127,000 Bitcoin, valued at around $14.5 billion, from the LuBian mining pool. ​These allegations surfaced after the U.S. filed a civil forfeiture claim in October against Chen Zhi, the Cambodia-based founder of the Prince Group, who is believed to have owned the assets prior to the breach. At the time of the filing, the U.S. Treasury Department noted that the funds were already under its control. ​CVERC contends that Washington hasn't explained how it accessed the assets. Citing data from analytics firm Arkham, the Chinese agency suggested the funds had been under U.S. control for over a year. They argued that the prolonged inactivity of the Bitcoin before the formal seizure is inconsistent with the typical behavior of hackers seeking quick profit, implying state-level involvement. Economic chess between Washington and BeijingThis matter of Bitcoin control adds a new layer of complexity to U.S.–China relations, even as a trade truce between the two countries took effect on Nov. 10. In a report by CNBC, Washington cut tariffs on China’s fentanyl-linked imports to 10% and extended a reciprocal rate reduction under that agreement. In exchange, Beijing is said to have eased certain restrictions on rare earth exports. Analysts at Morgan Stanley suggest that China is maintaining its export-control regime, implemented in April, to retain strategic leverage. They caution that recurring negotiations and strategic divergence will remain defining features of the evolving bilateral relationship. 

Disagreement has emerged within the Bitcoin blockchain community, revolving around the BRC-20 token standard. Domo, the pseudonymous developer behind the creation of the token standard, has publicly expressed his opposition to an upcoming upgrade proposed by the Hong Kong headquartered project, UniSat Wallet.Photo by Kanchanara on UnsplashDue diligence concernsOn Tuesday Domo took to the X social media platform (previously Twitter) to articulate his concerns. He voiced apprehensions about hastily implementing updates in BRC-20, asserting that such a rush could potentially harm the broader BRC-20 user community. Domo's resistance is rooted in his belief that UniSat Wallet's proposed updates lack due diligence and are being introduced precipitously without considering potential repercussions. He wrote:”Recognizing the serious implications and valuations involved, I believe rushing these updates in BRC20 is reckless, disregards their peer indexers, and could potentially harm the broader community of BRC20 users.” ‘Split’ rather than ‘fork’Conversely, UniSat Wallet has declared its intention to “follow the Ordinals Jubilee upgrade, to confirm that BRC-20 is still on Ordinals without splitting into an isolated protocol." Described as a "split" rather than a "fork," UniSat Wallet's approach adapts to the Ordinals Jubilee upgrade, a transformative change in how the Bitcoin blockchain manages tokenized assets. In mapping the way forward its proposing to take, UniSat outlined that it would publish a whitepaper on Jan. 31, describing it as “the most significant present we are able to deliver” for BRC-20, Ordinals and Bitcoin. The crux of the matter lies in the method and pace of implementing these changes. Domo's concerns reflect a broader sentiment within the crypto community, where the rapid pace of advancements often collides with the need for stability and thorough vetting. UniSat Wallet's proposed changes, though innovative, may be viewed as potentially destabilizing by certain community members, especially those deeply entrenched in the current BRC-20 standard. Striking a balanceThis development is pivotal, highlighting the dynamic and occasionally contentious nature of blockchain technology and cryptocurrency standards. Web3 project incubator and investor TrustlessLabs summed up the matter in a social media post on Wednesday, drawing the following conclusions:”This situation encapsulates a critical challenge in blockchain protocol development: finding the right balance between preserving stability and embracing technological advancements.” As technology evolves, divergent opinions on the trajectory of these advancements are inevitable. The ongoing debate between Domo and UniSat Wallet serves as a microcosm of the larger conversations transpiring in the crypto space about how to strike the right balance between progress and stability. The BRC-20 token standard, an experimental fungible token standard on Bitcoin, draws inspiration from Ethereum's ERC-20 standard. It allows the creation of fungible tokens using Bitcoin’s Ordinals protocol, constituting a significant breakthrough in cryptocurrency by enabling novel forms of tokenization on the Bitcoin blockchain. This disagreement not only spotlights a critical debate in the crypto realm but also emphasizes the delicate equilibrium between innovation and stability.