Mt. Gox edging closer to BTC payouts sparks market fears

In less than a year since Hong Kong regulators gave the green light to crypto exchanges, there's been a noticeable surge of interest among traditional financial institutions and brokerages eager to secure their digital asset licenses for trading.Photo by Florian Wehde on UnsplashTiger BrokersTiger Brokers, a Beijing-headquartered one-stop trading brokerage with nine million international customers, offers one such example. The firm upgraded its Type 1 Hong Kong Securities & Futures Commission (SFC) license in January to include crypto trading for professional investors and financial institutions based in Hong Kong. The move followed an uptick in interest from mainland China-based firms in Q4, 2023.In a recent interview with Cointelegraph, John Fei Zeng, the CFO and director of Tiger Brokers, revealed that the firm currently boasts 865,500 funded accounts in Hong Kong, managing $18.9 billion in assets. Zeng stated: "Residents of Hong Kong will be able to trade virtual assets such as Bitcoin and Ethereum alongside stocks, options, futures, funds, and ETFs [Through Tiger Trade]." He explained that as part of the firm's expansion plans, additional digital assets will be evaluated. HKMA guidance on crypto custodyAs a testament to the regulatory clarity that has attracted firms like Tiger Brokers, on Tuesday Hong Kong's central bank issued guidance for authorized institutions interested in offering custody services for digital assets. The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) outlined comprehensive risk assessment procedures and emphasized the importance of robust policies, oversight, and resource allocation to manage custodial activities effectively. Notably, the HKMA's guidance seeks to address concerns stemming from recent industry mishaps, including the collapse of FTX, Terra and Three Arrows Capital (3AC), by mandating stringent safeguards to protect clients' digital assets from theft, fraud or misappropriation. Key requirements include independent systems audits, secure storage practices and transparent record-keeping, underscoring the regulator's commitment to fostering trust and stability in the digital asset ecosystem. Victory SecuritiesIn a similar move to that of Tiger Brokers, Victory Securities, another Hong Kong brokerage, secured a license from the SFC last November to offer crypto trading services for retail investors. The company reported a significant surge in virtual asset transactions and new customer acquisitions, prompting plans to introduce trading discounts to incentivize compliant and safe virtual asset trading services. Moreover, OSL, a licensed Hong Kong crypto exchange, joined forces with Interactive Brokers in November 2023, enabling the latter to offer bitcoin and ether trading to retail investors through its platform. Further underscoring the evolving regulatory landscape, crypto exchange Bybit submitted a retail trading license application in Hong Kong, indicative of the sector's continued growth and maturity. Nevertheless, navigating the regulatory framework isn't without its challenges. Web3 firms eyeing Hong Kong may need to invest up to $25 million in corporate infrastructure and compliance to secure licensing approval, reflecting the stringent requirements imposed by regulators. As Hong Kong continues to refine its regulatory framework and enhance investor protections, the stage is set for further collaboration between traditional financial institutions and emerging crypto players within the Chinese autonomous territory.

As the cryptocurrency market’s sluggish performance stretches into another year, South Korean investors have largely engaged in a wait-and-see approach. According to local media outlet Dailian, users are now checking prices only occasionally rather than trading actively, a shift evidenced by sharp declines in engagement metrics at the country’s two dominant exchanges, Upbit and Bithumb.Photo by NordWood Themes on UnsplashHigh retention, low activityData from Mobile Index reveals a stark contrast between user retention and actual activity. Throughout 2025, monthly active user (MAU) levels remained relatively stable—Upbit recorded as many as 4.7 million MAUs, while Bithumb reached approximately 2.7 million at its peak. This suggests that while the market downturn has dampened enthusiasm, it has not driven users to exit the ecosystem entirely. However, the time users spent on these platforms plummeted as liquidity dried up. In January 2025, ample market liquidity drove aggressive trading behavior; Upbit users spent an average of 7 hours and 30 minutes on the app during the month. By December, that figure had crashed to just 2 hours and 30 minutes—a 66.4% decline. Bithumb experienced a similar contraction, with average monthly usage falling from 233 minutes in January to 120 minutes in December. Aggregate usage followed the same downward trajectory. On Upbit, total monthly time spent across the user base fell from 35.66 million hours in January to 10.54 million hours in December. Bithumb saw total hours drop from 10.63 million to 4.65 million over the same period. The altcoin freezeThis reduction in screen time correlated directly with collapsing trading volumes. Upbit’s daily trading volume shrank from approximately 270 trillion won ($187 billion) in January to 52 trillion won ($36 billion) in December. Bithumb saw a proportional decline, dropping from 85 trillion won ($59 billion) to 24 trillion won ($17 billion). Analysts attribute this trend to a capital concentration in major assets like Bitcoin, which hit a new all-time high in October. Conversely, altcoins—which typically account for a disproportionately large share of trading volume in South Korea—failed to spark a rebound. Despite aggressive listing strategies—Upbit listed 73 new tokens and Bithumb added 156 last year—the influx of new assets failed to prompt a broader rally. One industry expert noted that none of the newly listed tokens managed to stand out, adding that the decline in Bitcoin prices later in the year further soured sentiment toward altcoins. The expert also highlighted that stronger performance in traditional asset classes, including U.S. and South Korean equities and gold, drew capital away from the crypto sector. However, another analyst offered a less pessimistic interpretation, suggesting that 2025 was not a year of investor exodus but rather one of dormancy. Investors chose to stay on the sidelines due to a lack of clear profit opportunities, implying that a resurgence in altcoin momentum could restore trading activity. Institutional giants push forwardDespite the retail lull, traditional financial institutions are actively exploring the sector, positioning themselves for future utility. Last month, BC Card signed a memorandum of understanding with U.S.-based exchange Coinbase to test USDC payments at South Korean merchants. The pilot program aims to integrate Coinbase’s Base blockchain wallets with BC Card’s QR payment infrastructure. Simultaneously, the broader card industry is preparing for the second phase of crypto legislation, which is expected to focus on stablecoin regulation. Nine credit card companies—including Samsung Card, Shinhan Card, and KB Kookmin Card—plan to form a task force this month under the Credit Finance Association (CREFIA). This initiative will focus on building an end-to-end system for stablecoin-based card payments and merchant settlements, including pilot tests for stablecoin-linked debit cards usable at standard payment terminals. Investment interest also remains alive in the corporate sector. Mirae Asset Financial Group is reportedly considering acquiring Korbit, the country’s fourth-largest exchange, through its subsidiary Mirae Asset Consulting. Market observers estimate the potential deal could be valued at up to 140 billion won ($97 million). 

Civic Group Files Embezzlement Complaint Against Former Kakao Chairman Over KLAY TokensA South Korean civic group, known as Economic Democracy 21, filed on Wednesday a prosecution complaint against Kim Beom-soo, the former chairman of the internet giant Kakao, and several executives from Kakao’s affiliated companies. The allegations at hand pertain to embezzlement, specifically revolving around the virtual asset known as KLAY.Photo by Tingey Injury Law Firm on UnsplashKlaytn’s native tokenKLAY represents the native token of the Klaytn blockchain, which was developed by GroundX, a blockchain subsidiary of Kakao.Legal breach claimsThe complaint, formally submitted to the joint crypto-crime investigation division of the Seoul Southern District Prosecutors’ Office, asserts that Kakao executives have breached the Act on the Aggravated Punishment of Specific Economic Crimes and the Capital Markets Act.Clandestine pre-salesWithin the detailed complaint, Economic Democracy 21 alleges that following the issuance of KLAY, Kakao’s executives conducted private pre-sales of KLAY tokens before their official listing. These pre-sales activities reportedly raised between KRW 150 billion and 300 billion ($113 million and $226 million). The accusation is that these funds were not channeled into business endeavors, but rather diverted for personal use.The complaint also contends that Kim and other executives withdrew KLAY tokens from the company under the guise of investments, compensation, and service fees related to “overseas investment business” since 2022. The civic group further asserted that these corporate leaders employed a program to manipulate transaction records, presumably with the intent of preventing third parties from discovering the nature of these transactions.