OKX and HashKey plan partnership to promote industry development

Singaporean regulator, the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS), has awarded cryptocurrency exchange Bitstamp a Major Payment Institution (MPI) trading license.Photo by Julien de Salaberry on UnsplashExpanding into APACIn a blog post published on July 3, Bitstamp proclaimed that it is “globally trusted & now licensed in Singapore.” The company described the acquisition of the license as a milestone that “marks the start of [its] expansion into the APAC region.” It emerged in June 2024 that Bitstamp had been acquired by American trading platform Robinhood. The $200 million acquisition was finally completed last month. Bitstamp signaled last September that it planned to expand its institutional business across Australia and Asia. Earlier this year, parent company Robinhood outlined that it would use Bitstamp to crypto offerings in Singapore in 2025.Acquiring licensesAt that time, Johann Kerbrat, vice-president and general manager of Robinhood Crypto, said that “part of the reason why Bitstamp was attractive was because of their licenses with Singapore, in addition to its institutional business.” This latest license award strengthens the company’s efforts in gaining more traction in Asia. Licensing is all the more relevant given the recent actions of the Singaporean regulator. Last month, MAS set a June 30 deadline for unlicensed crypto firms operating out of the city-state and serving overseas customers to cease offering such services. Over recent years, Singapore has been striving towards establishing itself as a global hub for crypto startups. It has been successful in that endeavor insofar as a whole host of international crypto businesses have established a presence there.  However, its recent move to curb unlicensed firms working out of Singapore in providing services internationally has been interpreted as a much more cautious approach being taken by the Singaporean authorities. The regulator clarified its concerns recently:”MAS has set the bar high for licensing and will generally not issue a licence. The money laundering risks are higher in such business models and if their substantive regulated activity is outside of Singapore, MAS is unable to effectively supervise such persons. Without a licence, such DTSPs [Digital Token Service Providers] will have to cease their regulated activities.”Caution in Singapore to benefit Hong KongSingapore has been competing with cities like Hong Kong to develop and maintain that crypto hub status. Some commentators have expressed the view that Hong Kong will benefit from this latest move in Singapore.  Joshua Chu, a lawyer who co-chairs the Hong Kong Web3 Association, told the South China Morning Post (SCMP) recently that “this is likely to attract quality projects [to Hong Kong] looking for a compliant, liquid, and globally connected base.” In addition to licensing achieved in Asia, Bitstamp has acquired licensing in a number of European countries such as Italy, Spain, France and the Netherlands. Last month, Robinhood launched the trading of tokenized stocks and exchange-traded funds (ETFs) for users resident within the European Union (EU). It also revealed that it is in the process of building out a layer-2 network on top of the Arbitrum blockchain with a view towards using it to host tokenized real-world assets (RWAs).

Wallets belonging to the defunct Japanese Bitcoin exchange Mt. Gox have transferred over 140,000 Bitcoin (BTC), valued at approximately $9 billion, to an unknown address.  Sell-off fearsThis significant movement began in the early hours of Tuesday morning in Asia, marking the first such transfer from Mt. Gox’s cold wallets in over five years. Julio Moreno, head of research at CryptoQuant, initially confirmed that 12,239 Bitcoin had been transferred from Mt. Gox over the course of an hour. A short time later, he provided an update on X, stating:"All coins have been transferred to a new address." Despite market disquiet, the prevailing view which subsequently emerged is that the transfer is believed to be part of a plan to distribute assets back to creditors before the October 31, 2024 deadline. Alex Thorn, head of research at Galaxy Digital, shared his perspective on X, suggesting that most of the transferred Bitcoin would likely be held by creditors rather than being sold on the open market. Despite these reassurances, the market reacted negatively for a time. Bitcoin's price dropped by 1.4% since the start of Asian trading hours, falling to a low of $67,680 from a Monday high of over $70,000.Photo by Kanchanara on UnsplashNo Bitcoin FiresaleTo quell fears of a massive Bitcoin sell-off, Mark Karpeles, the former CEO of Mt. Gox, addressed the situation on X. He stated: “As far as I know, everything is fine with MtGox. The trustee is moving coins to a different wallet in preparation for the distribution that will likely happen this year. There is no imminent sale of bitcoins happening." Rehabilitation trustee Nobuaki Kobayashi also issued a press release, clarifying that no sale of Bitcoin or Bitcoin Cash (BCH) had taken place. He assured that the group was "managing bitcoin and bitcoin cash in a secure manner." Wallet activity reveals that these movements were executed through thirteen transactions. A test transaction worth $3 was made on May 20, followed by another smaller transaction of $160 early Tuesday. The remaining transactions varied from $1.2 million to $2.2 billion worth of Bitcoin. Bitinfocharts data shows that all of Mt. Gox's Bitcoin has now been consolidated into a single wallet. A long road to repaymentIn September 2023, Mt. Gox’s trustee announced that the repayment deadline had been extended by 12 months to October 31, 2024. It looked like repayments were imminent in November. However, those communications referenced cash repayments rather than the distribution of Bitcoin and Bitcoin Cash. Some cash repayments had started in December 2023. Speculation in January that the bankruptcy estate would begin the distribution of Bitcoin led to market fears of the impact that would have on the Bitcoin unit price. The extension provided a longer timeframe for preparing the distribution of assets to creditors. Mt. Gox, launched in 2010, quickly rose to prominence, becoming the largest Bitcoin exchange by 2013, handling 70% of all Bitcoin trades worldwide. However, the exchange faced a dramatic downfall in early 2014.  It suspended trading and stopped all withdrawals after losing hundreds of thousands of Bitcoin in a hack. Subsequently, the site went offline, and the company filed for bankruptcy protection after losing over 800,000 Bitcoins. Creditors have been waiting for repayment ever since.

Korea requires lawmakers and senior officials to declare crypto holdingsSouth Korea’s Ministry of Government Legislation announced on Thursday (local time) that 84 new legislative statutes are set to be implemented in December. Among these statutes, an amendment to the Public Service Ethics Act stands out, which will require lawmakers and senior government officials to report their virtual asset holdings.Photo by Huy Phan on UnsplashStarting Dec 14The Public Service Ethics Act requires public officials in political service, government officials of rank four or higher and executives of public service-related organizations to declare their own wealth as well as that of their spouses and lineal relatives. In Korea, public servants are ranked from one to nine, with one being the highest and nine being the lowest. As it stands, disclosing cryptocurrency holdings isn’t mandated, but this will change from Dec. 14 due to recent amendments. Records of cryptocurrency transactions will also be subject to disclosure.Possible restrictions on departments or employeesFurthermore, the leader of a national or local government organization has the authority to enforce restrictions on the acquisition of virtual assets for specific departments or employees under their jurisdiction. This action is applicable if their roles are associated with accessing cryptocurrency information or having an impact on the crypto market. In such scenarios, the chief officer is obligated to report their methods of imposing these restrictions to the pertinent government ethics committee. The committee then holds the right to recommend adjustments to these strategies.