Singapore police suggest hardware wallets to combat malware

The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS), the city-state’s central bank and primary financial regulator, has set a deadline of June 30 for unlicensed digital token service providers (DTSPs) working out of Singapore to cease offering their services to clients in overseas markets.Photo by Hu Chen on UnsplashResponding to feedbackThe deadline emerged by way of a process MAS has followed as part of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2022 (FSM Act). Last October, the regulator invited feedback from stakeholders related to the authority’s approach to the regulation of DTSPs. MAS published its response to that feedback on May 30.  It stated:”DTSPs which are subject to a licensing requirement under section 137 of the FSM Act must suspend or cease carrying on a business of providing DT services outside Singapore by 30 June 2025.” It added that it was not including any transitional arrangement for DTSPs despite MAS receiving such a suggestion from a number of feedback respondents. Instead, unlicensed DTSPs will need to abide by the June 30 deadline and have acquired a license by then or cease unlicensed activity.The regulator defines DTSPs as individuals, partnerships or Singapore corporations operating from a place of business in Singapore, including those formed or incorporated in Singapore who offer digital token services outside Singapore. Those found in breach of the regulation could face up to three years in prison and fines of up to S$250,000 ($195,000). Companies who have already obtained licensing or those exempted by way of the Securities and Futures Act, Payment Services Act and the Financial Advisers Act are free to continue trading. Challenging licensing requirementsThose who wish to become compliant will have to satisfy some challenging requirements. For those granted a license, an annual license fee of S$10,000 ($7,780) applies. Small-scale DTSPs need to satisfy a $150,000 ($116,670) ongoing capital requirement, while larger, well-established DTSPs must comply with a S$250,000 ($195,000) capital requirement. Additionally, MAS has put in place competency requirements related to a DTSP's CEO, directors, partners and managers. Hagen Rooke, a partner at law firm Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, outlined on LinkedIn that while it's possible for unlicensed operators to obtain licensing, it will be very difficult to get a license. In its feedback response document, the regulator stated: “MAS will approach the licensing of DTSPs in a prudent and cautious manner and there will be extremely limited circumstances under which MAS will consider granting an applicant a licence under section 138 of the FSM Act.” Rooke advised crypto companies that may be affected to act swiftly in order to derisk through an operational restructuring or removing the businesses' Singapore touchpoints. He suggested that firms need to consider if it has customers outside of Singapore or front-office functions located outside of the city-state to determine if they could be affected by this regulatory measure. A number of Asian countries have moved to take action against unlicensed foreign firms that have engaged with local investors, with Thailand becoming the latest country to do so recently. However, the Singaporean authorities have approached the issue from the opposite perspective, citing the potential reputational risk that unlicensed DTSPs pose for Singapore.

In a move aimed at boosting the Web3 sector, the adoption of investment tokens and the enhancement of startup financing, the Thai government recently approved a tax break for individuals holding such tokens.Photo by Nataliya Vaitkevich on PexelsIncentivizing crypto-based fundraisingThe decision, reported by local media as having been made on March 12, signifies a significant step towards incentivizing the use of investment tokens for fundraising purposes. Under the new regulations, capital gains derived from holding investment tokens will be exempt from personal income tax calculations. This exemption applies even if a 15% withholding tax had previously been deducted. The endorsement of this tax break by Thailand's cabinet underscores the government's interest in fostering economic growth and enhancing investment opportunities in the region. Kulaya Tantitemit, Director-General of Thailand's Revenue Department, emphasized the strategic importance of these tax measures, which have been made retrospectively effective from Jan. 1. The initiative is expected to stimulate fundraising activities through investment tokens, injecting vitality into the economy and paving the way for increased investment and job creation. However, it's worth noting that the tax break will only apply to individuals who refrain from seeking full or partial refunds of the deducted tax or claiming a deducted tax credit. Additionally, the government has extended tax incentives to investment token issuers, waiving corporate income tax as announced on March 7.Last month, the Thai Finance Ministry announced the exemption of digital asset trading activity from value-added tax (VAT). The VAT exemption is similarly designed to encourage the use of digital assets as an alternative fundraising mechanism. Potential $3.7B boostDeputy Government Spokesman Rachada Dhnadirek highlighted the significance of this move in diversifying fundraising avenues for firms, complementing traditional methods. The government anticipates that investment tokens will contribute approximately $3.7 billion to the economy over the next two years. While the recent tax break signals a positive step towards fostering a crypto-friendly environment in Thailand, the country's approach to crypto taxation has faced scrutiny from industry stakeholders in the past. Efforts by the Thai Revenue Department to tighten oversight and impose taxes on cryptocurrency trading were met with resistance from industry players concerned about the potential stifling effect on the sector's growth. In January 2022, the government's proposal to impose a 15% capital gains tax on crypto traders drew significant public backlash, leading to its suspension on Feb. 1 of the same year. Despite these challenges, Thailand has demonstrated a willingness to adapt its regulatory framework to accommodate the burgeoning crypto industry. Measures such as exempting traders on authorized exchanges from a 7% value-added tax (VAT) on crypto transactions, announced on March 8, 2022, underscore the government's efforts to create a conducive environment for crypto-related activities. The political backdrop in Thailand more recently is likely to be aiding the country in taking a more progressive stance where crypto is concerned. Last year, the country elected Srettha Thavisin as Prime Minister. In a prior role as CEO of real estate developer Sansiri, Thavisin oversaw the company’s involvement in digital asset-related activities. In January, Thailand’s Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) removed the investment ceiling imposed on retail investors relative to participation in initial coin offerings (ICOs).

South Korean retail investors are pulling back from cryptocurrencies after months of falling prices, rotating capital into domestic equities in a sharp reversal from last year’s trading boom, according to a report by Bloomberg.Photo by Timothy Ries on UnsplashCrypto prices have declined since October, leaving many individual traders nursing heavy losses. In January, trading volumes on local exchanges have dropped roughly 65% year-on-year. By contrast, trading value on the KOSPI, the primary benchmark index of Korea's stock market, has surged 221% over the same period, reflecting a decisive shift in retail risk appetite. Korean investors—who had heavily favored volatile altcoins—are now reallocating funds into domestic and overseas equities, particularly artificial intelligence and robotics stocks. Brokerage margin balances have surpassed 30 trillion won ($20.8 billion), suggesting speculative capital has migrated rather than disappeared. South Korea has long been one of the world’s most retail-driven crypto markets, with individual investors playing an outsized role in price formation and trading volumes. The recent downturn, however, has exposed the risks of a market concentrated in smaller tokens. The rotation back to equities has also coincided with political momentum around boosting the stock market, including President Lee Jae-myung’s pledge to push the KOSPI toward 5,000. Ownership limits spark debateAs retail enthusiasm cools, regulatory questions are moving to the forefront. A debate has emerged over potential limits on major shareholders’ stakes in crypto firms—a proposal that has stirred controversy over governance and competitiveness. According to MoneyToday Broadcasting MTN, Democratic Party lawmaker Min Byoung-dug recounted a recent dinner conversation in Seoul in which Eric Trump, the second son of U.S. President Donald Trump, reportedly reacted skeptically to the idea. Trump was said to have questioned whether such ownership restrictions would be conceivable in the United States. Supporters argue that ownership caps could strengthen oversight and reduce excessive concentration of control in crypto firms. Critics warn they could deter investment and weaken Korea’s position in an increasingly competitive global market. Innovation continues despite slowdownEven as crypto volumes shrink, financial innovation tied to digital assets is pressing ahead. Decentralized exchange Lighter said on X that it will support perpetual futures contracts linked to major Korean equities. The products include exposure to Samsung, SK Hynix, and Hyundai, as well as a KOSPI index-based contract with 10x leverage. The move reflects a broader convergence between crypto platforms and traditional financial assets.  Regional competition intensifiesKorea’s regulatory direction is also being watched across Asia. Speaking at the Consensus Hong Kong, lawmaker Johnny Ng said the city could draw lessons from South Korea and the United Arab Emirates in shaping its crypto framework. According to CoinDesk, he noted that the UAE has established a robust regulatory structure with dedicated oversight, while Korea operates a government body tasked with supervising crypto activities. As financial centers compete to attract crypto businesses, clarity in regulation has become a strategic differentiator. For now, Korea’s crypto market appears to be recalibrating rather than collapsing—with retail traders retreating, policymakers debating guardrails, and new leveraged products testing the boundaries of innovation. Whether this marks a transition toward a more mature phase or merely a pause in speculative fervor may depend on how the country balances investor protection with growth.