Bitpowr looks to Asia for further growth following $200M milestone

BOK Staffers Assess Crypto Market Vulnerabilities and Their ImplicationsOn Thursday, the Bank of Korea’s (BOK) staff members published an assessment of the vulnerabilities in the cryptocurrency market and their potential implications. Here is the summary of the report.Photo by D Tan on Unsplash2022 crypto winterThroughout 2022, the worldwide crypto market faced a series of adverse occurrences, such as significant drops in the prices of major crypto-assets and the collapse of prominent crypto companies. These events shed light on the vulnerabilities that had accumulated during the rapid growth of the market.The first major event occurred in May 2022 when the algorithmic stablecoin TerraUSD experienced a sharp decline, resulting in substantial losses and bankruptcies for numerous retail investors and crypto firms. This incident significantly eroded confidence in the overall crypto market. The subsequent bankruptcies of prominent crypto lender Celsius and hedge fund Three Arrows Capital (3AC) further highlighted the realization of risks commonly associated with traditional financial markets, such as multiple collateral loans and maturity and liquidity mismatches, within the crypto market.In November 2022, the well-known crypto exchange FTX filed for bankruptcy, demonstrating that the activities of a large crypto company can propagate risks through moral hazard and excessive profit-seeking behavior when it operates outside the realm of regulatory oversight.Similarities with TradFiThese negative events that unfolded in the global crypto market in 2022 share similarities with issues previously observed in financial markets, such as unsustainable business models, liquidity risk, leverage, and lack of transparency in financial conditions. These parallels suggest that if the crypto markets were subjected to comparable levels of regulation as traditional financial markets, it is plausible that the triggering of these risks could have been avoided altogether, or at the very least, the resulting damage could have been mitigated to some extent.Implications for the Korean marketAt present, it is deemed unlikely that events akin to those witnessed in overseas crypto markets will transpire in the Korean market. The Korean crypto-asset market has primarily evolved through exchanges, with limited influence from other enterprises such as crypto issuers and decentralized lending platforms. In addition, Korean crypto exchanges are subject to regulation under the Act on Reporting and Using Specified Financial Transaction Information. This mandates the separation of customer deposits from exchange assets and the strict management of custodial crypto-assets through secure wallets. Additionally, Korean exchanges are prohibited from listing their own tokens on their platforms.However, there remains a dearth of information regarding the business structures of crypto companies that offer services similar to those in the traditional financial industry. This lack of information poses challenges in accurately assessing risk and providing adequate investor protection. Meanwhile, there is a potential for a deeper integration between the crypto market and users’ daily lives, particularly through major technology companies, gaming companies, and security tokens.SuggestionsIt is vital to ensure that crypto-assets are regulated based on the principle of “same activity, same risk, same regulation” through the ongoing development of crypto-asset-related legislation. The Financial Stability Board, an international body monitoring the global financial system, explained this principle in a 2022 paper: “Where crypto-assets and intermediaries perform an equivalent economic function to one performed by instruments and intermediaries of the traditional financial sector, they should be subject to equivalent regulation.”Additionally, it is necessary to stay aligned with major countries in terms of the speed and comprehensiveness of regulatory measures to prevent regulatory discrepancies across borders due to the global nature of crypto risks.Enhancing the effectiveness and efficiency of regulation requires the establishment and maintenance of a close cooperation system between authorities. This collaborative effort should encompass various aspects, including monitoring, information gathering, and supervision of the crypto-asset market. Notably, the widespread adoption of stablecoins can affect the stability of the overall financial system, including monetary systems and payment and settlement systems. Hence, it is necessary to strengthen the involvement of central banks in the monitoring and supervision framework for crypto-assets, including stablecoins, as demonstrated by legislative approaches adopted by major economies like the EU. Furthermore, imposing disclosure requirements, external audits, and documentation submission obligations on crypto-asset operators is advisable.

Korean Prosecutors Say Do Kwon and His Colleagues Knew Terra Was Unviable from the BeginningKorean prosecutors claimed that Terraform Labs founder Do Kwon and the key members behind the Terra-LUNA crash were aware of the project’s unviability from the beginning, according to a file issued by the Seoul Southern District Court.©Terraform LabsTerraform Labs founders misleading Korean investorsTerraform Labs founders Do Kwon and Daniel Shin attracted 280,000 investors in Korea alone, claiming that the Terra stablecoin is a means of transaction, even though the company leaders had been notified by the financial authority that Terra-accepting businesses were impermissible. It is reported that during a search and seizure of the company, Korean prosecutors collected evidence that its employees shared such knowledge on their internal messaging system.Terra’s cross trading on crypto exchangesKnowing their cryptocurrency’s unviability, Terra executives registered its sister token LUNA for listing on major Korean crypto exchanges in May 2019. According to the Korean prosecution, they used a bot to create a trade volume of more than 800 million won in three domestic crypto exchanges by cross trading between 2019 and early last year.Cross trading is illegal in the stock market, as it is considered as an act of price manipulation, but LUNA was traded in crypto exchanges and it hasn’t been determined whether their token is a security or not. Under current Korean law, the court has to accept it as a security to punish those behind the Terra collapse.Shin’s denial of allegationsMeanwhile, Daniel Shin denied the prosecution’s allegations and argued that they had never received such a notice from the financial regulator.

The first tranche of spot Bitcoin and Ether exchange-traded funds (ETFs) have been officially approved to start trading in Hong Kong on April 30. Announcement from regulatorHong Kong’s Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) announced the official approval of the first batch of spot Bitcoin and Ether ETFs on April 24 via a press release seen by CoinTelegraph. The regulator first provided outline approval for these products on April 15. Additionally, some of the fund management firms themselves have come out to outline product trading commencement at the end of the month. The first batch of approved Hong Kong-based ETFs include China Asset Management’s (ChinaAMC) Bitcoin and Ether-based ETFs.  In a press release, the firm verified that its products will begin trading on April 30. HashKey Capital and Bosera Asset Management have partnered to offer similar spot products. A spokesperson for HashKey told Bloomberg that they’re ready to commence trading of the product at the end of the month.Photo by Ruslan Bardash on UnsplashIn-kind vs. cash-only approachHarvest Global Investments is the third fund manager that intends to launch such a product offering. The launch of these three spot Bitcoin and Ether-based ETFs on April 30 signals a new era for digital asset investment in Hong Kong. Unlike their counterparts in the U.S., which rely on a cash creation model, these ETFs in Hong Kong embrace an in-kind creation mechanism. This approach holds the potential to significantly boost assets under management (AUM) and trading volume, as highlighted by Bloomberg ETF analyst Rebecca Sin. The unique dynamics of Hong Kong's ETF creation model present an opportunity for market growth and innovation, positioning the region as a key player in the global digital asset landscape. By providing a regulated framework for retail and institutional investors, along with the ease of converting digital assets into fully regulated ETFs, ChinaAMC aims to cater to a growing demand for such offerings. China Asset Management’s Head of Digital Assets, Thomas Zhu, emphasized in the firm’s press release the in-kind creation feature. Potential fee warAs the ETF market in Hong Kong gains momentum, competition could result in downward pressure on fees. With issuers vying to offer the most competitive fees to attract customers, the stage is set for a potential battle of pricing strategies. Harvest, for instance, has already entered the fray with a full fee waiver and the lowest fee at 0.3% after the waiver, Bloomberg ETF analyst James Seyffart outlined on the X social media platform. This competitive landscape bodes well for investors, with fees for the first ETFs proving to be lower than expected, as noted by Eric Balchunas, senior ETF analyst at Bloomberg. All eyes will be on the performance and impact of these financial products relative to the crypto market in the Asian region and further afield.