OVERDARE partners with USDC issuer Circle

Binance withdraws Abu Dhabi bid amid global licensing reevaluationLeading global crypto exchange Binance has chosen to withdraw its bid for a trading license in Abu Dhabi, according to information gleaned from the Abu Dhabi Global Market (ADGM) register and a report published by Reuters on Thursday.Photo by Demid Druz on UnsplashChange of directionThe local subsidiary company responsible for the application, BV Investment Management Limited, initially submitted its licensing bid on Nov. 15, 2022. Much has changed in the crypto space and in the fortunes of Binance over the course of the past year, leading the firm to withdraw its application on Nov. 7.This proposed license would have granted Binance the authority to pool and invest funds from professional investors. The decision to retract the bid is part of Binance’s broader reevaluation of its overall strategy going forward. “When assessing our global licensing needs, we decided this application was not necessary,” a spokesperson from the company told Reuters.Adapting to new circumstancesMuch has changed for Binance in 2023. The company has been combating regulatory pushback in multiple jurisdictions worldwide, not least in the United States, where Binance founder Changpeng Zhao (CZ) recently reached a plea agreement with U.S. prosecutors and agreed to pay $4.3 billion for violations related to money laundering and sanctions laws.As part of that process, CZ stepped down as CEO, passing the leadership to Singaporean Richard Teng. Teng is a former regulatory executive who previously oversaw the exchange’s regional operations. A spokesperson for the company maintained that this recent decision relative to licensing in Abu Dhabi is entirely unrelated to the recently agreed-upon settlement in the United States.UAE tiesWhile Binance may be dropping its attempts to gain licensing in Abu Dhabi, in July the company acquired a Minimum Viable Product (MVP) license from the Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority in the United Arab Emirates’ (UAE) other major center, Dubai. The UAE is also the location where CZ has established his home.Some had speculated that the company had also established its headquarters within the UAE. However, CZ has always refused to disclose the firm’s global headquarters, instead suggesting that the firm has no global headquarters. Teng has taken a similar approach.Binance was originally founded in China in 2017. It then shifted its headquarters to Japan and later established a base in Malta to circumvent regulatory challenges in China. Similarly, it’s thought that regulatory scrutiny provides the rationale for the company’s ongoing stance in refusing to confirm the location of its corporate headquarters.Despite regulatory challenges, Binance had previously expressed a focus on expanding its operations in the Middle East, known for its crypto-friendly environment and specific regulatory frameworks. Binance holds various crypto licenses from regulators in the region. In May of last year, it acquired a Category 4 crypto-asset service provider (CASP) license from the Central Bank of Bahrain.The exchange maintains registrations and licenses across Europe, Asia and other regions. It’s had mixed fortunes in its endeavors over recent months, driven out of some markets while making in-roads in others. Earlier this week, its Binance Japan subsidiary became fully operational. Last week, regulators in the Philippines moved against the company due to regulatory irregularities.

A recent survey in South Korea found that 20.3% of crypto investors have fallen victim to financial losses. Conducted by the Korea Financial Consumers Protection Foundation in late December, the survey polled 2,500 adults aged 19-69, with respondents able to select multiple loss categories. Investors in their 60s were most vulnerable, reporting a 25.3% loss rate. Exchange-related problems constituted the majority of incidents (72.8%), followed by online chat room scams (44.7%) and investment fraud (35.5%).Photo by Growtika on UnsplashExchange failures lead lossesAmong exchange-related losses, 40.6% of users couldn't sell assets due to system failures, while 11.5% lost digital assets through exchange hacking. Overall, exchange technical issues accounted for 52.1% of reported losses, with another 20.7% losing assets when exchanges closed completely. Chat group scam victims experienced various forms of fraud: 23.2% paid for worthless or false information, while 21.5% suffered financial losses through market manipulation or proxy trading schemes. Investment scams included fake crypto projects or fraudulent firms (18.0%), deceptive exchanges (10.3%), and other scams (7.2%). Most victims (75.1%) reported losses under 10 million won (approximately $6,945), with 34.6% losing less than 1 million won. Due to these relatively small amounts, 67.7% took no action following their losses. Of the 32.3% who sought help through various channels, 73.9% were unable to fully recover their funds. Problem worsening across Asia and beyondThis problem extends beyond South Korea. In neighboring Japan, police reported 19,038 crypto fraud cases in 2023, with damages totaling 45.26 billion yen (about $300 million), according to Chainalysis, citing Japanese National Police Agency data. These figures surpass 2022 numbers, indicating continued growth in fraudulent activities. A recent case highlighted by the Fukushima Minyu Shimbun involved a Soma City woman in her 50s who lost approximately 116.6 million yen ($780,000) to scammers impersonating police officers. The fraud began with a fake customer service call, followed by deceptive claims about fraudulent accounts and threats of arrest, which led her to create cryptocurrency accounts and transfer funds before eventually reporting the scam. Elderly at highest risk as fraud surgesThe FBI's Internet Crime Complaint Center's 2024 report further confirms this trend, documenting 149,686 crypto fraud complaints in the U.S. with $9.3 billion in reported losses—66% higher than in 2023. Notably, people over 60 were the most affected demographic, consistent with the Korean study's findings.

Regulatory Caution Among Asian Nations Amid Reports of Illicit FinancingWith a plethora of reports of crypto-related terrorist financing having been published in recent weeks, it’s understood that Asian nations may be looking to exercise caution when it comes to the current ongoing process of establishing regulatory guidelines for crypto.That’s according to a report published by the South China Morning Post (SCMP) on Thursday. The use of cryptocurrency by Hamas to fund its attack on Israel is being seen as the catalyst that may drive authorities in various Asian nations to take a more cautious approach to regulating digital currencies, according to analysts cited by the publication.Raj Kapoor, the founder of India Blockchain Alliance (IBA), commented on these recent developments, stating:”It is a kick on the backside for most governments. All regulatory bodies will take a closer look at crypto regulation. Governments will need to start implementing new rules and regulations.”At the recent G20 summit held in New Delhi, a joint declaration called for the regulation, supervision, and oversight of crypto assets, among other measures. The declaration emphasized the importance of supporting “a coordinated and comprehensive policy and regulatory framework.”Kapoor stressed the importance of revisiting the declaration and developing solutions to implement its objectives.Photo by Adolfo Félix on UnsplashRenewed scrutinyEvents in Palestine in recent weeks have led to renewed scrutiny when it comes to monitoring illicit financing activity via cryptocurrency. Only days following the recent Hamas attack, Israeli authorities moved to freeze specified crypto accounts.That scrutiny has continued in recent days, with more accounts having been frozen on crypto platforms such as Binance, while more still have been identified as suspicious, with requests for further information having been submitted in respect of over 200 additional accounts.On Wednesday it emerged that the United States Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) had sanctioned a Gaza-based crypto platform.Potential over-reactionWhile crypto-related terrorist financing has been widely publicized, blockchain analytics firm Chainalysis warned on Wednesday that crypto’s role in this illicit activity has likely been overstated. In its blog post on the subject, the firm stated:“Although terrorism financing is a very small portion of the already very small portion of cryptocurrency transaction volume that is illicit, some terrorist organizations raise, store, and transfer funds using cryptocurrency.”Additionally, Chainalysis stated that it had seen “overstated metrics and flawed analyses of these terrorist groups’ use of cryptocurrency.” Peter Van Valkenburgh, Director of Research at non-profit crypto advocacy group Coin Center, also believes that reporting on the matter is not balanced. Taking to X, he stated:“Sensational early reporting on the scale of Hamas crypto fundraising significantly misstated the amounts involved.”Coin Center’s Director of Communications, Neeraj Agrawal, highlighted an article which claimed that crypto “fueled Hamas’ terror attack on Israel” in its title, only to reveal within the body of the article that “cryptocurrency is still far from the largest funding source for terrorism.”Anndy Lian, a Singapore-based author and inter-governmental blockchain adviser, noted that while some countries may consider banning cryptocurrencies as a solution, this could merely drive illicit financing underground and make it more challenging to trace and halt. Lian argued that cryptocurrencies are traceable and trackable, unlike traditional fiat currencies like US dollars.