Korea’s ruling party retracts its pledges to approve spot bitcoin ETFs

Upbit, South Korea’s largest cryptocurrency exchange operated by Dunamu, announced on Jan. 2 that its user base surpassed 13 million by the end of last year. With South Korea’s population at 51.6 million, the data implies that roughly one in four Koreans now holds an account on the platform. Demographic breakdowns show that users in their 30s comprise the largest cohort at 28.7%, followed by those in their 40s at 24.1% and 20s at 23.2%. Users in their 50s accounted for 16.9%, while those in their 60s and 70s made up 6.0% and 1.1%, respectively. Adoption is particularly high among younger generations, with the combined total of users in their 20s and 30s reaching 5.48 million. Based on Ministry of the Interior and Safety data showing 12.37 million people aged 20 to 39 as of November, approximately 44% of Koreans in this age demographic use the platform. Upbit added 1.1 million new users last year, with men comprising 56.9% of new accounts and women 43.1%.Photo by Kanchanara on UnsplashXRP overtakes BTC and ETH in tradingIn terms of trading volume, Ripple’s XRP was the most traded cryptocurrency in 2025, outpacing both Bitcoin and Ethereum. Daily activity peaked in the morning, coinciding with the start of the typical business day. The highest volumes were recorded at 00:00 UTC, or 9 a.m. Korea Standard Time. Beyond standard trading, users are increasingly turning to Upbit’s asset management tools. Since its 2022 launch, the platform’s staking feature has attracted over 300,000 users, generating 257.3 billion won ($178.6 million) in total rewards. Furthermore, a dollar-cost averaging feature introduced in August 2024 has drawn about 220,000 users, with cumulative investments totaling 478.1 billion won ($331.9 million). Kbank eyes public listingIn the broader ecosystem, Upbit’s banking partner is preparing for an initial public offering (IPO) this year. Kbank, an internet-only lender that has partnered with Upbit since 2020, is closely linked to the exchange through shared customers. According to Hansbiz, crypto-related funds accounted for roughly 16% of Kbank’s total deposits as of the first half of 2025. Under South Korean law, fiat-to-crypto service providers must secure real-name accounts from a local bank, meaning Upbit users are required to deposit Korean won at Kbank before trading on the exchange. However, Kbank’s financial performance has softened following the 2024 implementation of the Virtual Asset User Protection Act, which compelled the bank to raise annual interest rates on deposits from Upbit users from 0.1% to 2.1%. On a consolidated basis, net interest income totaled 323.2 billion won ($224 million) in the third quarter of 2025, down 13% year over year. Net fee income remained in the red, posting a loss of 2.8 billion won ($1.94 million), widening from a 1.3 billion won loss in the same period a year earlier. This latest IPO push follows two failed attempts and carries contractual implications. When Kbank raised 725 billion won ($503 million) in 2021 from investors including Bain Capital and MBK Partners, it pledged to list its shares by July 2026. If the upcoming attempt fails, those backers could exercise drag-along rights and put options, potentially resulting in increased financial obligations for Kbank. Meanwhile, Upbit has seen other notable shifts in its business and governance. In November, Dunamu and Naver Financial, a subsidiary of internet giant Naver, approved a merger plan structured as a comprehensive share swap at a ratio of 1 to 2.54. At the time of the announcement, market observers estimated Dunamu’s valuation at 15 trillion won ($10.4 billion), compared with 5 trillion won ($3.5 billion) for Naver Financial. 

Meme coin project Floki Inu has implemented restrictions on users in Hong Kong from accessing its staking programs following a warning from the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission (SFC). Last week, the regulatory body labeled Floki's staking initiatives as "suspicious investment products'' and urged caution among investors. On Jan. 26, it specifically cautioned Hong Kong users about the Floki and TokenFi staking programs, emphasizing the promised annualized returns ranging from 30% to over 100%. The Commission expressed concern over investment products that make claims of returns deemed "too good to be true."Photo by Jie Yeu Teoh on UnsplashStaking program access block in Hong KongResponding to the SFC's warning, Floki Inu took proactive steps to prevent users in Hong Kong from participating in its staking programs. In an official blog post which was published on Tuesday, the project's team announced the implementation of "practical measures" to block Hong Kong-based users from joining the staking programs. Additionally, prominent warnings have been placed on the Floki and TokenFi staking websites, clearly stating the ineligibility of Hong Kong users to participate. The SFC emphasized that neither of the mentioned investment products holds authorization in Hong Kong, warning that unauthorized schemes provide limited to no protection under its Securities and Futures Ordinance (SFO). Investors engaging in such unauthorized schemes may face the risk of losing their entire investments. Addressing regulatory concernsFloki Inu's team has responded to the regulatory concerns by actively collaborating with legal advisers to address potential regulatory issues associated with the staking project. The team committed to responsible community practices, while affirming its dedication to implementing measures to prevent Hong Kong users from participating in the staking program until regulatory concerns are resolved. As of Jan. 29, there is no record of Hong Kong users joining the staking programs, according to the Floki team. Furthermore, the team revealed that offline marketing activities in Hong Kong had already been halted before the project's launch in December 2023. Clarifying high yieldAddressing the SFC's primary concern regarding the high annual percentage yield (APY), the Floki team provided explanations. They clarified that the rewards are subject to volatility influenced by market dynamics and the value of staking rewards may fluctuate based on the market valuation of the token rewards. The team attributed the high APY for its staking programs to the allocation of the majority of TokenFi's token supply to token stakers, highlighting that the project had not raised venture capital funds or conducted a presale. They noted that market forces beyond their control had significantly increased the TokenFi price from its initial market cap at launch. In response to potential user confusion, the Floki team emphasized the complete decentralization of the staking programs for Floki and TokenFi, assuring users of a clear understanding of how the programs operate. They concluded by expressing their commitment to ongoing collaboration with regulatory bodies to ensure compliance and foster a responsible and transparent environment for users. Community response has been largely positive with one crypto influencer claiming: “You will not find a more legit team in #Crypto than $FLOKI. I’ve known about them for years and everyday they continue to handle themselves in the most informative, structured, and professional way.”   

Binance Thriving in China Despite Crypto BanWhen China cracked down on cryptocurrency trading in 2021, it seemed like Binance, the world’s largest crypto exchange, would have to leave the country behind. However, nearly two years later, an investigative report carried out by the Wall Street Journal finds that business is thriving for Binance in China.Photo by Hanson Lu on Unsplash$90 billion in monthly tradingThe report, which was published on Wednesday, reveals that users managed to trade a staggering $90 billion worth of cryptocurrency-related assets in China within just one month.Internal data, shared with The Wall Street Journal and corroborated by current and former employees, unveils this underground activity. Remarkably, these transactions propelled China to become Binance’s largest market, accounting for a massive 20% of global trading volume, excluding trades by a subset of major traders.Almost one million active Chinese usersDespite the supposed ban, Binance’s internal discussions highlight the pivotal role China still plays for the exchange. Current and former employees indicate that Binance’s investigations team collaborates closely with Chinese law enforcement. This partnership aims to identify potential criminal activities among the 900,000+ active users in China, underscoring Binance’s efforts to maintain oversight.However, Binance now faces regulatory challenges tied to its secretive global operations. In June, the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filed a lawsuit against Binance and its Founder, Changpeng Zhao (CZ), alleging illegal operations and misuse of customer funds.Meanwhile, the Justice Department is conducting its own investigation. A report by Semafor on Wednesday suggests that authorities are considering fraud charges but they’re concerned that such an eventuality may lead to a run on the exchange. This regulatory onslaught has seen Binance’s market share among US users plummet, leading to a reduction of over 1,000 jobs out of its 8,000-strong workforce.Circumventing regulationThe clandestine existence of Binance’s footprint in China offers insights into the exchange’s ability to function surreptitiously in unwelcoming environments. To circumvent restrictions, Binance directed Chinese users to visit local websites with domain names before rerouting them to the global exchange. This tactic allowed Binance to keep a foothold in China, even after the government blocked direct access to its website in 2017.China’s central bank, responsible for imposing the crypto ban, remained silent when questioned about these developments. Binance’s official stance is that its website is blocked in China and inaccessible to users there.Holding on to its China-based users is crucial for Binance as it navigates a treacherous regulatory landscape that threatens its future. The company’s history with China is intricate. CZ established the firm in Shanghai in 2017, only for the government to initiate a series of regulatory attacks on crypto exchanges soon after. This led to concerns about money being illicitly moved out of the country, and Zhao eventually relocated Binance’s operations to Japan.Despite this move, Binance retained a significant workforce in China, a decision that raised concerns among its US arm regarding data control. Binance’s Chinese heritage also attracted attention, with Zhao addressing the company’s challenge of being labeled both a “criminal entity” in China and a “Chinese company” in the West.Binance’s relationship with China remains complex. As the exchange navigates these murky waters, its ability to operate under the radar and maintain its foothold in markets like China will undoubtedly play a significant role in determining its future trajectory.